What It All Means: Week 1
"What It All Means" will be a weekly column during the regular season where we take a look at poll movement after the week's games and try to figure out what it means for the Hokies, plus anything particularly interesting on a national scale. Think the pollsters are right? Think they're nuts? Let's hear it in the comments.
The first thing this week's poll means is that all that talk about credit for playing good teams? It's crap. How we drop 3 and 7 spots for losing to the #3 team in the nation with a minute to go in the game, I don't get. Either Boise State's worthy of their position or they're not. This week's poll movement smacks of writers making a default judgment on a loss, not evaluating the game that was played.
The rest of this week's polls don't do a ton for us. North Carolina loses its position after the LSU loss, but that can be chalked up just as much to the NCAA eviscerating their defense as anything on the field. Miami becomes the top ACC school at #12, just in time to play #2 Ohio State and likely be punished for taking on a good team next week just like us. Georgia Tech holds;
TCU solidifying its #4 position leaves an interesting dilemma. They don't have any major powers on their schedule to give them an obvious vault over Boise State, but they do play an overall tougher schedule. Barring a loss by either team, watch the vote totals to see if this gap closes over time. The voters also seem to have a close eye on Florida, busting them to #6 after an uninspired performance.
Tweet, Like, Send, 1-Up and Follow
| Tweet |
|
|

Comments
These polls are crap #
UNC almost beats LSU with their 2nd string D. Ditto on VT dropping to 13. I would like to disregard early season polls since few games have been played but they set the tone for end of season expectations and ultimately the BSCS. It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. The computer polls aren't any better. They only apply consistency to a set of opinions of rating factors determined by the program creator. In other words they make sure the numbers support the opinon. We need to go to computer only polls and get rid of the ambiguity of the "voter" At least then there will be consistency. Also no chance for regional bias.
hard to judge #
most teams in week 1 as they almost all play the sisters of the poor.
everyone has a good idea after a month or so and everyone but boise is likely to lose a game or 3.
eric
twitter.com/beercontrol
"My advice to you... is to start drinking heavily."-John Blutarsky
i hate the polls #
I couldn't agree more...I've always felt that if the lower team covers the spread, then leave them where they are even if they lose. UNC should have gone up.
Polls smoke poles #
At least until late in the season. Polls shouldn't come out until October but then networks and pundits and probably bloggers wouldn't have anything to talk about would they? I just looked it up and last year we went into the Alabama game ranked #7. They were ranked #5. The next day, they moved up to #4 and we dropped to #14. I guess the formula is if you are ranked in the top 12 and lose to a top 5 team, you drop 7 points. If you win, you move up one. That way you don't have to watch the game.
could that also be said as #
'polls suck noles' ? especially in Heather Dinich kinda ways
"I don't know what a Hokie is, but God is one of them.' So I'm going with God. I'm going with Virginia Tech." Lee Corso Aug 23, 2000
http://www.thekeyplay.com
hahaha #
it's funny 'cause it's true.