
I honestly can't remember the last time I was that pessimistic before a night game in Lane Stadium. Incomplete performances in consecutive weeks inspires little confidence.
I remember watching Brenden Motley and the offense walk off the field after Pitt intercepted the redshirt junior to seal a second straight loss. The defeated body language was palpable — understandably so, considering the circumstances. But after such a thorough beating by the Panthers' defense, it looked as though Motley & Co. were being consumed by the moment, conscious of an impending downward spiral.
In two short, discouraging weeks, the air had been sucked out of the program. Frank Beamer and his staff were on thin ice, surrounded by a fire breathing fanbase that was tired of annual uninspired performances. Hokie Nation wanted to believe that this team was on the verge of reasserting itself atop the ACC Coastal. In actuality, we saw a team becoming more paper tiger than King of the Beasts.
"We got looking at the video yesterday and we downed a couple balls, one on the one yard line, it was a heck of a play," remarked Beamer last Monday. "And everybody got up and it was like business as usual. I said, 'you know, that's not the way we need to be playing.' It needs to be emotional. It needs to be fun."
Boy was it ever. Despite digging themselves yet another 10-0 hole, the Hokies battled back to score 28 of the final 31 points and reinvigorate a weary program.
Thunderstorms, an infuriating gate snafu and an unconventional Enter Sandman did little to quiet the fans. Their continuous energy helped lift the Hokies out of the early deficit. Players were celebrating with one another on the field and whooping it up on the sideline. The coaching staff was getting into it as well, clearly aware of the game's importance.
It was a more complete performance from the Hokies than in recent weeks. They simplified some things, winnowing down the running back carousel to wunderkind Travon McMillian and inspirational leader Sam Rogers. They focused on distributing the ball to their stars, looking to get the Holy Trinity of Bucky Hodges, Isaiah Ford and Cam Phillips involved early and often. The Tech defense adjusted and executed with increasing precision, locking down the outside runs and repeatedly pressuring Wolfpack quarterback Jacoby Brissett.
With each bone crushing hit and arm bar celebration from the defense, I expected to see Frank Beamer doing his best Gordon Bombay impression on the sideline, waving his hands and screaming, "More Fun! More Fun!"
When asked about the visible increase in energy after his three touchdown performance, Isaiah Ford noted, "We like to call it juice. I don't think we were missing it in the last few weeks, but it was a big emphasis on it this week. And even in practices, we wanted to make sure everyone was juiced up and had a lot of energy."
It felt like a throwback performance from the Hokies. After becoming one of the most intimidating visiting stadiums in the nation — especially under the lights — Lane Stadium has slowly lost it's lustre in recent years.
Consider this: From 2008-2012, the Hokies had a home record of 26-4 and never lost more than one home game in a season. Since then, the Hokies are 9-8 in Lane, including a sub-.500 record a year ago. Far-too-often, the Terror Dome had become a House of Horrors for the Hokies.
Friday night's performance was a positive step towards rebuilding that intimidating home field advantage. Getting there will require continued synergy between players and fans, feeding off one another to push them forward.
Moving forward, it is vital that this group build off of that experience and use it as a launching pad for the remainder of the season. For a Virginia Tech program looking to re-assert itself amongst a conference no longer intimidated by the brand, visible confidence could go a long way.
Just six weeks ago, this team led No. 1 Ohio State at halftime. After playing the Buckeyes close and dispatching of Furman and Purdue, any built-up confidence washed away along with the rain during those consecutive embarrassing losses to ECU and Pitt.
Friday night was different from the outset. Once the Hokies settled in, there was a swagger about the team that continued to build with each drive.
The vibe I got was akin to the 2007 road win at Clemson. Four weeks removed from an embarrassing 48-7 loss at LSU, Virginia Tech scored on a pick-six, a punt return and a kick return en route to a 41-23 thrashing of the Tigers. They laughed at the supposed hostile environment, danced on the sidelines and looked right at home in Death Valley.
This is a good Hokies team. They are by no means perfect, but the talent is there to succeed. In a mediocre Coastal Division there for the taking, the Hokies proved to themselves that they are capable of taking over a game and closing it out.
