Five Things For Spring

As it stands right now, there are more uncertainties than givens for this team. For instance, I'm quite confident in the defensive line. I think James Gayle and the gang have the potential to be among the top d-lines nationally. However, there are (depth) concerns in the linebacking corps and secondary. Cody Journell and A.J. Hughes will be the best battery of kicker and punter we've had in quite some time, but will the offense being good enough to play the field position game and consistently score touchdowns?

Spring football never really answers more than a few questions about a team. The same goes for August camp too. We won't really know what we have on our hands until sometime in late September or early October. That, in my opinion, is when the better teams really ramp up and play good football, and those destined to be bad, struggle.

So in my estimation, we're a long ways from knowing how this team will fare on the field. With that said, spring ball is right around the corner, and these are my five most important things I'd like to see the Hokies improve on in order to be serious contenders for Charlotte.

1. Better Offensive Line Play (Duh)

Jeff Grimes needs to be a miracle worker and the big guys up front must embrace the responsibility of carrying the offense as well as a tougher style of play.

"What I'm worried about is developing the toughest line in the ACC," he said. "And that's something that is hard to measure and it's one of those things that you can't necessarily put a statistic with it, but I think you know it when you see it. That's going to be my number one goal and approach.

"In order for us to do that, we've got to have the mindset up front, in order for us to do the things on offense, particularly running the football, we've got to have the approach up front that we're going to dominate the game from the offensive line position. It's the only way it works. It's the only way your offense takes a physical approach.

"We've got to be essentially the big brothers of everybody else on the offense. I believe we're the tip of the spear, so to speak, the first in to fight. And if we do our job with the right approach and the right mindset, then I think the other guys will follow."

Considering it felt like Curt Newsome was doing the Bernie on the sideline these last few years—someone should verify his pulse—talk like that gets me excited. However, many of the more physically talented linemen are also among the most inexperienced. Unfortunately, developing a dominant o-line may end up being a multi-year process. Either way, minor improvements may yield major results (eliminating communication / snap issues, playing the best players, establishing cohesion). This team will only go as far as the guys upfront take it. One or two of the younger players (Mark Shuman, Jonathan McLaughlin, Augie Conte, Adam Taraschke) having a good spring as well as the line grasping Grimes' concepts would be a nice start.

2. Scot Loeffler's Offense Takes Shape

Did Beamer Co. trade in a lemon for a Pinto? Scot Loeffler has worked for some extremely successful coaches, and had moderate success as offensive coordinator at Temple in 2011 (7th nationally in rushing offense, 39th in scoring). However, it's hard to overlook the disaster he was a part of at Auburn last season. Loeffler has described his scheme as multiple with many personnel groupings that prioritizes running the football. At a high level, that's what Bryan Stinespring tried to do through various ways during his tenure as coordinator.

Since I read them months ago, these paragraphs from The War Eagle Reader have stuck with me.

The Loeffler Question – What the Heck are We Doing?

Here is a simple question: What is Auburn trying to do on offense? We all see what the results are. But what is Auburn's offensive identity supposed to be? You would think after watching every play of every game that we would all know this by now. We thought Loeffler was hired as a "run-first" guy but we are actually throwing the ball much more than last season. (The actual breakdown shows more run plays than passes, but when you account for all the scrambles and sacks, the numbers are much more even.) And the constant rotation of players and seemingly random play selection at times doesnt allow anyone to get a rhythm.

This offense is attempting to do way, way, way too much. And that is one of the reasons that execution is so bad. Pick a few things and execute them perfectly. We don't care if the playbook is thicker than the last volume of "Harry Potter" if we can't run most—or any—of them successfully or even competently. Oklahoma State is leading the nation in offense and they will often run the same play six times in a row on a drive. But they execute it well.

So will Loeffler have a clear vision to successfully execute his plan, or will he overcomplicate things to the point of ineptness like his predecessor?

I'll be watching to see how the offense competes with the defense in the scrimmages and during the Maroon-White game. Normally, the defense steals the show. I'll be thrilled if the offense can make it more of a back-and-forth battle, hold their own in the trenches, and we notice a core group of plays that are run often and with success.

3. Revival of the Running Game

Prior to last season I nonchalantly discussed the tailbacks and the running game. Beamer Co. rarely came up lame on that side of the ledger, and I figured it would be a matter of plug-and-play. That wasn't the case.

