
The Hokies had every chance to put this game away, and they didn't.
The Hokies had a chance to grind out the clock with the running game, and they didn't.
The Hokies had a chance to stonewall Georgia Tech on a 4th-and-15, with a full-throated Lane Stadium behind them, and they didn't.
"We're not doing the things that we know how to do, have done, should do," head coach Frank Beamer said. "We need to take another look at this one and see how many times we could've won this football game and we just needed one more play."
The loss against ECU surely stung, but as an out of conference game against a gifted quarterback, there were ways to rationalize away what happened as just a minor bump in the road.
But this defeat at the hands of a Yellow Jackets team that often looked wildly inferior to the Hokies, particularly on defense, could be indicative of some major problems with this team.
"If you guys are wanting me to say we slept on a team, we haven't slept on a team," said wide receiver Willie Byrn. "We knew what ECU was capable of and we watched them do what they were capable of. We knew what Georgia Tech was capable of and we watched the same exact thing."
Coming into the fourth quarter, the Hokies were in control of the game. They had a slim six point lead, but the offense was moving the ball with some regularity and the defense had only allowed 42 measly yards through the air.
But obscured by the lead is the fact that the Hokies had chances to truly put the game away and squandered them.
"The way that game went, you could point fingers all day long," Beamer said. "None of us did it perfect today."
With the exception of Marshawn Williams' rushing touchdown in the second quarter, the red zone offense struggled once again. The team twice had to settle for field goals inside GT's 25-yard line.
"Anytime you turn the ball over and don't execute in the red (zone), things won't go your way," said offensive coordinator Scot Loeffler. "We've been executing in the red, we just didn't today."
The team also stalled on several drives because of a confusing barrage of illegal substitution penalties on offense. They had four in this game alone after suffering a few on defense last week.
"As you go on in the season, you get more and more personnel (groupings), coaches figure out who they want in which situations, so every single person has to do a better job," Byrn said. "It's going to be harped on during practice and it needs to be. That's something we definitely did take for granted in practice."
The team finished with a total of 79 lost yards in penalties on the day, but despite all that, the lead seemed pretty secure heading into the final quarter.
But the Hokies truly started to give away the game when quarterback Michael Brewer threw a backbreaking interception that was returned for a touchdown to give the Yellow Jackets a late 17-16 lead.
"It was a middle screen and I just had people in my face, tried to throw over them, and it just sailed on me a little bit," Brewer said.
Even still, the football gods smiled on the Hokies. Williams fumbled the ball on GT's 21 yard line, and after it squirted out of a pile of players, Brewer was able to scoop it up and score to revive VT's chances. After a successful two point conversion, the Hokies seemed to have a comfortable 24-17 lead with eight minutes left.
The defense forced a quick three and out, but the offense couldn't run any clock with a three and out of their own.
That's largely due to the running game's continued incompetence. The team finished with just 127 yards on the ground, and even after a few promising bursts from Shai McKenzie, the Hokies couldn't grind out the remaining time when they needed to the most.
"We started running the ball better in the second half, we just didn't finish," Loeffler said. "We had ample opportunities to finish."
On GT's next drive, the game looked over. The defense had forced the Yellow Jackets into a seemingly impossible 4th-and-15, and when Paul Johnson called a timeout, "Enter Sandman" started blaring.
The crowd went wild, evocative of the team's big win over Miami two years ago, but the result was very different than what the Hokies were expecting.
Justin Thomas completed a 19-yard post to receiver DeAndre Smelter to convert in an improbable situation. Then two plays later cornerback Donovan Riley got burned on a double move to Smelter, who waltzed into the end zone for a 31-yard score to tie the game at 24.
"Little things make a big difference, especially down the stretch," said cornerback Kendall Fuller. "We've just got to come out and make plays and execute."
Even after that deflating moment, the Hokies certainly had a chance. Armed with all three time outs, it hardly seemed like a tall order for Brewer to march the offense down for a winning field goal.
But on the very first play of the drive, Brewer got fooled by cornerback D.J. White, tossing an easy interception to give the Jackets the ball at the Hokies' 40-yard line.
"The corner came and pressed up on the hitch route and bailed late. He baited me to throw over the top of him and he made a good play," Brewer said.
Then it was just a simple matter of them bleeding the clock out, kicking a chip shot field goal, and walking out of Lane with a crushing blow to Tech's ACC Coastal chances.
Much of the blame will be laid at the feet of Brewer, who threw three interceptions in the game to give him eight on the season through just four games.
