
The first game of the 2014 season is over and Hokie Nation has a lot to be excited about. Frank Beamer's squad is undefeated and showed that there's reason to be cautiously optimistic about next week's chances against Ohio State. The defense looked rusty in spots, but did show a knack for creating negative plays and forcing turnovers. Virginia Tech was able to rely on their talent advantage and smart quarterback play to put up almost 500 yards of offense, looking downright competent at times. I almost feel foolish getting too hyped up about a win over an FCS opponent, but it's hard to watch that game and feel like things aren't heading in the right direction for Frank Beamer and company.
Simplified Game Plans
It became obvious early in the game on Saturday that William and Mary was going to focus on keeping everything in front of them defensively. They didn't want to give the Hokie offense anything cheap down the field, and against a more talented Tech team, that was probably the correct strategy. W&M head coach Jimmye Laycock wanted to force the Hokies into extended drives to increase the likelihood that his defense could make a big play or give more opportunities to the offense to shoot itself in the foot. Tech's offense was so inconsistent last year that William and Mary figured eventually they'd get the Hokies into a third-and-long situation or get lucky with a turnover.

On a third-and-short play, William and Mary uses a Cover-2 scheme. They kept two safeties deep to prevent anything from getting over their head and relied on their linebackers to help with any routes that broke underneath their umbrella. It's a very conservative play call. William and Mary isn't bringing any additional pass rushers or pressing the receivers at the line of scrimmage. They know that if Virginia Tech's wide receivers and quarterback are on the same page, and if the offensive line wins their blocking assignments, someone will get open. William and Mary is banking on the fact that no offense plays perfectly 100% of the time.
Loeffler loves playing against Cover-2 schemes because it invites throwing the ball short to his athletic tight ends.
Bucky Hodges runs a corner route, which forces the field outside linebacker and the middle linebacker to get depth. Malleck is aligned to the inside and threatens the boundary outside linebacker with a crossing route before planting his foot and turning away. He has the size and leverage advantage against the linebacker for what should be an easy first down catch.
William and Mary's "wait and see" approach paid off on this play. The receivers ran the right routes, the right man got open, the offensive line made their blocks, Brewer recognized the coverage and found his man. Tech just got unlucky because of a tipped ball. Despite this turnover, I couldn't help but feel encouraged by the state of the offense. It was clearly more capable of taking what the defense gave it than last year's team.

On this second-and-long play, William and Mary is once again in its two deep shell. Using three receivers at the top of the formation, Tech has a distinct numbers advantage once the Tribe only places two defenders to match up. Right after the snap the safeties get depth and Brewer finds Byrn for an easy six yard gain.
Time and time again the Tribe conceded the short throw towards the sideline, and Brewer had a field day completing those short passes to a multitude of different receivers. Loeffler has a firm grasp on west coast passing concepts and I think he is perfectly content throwing underneath all game long. He has said time and again that his primary goal as a playcaller is to protect the football. If he doesn't need to throw the ball down the field, he's not going to do it. By taking those high percentage throws, Loeffler stays ahead of the chains, avoids sacks and interceptions, and forces the defense to make tackles against his skill players in space.
Even with Kalvin Cline out, the tight ends were a huge factor in the passing game. As was hinted at during training camp, Bucky Hodges and Ryan Malleck spent much of their day spread away from the tackle box. This forced William and Mary's linebackers into space and allowed Hodges and Malleck to use their size and speed advantages in the passing game. Regardless of who the competition is, I expect these two will be matchup nightmares the rest of the season.
The Quick Screen and the Zone Read
One thing that the offense did really well on Saturday was use quick swing screens to slot receivers to open up the inside zone and the zone read play from shotgun. Early in Virginia Tech's first drive it's apparent that William and Mary's outside linebackers aren't paying enough attention to the two tight ends in the slot.

Right off the bat, the first thing that we notice is how much of a pain it must be for defensive coordinators to face Bucky Hodges and Ryan Malleck. With two wide receivers, two tight ends and a running back in the game the defense has to keep three linebackers in. When Loeffler lines those two athletic tight ends out in the slot, William and Mary has to flex their linebackers outside if they want to keep their two safeties deep. From here, the outside linebackers have the dual responsibility of covering Hodges and Malleck and providing run support.

