
For those familiar with my writing on Coach Scot Loeffler's "multiple" offensive philosophy, you know that the fundamental goal of his scheme is to find and exploit personnel mismatches against the defense. Whether Coach Loeffler is trying to force a linebacker to cover a quick wide receiver or outnumber the run defenders on the perimeter, his goal is to identify a physical advantage and then place his players in a position to win their one-on-one battles. In 2013 those opportunities were found easiest from spread formations. In 2014, Loeffler's offense will have a different vibe.
It's rare for the tight end position to be a major discussion point for fans heading into a football season. However, I'm looking forward to seeing what Ryan Malleck, Kalvin Cline and Bucky Hodges are capable of... Maybe more so than any other position. Everyone knows how much Loeffler loves tight ends (don't we all) and in 2014 he'll have plenty to play with.
Tight End Depth
Rising sophomore Kalvin Cline returns after hauling in 321 yards and 2 touchdowns. For the record, he looked even more dangerous than those numbers suggest. He proved himself to be a reliable route runner and, although he'll probably always be labelled as a "catch-first" tight end, Cline improved as a blocker as the season progressed. As a sophomore Cline will be bigger, stronger, and wiser. He should be more productive as well.
The tight end position may be the deepest on the team. Not only is Cline returning and poised for a big season, but Loeffler is finally going to get the opportunity to utilize Ryan Malleck. Although similar in size, Malleck is projected as more of a prototypical tight end. He's a very capable receiver, Loeffler was planning on featuring him in the offense after all, but Malleck is also a proficient blocker. He is exactly the type of multi-faceted tight end (blocker/receiver) that gives opposing defensive coordinators nightmares. Regardless of what personnel the defense has on the field, there will be a mismatch in either the running game or the passing game for Loeffler to exploit.
This spring few players generated as much buzz as QB turned TE Bucky Hodges. Hodges has as high a ceiling as any tight end at Tech since I've been a fan. He is an exceptional athlete who has the ability to either run past defenders or outleap them. Hodges has surprisingly good hands for a player that spent most of his time in highschool as a quarterback. Although his run blocking technique needs work, his aggressiveness and size makes me think he'll grow into that role.
Getting On The Field
With all these shiny toys to play with, Loeffler has to be anxious to find ways to get the most out of them. A team is only allowed to have 11 players on the field at a time and six of those players are basically penciled in on every down (five offensive linemen and one quarterback). Regardless of the number limitations, the trio of Cline/Malleck/Hodges are too talented and too promising to not get significant snaps. The question isn't if they'll get on the field, but how.
The quickest way to get all these players onto the field is to just... put them all on the field. Recently, Stanford has had a lot of success using heavy formations that feature three or more tight ends. Having all those tight ends on the line of scrimmage can stretch a defense across the face of the formation in ways that they don't regularly practice. With modern offenses often stretching the field horizontally with extra wide receivers, defensive coordinators are also spending more practice time developing their spread schemes. By compacting his formations, Loeffler can create mismatches out of thin air by forcing defenders to line up in ways they aren't used to and employ techniques they aren't familiar with.
Ideally Virginia Tech could use three tight end formations (with Cline/Malleck/Hodges) to help create a consistent run game, and having a ground game which can win in short yardage situations is the first step towards an effective play-action game. After all, Hodges did look dangerous all spring running right past linebackers and safeties peeking in the backfield. Loeffler can't just line his unit up with three tight ends all game long though, the law of diminishing returns applies to football too.
The H-Back
There are going to be times when Loeffler will only want two tight ends on the field at a time. When he goes that route, us Hokie fans can expect to frequently see him use one tight end and one "H-Back".
The H-Back is a hybrid position, partially tight end and partially fullback. It's one of my favorite positions in football because when used correctly can create havoc along the front-seven in the running game. The most recognizable difference between a tight end and an H-Back is the alignment of the player.

Tight ends have their name because they are the end man on the line of scrimmage, allowing them to be an eligible receiver, and are located tight to the tackle. (This is also how split ends earn their name. They are the eligible receiver on the line of scrimmage, but are "split" away from the tackle). Unlike a tight end, an H-Back will be flexed away from the line of scrimmage.