"You take three throws away and I had a good day," Brewer said. "But I made those three throws, and it cost us the football game and we've got to move forward."
Now, people are wondering if the QB competition that lasted the whole summer and spring is suddenly back open.
"I think we'll look at everything right now," Beamer said. "You learn from your mistakes. We're plenty capable."
The fact that the coach has to be evading questions about his starting quarterback just two weeks after Brewer engineered a superb game against one of the top teams in the country has to be mind boggling.
What will practice be like come Monday? Will Mark Leal and Brenden Motley suddenly be back in the conversation?
"I don't know," Brewer said. "I'm going to approach practice just like I always do and prepare for the game just like I always do."
But Byrn asserts the offense has total confidence in the man under center.
"With the few mistakes he had, he's in a position where he's highlighted, a lot more than our mistakes," Byrn said. "I had a few mistakes, and you guys didn't see it, so it's not as evaluated. So he had a few, but we all did. We've just got to get it out of our system."
As a senior leader on the team, Byrn has been the most vocal of all players about what needs to change.
"We can't just say we were three, four plays away, I never liked that because they're three, four plays away from beating us by 14 or 21," Byrn said. "It doesn't matter if there's 100,000 people in the stands or if there's three. We have to play with that sense of urgency. So we've got something to prove now. That's the mentality we had against Ohio State and when you play like that, with a chip on your shoulder, you can prove people wrong."
Beamer, as is his tendency, is quick to point out that the Hokies are still in a fine position to accomplish their goals.
"Our side of the division is plenty wide open," Beamer said. "It's going to be a lot of this team beat that, this team beat the other team."
Yet after losing two games at home that were eminently winnable, is it really enough to simply point to the fact that many games lie ahead?
"From this week and here on out, we've got to prove that we weren't just that one great game," Byrn said.

Comments
So many missed opportunities.
Western Michigan needs to be a "tune-up game." I'm not ready to throw in the towel on this season, and I guarantee you neither is this team.
Sloppy play. Period. It is a responsibility of the coaches to get them ready to play. Team loss all the way. Need to settle on a 1 and 2 at RB and keep them in there. Too much experimentation. Need to run the ball. Toss sweeps, moving pocket etc. the O line is a piece of work that needs a lot of work.
What I don't get is Loeffler himself said we ran the ball better in the 2nd half.. Sooo wtf were we doing running a wr screen on 2nd and 1?? run the damn ball qb sneak fb dive with rogers come on its not that damn hard.....
^^ One hundred times over this!
I'm pretty sure this team is giving me bi-polar disorder.
This team itself has bi-polar disorder. One game great. Next game terrible. One half terrible. Next half great.
I felt that way for a while. Now I realize I just fell into the trap of reading the recruiting updates, reading about spring practice, reading about the exciting freshmen, and thinking this team was going to be good.
This is not a good football team. They are not well coached and they do not play well. They have a pretty good chance of beating Western Michigan and they will probably beat Wake Forest if they improve on a few things as the season goes along. But this is the year the Commonwealth Cup goes on vacation -- hey, it couldn't last forever, right?
I just feel sorry for the seniors, both on the team and all the seniors at VT, whose time at college has been marred by a bad football team for three years in a row.
Yea, after 4 games we should jump ship and punt the season. Amazing how 2 weeks ago we were playing great and (at least on D) were getting accolades for being the best coached D in the country.
You heard it hear folks. Pack your bags. Nothing more to look forward to. /sarcasm
Calm down, we're 2-2, not 0-4. There's a lot of upside in this team, but mistakes have to be minimized. We can't negate good kick returns with stupid penalties, or give the opposition free yards with substitution penalties. It's not Monday and we are more likely to make it to the next game than we are to change the past ones. Let's move on and enjoy watching Hokie football instead of wallowing.
This year feels like 2004 to me. Rough year in 2003, start off 2004 2-2. Granted, one of those losses was to #1 USC, but it hurt because we were close to winning. Soul-crushing loss to NC State in week 4 on missed FGs. No one gave us a chance. Then we won out through the rest of the season. I'm not saying that will happen this year, but there is a heck of a lot of talent on this team, and they're young and developing. We'll see highs and lows. Minimizing the lows is the task at hand. If we can do that, we'll have a decent season. Anyone hoping for a magical year in 2014 had maroon and orange shades that are an even deeper hue than mine. This year is going to be a mix of good and bad, but hopefully growth. The next year or two will be the real determining factor if VT is returning to national prominence and the success we all desperately want.