By trying to prevent the long ball and use their OLB's in run support, the defense has lost all leverage on the slot receivers. If the WR's can seal the corners to the inside, the tight ends can make the catch and pick up good yardage before a safety or inside pursuit can make a tackle.
That is a very high percentage throw for some very easy yardage. Tech would go on to score that drive and on their next possession Loeffler goes right back to the well.
The impact it has on the defense can be seen immediately. The very next play the outside linebackers take a wider alignment to help keep their leverage on the screen play, which leaves them out of position to help on an inside run. With every box defender accounted for—five offensive linemen vs. four defensive linemen and a middle linebacker—Brewer hands the ball off to Marshawn. Williams picks up what would have been a first down if not for a (questionable) holding penalty.
These two plays (one screen, one run) may look different because two different players ended up with the ball, but it's likely that the play call for both was identical. This is called a "packaged play", something that is all the rage in football nowadays. The quarterback has multiple options before he snaps the ball (hand it off or throw the screen) and it's up to him to make the correct decision based on the alignment of the defense. Usually, the only player that knows what's going to happen is the quarterback.
Take a look at both of those plays again, every player other than the quarterback does the same thing. The wide receivers either block or run a screen route, the running back meshes with the quarterback for a handoff, the offensive line zone blocks to their right. It's the same exact play. If the outside linebackers line up in the box, throw the screen. If they take away the screen, hand the ball off. To call this package, Loeffler must have faith in his quarterback to see the field correctly and to know what to do with the ball based on what the defense is giving him. It also helps to have multiple skill players who can hurt the defense when given the chance.
We saw this same backfield action in the second half and the results were the same. By the then, it was obvious that Laycock wasn't interested in seeing those tight ends or wide receivers catch wide open screen passes and instead rolled the dice on his front stopping the run. That gamble didn't pay off for him.
William and Mary is making it quite easy for Tech here. There is no linebacker in between Marshawn and the first down line. All three linebackers start the play by moving away from the ballcarrier and have to stop and redirect.

It's no surprise that Williams picks up the first down. He's a powerful back that can be really dangerous when he gets going downhill. Shai Mckenzie showed he's just as (if not more) dangerous when given a seam. Later in the drive, Shai comes on to give Marshawn a spell and comes close to making something special happen.
If you're sick of watching this play by now, imagine how sick the Tribe defenders were playing against it. Shai gets the handoff with, again, no linebackers in sight. The front-five for Tech manhandles the defensive line and Shai takes off. The OLB to the field comes up to make the tackle in the hole and Shai nearly makes him miss. The backer gets juked but manages to grab a hold of just enough leg to trip him up. Otherwise, McKenzie would have at least picked up the first.
Keeping It Simple
Scot Loeffler loves playing his cards close to his chest.With a big matchup against Ohio State coming up, he didn't show anymore of his playbook than he had to. Using these packaged plays gives the illusion of variety, but there's not a lot of complicated things going on out there. The formations, the personnel groupings, the offensive concepts... he made sure that everything he put on film for Urban Meyer's staff was as basic as it gets. If William and Mary had come out and played really aggressively on defense, maybe the Hokies would have had to resorted to some different things. Instead, they were able to run vanilla plays and protect the ball while picking up the easy yardage that comes from giving the ball to athletes in space.
There's no way to watch that game against William and Mary and not feel at least slightly optimistic. The defense held W&M to less than 200 total yards, the offense almost had 500 yards, and the game was never in doubt after Chase Williams destroyed the Tribe QB and forced a fumble. I feel confident that the offense will be better than last year's, but I'm not sure yet just how good it will be. There's no doubt that there are more players in maroon and orange capable of hurting an opponent, but this wasn't a great game to show what the offense is truly made of.
Last week I wrote about the efficiency and explosiveness of an offense and how the two are related. On Saturday we saw an opponent try to take away the offense's ability to be explosive and force Tech to efficiently move the ball and stay ahead of the chains. Loeffler's unit passed that test with flying colors, but what about when an opponent decides to get aggressive? How will the offense react when a team, like Ohio State for example, decides to play tight to the line of scrimmage and take away the offense's operating room? Are the newcomers who looked so good when given room to operate (Bucky, Malleck, Shai, Marshawn, Ford, Phillips) capable of making those difficult plays down the field? Or will the offense struggle to force defenses to back off like it did last year? The game on Saturday didn't provide answers to those questions but one thing is for certain, we won't have to wait long to find out.

