
We've talked a lot recently about the seeming abundance of tight end talent on campus right now. I wrote was about how Loeffler could employ multiple tight ends to create "heavy" formations. The deployment of tight ends and H-Backs near the line of scrimmage could be helpful in establishing the recently elusive power running game, as well as giving Loeffler plenty of flexibility in his play-action game. When you have a bunch of tight ends who demand playing time, stacking the line of scrimmage with big bodies isn't the only way to attack the defense. Loeffler could (and almost certainly will) do just the opposite at times.
Attacking Alignment
Ever since Loeffler was hired I've discussed how he creates mismatches (or attempts to) through the use of formations. One of his strengths is finding out a defenses alignment and player responsibilities, allowing him to personalize his game plan to exploit those rules. One of his favorite ways to do this is to line up in a "five wide" formation and pick on linebackers that are trying to cover wide receivers in the slot.
Here we see Willie Byrn come across the middle of the field for an easy underneath route. He easily leaves the first linebacker behind and after a nice block by Knowles, is able to pick up the first. This doesn't really classify as an "explosive" play, but its an easy chunk of yardage that should be available as long as the QB makes an accurate throw, the WR catches it, and he gets some blocking help down the field. Why doesn't the defense have more defensive backs on the field though? If the Hokies are lined up with five receivers out wide, why do they allow themselves to get caught in this mismatch? The key is understanding how defenses create their game plans.
When the offense takes the field, the defense can actually see who is in the huddle and can substitute accordingly. If the defensive coordinator sees five wide receivers jog out, he'll bring on his best pass rushers and extra cornerbacks. On the flip side, if he sees a running back, fullback, and three tight ends he'd probably take some corners off and put in some linebackers.
Keeping this in mind, its easier to see how Loeffler created that WR on LB mismatch. The Hokies had 1x1 (one back, one tight end) personnel on the field. Cline is lined up on the LOS to the left of the LT. Chris Mangus starts the play off the screen on the bottom of the field, but at the end of the clip you can see him blocking along the sideline for Byrn. When the GT defensive coordinator saw that grouping while Tech was in the huddle, he had to keep his linebackers in the game in case the offense lined up under center and handed the ball off to Mangus.
Loeffler knew that GT would keep their linebackers in to protect against the run. He countered this by sending his running back as far wide as possible and putting Byrn in the slot. Based on GT's alignment rules, a cornerback lined up over Mangus and a linebacker lined up over Byrn... Viola. Mismatch out of thin air.

Tight Ends Split Wide
So how can Malleck/Cline/Hodges benefit? Obviously, getting the most out of these tight ends requires establishing a running game while they are on the field. If Loeffler can get a strong ground game going by utilizing the tactics outlined in my last article, defensive coordinators are going to have a tough time figuring out how to handle these tight ends.
Let's say Loeffler has Edmunds, Malleck, Cline, Hodges, and Stanford in the huddle. That's a conservative 1x3 grouping. Defensive coordinators are now in a pickle... What do they do with their secondary? Does he leave both corners and both safeties in the game? If so, those three tight ends are going to have the advantage in the blocking game. If Edmunds has been having success moving the chains, the DC might be tempted to sub in a linebacker and take out a safety or corner. Once that happens, Loeffler is in position to use his athletic tight ends in space to create mismatches.

Having three tight ends who are more than capable of winning battles in space, Loeffler can choose to go five wide again. With a secondary weakened by substitutions in order to account for the run threat, Loeffler can match Cline, Malleck, and Hodges all up against linebackers. We already know what Cline is capable of in those situations.
Cline is a mismatch against linebackers for sure, but Hodges is going to be a nightmare. Here he is, working against a linebacker out of a five wide formation in the spring game.
Hodges has the size to bully and box out linebackers on those short routes underneath, as well as attack a defense vertically. In the spring game we saw him break open wide open deep from another five wide formation.
We don't have a lot of film on Malleck, but we do know that the coaches think very highly of him (especially Loeffler). I'm not sure what type of vertical threat he'll be, but I feel confident that Malleck will be too much to handle for most linebackers on stick and hitch routes. At his size and with his hands, he'll be a nice target underneath for whoever wins the quarterback battle.