I will say that when they played Sandman on 4 and 15, that was the loudest I've heard Lane in a while. Really a fun game except for the end. I still like what this team can do. Ford and Phillips are real ballers. I still don't know what to think of Shai and Marshawn. They are never given a chance to get into a rhythm and Williams fumbling is a concern. Maybe the play calling is shotty. Some of the play calls just make me scratch my head. The O-line still leaves a lot to be desired. I don't know. I still think we have a bit of a personality disorder right now. At times we have our way with the other team, and at times we get taken behind the woodshed. Luckily we have Western Michigan next to hopefully cleanse our palette of the bad taste of losing. UNC hasn't looked good against ECU. 70 points! That is nuts.
I think most of the offensive problems are due to our O-line. Brewer has to be smarter but Im not ready to call for the back up yet. I think we are most productive going up tempo. Curious if smarter than me can help explain if that gives the O-line an advantage.
Brewer has one thing in his favor: he's a game manager who makes good decisions. That was what everyone told me after W&M and OSU. The fact is Brewer not a great passer, he is not a great runner, and he is not a great decision-maker. That doesn't leave much to work with.
Completion % wise, Brewer is the most accurate passer in VT history I believe .. He just needs to make better decisions with the ball
He may not be great at anything, but he has solid accuracy and is really good on 3rd down. Yes he makes some terrible decisions but as of now he is the best option we have. If he can cut down on the turnovers then he can be a darn good QB, but that looks like a big if right now.
What kind of blocking scheme did we use in the early to mid 2000's before Newsome? I'm really troubled that our o-line can't create any reliable gaps.
we did a lot more under center or pistol formation back then, it is easier than trying to run out of a shotgun set
I formation with man blocking. A mix of power, triple, and speed option.
Maybe it's nostalgia, but man do I miss that offensive attack.
That 4th and 15... Loudest I've ever cussed at a football game. I couldn't believe we let that go.
I'd like to up leg this twice, but the asshole who created this site didn't make that possible.
I heard he was an ok guy most of the time... ;)
I think this may be one of the most TKP moments ever, so I'm going to preserve it for posterity before it gets up-voted more:
Seriously, that might have been one of the bigger letdowns I've seen at Lane in terms of how hyped everyone was and then BOOM, first down. And then when Bonner missed that INT. Ugh.
Total lack of organization
The 4th and 15 brings up an excellent point of discussion though. Right before that play, when the stadium was going crazy to Enter Sandman, I noticed that some of the guys on defense were motioning for the fans to stand up and dancing nearly right up until the snap. I mean, it's great to come out on the field with enthusiasm, but do you think that some of the guys were too distracted and hyped in that moment?
Anyone have any insight into the illegal substitution penalties the offense keeps getting? Are they just due to youth or are they the fault of the coaches or is it a combination of the two?
After one of the penalties Shane and Moorehead looked like chickens with their heads cut off. Lots of confusion.
I don't know, but they need to get that s--t fixed, like yesterday.
Watching the game, it looked like the assistants yelling at players, but after like the third one, it looked like Coach Beamer was chewing some assistant coach tail.
These type of penalties at home games are the most frustrating. I wonder if the assistant coaches aren't communicating with one another.
Looked like to me that anytime the offensive line went into set position before the substituting player was off the field we got flagged for illegal substitution, but I haven't gone back and studied the tape.
trying to hurry up too much without paying attention to what's going on
Please explain how playing at home gives us virtually no advantage at this point. I think I feel better about away games. WTF!!
I was quick to jump on the Brewer killed us band wagon last night but after sleeping on it...I'm going to go with what the hell was lefty thinking with that screen on 2nd and 2. That said I agree with the comments above Shai is the man he's earned it make him the lead back and make a decision on who backs him up. Too much rb rotation is hurting our ground game as well. We got better in the second half but were afraid to go with it. Lefty got too cute. I hope we can recover ...I hate this feeling of loosing very winnable games. Getting beat is one thing beating ourselves sucks!
How many times over the summer did Shane Beamer promise this would not be a problem like it was last year?
sbeamer@vt.edu
There's his e-mail address. Let him know how you would coach the team. Seriously, given that Loeffler is the OC, I doubt Shane has much control over the RB that goes in except when a RB calls to the sideline for a sub.