The H-Back's alignment allows him to motion pre-snap, giving him a lot more flexibility than a tight end has. A tight end, being on the line of scrimmage, is locked into his position once he becomes set. The defense has time to set themselves and recognize their run responsibilities based on the tight ends alignment. With an H-Back, the coordinator has the option to quickly motion him from one side of the formation or another pre-snap, changing the defenses rules and roles on the fly. This forces them to realign themselves in a hurry, increasing the odds that the defense will drop an assignment in the confusion.
The power of an H-Back isn't limited to pre-snap flexibility though. Being off the line of scrimmage also makes it easier for the player to come across the formation and attack the end opposite of his original alignment. This is one of the traits of an H-Back that Loeffler used heavily in the later parts of the 2013 season.
Cline starts the play on the left side of the formation. The play fake in the backfield forces the linebacker lined up over Cline to stay at home, leaving Cline free to run across the formation. Cline had a full head of steam by the time the linebackers on the right side of the formation see him coming and they don't have time to turn and run with him. Logan hits the uncovered Cline and he's able to turn it upfield to pick up the first. The alignment of Cline is what allowed him to get open on this play, being free to run behind the line of scrimmage instead of in front of it was key. In 2014, expect to see H-Backs targeted in this fashion often. Bucky Hodges is an athlete that no defensive coordinator will want to see with the ball in space and I'll be shocked if he isn't used to threaten the width of a defense on play-action passes.
Cutting behind the line of scrimmage post snap allows the H-Back to do more than just go and receive a pass, the H-Back can threaten the either perimeter of the defense as a lead blocker. Here's Cline pulling across to lead the way for Logan Thomas on a keeper.
At the top of the screen you can see a safety drop down to help with the threat that Cline presents as a run blocker right before the snap. After the snap, the safety has to stay at home to protect against the RB bouncing it outside. Cline is going to cut across the face of the formation and read the defensive end. If the end tries to come under his block, then Cline is going to run past him and lead block for Thomas (who will be making the same read) on the edge. He manages to get just enough of the OLB to allow Thomas to cut it up and pick up good yardage.
To keep a defense honest Loeffler can use the H-Back as the lead blocker to the side that he's aligned to, rather than exclusively pulling him across.
The outside linebacker does a fantastic job of recognizing his responsibility and getting up field to make J.C. Coleman hesitate, but the play design itself is nice. Cline and Edmunds are leading the way for J.C. running full tilt, if they can execute on their blocks they should have the numerical advantage on the edge. The point here is that, unlike a tight end, the defense isn't capable of accurately predicting where the H-Back will be used as a lead blocker or flat receiver pre-snap.
Personnel Decisions
As I said earlier, the question isn't if Loeffler will use multiple tight ends through the season. The real question is who he chooses to pair together and how he chooses to highlight their skill sets. For example, having Cline and Hodges on the field would be a potent receiving duo. If the defense responds with an extra secondary defender... the chess game will be on. Would Loeffler choose to trust his personnel skill sets and throw the ball or would he choose to run against the soft defense?
I'd be remiss if I didn't mention Sam Rogers when talking about the H-Back. Rogers was used as an H-Back last year quite a bit. He did a good job as a lead blocker and even as a receiver off of play-action last year. Rogers knows the playbook and is familiar with the correct techniques to use with that position. Having a tough and versatile player like Rogers allows Loeffler to turn a two tight end/one fullback formation into a three tight end one rather quickly. With Malleck/Cline/Hodges/Rogers on his roster, Loeffler won't be hurting for ways to out scheme his opponents.

Comments
Great post, Third!
It's not instantaneous, but I can feel the knowledge seeping in.
This is the most relevant that Eddie Murphy's acting has been in years.
Big fan of big tight ends
Sounds like we finally got around to watching Stanford's Orange Bowl film against us. They really put on a show case for how big bodies can create even bigger match up problems.
Exactly...I've only been screaming this from the rooftops for three years now. Harbaugh has a great system and plagarism is ok in football.
What happened in the rest of the game? My version stops at halftime right after Tyrod threw the pass to Wilson and Harbaugh was trying to argue that he was out. Someone taped over the rest with Skinamax.
