
Shane Beamer isn't the type of guy to say 'I told you so.'
But if he was, there's a pretty good chance those words might escape his lips when it comes to the team's depth at running back.
"I should start posting on the message boards like 'look at us now,'" Beamer said with a bit of a grin.
After taking his fair share of criticism before the season for insisting that each of the six running backs on the team deserved time on the field, Beamer's insistence on keeping so many backs in his meeting room and giving them each playing time is looking pretty prescient now that the team's top three runners are injured.
"I've said from day one that I feel like we have more than one starter in that room," Beamer said. "You need more than one or two guys to get through the season. Not that I envisioned that we'd lose our top three guys halfway through the season, I don't think anybody anticipates that, but it's good that we've got depth there."
It would've been pretty surprising for the Hokies to predict that one of the main trio of Shai McKenzie, Marshawn Williams and Trey Edmunds would miss the bulk of the season, so the fact that two of the three have gone down for significant time seems downright unthinkable.
But now, with McKenzie out for the year with an ACL tear and Edmunds' out for the next six to eight weeks with a broken clavicle, the Hokies will have to turn elsewhere at running back.
The natural pick would be Williams, but he too is battling injury woes. He sprained his ankle against UNC and was in a walking boot after the game.
He benefits from having the bye week to rest a bit, but the coaches aren't sure where he stands a week away from the Hokies' road test against Pittsburgh.
"Marshawn expects to be ready," said Frank Beamer. "I saw him yesterday and he was talking very positive and felt good about his ankle. But I think we have to wait and see."
The tricky part about judging Williams' readiness is that ankle injuries can easily be re-injured despite apparent progress, so the staff is trying to take it slow with the freshman.
"I've seen those ankles, they do good for awhile and then they seem to be slow for a while," Frank said.
Should Williams be unable to go against the Panthers, or slowed by the injury enough to need some help carrying the load, the Hokies will put the ball in the hands of J.C. Coleman and Joel Caleb.
The veterans have rarely seen the field so far this season, combining for just 48 carries for 145 yards, but their running backs coach has confidence that their experience will help them adjust to expanded roles.
"It's good that they've gotten some work in games and we're not just pulling a redshirt off a guy and throwing him onto national TV next week," Shane said. "J.C.'s been here for three years, Joel has been here for three years counting his redshirt year...so you've got guys with a lot of experience, and the moment won't be too big for them next week."
In particular, the staff gets to avoid burning the redshirt of recently converted RB Travon McMillian to help fill the void. While they might've considered the prospect at some point this week, Beamer stresses that it was never a serious concern.
"It was discussed briefly, but briefly, briefly," Beamer said. "Physically, could he get out there and help us? Sure, but he's got to get in there and he hasn't really been in my meetings since August and you'd have to get him caught up there."
That decision to keep McMillian on the bench largely stems from Beamer's newfound confidence in Caleb and Coleman.
When Williams and Edmunds went down against the Tar Heels, Beamer was forced to turn to the pair on the fly, and they largely responded at the end of the game.
Coleman had his most meaningful performance in some time, turning his seven carries into 25 yards and a score as the Hokies drove to seal the win in the fourth quarter.
"I really have a lot of respect for him starting the first game and then not playing a whole lot after that. He's handled it like a mature guy and he's been a leader on this team," Beamer said. "I told these guys all along, when you get this opportunity, make the most of it. So whether Marshawn's healthy or not, he'll get a lot of work next Thursday, I'd envision."
The Hokies had previously only used Coleman as a blocker on passing downs, but the junior says he never got discouraged about being passed over in favor of the freshmen.
"They put me in for blocking around the edge, and I was going hard at that, just doing whatever I had to do that the team was fine," Coleman said. "They played great before they got hurt, they were killing it. So it was it is, with them down, I might have a heavier role, so I'm ready to take advantage."
The ascendance of Williams and McKenzie must've also been frustrating for Caleb.
He spent all of last year transitioning to his new position at tailback, learning a bevy of new responsibilities that differ from his time at wide receiver.
"It was just learning the protection schemes and blitz pickups and just being aware of everything the defense is doing within the secondary, moving safeties and just disguising blitzes and things like that," Caleb said.
He figured to have a larger role in the offense now that he'd finally gotten his feet under him at the position, but then the freshmen surged ahead. Now, he's focusing on what he can bring to his new role.
