Hokies Flip the Script, Beat Duke on the Road 17-16

The Hokies erased bad memories of past close games to win their second game against a ranked opponent on the road.

Dadi Nicolas celebrates a big hit on Duke QB Anthony Boone. [Michael Shroyer]

Just as flashbacks of painful losses past were about to overwhelm most members of Hokie Nation, Tech somehow managed to flip the script.

Fans were surely groaning as the fourth quarter unfolded, watching the Hokies cling to a slim lead that seemed almost sure to slip away once again.

But then, all of a sudden, the Hokies did what they couldn't all year long, at the strangest possible time.

"It's like you've been suffocating for so long and you can finally breathe a little bit," said linebacker Derek DiNardo.

"It's like one of those things where it's like 'yes, finally,'" said running back J.C. Coleman.

"It was a combination of ecstasy and relief," said defensive coordinator Bud Foster.

That sense of relief was palpable in the Hokies' locker room after the game. For this team, coming off three straight demoralizing losses, to somehow win its second game against a ranked opponent on the road is nothing short of a miracle.

"This game was ugly as all get out," said offensive coordinator Scot Loeffler. "We had some adversity that we were facing before we ever took the field and my hat's off to those kids."

He's absolutely right about that. Even as elation washes over the Hokies, it's possible not to recognize that this game nearly was another tough loss, just like the ECU, GT and BC matchups.

The first quarter was similarly disastrous for the Hokies as it had been in weeks past. They let Duke go up 10-0 in the quarter, allowing 121 rushing yards and managing to put just 40 yards of offense on the board themselves.

Loeffler attributes part of that to the way the Blue Devils changed up their scheme.

"They threw the kitchen sink at us. On first and second down, they were generally one or two or three or four (plays on) defense and that's about it, but they changed up, they did some really good things," Loeffler said. "Third down was a zoo anyway and they added even more problems to it."

But the offense solved some of those problems in the second quarter to draw within 10-7.

The team put together one of their best drives of the year, going for 12 plays in 98 yards to culminate in an Isaiah Ford touchdown, helping him breaking the record for TDs by a freshman in the process.

However, immediately beforehand, the Hokies' lost Marshawn Williams to a left knee sprain, an injury that team doctors think could put him out for the year.

Loeffler can hardly believe that kind of luck for the running backs.

"I've never seen anything like it," Loeffler said. "Hopefully we don't lose any more. It's really sad for Marshawn. It's been one right after the other, between that and the offensive line."

In stepped J.C. Coleman, a guy most people barely even knew was on the team still, let alone ready for a starting load. He had five carries for 35 yards to finish with 96 on the day and add a spark to the offense.

"It just feels real good," Coleman said. "I hate to see Marshawn go down, that really hurt me. I went over and told him I had his back, I'm going to finish it off. The offensive line did a heck of a job today. There were some creases and I was able to hit them."

The coaches were ecstatic to see that kind of effort from a player that was largely an afterthought, yet turned his first carries since the Pitt game into a vintage performance.

"He could've pouted, packed his lunch pail and went home and he didn't," Loeffler said. "I can't be more proud of a guy to be quite honest to you. That's what we consider a Virginia Tech guy."

The offense was helped out by another player seemingly resurrected from the dead: backup QB Brenden Motley.

The team started running him out of the wildcat to great effect, running twice for 34 yards in the quarter alone.

"He had an excellent spring, then kind of similar to what happened to Demitri (Knowles), the next thing you know there's guys in front of you and it's hard to catch up," Loeffler said. "He got an opportunity and he slowly but surely is going to get better and better."

In the process, Duke also managed to lose eight yards on the ground as the Hokies started to figure out how to defend the Devils.

They were also helped out by Duke kicker Ross Martin missing his first kick of the year, a 51-yard that could've changed the complexion of the game. Frank Beamer feels this team was long overdue for that kind of luck.