The coaches probably stuck with Michael Holmes too long, didn't give Martin Scales enough touches, and even though they tried every conceivable combination of backs the ground game was never consistently reliable. Although there were some flashes of success against more feeble fronts, the o-line didn't overpower most of their opposition.

Scot Loeffler and Jeff Grimes have made it clear running the ball is their top priority. Hopefully it will yield yards, and not just be an exercise in repetition and futility. It goes without saying better line play will make it easier on the tailbacks, but the coaches still need to designate a feature back and make use of a sensible rotation that is not predetermined and takes into account the situation on the field.

It's unfortunate Drew Harris won't be enrolled for spring to compete, but it's Trey Edmunds' opportunity to prove he's the real deal. Edmunds blowing us all away with a breakout spring would make me feel better about the future of the running game. J.C. Coleman showing he's more of scoring threat in goal line situations is also on my wish list.

4. Leaders Need to Emerge

I try to refrain from questioning a team's leadership. As an outsider it's unfair to judge what's happening in the locker room and practice field without seeing it first hand. Furthermore, it is a subjective analysis. But last season, then senior receiver Marcus Davis publicly questioned the team's lack of leadership.

"Of course, we don't have the same players, but at the same time, we don't have the same attitude as we used to have," Davis said. "Even [former quarterback Tyrod Taylor] wasn't the most vocal person, but he'll let you know: 'Pick it up.'

"It's just like we don't have that or if somebody do try to do that, it's like egos get in the way or 'Why you coming at me like this?' Or 'why are you singling me out?' Instead of, 'Alright, I'm gonna pick it up.' It's not the same. I don't know what it is, but it has to change."

It's somewhat ironic that Davis said all that before the Florida State game where his play served as the source material for his blocking "highlight" film. In any event, I think the lack of senior starters resulted in a dearth of senior leadership.

Change isn't easy and it's almost assured this team will struggle at times. There needs to be a strong foundation of leaders, something we've previously been accustomed to, to help the transition and keep everyone competitive and focused. I think it's a very good sign Gayle, Exum, and Thomas all decided to return to Blacksburg for their senior seasons.

5. Foster Must Develop Quality Depth at Linebacker and in the Secondary

Not including the front-four, defensive depth is a major concern. Now that Antone Exum's status is unknown, Foster will probably have to rely on at least one inexperienced starter, and another in a backup role. Michael Cole retiring stings too. He was coming into his own as a nickel back, and added depth at rover. One of Donaldven Manning or Donovan Riley along with Desmond Frye having a big spring would make me less uneasy about the secondary. Detrick Bonner building on last season's late success would be a bonus.

At linebacker, Jack Tyler is a tackling machine and when Tariq Edwards is 100% he's a force inside (and out). Edwards' was healthy at the end of last season, so that alleviates any concerns I have of him. Ronny Vandyke was a mixed bag at whip last year. He made both brilliant and poor plays. I think the complexity of the position got the best of him. Once he masters the reads and mental responsibilities, his athleticism will shine through.

However, injuries could force players with little to no experience to see the field. Chase Williams has played a good amount of snaps, he started against Austin Peay, but I'm hoping highly regarded recruits like Deon Clarke and Devin Vandyke or Josh Trimble and Dahman McKinnon (if they're back on the team and practicing) push for playing time and by doing so create a strong two-deep.

What do you guys think? What important strides would you like to see this team make during spring ball?

Comments

I'd like to see Logan hitting receivers in stride. If he struggles with his mechanics in the spring, I'll be worried.

I miss Stick it In

i'm with you, if he sails his first pass in the spring game, i feel like i'm gonna bang my head against the bleacher.

"It's worth it right? It's worth it to lay it all on the line for your brothers."

"That kid you're talking to right there, I think he played his nuts off! And you can quote me on that shit!" -Bud Foster (both quotes)

Not me. Tech is DANG lucky to have Logan Thomas at Quarterback. Brings many more positives then negatives.

No way Tech gets to a bowl game last year without him.

Logan Thomas was essentially an "Army of One" last year. He had to be, given what little help he had around him.

Which reminds me, I have drill during the Spring Game weekend. I really hoped to go this year, after going to the cancelled one last year.

Everybody please give good reports for those that can't be there.

VT '10, Born & Raised in the 804. Hokies, Keydets, Army Black Knights, NY Giants, NY Rangers, and ATL Braves.

