By the (Advanced) Numbers: Western Michigan

Tackles for loss could predict this week's outcome.

After consecutive bye weeks, the 2-0 Virginia Tech Hokies looks to carry the momentum of their upset win in Columbus into a clash against the 2-1 Western Michigan Broncos of the MAC. Both teams are eager to keep their names in the playoff discussion and will certainly bring energy into this one!

Let's start with the computer rankings for each team.

The ones and zeros show the Hokies as being a middle-tier Power 5 team while the Broncos are definitely bottom-tier for FBS. But where do those computers predict the result, and what does Vegas think? (Vegas thinks you believe the dancer you're going to see will look like the picture on the card the stranger handed you while walking down the sidewalk.)

The odds of a 25-point favorite winning are 95.8%.

Now let's look at any overall offensive or defensive advantages before diving deeper.

By S&P+, Virginia Tech will have a slight advantage while on offense while holding a solid advantage on defense. To understand why, we'll look a little more closely at each team's personality.

When Virginia Tech Has the Ball

Here is an explanation of S&P+ ratings, and FEI ratings.

First, a note to clarify how S&P+ breaks down teams. In the first 7 weeks of the season, the overall offensive and defensive S&P+ numbers are adjusted for opponent, but the individual personality characteristics (Rushing, Passing, Standard Downs, and Passing Downs) are not. FEI personality stats are also unadjusted at this point in the season. So those characteristics seen here should be considered relative to one another and not as a true overall advantage at this point.

It's no surprise that the greatest advantage would come on passing downs for Virginia Tech. We've seen the Hokies dig themselves into holes, then escape for long third down conversions many times over the past 4 2 weeks. Similarly, although Tech's running game has yet to take off in any way, the Broncos run defense isn't exactly stellar either.

Now let's take a look at the FEI personality traits of the Tech offense versus the WMU defense.

We're getting deep enough into the season to start to see the numbers reflect what our eyes are telling us: the Hokie offense is not explosive, and relative to most teams Tech is going 3-and-out (first down rate) too often. However, things look better on methodical drives (those that last 10 or more plays) as that appears to be the only way the Hokies can move the ball this far.

The Virginia Tech offense is closest in personality to:

  1. Clemson (Unfortunately that says more about Clemson than VT)
  2. Purdue (Considering just lying about the numbers to remove this)
  3. Texas (Hey! That's a powerhouse!)

The Western Michigan defense is closest in personality to:

  1. West Virginia
  2. Georgia Southern
  3. Northwestern

When Western Michigan Has the Ball

Again, look at pass-run comparisons first.

This is a good time to remind you that these are currently unadjusted for opponent. Western Michigan has a very good running game, but will not enjoy a huge advantage as seen here. However, we can at least glean that passing downs and rushing will be relative strong points for their offense against Tech's defense. FEI personality stats show us a little more.

Here we see that while the Bronco offense has been efficient (moving the ball), Tech's defense has been stronger thus far at preventing methodical drives.

The Virginia Tech defense is closest in personality to the state of Florida:

  1. Florida International (Make fun of them one week and they jump from 3rd to 1st)
  2. Florida (Relax...DEFENSE, not offense)
  3. Florida State (Drinking antifreeze)

The Western Michigan offense is closest in personality to (UNADJUSTED everyone. Unadjusted.):

  1. Arizona State
  2. Oklahoma
  3. Oregon State

Who To Watch Out For

Who to watch out for:

  1. Freshman RB Jarvion Franklin will get the ball often and so far this season has produced 9 TD's and 6.6 YPC, although against run defenses averaging 108th in the country plus Murray State.
  2. LB Grant DePalma has accumulated 24 solo tackles and 4.5 TFL already this season, by far the most active defender at getting to the ball.
  3. WR Daniel Braverman, who leads the team in receptions, is used on returns and occasionally participates in the run game where he broke a 65-yard TD last week.

Statistical Key to the Game

Western Michigan's bruising running back Jarvion Franklin may get most of the attention, but the Broncos can pass just as effectively. Simply limiting YPC is not the key to stopping them. They key to this game will be on the line of scrimmageβ€”can Tech plug up their rushing lanes and pressure the QB? Can the offensive line open up more running room for Shai McKenzie and Marshawn Williams? Watching Franklin's TD runs, he's typically had fairly wide rushing lanes and is not a shifty tackle-breaker. He takes the yards given and makes the right read.

My key to the game will be tackles for loss, on both sides. How often a defender is able to break through and get to the RB or QB will be a great bellwether.

My Prediction

Rather than worry about winning or losing this one, I think we need to hope for no significant injuries and the establishment of a running game. I see Wiles' d-line playing good assignments and not allowing Franklin the space he needs to punish the defense, and Virginia Tech winning the TFL battle 5-2.

Virginia Tech 38, Western Michigan 17.

As always a thanks to Football Outsiders, cfbstats.com, and Minitab Statistical Software.

Comments

I think the S&P ratings are still showing for the GT game

If you don't want to recruit clowns, don't run a clown show.

"I want to punch people from UVA right in the neck." - Colin Cowherd

I think you left the GT graphics up.

Wow: it's only 7am and I already have to drink.

This is going to be great for the ACC.

EDIT: 2 above me already mentioned it

"I don't know what a Hokie is, but God is one of them" -Lee Corso

I don't know if anyone noticed, but the post first ran with the graphics from GT. That should be fixed now.

I'll take credit for this one...

I hope we can establish a running game, but I'm not confident we will. We have faced bad rushing defenses in the past and have appeared to be the only team not to rush on them for a million yards for whatever reason. Perhaps Shane will ask PJ how they rotate their backs.