Pretty sure Harbaugh told TT he was in and that it was a nice play, not trying to argue he was out.
both correct. when TT made the throw Harbaugh can be seen pointing down at the line. Then later after the TD is called you can see TT looking back towards Harbaugh and nodding his head. Apparently, Tyrod asked him if he was in and Harbaugh said he was.
I saw this on ESPN but I can't find the highlight that shows Harbaugh telling him he was in. You can see Tryod nodding his head in most videos on youtube, that's him acknowledging Harbaugh telling him he was in.
Harbaugh admitted it himself later in the post game (I think). He knew he was just trying some gamesmanship during the play, trying to get the refs to blow the whistle. Afterwards, he did tell Tyrod that he was in and that it was a nice play. I believe ESPN mics picked it up during the game. It was a cool moment between two guys trying to compete and to win. I have had Clockwork Orange type electroshock and brain stimuli to erase the rest of the game, so lets talk about anything else.
I thought Stanford conceded after that play and that it was the last play of the game.
Aha yes, all the tight ends!
Unleash the power of the TEs!!!
This analysis has me even more pumped up for the upcoming college season.
There is so much content from columnists lately that my heads be spin'n! Keep up the good work!

Great write up! I love the slow-mo on the videos; it really helps to see what you all are talking about.
One thing though, for your safety:
.
Safety from the board or Sam Rogers himself?
Clearly from Rogers himself
What have I done...
Really good stuff, Mason. Gets me all the more pumped for the season.
I have a much greater appreciation for Hbacks after reading this post. Great write-up!
Scot Loeffler now has some shiny toys to play with, lets hope he can get them to play at a high level. The defense cant afford to keep bailing out the stuttering offense every year.
Please get good at one offensive set instead of apprenticing them all.
Do you really master offensive sets? If by sets you mean formations, I don't think so. I believe Tech should have a core set of running plays, and they do, or at least what we saw last year was mostly inverted veer, power, inside, and outside zone with some counters tossed in for good measure.
The hard part is teaching a core set of fundamentals and plays. By comparison, bolting on pre-snap action and dressing up the same base plays in different formations is simpler, and is what will play hell with a defense.
Theoretically, having 2-3 athletic tight ends / H-Backs on the field is either going to stress defenses in the passing game, or set up very favorable matchups running the ball.
I would just prefer to see much less offensive schizophrenia in Year 2. Until then, color me skeptical about The Loeff. The only reason we didn't burn him at the stake after last years cluster was the "He's Not Bryan Stinespring."
Not to mention he's a good OC. The passing game is well-designed, the running and playaction game have some cohesion and he uses sets and plays to set up other plays very well. He did a heck of a job for having one reliable weapon (LT3) for the majority of the year and absolutely zero deep receiving threats.
To be fair, what options did loeffler have last year? He did need to win games, and do so with very young skill position players.
There are a LOT of offensive coordinators that would have lost more games than loeffler last year. He might have been able to squeeze some extra yardage outta that unit, but he knew he had one of the best defenses in the country to rely on. Trust me, if the offense was capable of simply lining up and runnin the same play over and over
Loeffler would have.
We should document our expectations for Loeffler before the season starts for offensive efficiency metrics. Just seems like a lot of acceptance in retrospect of the shit show of last year. Coupled with his Auburn performance, makes you think the Temple experience is the outlier on a very thin resume.
High expectations were that Loeffler would 1: win games, and 2: teach the players the foundational aspects system.
This year, the expectations are that he will do some serious damage.
If we want to dig deep into the bag of tricks, which I know is pretty rare, both Hodges and Rogers can throw.
00:01:54–00:02:06
Still have nightmares. Of course, there was also the Sam Rogers pass to Logan in last year's UVA "game"
I don't know why everyone keeps forgetting to mention Darius Redmund he is 6'4" 270 and runs a good 40 time
got plenty of play last year he will play and is the most physical blocker of the bunch. He will be in the mix also .
Saw him when he got on the field in the spring game. Dude looks like he is 100% muscle and a lot of it. I wonder the same thing. He did catch a pass in that spring game too.