Much like that 2007 squad, it will be important for this team to rally around one another and recognize that they are a talented group — the same group that had Ohio State on the ropes — with the mental wherewithal to bounce back from a tough defeat.
Saturday's trip to Miami will be another important test for Virginia Tech. How they follow-up on a resurgent win will tell us a lot about this team and whether or not they truly have what it takes to be a player in the Coastal race.
After feeling dejected for two straight weeks, I desperately want to believe in this group after such a positive win. For the time being, what's important is that this team continues to believe in themselves and not be afraid to show it on the field. Ironic, considering The U is next.

Comments
Motuapooka definitely had a few bone crushing hits.
This season for me:
WWWWWWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!
Or in this case guy...
Was at the game and had no problems getting to my seat with plenty of time before enter sandman and kickoff. The energy was obvious and a pleasant surprise.
I think I speak for most fans when I say that I was just waiting for us to blow the game up until Travon's TD run. I do not have much faith in the team to win any game yet. The only thing I am sure about is our team's inconsistency. That said, I hope we keep the energy (juice) up because it showed and reminded me of the ACC championship caliber teams less than a decade ago.
Also, we need to run the I-formation more. Travon got 14 yards on the only I-formation play and he just looked very comfortable running full speed at the line to take the handoff. I'f I had to guess plays that French highlights in the film review, this is one of them.
I believe we ran the toss sweep to Travon at least twice out of the I, both times with success.
I remember sitting with some Clemson friends in the Clemson student section and screaming my head off as Flowers and the Defense along side Eddie and the special teams single handedly beat the pants off of the tigers. Now that was Hokie football.
One of my greatest memories. Nothing would make me happier than to meet them in the ACCCG and SMASH THEM.
You nailed it here. I am cautiously optimistic about this win. This is the kind of win that reinvigorates a season and sometimes a program, but just like 2013 and 2014 big wins have been followed up by complete duds the next week.
2013: Win against #11 Miami, lose to Maryland next game.
2014: Beat OSU, lose to ECU next game.
Both teams were ranked in those victories and we laid eggs the next week, and although NCSU as a program isn't like Miami or OSU, this victory arguably could mean a lot more to the program than those games do. It could mean the start of a rebound and re-emergence of VT football, and a place back in the ACCCG.
Anyway I'm getting ahead of myself. The point is the team has to stay focused and continue to perform at a good level. Don't regress like the team has shown a knack of doing the past few years. If we play like we played against Pitt, then this victory meant nothing.
I can't help hoping that maybe this win is the one that quietly turns the program around. I know some of it may have been the pre-season hype but we do have talent on both sides of the ball. What struck me wasn't the comeback as much as this team finding a way to finish. It's been a long time since I saw a Hokie team finish like that. I hope this starts a new streak. Go Hokies!
Excellent piece, Pierson. Just to elaborate on it, it seems like what we've had the two weeks prior to NC State was half the team not showing up. The defense let the team down against ECU, and the offense laid the mother of all eggs against Pitt. Finally against NC State we saw both sides of the ball show up for a game, and while it wasn't as great a performance as we saw against Purdue, it was encouraging to see.
Our problem hasn't been talent or scheme. We have enough of each to beat any team in the country. Our issue has been consistency. We have had consistent output from offense and defense in three games, and we've won each. We've had issues on one side or the other in our other three games, and we've lost each.
(Granted, our "issue" in our first game was losing our starting QB and being afraid we'd lose our second string QB, too. Given the beating Motley has taken the last five weeks, I can't fault that decision.)
The only thing I'll slightly disagree on -- I don't think we have the *depth* necessary to reliably beat any team in the country. This, too, goes back to recruiting. We just don't have enough depth to absorb the losses of Reavis, Fuller, Brewer, etc. without taking a pretty big step down in overall team effectiveness. The better programs who consistently recruit in the top 20 (of classes) have a better chance of overcoming those same losses.
When we lose guys like that, our margin for error is pretty much nill. We go from wins to losses pretty quickly.
Go Hokies!
No, I agree, depth is an issue. When I say talent isn't a problem, I'm referring to our ones. Our ones are, by and large, as talented as just about anyone's ones in the country. We don't have a serious deficiency in starting talent. But yes, you are correct, there are some positions that we aren't two deep at, let alone three deep. That will catch up with us. But simply matching up starters vs starters, there aren't many teams at all that we will be significantly outgunned by.