I agree, I've seen the RB rotation complaint several times.. and outside of Trey getting a series, VT is going with a 2 back rotation, with special packages here and there.. and Shane would seemingly have no control over what package is called to go in the game
Here's a quick breakdown of the rushing attempts per player:
Marshawn: 51
Shai: 35
Brewer: 23
Coleman: 15
Deon Newsome: 8
Caleb: 5
Ford: 3
Stanford, Trey, and Bucky: 2
To me, that's pretty obvious that it's a 2 back rotation with very little question. If a RB is getting less than 4 touches per game (JC) he's not in the main rotation.
Not to mention that JCC had 10 carries in the season opener, and has had only 5 carries in the 3 games since
I don't know who makes the in-game decisions, but I recall Shane Beamer saying in more than one interview over the summer that we shouldn't worry about the mixed up depth chart at TB, they realized it was a problem last year but they weren't going to repeat that mistake this year.
I don't see a mixed up depth chart, after W&M (the game in which Coleman lost his starting job), it's been a steady Williams and Shai rotation.. they have plugged in Trey a down here and there, but only has 2 carries on the season, as his recovery continues there may be an issue with what to do with him in the rotation, but not so far
Seven out of 29, roughly one-fourth, of the carries went to RBs other than Williams and McKenzie. And last I heard, they were still calling those two "co-number-one" on the depth chart.
Knowles and Newsome are not RBs and got the rushing yards on jet sweeps or the reverse, so therefore you have 4 carries out of 26. Sounds like the co-#1s are getting the bulk of the carries at roughly 85% of the work load.
Part of me wonders if SL will make his way down to the sidelines instead of the box.. Would that help him feel/experience the game tempo and whats working instead of being in a box from above and having to guess? Maybe then he would be able to get a feel for who has the hot hand and then call plays towards that strength.
I wonder if SL called the toss play before he knew JCC was in or after <-- that would be interesting.. I know it was the 1st play after the turnover which makes me wonder why we would throw JC in there absolutely cold? Unless JC is the back for that package play.. again makes 0 sense why we would call it since he had 0 influence so far.
Loeffler won't go down to the sidelines. His philosophy is to stay up away from the sidelines, to remove himself from the emotion and stay focused. He can also see the field better and study the defense.
As for the personnel choices, I have a seriously hard time believing that Loeffler calls plays in response to personnel. As I understood it (someone please correct me if I've misunderstood this), but Loeffler calls the play down to Moorehead and personnel are switched based on the play that is called. Loeffler doesn't say, "Oh hey Shane, you want JCC in at this point? Let me figure out what to do."
which makes it even more ludicrous that JCC is in on that snap/package play? Out of all the backs we have and we pick the 1 that has the least amount of highlight play/ make the 1 defender miss.. He ran right out of bounds instead of trying to run him over/cut it back inside a yard or two.
I'm obviously no coach but that just seems silly. But it was 1 of many mistakes that hurt us so can't blame/finger point at all.
As far as a toss play, I've always felt that that's the sort of thing for which JC's skills are best suited. He's not a between-the-tackles kind of guy. Now, that said, I disagree totally with the play call. Pound it with Shai or Juice, or take a shot to the endzone with Bucky or Rogers.
Here is my take, for what it is worth.
We are not DBU! The backs are getting smoked so many times you would think you were at a BBQ competition.
Defensive 7 play lights out 95% of the time. I will take a 19 to 1 ratio any day of the week, unfortunately because of above statement, the 1 tends to be a back breaking play.
Offensive line is just terrible.
QB play- way too inconsistent. 8 picks in three games will not get it done.
Running backs have looked good at times but they don't seem to be able to get in a rhythm, probably due O-line issues.
Offensive play calling. If I was to give them a grade, it would be a C- at best. Are we a spread team, an I team, a no huddle team? We have no identity.
If this team cannot get it turned around quickly, the wheels could fall off and who knows where we spiral to.
The only thing that is consistent about this team and coaching staff is INCONSISTENCY!
I agree with the DBU thing, that hype hashtag crud needs to go. The def we are playing may speak to the higher football IQ folks that are watching what kind of true skill those kids have, but to the average fan, all they are seeing are our backs giving up big play after big play.
I let my emotions get the best of me yesterday after the 3rd INT and started calling Brewer "Glennon Jr" and for a 10 minute period I even put "BENCH BREWER" in my signature then came to my senses and deleted it. In retrospect I think its a tad premature to jump to that conclusion so quickly. Yes he had some bad turnovers and that last one just reminded me of Glennon so bad, but he showed toughness and had a few really nice throws to the 2 freshman Ford and Phillips. Lefty takes some of the blame for Brewers woes as well for some questionable play calling, plus Brewer did lead a game winning drive at the #8 team in the country home field something Glennon never came close to doing. That being said if the offensive line can play better and Lefty keeps feeding Shai it should take some pressure off Brewer cause throwing it 50 times in a game gives so many more chances for INTs.