Comments
Great write up. The defense stayed fresh because the Offense, for the most part, controlled the tempo.
I thought the LB's played great-Chase Williams looked very good out there.
Also, I thought the pass protection was excellent.
The O-line blocking on the run plays was questionable, to my view, at first-especially the tackles not sealing the back-side. But once the 2nd half began, the holes got a lot bigger. I don't know if that was due to adjustments, or the Tribe wearing down, or both.
Great write up. Trying to picture the game through all of these write-ups and this one was very helpful. Did everyone else pick up on the same set of plays being run over and over again just with twists? Again thanks for the write up.
I certainly did. My tailgating activities had me feeling annoyed through the first half, but then I reminded myself that we're not giving anOSU anymore help than we have to in order to beat W&M. While we all want big, explosive plays to watch from the sidelines (or on TV), it's refreshing and exciting to see the breakdowns above and realize that we had a consistent attack that immediately reacted to anything W&M tried to stop us with.
I think Loeffler kept it pretty vanilla partially because of OhState, and mostly because we didn't NEED to spice it up to win. It was more about letting the new players get the feel of the offensive fundamentals before adding more to their plates. I thought he had a sound strategy and that we got to see more of Loeffler out there. Last year was all about Logan, so it was hard to tell exactly what kind of offense Loeffler WOULD like to run. Now we can tell, and it seems to be solid. As much as we can tell against an FCS team, of course.
I noticed it even more with a different formation, in which the WR came in motion -- sometimes it was a jet sweep, sometimes it was a run up the middle, and sometimes it was a pass into the flat. Same exact play, three different outcomes, and Lefty always one step ahead of the Tribe defense.
Fantastic job 3&31!.
Looking forward to French's, but from what I see, the O-line definitely seemed to pass the smell test, compared to previous years where their were a bunch of people blocking air against even the cream-puffs.
This was a legitimately good D-line, albeit maybe not as deep as Div 1A.
Outside of the tip-passes, they seemed to do well. Holes were there, RBs were hitting them and winning a lot of one on one battles. (Or in Juice's case that one run, 1 on 4).
Seeing that tip pass for an INT gives me hope as well.
One: that was lucky timing as much as anything for the Defender who happened to be disengaged at exactly the moment of the pass.
Two: this is a relatively easy fix for our linemen.
Be very interested to see French break all this down.
And I am plumb stoked to see this offense play against OSU.
Brewer just looks very comfortable out there making the reads and delivering the ball with touch and in stride. Those screens live or die in no small part in the receiver catching the ball while on the move, rather than having to change direction to make a tough catch.
One last thing... that 6 yard completion to Byrn. I know, it's sandlot, but I see the potential for a trick play -- if Byrn had flipped that ball to Knowles, he'd have had one defender to beat with a blocker already engaged on him.
I too, sir, am plumb stoked. Great writeup 3rd and 31!
The ol' hook and ladder! Let's dial it up!
i never played organized ball, but i did play a few million hours in the neighborhood...and i saw exactly what you saw
Agree with Shoog on the rest factor. I look at this as it was the first game and it gave a lot of guys the opportunity of getting some jitters out before a bugger game. The offense can be in the middle (considering it was ranked towards the bottom the last few years) in order for us to have a good season.
Then when the jelling and confidence get in line, the rest will follow. I definitely got excited thinking about 2015 and 2016 for sure.
It will be interesting to see how our o-line performs against oSU's highly touted defensive line. I believe that is the key to the game.
Look at the box score for Navy @ anOSU (http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=400547982. Navy put up 370 yards on the ground against the Buckeyes. While it appears Navy doesn't know what a passing game is, I am hoping that Loeffler can run more of a balanced attack that will be more successful at scoring than Navy was.
True but they were also scheming against the triple option and not a normal offense.
Yeah, that's something that's always irked me a little bit, like whenever Mama G would get on and say that GT was awesome because they had the #2-ranked rushing offense or whatever it was. Well shoot, if all you do is run, you'd better be good at it.