The Hokies can manufacture a lot of mismatches out of their tight end position if, and only if, they are able to have some type of threat running the ball. If defenses don't feel the need to sub in run defenders when they see a surplus of tight ends come into the game, it will be a whole lot harder to get the trio open. Football is the ultimate team sport and Malleck/Cline/Hodges will have to rely on the offensive line to win their battles up front and their young running back teammates to make the right reads and make some guys miss. Otherwise, the space that Loeffler hopes to create for them will evaporate.

Comments
Great stuff,

but do not Google the title.
Good tip. "The field with" brings up all kinds of unwanted links. If you want to find this article in the future, google "stretching tight ends."
Out of overconfidence and part stupidity I googled every segment of the title and what did I find? Americans love football, specifically Gronkowski in stretching poses, even more than Sex.
Now try "Tight ends split wide"
Get anything with Gronk in it?
I might leave that one to you. Haha
Actually came up 100% football on page 1 with a link to an article in the Roanoke times regarding the Hokies
I like how they have Hodges off of 1st team and listed as only 6'6 to motivate him...
"GROW!!! GROW LIKE YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT. CAN'T CATCH A BALL? GROOOOW!"
Been waiting for a tight end article. Thanks. I understand what you're saying that it will work best if we have a capable running game and the defense puts in run defenders, but what about mismatches created through size against generally smaller defensive backs and perhaps timed routes taking advantage of that size?
note the lack of photoshopped fans in that first picture.
And that is our spring game
A TE package set including Cline , Hodges , Malleck is going to be hard to stop. I cant wait to watch the finish product on the field this season.
And to make it even more confusing throw in Durkin at QB and there will be wild turkeys running all over the field!
The offensive talent should be improved in general this year. I'll be extremely disappointed if Tech has an offense ranked in the 100's again. The only way I see that happening is if the QB play just never materializes or if the offensive line is devastated by injuries.
Not really. Load the box with eight run defenders. Press coverage on all five receivers, with two safeties over the top. As long as the officials don't notice you have 15 guys on the field, you're golden.
How you do it with 11 guys I have no idea.
Didn't Savannah State try that against Miami and STILL give up the TD?
Not sure the image caption is accurate. How does one overthrow a man who cannot be overthrown?
I get how Bucky can cause mismatches, but are Cline and Malleck such great athletes that LBs will have a hard time covering them? Are they exceptional players?
I haven't seen much of Malleck, but Cline's footage speaks for itself. Look at what he did as a true freshmen last year, barely being familiar with the playbook.
If he's in single coverage against a linebacker, expect him to get open the majority of the time.
Malleck is unproven, but considering Loeffler reworked a good deal of his offense last year after his injury, my guess is he's a player.
The second clip Mason embedded answers your question on Cline. The linebacker is unable to turn and run with him. He scores easily.
Now consider this from Brian's post yesterday.
If he retains his athleticism, and with a 6-4 frame he probably will, he's going to be a matchup nightmare for folks.
So what you're saying is that we have 3 potential matchup nightmares in our TE rotation this year?
Would it be that crazy to think we could see some 3 TE sets this year? One staying back to help block, and 2 going into coverage? With the WRs we have, a jumbo offense like that for us could be absolutely lethal this year.
Yeah, I agree and I think that's the point.
Not many teams will have big 3 TE sets. It'll take particular attention from other teams defenses meaning it'll be custom schemes they need to learn in practice that week.
What about a Power I with all TE's behind the QB? I'm sure we could throw Fuller in there too for good measure.
We absolutely will. In anticipation of just that, this article and the last one I wrote looked at how the run and the pass game could benefit from those multi TE sets
Can you do a link to your last article, I'd like to go and brush up on it.
First line of this article contains the link
Yeah, I saw that above. The more I think about it, the options we have to run with our TE packages this year are very, very enticing. I could see us going 3-TE sets quite often. Our TEs are just so ridiculously athletic right now that if you go like that, you're going to have a major mismatch somewhere. I would go so far as to say anything less than double coverage on someone like Bucky is a mismatch. Thing is, if you go 3TE, if you're doubling Hodges (with LB/CB I would assume) you're going to put someone else on an island, so if thats Stanford on a go route, or Malleck/Cline working a pick route with Bucky, yards should be a plenty. And then for the running game, line 2 TEs wide, pulling LBs away for coverage, and it should drastically open up the middle of the field for our guys to run through.