If there's one thing I've learned, it's that almost all your problems can stem from an inept offensive line. Somebody said it before, this is Searels' first year and if this were Grimes' second year instead, our guys up front would probably have a clue. But without strong run blocking, holes can't be created to make for 7 yard-per-carry games, which means that more and more our guys are forced to pass,
which means the defensive line is more likely to know what's coming rush the QB,
which means that the mistake of a forced pass will cause an incompletion or interception,
which means that we're going to 4 and out more often,
which means the defense is on the field more and is getting worn out.
Once our offensive line can get it together and run-block, our offense will open up. I believe our running backs have all the talent in the world, but if they can't effectively find holes, they're gonna get tackled at the line of scrimmage. It's hard to put all the blame on the offensive line (especially considering all the unforced penalties, Michael Brewer interceptions and defensive miscues) but you maybe gotta believe that the reasons for our missed opportunities are all interconnected.
That is one of the reasons why I think we will improve through the year. The O-line will hopefully get better as they get more used the the scheme. Hopefully. I really have no clue what I am talking about.
* Running back rotation and players packages for special situations is not working on offense, in fact it's costing us momentum and yardage. It's time to choose a system and personnel and stick to it!!!
* Offensive line must be reshuffled; it's not working with current personnel and scheme.
* Offensive play selection feels at it's best in the uptempo pace without multiple substitutions between plYs so you can create mismatches against the defense...
* Foster has to stop trying to win the war on every play....nonstop blitzing, especially late in the game has killed us in a number of our fourth quarter losses
* Special teams aren't special...need to turn it up a notch with return and blocking teams.
* Leverage more from our young running backs...they are talented!!!
* Continue to use crossing routes, our receivers run well and it's in Brewer's sweet spot to throw the ball
* Get Tight Ends back into game plan
* Go back to boundary & field corner play. It best suits our personnel at DBU!
* Enjoy the game---Team is too tight team has to enjoy it to exceed!
Teams know BF is going with a blitz heavy package almost all the time especially on 4th downs, as an opposing coach I' ll take my chances all day on throwing against 1 on 1 coverage. Secondly team looks like they are gassed by 4th QTR IMHO.
3rd and 1- we get stuffed and lose a yard? Fix that and everything else follows suit- we don't and I expect more of the same.
Well at least all our young guys show promise. I just hope the lines can become more consistent. I'd love to see more OL recruits show interest in VT.
As for DBU, our secondary has always gambled. I can think of many games where deep balls hurt us. I'm not too worried about our secondary though. They are young and they will improve or be replaced.
I can also say that VT has often given up heartbreaking TDs when playing prevent defense. BC '07 being the worst memory.
For What Its Worth:
1) Shane Beamer needs to either become a better RB Coach or he needs to be replaced. Something that I have noticed in the last two games is that a hole is created by the O-line and the RB is assigned to assist with QB protection. Unfortunately, the RB looks for a second then decides to unplug the hole he is assigned to plug by assisting someone else with blocking. This does not work when the Defense uses a delayed blitz! So teach the RBs to just plug the hole.
2) Brewer seems to lock onto either Bryn, Ford or Hodges. He rarely uses his safety valve WR when all the other eligible receivers are covered. Perhaps our QB Coach should work on that; I'm looking at you OC Leoffler.
3) I want Bryan Stinespring out of the OV Box and on the field. I need that bad mojo on the sideline instead of being near our OC. He is not the OC and he needs to accept that. He is the TE Coach and Recruiting Coordinator. STAY ON THE DAMN SIDELINES!
4) As everyone else has mentioned, the RB rotation is destroying any chances of an RB establishing a rhythm. Pick two and stick with it! You coaches are paid the bid bucks to make these decisions, so it is time to put on your big boy pants and decide post haste.
5) The coaches need to pull their heads out of the sand and implement some discipline on the team. The "illegal substitution" penalties are a sign the players do not know what is going on and that is on the coaches. Again, you make a lot of money, so get with it please.
6) Brewer seems to be real comfortable throwing to the middle of the field and struggles a bit when throwing to the sidelines. Maybe the OC/QB Coach can take this into account when planning the game.
7) Our O-line is disintegrating before our eyes. Help our QB by calling more play-action. If an opponents defense has great speed, then use it against them by tricking them into over pursuit and using reverses.