"He's a good kicker," Beamer said. "Sometimes it's just your day. It was kind of our day and our kids played hard enough and relentless enough to make it our day too."

The relentlessness showed in earnest in the third quarter.

After two Duke field goals widened the Devils' lead to 13-7, QB Michael Brewer threw an embarrassingly bad interception and the Hokies looked done.

Yet DiNardo answered with an interception of his own, after pressure on Duke QB Anthony Boone forced him to try and get rid of a ball, and once it was batted up in the air, DiNardo came down with it and returned it 51 yards to Duke's nine yard line.

"I could see the guy's shadow coming up behind me, I was counting the yardage as the shadow was closing in," DiNardo said. "Once I felt him behind me, I tucked the ball high and tight so he wouldn't get the strip."

But the offense couldn't truly capitalize, settling for a field goal to draw closer at 16-10.

"We wish we had scored a TD there," Loeffler said. "We called the same play we called against the Buckeyes, haven't ran it since the Buckeyes, the secondary took the bait and the defensive end tackled (Ryan) Malleck."

Yet Tech's good luck continued at the start of the fourth quarter. C.J. Reavis forced a fumble on the opening kickoff of the final period that caromed wildly up in the air, before Dahman McKinnon fell on it.

With the ball on Duke's 31-yard line, Brewer looked his best all game. He had to scramble around to do it, but a 26-yard pass to TE Bucky Hodges followed by a 15-yard TD throw to the big tight end helped the Hokies grab a 17-16 lead.

"He's pretty good about scrambling around back there and finding a guy," Beamer said. "When he's out there and bullets are coming, you've got to go with what you feel."

Loeffler had high praise for Hodges as well, who tied a record for TD receptions by tight ends with the score.

"Bucky ran probably the best route he's run all year long, he had premier protection and he somehow finished it," Loeffler said.

Here's where things got weird. After punting back and forth for a few drives, Tech faced a 4th and 16 on their own 48. Not exactly time for a trick play, right?

Yet there went punter A.J. Hughes, completing a 10-yard pass that fell short of the sticks to leave fans scratching their heads.

They weren't the only ones.

"I said the same thing that you did: 'what the hell are they doing?'" Beamer said.

Beamer contends that the play was borne of confusion between him and DiNardo, the punt protector for Hughes.

"The time before, they brought a guy off the edge, and almost blocked the kick, so I was trying to get that squared away, I was talking to DiNardo," Beamer said. "I was telling him to call it if he didn't like it, if he didn't feel comfortable with it, just to call timeout and bring the headhunter in and somehow the codeword for our fake got involved there."

DiNardo tells mostly the same story.

"I thought he was trying to describe the fake and in reality he was trying to talk about someone coming off the headhunter, just terrible miscommunication on the sideline," DiNardo said.

Beamer pleads guilty for his role in the whole thing, but with a win, he can afford to be lighthearted about it.

"I just probably overcoached him and had too much going on in his head," Beamer said, "My son said 'you know he's hard of hearing, so you've got to talk loud.'"

After that, it sure seemed as if a Duke lead was all but inevitable, forcing the Hokies to try another furious comeback.

Yet then Martin missed a 40-yard field goal, and hope was alive.

Tech didn't do much on the next drive, going just three and out, and handing Duke the ball on their own 40. Surely, this is where they'd blow it, right?

Instead, Foster finally solved Duke's protection schemes at the most crucial time possible. The Devils, tied for the lead in sacks allowed all year with just four, allowed a pair of sacks and a QB hurry, helping Foster's bunch finally get the late game stop they needed.

"He sees pressure, he just gets rid of it, so that's big," Foster said. "Sometimes you may not get the sack, but if you get some pressure and you get a hit on the quarterback, then all of a sudden he starts looking for the rush."

Even if it's all coming a bit too late for the Hokies to really matter when it comes to any other than getting to a bowl game, that doesn't take away those good feelings.