The possibilities are truly endless for our offense this year. What I like most is that right now, it could be the best kept secret in football. Absolutely nobody is giving us a second thought, cause the assumption is that we're going to suck, but its difficult to be that bad with the natural mismatches we have developed.
It's exciting, that's for sure. If the promising young OL and RBS can get a consistent thing going on the ground... I wouldn't be surprised to see a drastic improvement over last years numbers.
Those are big "ifs" though
Yeah, MASSIVE ifs right there.
Thing is, I'm not fully sure where the blame for last year's struggles with the OL belong. They absolutely manhandled Alabama in the opener, and then looked downright pedestrian against pretty much the rest of the schedule. My theory is that they were playing a lot better than it appeared, but, as teams realized that with the inconsistency we saw from Logan, there was no need to respect the passing game, everyone just pinned their ears back with pure intention on getting pressure on the QB and disrupting the run, and they made our OL look bad by just simply consistently sending more guys than they could block. With Logan's struggles with even completing simple screen hot routes, there was no punishing teams for doing this. Makes me wonder, if Brewer is as smart a QB, with as accurate of throws as they say he has, if we'll see a monumental improvement in the play of the OL this year, as there will simply be less guys to block?
To place the running games lack of succes at Logan's feet is a little much.
One, the offensive line wasn't dominant. They weren't as bad as the numbers suggest, but they weren't consistently blowing up the dline either.
Two, the running backs struggled with injuries and no one emerged as an every down back (I thin Trey could have if given more of an opportunity)
Three, the lack of a vertical threat (not lack of consistency) in the passing game is what hurt the ground game the most. Whether you blame te WRs or Logan for that is up to you.
I mean, it wasn't ONLY Logan, as the receivers struggled badly with consistency as well. In that Alabama game, I beg to differ. That was one of the more dominant performances from an OL I've seen in a while, and they were doing it against the defending champs. They were routinely getting push off the LOS and were opening up holes for Trey to run through all game. Had we not had an unfathomable number of drops (I'll spread the blame equally among the WRs and QB for that) we very well could have and should have won that game.
My belief is that DC's saw the lack of consistency from both Logan with his errant passes and our WRs with their high number of drops, and figured its better to dare our offense to pass the ball and sell out to stop the run/pressure the QB. If I were a DC, I would have instructed my LBs to pin their ears back every play, and would have sent a corner on the blitz most plays. We never showed we could beat that. Consistently, our screen passes sailed high and wide or burned in the dirt at the receivers feet, and when it did hit them in the hands, about half the time they dropped it anyway.
I just have a strong feeling that with more consistency behind center, we're going to see things open up this year.
I don't understand how you can blame drops on a QB......? These are D-I athletes, if you are a receiver and the ball hits your hands, you are supposed to catch it. All that crap about Logan needing to put more touch on the ball and lighten up his throws is complete BS. You are a WR at a major college football program. You can't complain about a QB "throwing it too hard". Catch the damn ball
lol I've heard this argument so much and I laugh every time I hear it. You sure as hell can blame a QB for drops when you're putting passes out there that are causing the receiver to alter their route to make a play on the ball. Logan did that A LOT, whether it was a pass behind the receiver, at his feet, or just over his head. Just because a pass can hit a guy in the hands does not make it 100% catch-able. Of course, coaches will say that, to encourage a WR to keep striving to play better, but inconsistency from the passer can and will lead to drops from the receivers. Deliver the damn pass.
a lot depends on what exactly constitutes a drop, I think the general rule is that it is a pass that should be caught with ordinary effort... now that shouldn't include the overthrown passes that the receiver made an extraordinary effort to get a hand on but couldn't pull in, those are definitely on the QB
I think you did not play WR in football before
Yes, any WR and QB coach will tell you that it's the receivers job to catch the ball. If you can touch it, you can catch it. That's the first rule of receiving. I was a WR and that's how I was coached, that's how coaches I have known and spoken to coach including high school, college and pro. It may be motivational and you may laugh when you hear it but it's not wrong.
Yes, the QB is going to challenge you but his job is to get the ball to you any way he can so you can make a play. Not gift wrap it into your breadbox every time. You as a WR must catch it, because receiving the ball thrown at you is your job. I and every WR I know all have blamed missed or dropped balls on QB's but in the end we're the ones making the play on the ball. So make the dam catch.