This now has me interested about the defensive assignments for covering the TE/H-back. The beauty of the position as Mason showed is that you can be a blocker or receiver. So how do you cover it? In the first clip I see multiple different scenarios. The play could be an outside zone read with Trey or Logan taking it and Cline going to block the backside pursuit. Or like what happened, we fake the run. That still leaves two options. Cline still could have engaged either the free DE or LB and given Logan more time to find a receiver (Willie also looked to be open in the flat). Or he runs past them and is open. Is the defense allowed to engage Cline even if he wants to run past them. Both players hesitate, but neither lays a hand on him. If they did could it be called holding or pass interference? Did they hesitate because they thought he might try to block them?
I really think the players didn't even see Cline go past them. I know I know silly me but if you watch the first play again their eyes are clearly on the football and Logan. Cline runs right between them and its and easy 10-12 yard pick up. Also If I am not mistaken you can contact a player as long as it is within 5 yards, so they could have used 1 of those players to block cline/hit him then the other go for Logan but again its a split second decision.
I loved how Logan read it fast and was already in his throwing motion before Cline made it past the two players, it was a great throw so he could pick up yards.
Anybody else remembering the jumbo package that BC used against us last year? It felt like they were lining 7 or 8 players on the line against us.
EDIT: Huh, somewhere along the way I topped 2,000 legs.
We played BC last year?
Six to midnight.
Bucky needs to be on the field a lot this year. I don't care where. The guy is clearly a weapon and he needs to be used immediately. Even if he's not completely ready, there is no better way to get ready than by playing.
It might be blasphemy, but if Redman, Cline and Malleck are all better I want to see them on the field. We might end up seeing more Redman than Cline in the two TE formations just because Redman is our best blocking TE and we want to get the running game established.
I'm not sure if this is 100% accurate. French could probably give you a definite answer and more specifics, but I'll at least say that size doesn't necessarily equate to blocking proficiency.
I think Redman is a good blocker who will be utilized in jumbo sets. I don't think you will see Bucky in those sets. I envision him aligning in the slot similar to how Ohio State used Jeff Heuerman. Heuerman is one heck of a blocker, but the Buckeyes love to split him out and look for him downfield, as he lead the team in YPC at nearly 18 yards a pop. Bucky and Cline are both more suited to be weapons in that HBack role (which will loin how much you see fullbacks) right now.
In the Stanford formations, I expect to see Malleck, Redman on the LOS and the 3rd guy is a toss up.
And that is kind of what I figured.
I think it'd be a mistake to not have Bucky in jumbo sets. Definitely pick redman in short yardage situations, but in a regular situation Hodges is much more dangerous.
Hodges will certainly be in the slot a ton, no doubt. There's still a lot of value by lining him up as a tight end at times as well. More so than redman, imo
I like redman, but on a team that's still trying to find explosive plays I'd be surprised if he takes many snaps from Cline. Redman will definitely have a package he's involved in (goal line, short yardage) but Cline and Bucky could be the mismatch opportunities he offense has lacked the past few seasons.
He will be on the field a lot. Each time he exits the tunnel.
Every time he hits the turf, he'll be on a pretty significant portion of the field.
They don't call him "Red Zone" for nothing.
(I know. They don't call him "Red Zone" at all... Yet.)
Just want to point something out in that first clip that made me happy. Knowles coming back to block that linebacker and spring Kline for an extra 5 yards at least. He's not a big dude but he's willing to take on linebackers and downfield blocking is going to critical to breaking big plays. He had a nice block in the third clip as well. GET AFTER IT, KNOWLES!
One thing I'm really happy about with Moorehead is instilling the mindset of receivers looking out for their buddies. That means being involved in blocking when you're not getting the ball.
One clip he was really proud of was from the Miami game, after Byrn caught a pass and got tackled. Really nothing spectacular, but at the end of the play, Stanford came in and shoved some guy off of Byrn who wasn't getting up quickly enough. Moorehead loved it that one of his guys was looking out for his teammate. Look for more of the same this year.
Exactly, perfect follow up point. It all starts with the massive upgrade in offensive coaching we got last year.