I'd just like to see a clean game from the offense and the defense get some turnovers. No interceptions, please. If we are not able to impose our will on this team and win comfortably then it's really going to be a long season. This should be a good game to clean stuff up and get a win at home. A team that you can't overlook but should beat.

UNC was supposed to be some of the biggest compeition this year in the ACC-C, however they have not looked impressive especially after allowing 70 points to be put on them. So they are dealing with that while they head to Clemson then have us and what appears to be a decent ND team the following week. They have a tough road ahead, although not as tough had Clemson won either at UGA or FSU or if we had at least won last week. But I'm getting ahead of this week and who wants to fast forward the season?

Hope we can look good in this game. I'll be trying to find a way to watch it on Directv out here in Kansas City since the one channel that it's on locally Directv doesn't have for whatever reason. Any advice on this would be awesome. Thanks.

Go Hokies!

If you don't want to recruit clowns, don't run a clown show.

"I want to punch people from UVA right in the neck." - Colin Cowherd

I wouldn't be upset by our defense being compared with FSU. I mean, if our team was starting a PSA program modeled after them, then I'd be concerned, but they have the best defense in the ACC after us. Or before us. Not sure yet...

I'm not bothered by it in terms of how good their defense is; I just don't ever want to be compared to FSU even when it's a compliment.

Those consecutive bye weeks will get after ya, hopefully everyone is focused and ready for this weeks contest!

I can imagine no more rewarding a career. And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction:
β€œI served in the United States Navy"

That Purdue offense we can't get away from put up 43 on WMU (I realize it's personality based), so there's that

HOKIE HOKIE HOKIE HI
'14 grad

Although personality based, it's also overall ability-based (but not yet opponent-adjusted). I sum the squared differences between each team's personality stats and every other teams personality stats and the lowest sums are the most similar. So they have to be similar on raw scale too and not just relative to one another. After week 7 when things get opponent-adjusted these will become more accurate but they're not terrible now. Recall that the most similar offense to GT was Navy, which fits right in with conventional wisdom too.

That's smart. It'll be interesting to see if there are major changes once the adjustments roll in. On a side note, and you may have mentioned this somewhere, but how the the machines adjust for FCS schools? Are they just dropped?

HOKIE HOKIE HOKIE HI
'14 grad

Good question - S&P uses FBS and FCS games, while FEI only uses FBS games. So we're 2-0 in S&P but just 1-0 in FEI. The Run-Pass personality stats are from S&P and the other personality stats are from FEI.

The computer rankings only include FBS teams even though some of the rankings systems include games against FCS teams and others don't. Unfortunately few ranking systems show how they rank the teams, so there's no way to tell whether it is more or less accurate to include those games or not.

I hope we use this game to figure ourselves out.
1) QB needs to be smarter with the football
2) Establish that run game! Please find a primary back.
3) Solidify that secondary, better decisions.

Western Michigan has never scored a point on us in the history of the series. I think Bud takes that to the team and tells them they won't blow that streak.

I think that after a hard week of practice, the offense pulls it together to be effect running and passing the ball. The starters are pulled in the third quarter.

Tech wins big 45-0.

I still don't feel like I know anything about our offense, but if our defense gives up 17 to Western Michigan, we should just call it a season and practice the rest of the semester.

"Our job as coaches is to influence young people's lives for the better in terms of fundamental skills, work ethic, and doing the right thing. Every now and again, a player actually has that effect on the coaching staff." Justin Fuente on Sam Rogers

I talked about this in a different thread, but what do you think about the IsoPPP? The one Achilles' Heel of our defense seems to be a place where they really excel (big plays).

If the offense can't do their job and move the ball against the Bronc's abysmal defense, can't close in the RZ, and/or turn the ball over a couple of times then I can easily envision a scenario where just enough big plays get through to have everyone moaning about how the defense "lost us the game" again...

I don't think anyone said the D "lost us the game", but rather that they had a let down in a crucial situation (just eas the O did) .. VT needed one unit to step up in the final minutes last week and neither did

Great point...while S&P has us as the #22 defense thus far, we rank a horrendous 110th in IsoPPP. Explosive plays are killing our defense and I'm not sure we really need a statistical metric to know that. It's no secret that Bud has been comfortable putting our CB's on an island with no safety support, and that's a high risk-high reward strategy. It lets us win the numbers game up front but one mistake by a CB is like a dagger.

I think the broader question is how will that be moving forward. Some of those against GT were due to CB's biting against an offensive formation they're not used to seeing and won't see again until we play Navy in a crappy bowl in mid-December. So that's not an issue moving forward. Then you had Faycson giving up the big completions at the beginning of ECU, which the coaches have blamed on not being full speed after injury. If you buy that, then things are looking good moving forward as long as Riley and Clarke fill those shoes decently.

Now if they don't fill those shoes well, that may be a huge Achilles heel this year except I would trust Bud to make the right adjustments if that's the case. If he's keeping the CB's on the island then he really believes it was the injury and schematically teams will not be taking advantage of our scheme.

OT - Just thinking... The Hokies are currently on a 4 game losing streak at Lane stadium to FBS programs.

Dammit.

Leonard. Duh.

Very little chance of that. Aside from that statistic missing all kinds of context, this is en even more lopsided matchup than W&M was. Of course anything can happen, but I wouldn't cite that statistic as some reason to think we will struggle Saturday.

Oh, I wasn't citing that as a reason to believe anything about the future. I was just feeling sad.

Leonard. Duh.

Due theory!

HOKIE HOKIE HOKIE HI
'14 grad