"It sucks because you look at our record and you think 'aw man, Tech's having a terrible year this year, but when you look back at the games, most of the year we've been in the game in the fourth quarter, except for the Miami game, it's a shame," DiNardo said. "But it feels awesome to get a win on the road against a top 25 team.

The difference this time? Those few plays we've heard so much about the last few weeks.

"The difference between winning that game and losing that game, like I said all year long, is three to four plays and we were fortunate to make those three or four plays to push us over the top," Loeffler said.

"We made those two or three plays you need to make to finish a game and if we would've made those two to three plays in the Boston College game, we'd have a win, if we'd made those two or three plays in the Georgia Tech game, you make two to three plays in the East Carolina game, that's a win. That's what our young guys have got to get, every play matters. the difference between winning and losing is so fragile."

It's easy to wonder what would've happened if the Hokies managed to pull out these close wins every time, but for now, this victory will do.

"I'm just happy for the kids," Foster said. "Because they're the ones that are playing hard and they really worked hard this week."

Comments

The Hokies are 3-0 when my girlfriend runs in a race the same day as VT plays.

9/11 Memorial 5K - Ohio State
Clarendon Day 10 K - Western Michigan
Richmond 1/2 Marathon - Duke

She did not like my suggestion that she needs to run a race every game day. I will need your help convincing her....for the sake of the program!

Black friday is a great day to run a race. You get to burn off a lot of the Thanksgiving calories and avoid all the shopping. It would be a good idea to run a race, for what it's worth. Lots of value running on that day.

Haha, she is signed up for the Alexandria Turkey Trot 5 miler. I hope that will be enough, because we are going to be at the game on Friday.

I'll be running the drumstick dash in Salem right before the game. Earn that beer!

It could be worse.

I'm in Vegas for a race and forgot to bet on the Hokies. Granted, with the time difference, I woke up around halftime.

Live for 32. Ut Prosim. Let's Go, Hokies.

Great write up Alex, Thank you!

"And guess what, you've wandered into our school of tuna and we now have a taste of lion." -Allen Gamble, The Other Guys
@Doooougie07

Very appropriate , lose last year on a long field goal , win this year on a missed long field goal. Retribution

georgebd

Brewer throws a pick and we won. Coincidence? I think not. Although, I didn't get to watch any of the game, I was so happy to hear that we won. Marshawn gets hurt though? What is going on with the RBs this year?

It actually isn't a coincidence. Brewer throwing a pick means he's trying to go downfield. The past few games the coaching staff have neutered him with safe 3-4 yard plays, which is completely opposite of his gunslinger mentality. Sure, it's safer, but it's also a lot less effective. If Brewer can keep the offense chugging by playing a bit risky and getting high rewards a pick here and there shouldn't hurt us with a good defense.

But interestingly enough, our offense wasn't chugging.. the offense had one good drive of 98 yards, outside of that we scored on 2 very short fields, we actually had a scoring drive of minus 9 yards

we actually had a scoring drive of minus 9 yards

Yeah, when I read this:

With the ball on Duke's 31-yard line, Brewer looked his best all game. He had to scramble around to do it, but a 26-yard pass to TE Bucky Hodges followed by a 15-yard TD throw to the big tight end helped the Hokies grab a 17-16 lead.

I thought, how do you throw a 26-yard pass and a 15-yard pass, starting from the 31? Then I remembered the holding penalty. So that's a scoring drive of -9 and a scoring drive of 41 yards from the 31 yard line.

"Our job as coaches is to influence young people's lives for the better in terms of fundamental skills, work ethic, and doing the right thing. Every now and again, a player actually has that effect on the coaching staff." Justin Fuente on Sam Rogers

The pick wasn't when he was trying to go downfield though. He was trying to throw to Bucky in the flat. He had him open early, he just hesitated and threw it too late. If the throw had been on time it would have been a good play, but he took too long and stared Bucky down, which caused the INT.