8) If we are running the ball down their throats, keep at it! I know that fumble and Brewer recovered and turned into a TD must have spooked the OC because after that, we almost completely became a passing team with almost zero running plays other than a few here or there.
You had some good points. I totally agree, Shane is ok but no Billy Hite. And because of his last name, people rarely throw blame his way.
#4, in yesterdays game only 2 RBs had over 2 carries (Brewer also had 4) so I think the RB rotation isn't really that out of whack.. they are trying to get Trey back in here and there, but that's to be expected as he gets back to 100%... other than that we've seen less and less of JCC which is what everyone was clamoring for so I don't see the problem there
Fair enough, but the play that keeps coming back to me was a drive in which Shai had some good runs and were down to 2nd and 2. They then telegraphed that we going to run it up the middle by rotating in Williams. We got stuffed for a loss of two. Why in Gods good name did we
A) Sub out Mckenzie.
B) Huddle instead of going up tempo and immediately line-up and get the first down?
Someone needs to take OC Loeffler and QB Brewer to a boxing gym and have them talk to a boxing manager. Emphasize about attacking rhythm and maintaining the initiative. When attacking an opponent, maintaining the rush of an attack is just as important as the personnel involved in the attack.
not really sure why they subbed out Shai, but if I had to speculate - maybe Shai isn't an every down back yet, he's coming off an injury and he well may not be 100% either.. hard to say
I agree with the complaint about going away from the up tempo, it seemed to work when they did it, but I don't see that as a RB issue (Shane) , which was the original point that I objected to
French said Leftys game plan was great against GT, so it's hard for me to really nit pick over it really
Also, on 3rd and 1 situations yesterday, Bucky should have dived forward, instead of some of the other mind-boggling play calls made. GT routinely proved they couldn't stop Logan in those situations.
My father left me a voicemail this morning asking "Who the hell keeps putting that guy Coleman in the game. Why not just try the waterboy?"
It left me shaking my head, thinking I just don't know...
Yeah, put Stiney on the sidelines and put him in charge of making sure there are 11 men on the field for each down.
NOPE. I don't care how perfect of a throw you can make, you should even attempt that pass. I was hoping he'd recognize that. Still think he's our best option at QB right now though. Teach him to not force it anymore and we'll look much better.
yeah that is a throw you just dont make...if you can't see where you are throwing and throw off your back foot you are never going to complete that pass...he threw that up blind
Brewer is the Tony Romo of Blacksburg, and I mean that as a compliment. With the upside you also get the downside. Classic gunslinger. Our defense definitely deserves a lot of blame, but throwing an interception on first down at your own 15-yd line with the game tied definitely falls on Brewer's shoulders. If he doesn't look like the next coming of Jim Druckenmiller after next week's game, then you start calling for his job
Who would you put in his place? What has any of the back-ups shown that makes anyone think they can do any better?
Where have we seen this debate before...
All summer we were told the QB competition was too close to call. Then we were told Brewer won out because of his great decision making. Then he turned into a guy who makes terrible decisions.
Who says he "turned into" that?? Maybe that's what he has done all along, but it is STILL better than what Leal brings to the table... If the coaches that watch all the QBs every day say that Brewer is that much better a decision maker that Leal, then I'll take their word for it. (we also have a bowl game performance to back that up)
His accuracy numbers suggest that he doesn't always make bad decisions. That said, I REALLY want him to cut down on the INT's.
Oh, I do too, I am impressed by his accuracy when given time to throw.... if he cut just cut down to 1 INT a game I think we're in good shape against most of the teams on our schedule this year (not saying that 1 INT a game is ideal, but that's half as many as where he's at now)
Right and maybe Leal is just a game manager. I mean for real, maybe we need to cut the guy a little slack here. Last year against UCLA, we were facing a good, not great defense in a quality Pac-12 team. The guy came out cold and looked terrible, but that was also 8 months ago. My guess is that Brewer is the more explosive, long-ball threat-type of guy while Leal is your classic game manager. He won't win you the game, but he won't lose it either.
With that being said, I really think Brewer has to stink it up this week against WMU to lose his job. People forget if it weren't for him, we probably wouldn't have even been in the game to start with against Georgia Tech, especially as average and dinged up our defense looks at the moment
I guess Leal, as poor of a performance he had at the Sun Bowl last year. Look, all I'm saying is that you can't throw 3 interceptions a game and expect to win. As if we haven't learned our lesson by now with Logan Thomas...