In this edition of the roundtable Brian from BCI asks questions about the ACC's championship and bowl games. I participate, but don't get any swag.
1. Virginia Tech and Florida State seemed to acquit the ACC Championship Game well this year, turning in an entertaining 44-33 game in front of a crowd of 72,379 at Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte. Assess the success of the ACC Championship Game in Charlotte in year one. How much of the success can be attributed to the host city, and how much can be attributed to the matchup? A little of A, a little of B?
We won, so regardless of attendance or television ratings it was quite successful for me. To speak to your point Brian, the reason why the game was "successful" was because it passed the eye test. It looked and sounded like a competitive football contest and not the Senior Bowl. The city and matchup were most definitely an equal parts catalyst for getting fans in the seats.
2. Would you like to see Charlotte become the permanent home of the ACC Football Championship? Or would you be in favor of some alternate Championship Game format? (continuing to rotate the location, move to campus a la the Pac 12, etc.) Explain.
Well, I don't think the ACC should sign a lifetime contract with Bank of America Stadium, because that's just bad business (precisely why the ACC will do it), but I'd like to see the game stay in Charlotte for the foreseeable future. It's located in the heart of ACC country so it's accessible to the casual fan of the conference, the trip is a reasonable drive for nine of the twelve teams, and Virginia Tech is 1-0 there. To the people complaining about the weather, it's football. Grab a bourbon and enjoy the cold.