Thank you. Same thing with me. If my QB threw a pass anywhere in my general direction and I managed to touch it but not haul it in, it was me getting chewed out, not the quarterback
I don't recall Boykin or Boale or even Davis having those issues.
I think you meant "Bavis".
Davis actually had stone hands early in his career
ironic because his feet looked like they were made of stone when he was blocking late in his career
I agree with you in a lot of cases, but there are some in which I can absolutely blame a QB for a drop even if it hits a WR's hands.
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=9916340
This one is an example. Receiver is wide open just a few yards down the field, but the pass is a little off target and coming in really fast. A great receiver would maybe catch it, but I'm putting the blame on both parties on this one.
Yep... if you're consistently hitting your guys in the numbers, and they're just dropping them, chew the receivers a new one... But if you're putting the ball out there, where they have to fully extend to make the catch, you're doing them absolutely no favors whatsoever, and you should be thankful if and when they come down with the ball, and not blame them if they don't. This is a different conversation if Logan consistently hit guys in the numbers, or consistently effectively led them on their routes, but the fact of the matter is... he didn't.
Perhaps the most frustrating thing about LT3 was his ability to throw a 60-yard pass and drop it right on the money, coupled with his inability to throw a five-yard crossing route with accuracy and a little touch. He was like a skier who has no problem on the black diamond slopes, but consistently fell down on the bunny slope.
Man y'all are some hard people to please. Logan Thomas is the career leader in many offensive categories... all while being surrounded by less offensive talent than Randle, Marcus, Tyrod or even Glennon. Is Thomas the greatest college football quarterback of all time? Of course not. He had his flaws just like any college player does. Lets not forget though, he was good enough to get drafted in the NFL... something that can't be said about many of his teammates.
The tendency of some Hokies to place the blame of poor offensive output on Logan is misguided, and blaming him for the lack of a running game in particular is just incorrect.
Speaking of Logan, can we take a minute to appreciate how good that throw was to Cline in the video in the article. That was a perfectly thrown ball that was made while a defender was taking his legs out from under him. Seriously, how many other QB's complete that pass?
The fact that they couldn't catch greatly affects him mentally. When he knows that he has people who will consistently catch the ball, it relieves a lot of the pressure and he is able to focus more on making the pass, not whether or not they will be able to catch it. LT is not the only person this is the problem with. Look at Tom Brady last year. He had new unproven receivers and no Gronk. It was his lowest completion percentage and passer rating since 2003. All because his receivers couldn't catch the ball. If you don't think that that plays into it, look at LT in 2011, he had people who could catch and he was great. Or look what he did with the Cardinals the other night. He knows his receivers out there will catch the ball that he throws and he was almost perfect. 11-12 i think for 113 yards and a TD. If you haven't watched it, his passes were PERFECT. Balls being thrown on a rope right to the numbers of the receivers. Yes he was inconsistent. No one will deny that. But it all comes back to the lack of receivers who can catch, the lack of a running game, and him being hit 20+ times a game from called runs, sacks, and qb hits.
The exhaustion caused by constant hits all day will tire and make throws tougher.
I think you have a great point. I am a Logan Thomas jersey owner but as I look through old games he is not a great quarterback...he is good but never consistent and you all season I just never felt like he was a game changer on a consistent basis. Tyrod, Vick(s), and even Randall had that quality about them. You trusted them.
Okay but look at the talent that surrounded those QB's. When Logan was given the exact same weapons in 2011 that Tyrod had in 2010, he broke Tyrod's record for total offense in a single season. And that was his first year as a starting quarterback......... He led us to an 11-3 record while only losing to two teams; Clemson twice and Michigan. That Sugar Bowl can go either way. IMO, Danny caught it. Plus you can look at the number of games where he put the entire team on his back and won by himself; Miami 11' he had FIVE TD's, GT 11', and then pretty much every game we have won the past two seasons was simply Logan carrying our team (except Miami last year). Say what you want about LT but the fact of the matter is, when he had a running game and people who could catch passes, he was a fantastic QB
Somewhat OT, you're not the only one rocking the LT3 jersey (courtesy of the Daily Mail)....