Good clarification. I agree 100%.
Did any one else notice how Mack "all of the sudden" Brown kept referring to Travon as "Williams"?
#34 baby!
The similarities to the 2004 season keep poppin up.
This team looked dead to rights in that 1st quarter. 2nd through 4th quarter, we looked like a football team again, and not necessarily a bad one.
Not really. That team only lost the 1st two games (almost beat USCw). They didn't lose the next one until they faced Auburn in the Sugar Bowl.
http://www.hokiesports.com/football/schedule/2004
No they went 2-2 to start the year then went on to win the rest of the regular season.
How is 3-3 that different? Same number of conference losses before the turnaround.
Ok, so I was only partially incorrect. But still, that team didn't lose their 3rd game until the Sugar Bowl. This team has already dropped 3.
Granted, but I think his point was a .500 start. Yes, we've lost one more game than we did in '04, but just taking a .500 start at face value, there could be significant similarities to '04 if we have truly flipped the switch.
As always, someone else more eloquently stated my original point. +1's all around.
Not just the .500 start, but the potential of the team before the season started - lots of talent but lots of questions - and the fact that we dropped game #4 to NC State that year with a couple of missed FG. 17-16 final (an ugly slog all around), and we had no business losing that one. Sounds a lot like Pitt/ECU this year.
That team (as I recall) had lots of young new talent (particularly at WR). Another difference was that squad had Randall (who has just been inducted into the VTAHOF). And dealt with some offseason legal issues (Imoh, MV5 and another dude who's name escapes me).
We have zero WR depth, and our DB and LB positions were promising but unproven outside of Fuller and Facyson.
Maybe the Brewer hype was a little crazy, but with all the talk of how he had learned so much in the offseason, and how we had this stud QB in Lawson in the wings, I'd say QB expectations were about the same. Randall was actually pretty maligned coming into 2004, but only after his performance that year did people really love him.
See: Reavis, CJ and McKenzie, Shai.
I actually watched the USCw game with Imoh, who was suspended for the game. It was...awkward.
Agree that there are slight similarities but another big glaring difference between now and then is that that squad only dropped below .500 once (USCw). After that they only dropped to .500 even (NCSU). This squad has dipped below .500 twice already. I sure as shit hope we turn it around like '04. But at this point it's a gigantic we'll see.
We are at the tipping point of the season, no doubt. And at this point we have the potential to replicate 2004, or to replicate 2012-14. The difference between this year and the last two, though, is that now Lefty's offense is completely installed and we have two QBs (when Brewer returns) who have some longevity within the system.
I do agree Lefty superior to whatever the fuck Stiney was doing in the bathroom on the toilet.
Such a roller coaster of emotions from week to week.
At the beginning of the season I think several people (myself included) thought the game against Pitt would go a long way towards showing us what type of team we have...now, after having played Pitt and then NCST, I kind of feel like we still don't really know what we've got with this team. I could almost see us winning the rest of our games just as easily as we could lose them all. What an interesting season this is turning into. I think we'll probably be in the Coastal race much longer than we should be, because #goACC, but ultimately I think this team will just barely miss out on an opportunity to play in Charlotte. Having said that, though, it's impossible to tell where this season will take us. If nothing else, Unpredictability has become a staple of VT football in recent years. (good & bad)
"I could almost see us winning the rest of our games just as easily as we could lose them all. "
Actually, I think this is exactly what we do know about this team. They are young and inconsistent from week to week. Unfortunately, I think that likely means we'll continue to ride the roller coaster the rest of the season -- which means close to .500 at the end of the season.
I sure hope I'm wrong and we're sitting at 9-3 or 8-4 at regular season's end. I'll gladly eat the crow.
This team has talent, and this team can be fun to watch. I hope this team continues to play like they did in the 2nd qtr because it will be a fun second half of the season to watch. The only time I don't enjoy watching the Hokies play is when they look flat, apathetic, and uninspired. This team is too talented and has too much potential to ever play that way.
"Slept on it"


You must have either pulled a Rip Van Winkle or had one hell of a weekend.
or