There is nothing in the world like Thursday night in Blacksburg!

Loeffler is looking at data and forming the following game plane:

1) Start Brewer
2) Call 'Interception Deception' play, where Brewer throws the ball to the other team, because they surely wouldn't be expecting that.
3) ...
4) Declare victory

My friends and I were joking about that. 5-2 in games with a pick, 0-3 otherwise. The game plan now includes drive deep, throw a deliberate INT, relax and just win the game.

Extremely ugly game all around. We didn't deserve to win this game, but Duke didn't deserve to win last year so I guess it all balances out.

I still want to know what they were thinking with the fake punt. If it wasn't a miscommunication (a huge, almost match-losing one at that), then Beamer should be removed as special teams coach because he's obviously lost it and our ST has been atrocious for the past 4 years anyway.

A much needed win regardless!

VT '10--US Citizen; (804) Virginian By Birth; (979) Texan By the Grace of God.

Rick Monday... You Made a Great Play...

I also root for: The Keydets, Army, TexAggies, NY Giants, NY Rangers, ATL Braves, and SA Brahmas

To quote Sam Elliot from "we were Soldiers" (I think)...

"Deserves got nothin' to do with it."

If you don't want to recruit clowns, don't run a clown show.

"I want to punch people from UVA right in the neck." - Colin Cowherd

Ok, that was Clint Eastwood in "Unforgiven". But you were like almost, kind of, sort of.....Naw forget it, you weren't anywhere near close.

There is nothing in the world like Thursday night in Blacksburg!

Ok then, to quote Sam Elliot from "we were Soldiers"

"How the hell would you know what kind of day it is!?!?!"

"Our job as coaches is to influence young people's lives for the better in terms of fundamental skills, work ethic, and doing the right thing. Every now and again, a player actually has that effect on the coaching staff." Justin Fuente on Sam Rogers

Did you read the article that you are posting on? Above, it clearly outlines that it was a miscommunication.

"Nope, launch him into the sun and fart on him on the way up"
-gobble gobble chumps

"11-0, bro"
-Hunter Carpenter (probably)

I thought about it and I was not bothered with the play calling for the most part. We ran the ball pretty well and we took shots down the field. There were a small handful of plays I would have been happier not seeing (The Brewer fake left, spin right and turn his back to the play). Overall I was pleased. Execution lacked on a few plays and a few plays were very close to be big for us. I was excited to see Motley in there but wondered why we didn't do that earlier in the season when we had another option if he got hurt. Hopefully we use it some more and let him throw out of it.

"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken" - Colonel Sanders via Ricky Bobby

My assumption is that with Leal leaving the coaching staff is wanting to get Motley some snaps just in case Brewer gets hurt. At least Leal had seen the field (the Sun Bowl, some mop up duty here and there) whereas Motley had never taken a snap. So, get him in there, let him take a few snaps. He's a big boy, give him the run option so he can take a hit or two. Maybe next week let him throw a pass or two to confuse the defense. I liked the idea.

There is nothing in the world like Thursday night in Blacksburg!

Also to spell our depleted RBs,
I thought one of those plays was a pitch to Newsome. Maybe I saw it wrong.

Anyway, it looked like in the past week since Leal left, they decided to get Motley some plays worked out that were to his strength, easy to execute and filled a need.

Coaches - working with what they got, made something that worked.

Go Hokies.

This is going to be great for the ACC.

I have a horrible confession. I wasn't able to watch the game live. I was working on a fence for the new puppy. When I am came in for lunch it was just after half and I watched our offense do nothing. I went outside to listen on the radio and they did awesome. Could it be that when I watch we play horribly? Am I truly going to be relegated to only a listening to the games?

Puppy fence? Seriously I give you a pass on that one. We just moved into our house earlier in the year and we've already dealt with the dog getting out scenario a couple times. Not fun at all.

But you do realize this means you have to be building puppy fences every the next 2 game days, right?