Does this guy read TKP? Dressing like that he must, right?
So, without further ado, come forward silent rogue and receive thy prize.
Brittany is probably taking him to Vegas, so he'd just throw his prize down a slot machine.
If he can jump, that's a red zone passing TD every time.
Imagine a 250lb center blocking out for a rebound and that's what you have here, except in the end zone, and the other team doesn't have a center.
Cline being a former basketball player, I think he knows a thing or two about jumping.
Hodges being 14 feet tall, he doesn't have to.
Malleck will just be wide open all the time.
Depends on the linebacker. If it's Ronny Vandyke? Then, no. Ohio State will have a few RVD's.
If it's Hall or Adibi? Also, probably a no. Both were excellent cover guys...although Hall was probably better reading in zones.
Case in point:
While the Exumtar steals the show here by making the pick and promptly running it back 35 yards, you can see that Alonzo Tweedy has a better chance of catching the football here than the receiver.
Full Disclosure: I didn't notice this myself, French pointed it out in his post game review. It's near the bottom, starting with the paragraph before the "VT Double X Defense" diagram
Is it confirmed that Loeffler is going to utilize 3 TE sets, multi TE sets, etc? Or are we just speculating/hoping they do this?
Kline pretty much said it outright in Marcolini's interview
Can't give you a specific source but Loeffler has definitely said yes to being asked about the 3 TE set. Or said yes as much as Loeffler ever does.
Bitter asked him earlier this summer if he was working on implementing 3 TE sets into the playbook this year (Link here) and he responded with:
Oh gawd please stop there I need to fix myself!
I expect Bucky to flex out wide in some of those 3 TE sets as well. Especially in the redzone to give a size mismatch against a safety or CB
Its really not reaching to say that we could have one of the prototypical new NFL TEs in Bucky. Big strong and able to move and catch like a Wide Receiver. You can see the impact that those guys have in the NFL against elite defenses and elite linebackers.
Thinking about these match ups gets me all sorts of excited.

If TEs create all these mismatches, why not just play 2 or 3 every play?
Like Stanford did to us?
...and now I'm sad
Most teams don't have 2-3 GOOD ones. They're actually kinda hard to find. This was the hidden genius in our TE heavy recruiting tactics over the years...
Cut to Steiney nodding in approval
Insert joke about converting TEs to QBs here.
I think you mean QBs to TEs.
What gets me excited is the Kline/Malleck/Hodges/Rogers/Williams/Durkin goal line sets for multiple seasons #SmashCity
I think we should put Maddy and Dadi in on goal line sets.
I know they were working on the Dadi fade route last year. I wouldn't mind seeing him catch a TD pass, I'm sure the celebration would be crazy enough to be flag worthy.
The potential of this offense is very exciting. I have not been this excited about the offense sense we had Tyrod, Wilson, Evans, and Williams. If the running game can improve just a bit with the potential the passing game has, I can easily see 10 wins or more this season.
Great piece. One of the big reasons that I didn't feel Mark Leal was capable of being the starting QB is that he repeatedly missed these match up advantages against UCLA in the Sun Bowl. Several times, Loeffler got Byrn and Caleb one on one with Jordan Zumwalt out wide, and he never even looked in the direction.
Also, Mason does a great job of expressing the exact reason why I don't want Bucky Hodges playing wildcat QB. The guy has the potential to be a unique weapon on the outside. When you have power backs like Williams and McKenzie and a QB who is uniquely talented as a power runner like Durkin, why take a unique big play threat like Hodges and grind him up for 2 yard gains? I have said all along, I don't like it, and you will hear the volume and pitch of my voice rise if we see it.
100% agree. I LOVE the idea of using Durkin in that package sparingly, just so he can get some experience (plus I think he has the potential to be a real threat on the ground). If that's not going to work this season though, then lets focus on getting Bucky reps at tight end and out wide. It'll be better for his development long term, and I don't think there's much of a chance for the Wild Turkey to produce explosive plays at a much higher clip than a normal package would.
^^^This. Wild turkey will only be moderately successful without the threat of a pass. However, having a QB that's 75% run, 25% pass (like Durkin) seemed to work really well with Duke and Connette. That's the where the success lies, having the ability to keep defenses honest, but utilizing a different skillset to exploit weaknesses in the defense.