"I've been there for a year and a few months now and I feel very comfortable in the position and I'm ready," Caleb said "It's a really big opportunity for me to come in and fill a position that we're going to need this week in the running game."
Caleb also played well in his limited snaps against UNC, finishing with six carries for 20 yards, but Beamer still wants to see more elusiveness from the redshirt sophomore.
"What he's got to do is take his game to the next level in making guys miss," Beamer said. "He did a good job down on the goal line against North Carolina, but he had one run where he came through the line, got to the second level, and the safety tackled him one-on-one, so what I've told him to do is make that guy miss. He lowers his shoulder for contact, so I know he's a physical guy, but make him miss, run him over, do something that can make that guy miss in the open field, and he will."
Had Caleb been able to break that particular tackle, it might've allowed the Hokies to score a touchdown on that late fourth quarter drive instead of a field goal. But despite that misstep, Shane still says he has enough confidence in Caleb to hand him 40 carries in a game if it comes to that.
Caleb says he would have no problem with that kind of workload.
"I'm pretty confident in myself, if I had 40 carries in a game, I would love that," Caleb said.
Now, with Pitt's 40th ranked run defense next up on the schedule, the Hokies may not be willing to run the ball 40 times, but they'll still need a quality performance from both Caleb and Coleman.
"You hate that these three guys are injured and can't go, but you have to think these other guys have to elevate their game as well," Beamer said.

Comments
I'm excited for Caleb - he deserves this opportunity. He's been working hard to find a place to fit on this team and is a heck of an affalete.
Hopefully, he takes the opportunity and runs with it...
Hopefully Caleb is the main, with JCC as second. Otherwise I'm really worried. I believe Scot will be passing more against Pitt.
^^^^^^ this x1000000, i highly doubt we will see the number of rushing attempts that we saw against unc which scares me. caleb deserves his shot at #1
the need to play Caleb and Coleman does not negate the criticism. Sure we ended up playing both Williams and Mckenzie but McKenzie's injury now puts us in the same position we would have been had we redshirted him. He isn't playing. The real point of the criticism was when Shane talked about not redshirting McMillian. Sure there was talk when we were not going to redshirt one of the Williams and McKenzie and people wondered how he would play so many backs. He talked about playing everyone regardless of injury. So that criticism was valid. The criticism was added to when the talk of McMillian playing came into focus - again without regard for injury. And prior to now, the criticism was valid because Coleman, Edmunds, and Caleb DID NOT play a lot. So again, to make fun of the critics is disingenuous because the critics were right. And if Beamer meant something different than being able to play 6 RBs, then he needed to be clearer. ONLY season-ending injuries have allowed for that...not his ability to figure out how to play so many backs.
"He talked about playing everyone regardless of injury. So that criticism was valid. The criticism was added to when the talk of McMillian playing came into focus - again without regard for injury. And prior to now, the criticism was valid because Coleman, Edmunds, and Caleb DID NOT play a lot. So again, to make fun of the critics is disingenuous because the critics were right. And if Beamer meant something different than being able to play 6 RBs, then he needed to be clearer. ONLY season-ending injuries have allowed for that...not his ability to figure out how to play so many backs."
If criticism based on speculation is to be "right", then the speculation has to be right, that he meant literally what he said (i.e., regularly playing 6 running backs as running backs). Not that he was complimenting 3 true frosh who were game ready and otherwise notifying Coleman, Caleb, and Edmunds they'd better wear their big boy pants to practice and be ready to do whatever to help the team.
Criticizing a coach for sharing his thoughts is the recipe for encouraging coaches not to do it. It is why many only give us coach speak and coaches like Steve Spurrier are a very small minority.
I am accountable for how I choose to interpret what I hear...that what he said either is, or is not, literally what he meant. Many didn't criticize the statement or notion of playing 6 backs in some kind of rotation because we didn't think that is what he meant or what he would do...and he hasn't. What does that make us?
If Beamer needs to be clearer, then so do his critics...
Coleman and Caleb are true team players and hope they make some big plays for us. They deserve the chance and have full confidence in those guys.
Absolutely. It was good to see JC get the touchdown and Caleb is very talented. It would be fun to see what he would do with a games worth of carries.