"When I was growing up, Virginia Tech was a school that was kicking ass and taking names, and it's time we get back to that" - James Franklin

Next 3* games. FTFY.

"Exit light..."

9 week old black lab. As I am fencing off about a .2 acres (backyard) with a real wooden scratch fence I might be working on it for the next couple Saturdays. I got about 200 feet of posts dug and placed today and about 120 feet of the stringers hung. Next step is the pickets.

Still another 100 feet of posts to go. So we should be safe through Wake Forest at least. But I will be going to the UVA game (season tickets)

Radio fence is the way to go if the fence is just for the dog, but there are a lot of pluses to a good privacy fence

In Fuente we trust

Somebody smarter than me please explain how JC looked stronger, faster, with better vision today. I love it for him. If we actually had a monster OL, I think he would be a wicked little playmaker.

"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K

The line was able to open up holes in the running game today. Pass protection was, um, not good.

JC was doing an outstanding job of finding a seam, putting his foot in the ground and decisively getting upfield. He even did a solid job of finishing runs and falling forward. The only time he really failed there was the 4th and 1 play in the 4th quarter, where he got stood up by 2 guys. Short of that, he looked great today. Hopefully that'll continue with Marshawn out and with Tech facing a Wake team that might actually be worse than William and Mary.

A wiser man than myself once said:

We should be using JC more on triple option type plays or jet sweeps. He needs to have hit full dipped before he gets the ball the dork magic.-HokieAGR

It wasn't jet sweeps, but he hit that full dipped before he gets the ball the dork magic
full dipping

FOSTERS: Australian for defense

Honestly... This.

What's Important Now
The Lunchpail.
The Hammer.
BeamerBall.

JC did look a lot bigger, stronger, and faster today. Maybe this is the way the coaches see JC all the time. I either just noticed it today or it just started today. I almost feel like Motley + JC + Rogers could be a ... good ... short yardage combination? Did I just say that?

I think they were using Motley in the situations that they would have previously gone with Wild Turkey, and I think Motley gives us a wrinkle we don't have otherwise.. It's a smart move to get him a few snaps here and there

(Pure speculation alert)

Part of me wonders if JC's mentality for this game was different. For most of the season, he got some snaps amid a crowded backfield and every time he touched the ball maybe he was putting too much pressure on himself or over-thinking, saying "I need to be impressive right now if I want to play." As the season wore on, and our RBs continued to be cursed by injuries, he approached yesterday's game thinking, "the team needs me." Maybe it inspired him, maybe it's his team-first mentality shining through.

"Exit light..."

to me, JC looked:

A) rested (i.e. healthy & fresh)
B) patient
C) benefiting from some better blocking
D) hungry & emotionally fired up
E) most importantly, esp. after MW went down...a guy who seemed to have the 'next man up' swagger...and brought it. ...

I gained a TON of respect for JC today....guy was ready, and BROUGHT IT when the team needed it, regardless of how the last few months went down for him.

My wife takes the kids and leaves the house while I watch my Hokie games.........nuff said

Yessir, there was some drive in them legs today.
I remarked to the wife that I was wondering if earlier in the season maybe he still had some rubber ankles from last year's injuries.

They are fixed now, that's for sure.

This is going to be great for the ACC.

Football is matchups. IMO, JC's strengths are a Duke weakness. JC has just enough ability to stretch the field vs a Duke defense without a lot of speed to the outside (although they're much better now than, say, 2 years ago).

I actually think if Williams had not gotten injured (hopefully the news turns out to be better than it seems) and gotten the bulk of the carries, it would have been playing into Duke's hands. JC is a much better matchup vs. Duke.

Unfortunately I would not assume this will carry over against other teams. I hope I'm wrong.

A couple of Coleman's good runs were up the middle when the oline had a good play.
I'm not remembering too many of Coleman's zone stretch plays gong for much. I could be wrong though.