My PSN: Wisec4g feel free to add me for NCAA or Madden

#VT4SEC #BEATBAMA

dont worry. I'll be doing an everysnap vid of the spring game.

isittimetobeatbama.com

VT '10, Born & Raised in the 804. Hokies, Keydets, Army Black Knights, NY Giants, NY Rangers, and ATL Braves.

My PSN: Wisec4g feel free to add me for NCAA or Madden

#VT4SEC #BEATBAMA

and if we are lucky, French will do what he does best when he sees an eversnap vid.

BREAK IT DOWN

isittimetobeatbama.com

Is that The Dude??? I love that movie!

In Tyrod we trust.
#BEATBAMA #EATBAMA #EXCRETEBAMA

I completely agree. I am stoked he came back. That said, I hope he is more accurate than he was last year, for whatever reason. Remember O'Cain hilariously blaming his poor mechanics on that trainer he had worked out with over the summer?

Now I'm not sure if receivers were to blame, a lack of trust in the o-line was thr problem, the staff's 'mastery' of the pistol (I think they spent as many minutes learning it as UVA had fans at their spring game), or if it was just lapses in concentration. But whatever was the root of it, I sincerely hope it's fixed.

I miss Stick it In

Even better...

Let's go for "toughest in the country"

In Tyrod we trust.
#BEATBAMA #EATBAMA #EXCRETEBAMA

Reverse the regression

A number of players regressed from their 2011 levels - pretty much the whole DL, for instance. Everyone needs to reverse that trend. We need a dominant Front 7.

We may need to temper expectations for Loeffler....

...because the defense he will be facing is so good.

Well, the defense he'll be facing on Aug 31st is pretty darn good too. Spring and fall scrimmages should give us a decent idea of how this offense is progressing.

If we can get a solid showing out of #BeatBama, I think we can get a pretty good gauge as to where we are headed. There will be a lot of room for growth after that, but the first game is the biggest wild card because a) It's Bama's defense and b) It'll be the first time we see that game plan in action.

I agree with what you say about leadership and that is always something I have questioned. Even though its impossible judge what's happening in the locker room and practice field without seeing it first hand, but when you pay attention to the sidelines during a game you rarely see anyone taking a vocal or strong leadership stance. During a game it seems like some one would stand up and try to raise moral when things get tough. Im not placing judgment because I dont know all the variables when it comes leadership. Maybe I dont see it, but I sure hope its there!

Offense

I would love to see the Tightends used more in the passing game.

RE: Leadership

I think its a contagious thing. This was one problem I had with our OL the last few years. With Newsome, you got the feeling that he basically laid out the plays, organized the drills, and left the guys to figure out the rest (can you say "no film study"? I knew you could!). The players need to see coaching leadership, which fosters player's leadership on (and off) the field. Players with leadership abilities feed off of the coaches. This was one indication I saw long ago that told me Newsome didn't have what it took at the D-I level. Hopefully Grimes will work on creating the correct mindset. If what he says up front is any indication, I think we may see a sea-change in our OL.

Take the shortest route to the ball and arrive in bad humor.

I think Logan's offseason development is just as key as the offensive line's progression. As much as we need a decent running game, we can't become one dimensional. How confident is he with the younger receivers? Can he manage the game better than he did in 2011? Can he make good reads? Can he put his less-than-stellar 2012 behind him and be the Heisman candidate everyone thought he would be? All this and more in the 2013 Spring Football Season.

I literally have no idea why my username is VT_Warthog.

@VT_Warthog

wide receivers

Along with everything else on O, I want to see how our WRs look. Does Coles look like his old self? Are they running good routes? Blocking well? In synch with LT? Etc.

WRs

Marcus Davis on why Sherman was let go/hired at Perdue and why Hokie WRs have been drafted recently:
"I wouldn't really say it was him," Davis said. "It was more player-coaching than anything. We taught each other, especially when Jarrett (Boykin) and Danny (Coale) were here. I sat in the back seat and just learned a lot from them. And when they left, we kept pushing each other."

Sorry MD...but this is BS!

Blaming Sherman because you're lazy is a punk move. Let's see Coale and Boykin leave and you guys "kept pushing each other". REALLY! Let's watch your tape for this year (or just F$U would do the trick) and see how much you "pushed yourself" or someone else pushed you. I'm sorry but you have talent...you just have no heart. Sherman is gone...don't blame him. He did plenty while here (look at who he put in the League), I admit he had his faults (one of which was leaving your sorry ass in the lineup as long as he did)...with your attitude, and comments like this, I now hope you're not one of them.