Well, do you disagree that Navy's rushing offense is good? It may not be the best in the nation, but they're good at what they do. I mean, average offenses don't put up 370 rushing yards.
Exactly -- it is not unusual at all to see a triple option team lose, and even lose big, but still put up close to 400 yards on the ground.
Just a completely different scheme to plan for, and hard to draw conclusions from the box score on how well their defense will translate to what we are doing.
I haven't watched any of the OSU highlights, but it sounds as though their offense had some serious hiccups.
370 yards on the ground is just shocking.
These D lineman all have first class tickets punched to the NFL, I thought.
On a side note, I wonder if we can neutralize the crowd with some early success.
I bet there are more than a few spoiled fans there that are getting antsy.
I watched a fair amount of the Navy game and OSU struggled with misdirection and keeping their assignments when Navy made the correct reads. The triple option can definitely tie up the minds and feet of talented d-lineman, so it's hard to say how things will translate for our matchup. I do hope Loeffler uses some early misdirection and gets the OSU d-line thinking and reacting rather than playing aggressive.
Regardless I think it's good for us that Navy forced OSU to prepare for a completely different offensive system. Hopefully they will still be feeling some effects from that matchup.
The thing about the triple option just like our O system, can you get the yards when critical? OSU stopped them when critical. Can they stop the juice? Man I hope not but I will be in Columbus with my wife screaming our heads off!
OSU's DL actually played pretty well within their scheme. Their LB's and safeties, however, really struggled to identify their assignments, keep themselves clean (get off blocks), and make tackles. That's the main weakness of this defense as I see it.
Interestingly, OSU often chose to have their DEs take the QB instead of the dive and LBs struggled to make plays behind the DTs, which resulted in them getting gashed up the middle on occasion. Something to keep an eye on in light of Loeffler's scheme this Saturday, which forced the W&M LB's to go wide(r) to cover our athletic TE's (credit to 3rdand31 for pointing that out)
On another note, just rewatched some tape of the 2013 GT game. That defense was so phenomenal at keeping themselves clean and Derrick Hopkins was such a monster.
GT with Megatron or Bebe Thomas could give even Coach Foster fits. GT without that star WR talent ... not so much.
I'm really digging our offense finishing drives especially WR blocks downfield and Marshawn and the lineman following the play. These guys definitely have the right mindset.
"Scot Loeffler loves playing his cards close to his chest.With a big matchup against Ohio State coming up, he didn't show anymore of his playbook than he had to."
Why Kate, you're not wearing a bustle.
How lewd...
It really scares me that I understand most of what you and French post now. I was happy with the results, let's keep the momentum rolling against *!
There was another play they seemed to run multiple times on offense - the one with the receiver coming across right as the ball was snapped. Was this another "packaged play"?
Liked what I saw out of the passing attack (especially the 20 yard in route Cam Phillips had; which brought a tear to my eye seeing a natural wr on the field) There's definitely a different buzz around this group. I still remain cautiously optimistic but the ship is pointed in the right direction. Big test Saturday night.
I was so excited with the offense, love seeing how spread out things are on these plays.
Quick Question - was hoping to see a couple of plays from the wildcat with Bucky or Durkin....do you think we are just saving that for next week?
Chris Durkin should be excited.....about the emphasis on the TE position. He's going to look great in the slot catching those screens and running over CBs.
I... Wait ... Yup. Something was done here.
Looks like on the tip&INT play, Brewer also had Ford open between the linebacker and corner. At least, that's where I would've put the ball in NCAA 14.
Dude. You do such an excellent job of simplifying the tactical and explaining how it builds together into the larger strategy. This is wonderful, just like how you explained how Loeffler established one thing to allow Edmunds to break that huge run against Bama. Thank you. I can't wait until next week when you break down Loeffler's strategy for beating anOSU.
Inshallah!!
I see what you did there.
So are you saying that 3&31's breakdown will come in between a week and a year or four after the game... I prefer it much more timely. :)
Another reaction from this post. The picture at the very top of Ford's celebration gave me chills. Think about being in his shoes right there. First drive of your first ever college game and you score. Then you get the enormous roar from the Lane crowd and everybody is holding their hands up just like you are. Chills.