But there was some good stuff through holes in the line.

This is going to be great for the ACC.

What I saw was JC having much better vision in a zone-like scheme; the stronger and faster attributes were attributable to him getting in the seem. JC was extremely patient, would find a seem, plant his leg and cut up field. The O-line did a great job of preventing the defenders from getting in the backfield and making the correct blocks down field.

So, I think it's 3 things, the O-line playing better, JC getting better at zone-rushing and Loeffler calling the correct plays for JC.

🦃 🦃 🦃

I'm a big fan of Brewer, and I generally can't stand fans who constantly call for backups, but I LOVED the change of pace that Brendan Motley and Deon Newsome brought to the game. I hope to see it more in the coming weeks, especially after losing Marshawn potentially for the year.

Now Miami wants to talk about it...

Yeah, without Marshawn, we need Motley to provide some rushing balance. I'm surprised they pulled him in the redzone. That's where I thought he could be most effective.

i loved the change of pace too....i only worry about killing any consistency by switching too much...i really don't want to get into that dual quarterback deal....I must say though, that Motley seemed comfortable coming in (albeit he didn't throw a pass i think) and i really wouldn't be surprised if he outright won the starting job in the spring over Brewer....the guy just looks the part to me.....

My wife takes the kids and leaves the house while I watch my Hokie games.........nuff said

My buddy is a big Duke fan. He was at the game and said they played Enter Sandman and the next play we scored.

Pepper

It didn't.

I have no idea why my username is VT_Warthog.

Arkansas blew a 24-0 lead in the Belk Bowl.

They did, and then we did. It was awesome.

I wish Rod Gilmore would call more of our games. Anyone else agree???

This game lent itself well to readable quotes. Thanks for the writeup.

As bad as we have looked at times this year, one could argue we are much better than our record. We've beaten two ranked teams on their fields and lost close ones to some decent teams, Georgia Tech and ECU among them. What these young guys carry over from this season's lessons should pay dividends in the coming years. Let's hope Beamer and his staff have learned a thing or two too.

Go Hokies!

"The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It's a very mean and nasty place and I don't care how tough you are it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it. " Rocky B.

#BeatUVA That's all I want. Just beat the Wahoos in two weeks. Keep the Commanwealth Cup in Blacksburg. #BeatUVA

And Wake.

In Sam Rogers we trust.

I thought this game was laugh out loud ugly. I couldn't get over the multitude of mistakes, bad calls, stupid penalties, miscommunications, duck passes, dropped balls, etc... I am nothing short of astonished that we won.

Beamer/Lefty owe Bud a steak dinner.

#BeatUVA

Not to mention the O-Line play...., of all of our close games this year we probably deserved to lose this one as much as any of them, but I'll take a W any time we can get one

One play the oline was a sieve, the next play Coleman had a hole the size of a mack truck.

It was so inconsistent.

This is going to be great for the ACC.

The way the defense started out, not sure Bud doesn't at least cover the potatoes and veggie.

Another situation that has not been addressed is the play clock on the next to last VT possession. We were continually leaving 20+ seconds on the play clock during that drive. VT had a couple of first downs on that drive and had a third one called back by penalty. If they had waited 15 seconds more on each play they could have used almost 2 more minutes off the clock.

In Fuente we trust

Yup, we were doing the same thing while we were leading late vs GT. It was driving me nuts.

"That kid you're talking to right there, I think he played his nuts off! And you can quote me on that shit!" -Bud Foster

I think Lefty was trying not to get too conservative there (hmmm... seems like that's been a sore spot for people with Beamer before). Even if he does run a few more seconds off the clock, one big play, even down to the 30 or so, for Duke and the game is over - seriously, that kicker is good. I would have bet all the money I possess on him not missing twice in one game. It's been well-documented that the offense moves much better when it goes up-tempo. With 6 minutes left, I'm sure the mentality was to protect the football, flip field position, and score if possible. If not for an offensive PI foul and subsequent blown pass protection and phantom fake punt, it would have worked perfectly. General rule for a one-score game is that outside of 4 minutes, you're running your normal offense (maybe a tad on the conservative side). Inside 4 minutes, it's all about milking the clock.