BTW-Fuller did a pretty good job being coached by him...how do you explain that? Oh, yeah...he listens and works hard. Something you know nothing about...

We put the K in Kwality

One of Logan's biggest problems last year was that he couldn't trust the running backs. Logan kept the ball 75% of the time when he had a choice. Hopefully Trey Edmunds and JC can really get things going.

"Go Hokies!" - Thomas Jefferson

Going against the grain

So bear with me here.

1) I think Logan Thomas need to feel some heat. Mark Leal and Brenden Motley both have been in the system quite enough to seriously challenge Thomas for the starting spot. I feel Scot Leoffler should be given the chance to evaluate what he have on hand, and Carlis Parker being in the mix would spice things up this spring. I am not saying that Thomas should be demoted, but I think if he feels a bit of competition, maybe that will make him step his game up, take ownership of the offense and leadership in general.

2) The offensive line have to completely start over. Grimes' track record indicate he is a success story, and I have every reason to believe that Grimes will get something out of the current offensive grunts. Just because some of the players have been on the roster for a long time should not be given the first look. Translation: time for some serious butt-kicking, competition this spring.

3) Aaron Morehead is given a great opportunity to apply what he have learned from his time at Stanford and being in the NFL under the quarterback of Peyton Manning. With the way he publicily challenged Antone Exum, I think he is going to push the young wide receivers. I saw a tweet where one of the receivers didn't make to his mandatory 7 a.m. meeting, so he said, "Ok, we'll try again tomorrow at 6 a.m." When was the last time a coach gave the players the old "what for?" I think that was something missing from Kevin Sherman. In fact, I read on a blog at Yahoo! Sports where Marcus Davis said the players basically coached each other, and Sherman had a bit of hands-off philosophy. (Reference

4) The health of the linebacker and secondary are of serious concern. That said, I think that the entire defensive staff are more than aware of that, and I think they are already hard at work on making a contingency plan. It kind of sucks that they have to go up against a very physical Alabama without Exum (presumably he's not gonna make it back in time, I'm hopeful though), and that means all the young'uns have got to take advantage of their opportunities. I think this spring is going to light fire under their collective asses to get better or go home.

5) I think that Beamer should let Shane have some inputs on special team. After all, Shane helped engineer a turnaround in South Carolina's special team performance. Sometime new set of eyes are extremely helpful.

6) The running game needs a kick in the ass. With Shane coaching the running back, I hope he listens to Grimes (who doubles as a run game coordinator) on who is the best back in what situation and on what downs. I can't remember the last time there was this much uncertainty with the running back situation. It always seem Tech could plug and chug, but this time, the running back need a serious evaluation. Shane has his work cut out for him.

I think I have rambled on long enough to write a blog post!

"We are not going to back down from anybody." ~ Coach Shane Beamer

To your last point (6) there were a couple years in the middle of the 00's that we didn’t have a consistent running game. Humes and Imoh were good but they certainly had their off nights too. But to the good, there was uncertainty going into 08 after Ore left, we had Kenny Lewis and Darren Evans, neither of which had a lot of experience. Thankfully, Darren set the freshman rushing record. Then in 09 Darren hurts his knee and again, we're set to face Bama with an unproven back and Ryan Williams had a nice game against Bama and flashed his talent on that nice long d run in the 2nd half. My only worry WRT rb is how Shane seemed to over sub last year. We're going to have some highly touted kids this year especially if Harris can get cleared this summer. Shane needs to settle on a clear 1 and 2. If its Edmunds and Harris I can see getting Coleman on the field as well, but not constantly running 3 or 4 different backs in there during the game.

Correy

Thanks for the history lesson. I'll admit I didn't pay much attention to the off season back then as I do now.

One issue I had with Shane is his substitution of running back who was getting really hot. I can't recall what game it was (Boston College?) where Martin Scales got going, diesel-engine hot, and Shane put in a very cold Michael Holmes for a predictable loss.

That's why I am hoping Shane will listen to Grimes. You do make a great point, Shane needs to establish a #1 and #2 backs, but we shouldn't count on Harris enrolling this summer as precaution measure. I have not heard anything official on Harris, but I think the coaches just need to go about as if he won't make it. There's talents in the backfield right now.