I was very impressed with both Coleman and Caleb last week.
Granted, UNC was looking gassed -- but that never stopped Coleman from dropping at first hit previous games, and the way he ran through some tackles against UNC was very promising.
It almost makes me wonder if his problem was being subconsciously paranoid of the injuries he'd suffered, and was shutting down on impact to save himself. If he can run with that kind of drive going forward, I'm feeling a lot better about him. Too early to know of course, but I hope he turns it up. Love this guy.
And Caleb -- he just looks like someone on the verge of breaking off a huge run. And his pass protection skills definitely look better. At least he was in the right place and getting his assignment done. More reps will tighten that skill set up nicely.
I cannot wait for Pitt. I am excited to see how these guys perform after last week's confidence builder, and 2 weeks of first-team reps.
And let's not exclude the possibility that our O-line is starting to get it. Granted, there is plenty to wince about the last 2 games, but they have had some legitimate success, and they may just be starting to internalize the things Searels has been teaching them. They have a bye week to keep working at it while healing up some dings.
Man, I love this team, and I love TKP for helping me love the team even more.
TKP: It's like Viagra for Football!
Agree here. JCC's run right before his TD was impressive he had at least two UNC defenders that he carried a couple yards. Caleb almost broke one as well on the last drive. I can't wait to see Caleb get into the endzone. Hopefully off of a huge run and not a 2 yard punch it in. But I'll take that as well.
Please, do not go see your doctor if you have Football lasting kore than 4 hours.
The comment about Travon not being in the RB meetings since August -- is that typical for a player that's RSing? I'd figure even if not playing they'd be in all the meetings they need to be to get up to speed.
If I had to guess, the RB meetings he's missing are the ones reviewing game film and discussing plans for the next week while Travon is working with the scout team to learn how to work in that offense for the week. He's more valuable there than he is sitting in on RB meetings.
I had the same question, good answer above! Hopefully that is the case
i know our line play has been spotty at openning holes for our backs and pitts d is good against the run. but for some reason i feel like this is going to be a joel caleb breaking out party. i think he bust quite a few big runs and finishes with 100+ yards on somewhere around 15-20 carries. his vision is under estimated in my opinion at finding the cut back lanes on zone block plays and i think he really runs with a purpose in this game to show that he belongs. reminds me alot of when brandon ore used to get carries when it was still the imoh and humes show. ready for the thursday night show down and to get some road revenge on pitt!!!
I have confidence in Caleb and Coleman, but it is really unfortunate the Mangus transferred cause I thought he was better than both of those guys. He could really help us out this week.
"I've seen those ankles" "It was discussed briefly, but briefly, briefly," "I should start posting on the message boards like 'look at us now,'" "they were killing it. So it was it is,"
Gotta love them quotes.
as of now, I would give Joel Caleb more carries than JC . Joel has been impressive in his few carries. But JC has the experience so hopefully hes been working on how to take his game to the next level and stop going down before contact.
Certainly both Caleb and JCC are getting more reps at practices up to the Pitt game. That will help both of them even more. I'm sure their rep count was lower up to the UNC game.
Any news on Marshawn's ankle recovery yet?
Andy Bitter reported this yesterday in his blog...
Still in a walking boot, but probably will stay that way through the weekend. Got to make sure those ankles are right before you start stressing them again.
Since RB duos need nicknames, can these guys be "Necessary Evil"
The JCs? See below
I am 90% positive that JC will be taking 80% of the snaps against Pitt. Of course it helps we have a Joel Caleb and J. Coleman.
90%? What makes you say that? JC didn't even take 90% of the snaps after Williams got hurt last week.
'tis a joke. Joel Caleb (JC) and JC Coleman... they're both JC...
Yup. I left 20% of the carries for Brewer, Hodges, Rogers, et all.
What I've taken away from this is that coach Shane has a TKP account..
We will know when we see TKP pint glasses in the background of a tweet.
Well, we won't be seeing the defense key in on jet sweeps with Coleman in the game next week. And that works in his favor.
Slightly off-topic, but our top two RBs have the first name Joel now. I didn't realize that until earlier this week.
I am pretty sure this is a picture of Cam Phillips and JCC trying to hold up Wang after Sam Rodgers gently placed a hand on his back and sent home hurtling toward the ground.