!!!!!!!!

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

I love the resiliency of this team, the players showed a lot of heart today. However the only issue I have is Loeffler falling in line with the thinking from the previous regime...."just a play or two away", etc. He harped on that multiple times, but that was a favorite of O'Cain and Stinespring. You could use that same argument for reasons we were lucky to beat OSU and Duke. Both of those teams left points on the board and were "just a play or two away." To me it's pretty obvious, either you get the job done or you don't.

Once again, love the heart from the players. They put in a spectacular effort today, especially that defense. They constantly bent but didn't break, and that's great to see from such a depleted group.

Yeah, would be nice to have solid schemes and execution so every game does not have to swing on a few plays. The margin for error is way too slim.

Stick it in! Stick it in!

Scheme always looks a whole lot better with better execution, especially up front.

As a fan you can't get too hung up on the "play or two away" interviews. ALL coaches use it, in victory and defeat. Yes it can go both ways, but it is a coaching tool. Film study is about fixing the couple of plays that weren't executed properly in order to grow as players. It is coach-speak at a presser but it doesn't change the fact that it is almost always absolutely true too.

"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K

However the only issue I have is Loeffler falling in line with the thinking from the previous regime...."just a play or two away", etc.

But read the whole quote, the way it was presented in the article (emphasis added):

"We made those two or three plays you need to make to finish a game and if we would've made those two to three plays in the Boston College game, we'd have a win, if we'd made those two or three plays in the Georgia Tech game, you make two to three plays in the East Carolina game, that's a win. That's what our young guys have got to get, every play matters. the difference between winning and losing is so fragile."

That last sentence is the key to the whole thing. If the coaches were telling the players, "you're good enough, don't worry about getting better, all we need is a couple of breaks," then yes, that would be a horrible, terrible, no-good, very bad message. But he's saying the opposite: almost every game turns on one or two plays and that's why you have to give max concentration and max effort on every single play.

As long as that's the message, I agree with the coaches wholeheartedly. Taken out of context that "play or two away" line is just a a cheap excuse. But if you're trying to convince 19-year-olds that 95% effort is never good enough, it's an important reminder.

"Our job as coaches is to influence young people's lives for the better in terms of fundamental skills, work ethic, and doing the right thing. Every now and again, a player actually has that effect on the coaching staff." Justin Fuente on Sam Rogers

Thank you Duke kicker, for handing us the win after we gift-wrapped not one, but TWO opportunities for you to put the game away.

Reality has a mighty pimp hand.

Karmic payback for Journell missing field goals against Duke last year.

Plus Slye just barely hooked in the one he hit. A game of inches. . .

"That kid you're talking to right there, I think he played his nuts off! And you can quote me on that shit!" -Bud Foster

Not to mention the one that was blocked and just squeaked over the crossbar. Watching it again, it was crazy thinking about how no one knew just how crucial those few feet were gonna be.

This team won't grow if Loeffler cannot improve. He's got to get better at his job before we can truly turn a corner and get better. I'm pumped we won, but I still feel like Loeffler doesn't prepare our Offense well enough and doesn't make adjustments quick enough to Defense.

Pour some Beer on it

I literally face-palmed when we took a shot at the end zone on a 3rd and 3.

This is not necessarily related to the play-call above, but we need a system that the players can execute consistently. It took us about 2 months to use the same play that we scored on against OSU... I'm not sure how we can get consistent execution by practicing all of these plays within NCAA practice time restrictions.

There were a few head scratchers but overall I thought Loeffler coached well to the personnel he had on the field. It has to be frustrating never knowing when you can and can't trust that inconsisent offensive line.

"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K