Great article 3rdand31. Hopefully this year we won't be put in many 3rd and 31 downs situations. I agree this was as plain vanilla as you can get but the nice thing was it was execution that allowed not to dip into the bag of tricks. Yes, it was W&M, but in the past we struggled offensively against everyone, no matter who they were.
OSU will be a challenge, but quite frankly they did not look that impressive against Navy and their QB is very young, unlike our new QB. I like the new direction we are heading. 1 - 0, and the train is starting to roll out of the station.
Things are definitely looking up for the Hokies
Question for Mason or any of the other gurus about the tipped pass shown above. It looks to me like this was an O-line communication problem. Seems like Teller and Farris are trying to pass the DT off to one another, with Teller moving out to backup Gibson against the DE and Farris trying to help Pfaff. I'm assuming that's just a newbie mistake kind of thing, each guy thinking the other was handling the DT? As soon as they both release, the DT gets his hands in the air (heads up play by him, so kudos) and we saw what happened.
Everyone seems worried about Brewer's height regarding the tipped ball, but it seems to me that if either Farris or Teller keeps his hands on the DT and drives him back, the ball doesn't get tipped, so I was more worried about O-line on that play.
This is true-I went back and rewatched.
The tip/interception, IMHO was more due to Teller letting off his block and the DT being able to get up rather than Brewer making a poor choice.
Brewer had the receiver open, and put it up, but I think if Teller had kept the defensive player engaged, it wouldn't have been a tip.
This is what I saw as well. Teller will learn, get better. Brewer will learn as well and move into passing lanes more. Not worried, just glad it didn't happen in a critical game at a critical time.
ZOMG that Shai shoulder-dip juke!!! That's what French mentioned about in his recruit preview!
But did he fully dip?
Maybe not but he used his dork magic
I thought that's what it meant!
I don't get it. If you look at the video, you clearly see that his shoulder is fully dipped...
Prepare yourself for more laughing than you probably should. Please read my new favorite thread of all time. Be sure to take in every picture as it truly adds to the whole experience... and your welcome.
Good looking out!
Great article as always sir!
I think this is the kind of offense that Beamer wants to run since he hired Loeffler. He's always admired the kind of up-tempo spread that Chad Morris runs at Clemson, and now we have the QB to do it. It takes good decision-making skills to execute this scheme and it's not something we could have done last season. Next week should be fun.
Here's an awesome article from Grantland about packaged plays and their ubiquity in college football and their arrival in the NFL.
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/packaged-plays-and-the-newest-form-of-...
Thanks, great article. Coupled with the more stringent DB rules giving WRs cleaner releases, the offensive movement marches forward in both leagues.
Your article just got referenced on JD Howell Show (right now, 5pm Monday)
Anyone got audio??
Maybe the website will have a podcast/archive. Was discussing Bucky getting isolated.
Awesome, I'll check it out when I get home. I appreciate the heads up.
Starts about 2:45
http://espnblacksburg.com/local-shows/the-jd-howell-show/podcasts/1724-s...
Excellent tagline sir
It seemed like on a lot of 3rd downs/other passing downs Sam Rogers was the only RB/FB in the backfield. Maybe it was just a few instances, but I wonder if it is because they don't trust the freshman as much in pass protection yet?
I think pass pro is one of the things Trey was best at last year and could be something we miss while he is still recovering. Also something that may be very important against OSU's D-line this Saturday.
You may have noticed we didn't give up a sack on Saturday. I don't wanna meet the man that wants to go one-on-one with Rogers.
Yep, pass protection was very good on Saturday, o-line and backs included.
But I agree - can you imagine being a LB thinking you have a free shot on a blitz, only to realize Sam Rogers stands between you and Brewer? Poor LB.
Sam Rogers is probably the best 3rd down back on the team. Probably the best pass blocker and probably has the best hands of all the RBs. He probably doesn't run the draw as well as Shai or Trey, so the team is taking a hit there. Otherwise, he's a consummate 3rd down back.
You know what? This came up in my head last night. Forgive my lack of football understanding, but what defines a good "third down back"?
I've heard this phrase for, probably, decades of watching football and I've never really know. I thought about it last night because I noticed an interesting pattern in personnel in the Miami game. First and second down, Duke Johnson was on the field. Then, third down came around, and he was taken off.