"We are not going to back down from anybody." ~ Coach Shane Beamer

pre darren evans

our running game was awful in the first few games before evans was discovered that season....whether that was our O-line young receivers or what iunno but it was pretty bad before evans was plugged in

Perhaps it sucked because Evans was far and away the best rb on the roster at that point and he wasn't playing much?

I miss Stick it In

I feel like I'm in the minority here

I expect 100% to see a completely different product on the field along the offensive line. I've seen more posts than I can count saying it'll take Grimes 2-4 years to get 'his' guys out there and have them coached up properly. I've seen way more posts about the line needing time to 'gel' and 'become a cohesive unit.' No. False. Incorrect. Wrong.
If Grimes is the excellent coach I personally (and I know many of you) expect him to be, we'll see a nasty, tough unit on the field day one. At the very least, it'll be a nastier, tougher unit. No amount of 'gel time' or 'cohesion' would have stopped Farris getting knocked on his rear all game long against Rutgers. I'm tired of that excuse. We've already seen Moorehead dropping the hammer on his receivers and holding them accountable. Grimes will do the same. Those boys will hit, stay low and drive (and then repeat until the will of the opponent is broken), or they'll sit on the bench. Grimes was hired for one reason: produce elite offensive lines. I believe that begins now, not 3 years down the road. Will he have his best unit in 2013? Highly unlikely. Will it be a solid, tough unit? You're darn right.

I agree. I'm assuming these guys know little to nothing about technique due to how bad Newsome was. The smallest amount of coaching will have a dramatic impact compared the "you're bigger than them so don't let them by" approach previously taught.

"Go Hokies!" - Thomas Jefferson

I agree and I would add....

that I have never thought the OL talent was poor. In fact, I thought Newsome was making it them look worse than they are. Part of that was playing guys he favored (Wang) and not playing guys who were out of favor (Gibson).

One of the more subtle, yet effective, components of the OL is that every guy will both have a chance to play and not have any position locked up due to prior performance. This will be a true meritocracy and we will see the results right away.

I'm expecting something wonky to come out of Spring regarding the depth chart. Imagine, for a second, that we end up with:

RT: Conte, Shuman
RG: Acree, Farris
C: Miller, Wang
LG: Arkema, Fisher
LT: Gibson, Benedict

In a way, I'm expecting the unexpected from the OL this spring.

Wow, that's quite a shakeup.

I'll take this lineup. Obviously it depends on Acree's knee being 100%.

RT: Acree, Conte
RG: Benedict, Farris
C: Miller, Farris
LG, Gibson, Wang
LT, Shuman, Conte

Beat Alabama.

And if Acree can play RT... Big guy, but couldn't cut it on the defensive side (where they coach well). I hope he is good as his potential.

That's a big "if" that I'm wondering about: Has anyone heard anything on Acree's knee?

Knee

I'm guessing healed if he is pushing as much weight as he is (see winter conditioning post).

If Acree can't go, I think we'll see a little shake up with

RT: Gibson, Conte
RG: Benedict
C: Miller, Wang
LG: Farris
RT, Shuman, Conte

Still not sure about the backup guards, and it would most likely require further shifting of the line.

Beat Alabama.

It wasn't meant as a prediction as much....

...as a statement of the overall assessments forthcoming.

"What have you been doing playing guard? You're a tackle now."

"You're solid at tackle, but you're the smartest guy we've got. You're the center now."

....or something along those lines. Nobody, and I mean nobody, can take anything for granted.

the line play and Logan tie into this but I want a consistent run game I'd love to see edmunds go for 1000 yards I know that may be a stretch but I think it's possible if the line clicks and Logan plays like we all know he can. I really miss seeing a vt RB just scare other teams like Wilson Williams and Evans did.

tyrod did it mikey! tyrod did it!

I want to see three things...

1) Leadership - it's amazing how good leadership can make a good team, great.

2) Offensive line toughness - I no longer want to see Wang being pushed into the backfield at the snap by a guy 100#s lighter! Tip of the spear.

3) Defensive line toughness - see #2 above. I think we were a little soft and full of ourselves at the start of last season. That tough "none shall pass...or run" attitude of the 90's 2000's D was the thing of legends. If the other teams O cannot get a push, game over. If Bud can make the other team one dimensional (stop the run and focus on the pass)...it's game over!

We put the K in Kwality

I want to see #2 a hundred times over. Spears go forward. If they break, it's only because they're embedded in an opponent who is likely in the process of dying. Tip of the spear.