Wait, what? The best player on your team is being taken out, seemingly, every third down? Is this because he isn't a 'third down back'? Is it because someone else is a better 'third down back'? (Hint: They aren't. Johnson is your best player.)
Kindly?
Generally it's your best pass blocker and a guy who has dependable hands to catch screens or other passes out of the backfield. We're not gonna use a straight-ahead run on 3rd and 7 anyways, so why have a straight-ahead runner like Williams in there?
Think what we can do with a 3 TE 1 WR 1 RB set. You've got a heavy defense in and they set Kline n Bucky out wide with Malleck in the slot n Shai staring at you from the backfield.
The short passes play into Brewer's hand, and the program philosophy, eating up the clock
And you feed them a rotation of Isaiah, demetri, and cam going deep from that WR spot to tire the DBs out. Boy oh boy, we are going to snowball late in games with the hurry up tempo and the favorable athletic matchups.
CAM PHILLIPS ROUTE RUNNING DOT COM
00:26:13–00:26:20
I can't express, after years of "banana routes" by our talented receivers (see Orange Bowl vs Kansas, Marcus Vick vs Miami in 2005 etc), I get really fired up to see a crisp, sharp dig route on a "Levels" crossing play.
YES YES YES!
Most impressive route of the day, so smooth sitting down at the top of that route the db didn't stand a chance.
I missed in the game just how close that was to going all the way. The W&M safety screwed up pretty badly there, and just barely got enough of Cam.
You weren't sitting in my row, then, because everyone near me got tired of hearing me yell, "if that guy hadn't pulled his shoe off, Phillips would still be running!"
Were you in the vacinity of section 15 because I heard somebody shout that and laughed because I was thinking it.
Unfortunately, I'm stuck watching from home. So I got to see what ESPN wanted me to see.
We were in 18, but I was shouting it pretty loudly.
Where in 18? I was screaming in row SS.
GGG. When I saw that it was three letters I was afraid it would be too high to see well, but actually they were not bad seats ... as long as the action was on the south end of the field.
I might even give that one a "DOT EDU" because it was straight-up educational. That's how you do it, guys!
Guys our WRs actually BLOCK!!!!! Isaiah Ford had some great sealing blocks!
i know this isnt relevant to this thread but at the 38:20 min mark on the above review of the game watch dadi and see what he does and then tell me your not absolutly CRAZY about his skill set! thats a D END!!! A DANG D END MAN!!!!! crazy!!!
Where he's covering the TE? Yeah that's pure speed.
Out of curiosity, and having not read stuff for a couple days I can't really remember if it mentioned it at all, I can't recall if we had any three and outs. I know we had a good 3rd down conversion rate, but I don't recall getting the ball and not being able to even get a first down in a single possession.
If we did, we certainly didn't have many. Something that happened quite frequently the last couple of years, even against not so good teams.
I think that the possession where we got a first down on a running into the kicker penalty might have otherwise been a 3 and out, but I'm not sure.
Edit: I looked through the play by play on ESPN. There was a 3 and out at the start of the second quarter (JC Coleman 2 yard run, I. Ford 3 yard run, J. Caleb 3 yard reception); the running into the kicker penalty later in the second quarter was indeed following what would have been a 3 and out; the JC Coleman fumble in the third quarter was on the second play of the drive; and there was a 3 and out on the drive that started at the end of the 3rd quarter and finished early in the 4th quarter (M. Williams runs of 4, 3, and 2 yards). So there were two actual 3 and outs in the game, another 3 and out was avoided due to a penalty by W&M on 4th down, and the JC Coleman Fumble was on the second play of the drive was a similarly short possession by the offense. Our 4th down QB was only on the field 4 times and had punts of 47, 50 (not on stats because of running into kicker penalty), 44 (recovered by tech after being touched by W&M player), and 48 (touchback) yards.
Dude i learn so much from your posts. Seriously thank you for the hard work you put into this stuff. I knew i liked what i was seeing during the game and felt optimistic about our young players, but now i actually know why!!
Question: The tipped passes at the line concern me (of course). Is that a line issue, a QB issue, or just luck/good work on the D-Line??
Little bit of all three. Ultimately, Brewer threw that pass so he's responsible for what happens after it leaves his hands though. He's got to find the passing lane.