
Boos cascaded down upon Buzz Williams as the Virginia Tech head coach called his last timeout with 45 seconds remaining against Clemson. In all honesty you couldn't really blame the crowd inside Littlejohn Coliseum for their unrest. The Hokies were down 19, which was actually an improvement on a deficit that had been over 30 for a portion of the second half.
The Tigers onslaught mercifully ended moments later, and the Hokies fell 54-75. To say that Tech's performance was disappointing would be a massive understatement. When we last checked in with Williams and company, they had just pulled off a comeback win over Georgia Tech and were riding high.
This game brought the youthful Hokies, or at least their fans, careening back down to earth. Clemson canned three pointers like they were layups right from the jump, as they nailed their first five attempts from distance and never looked back.
The fifth of those triples not only gave the home team a 19-4 lead in less than five minutes, but also signified what kind of day was in store for the visitors.
"I don't know that we didn't have good focus," Williams said. "I think that [Clemson] were just dominating in how they played, and we didn't respond.
"I don't know that it had anything to do with focus. When you're in last place, you won a game by two points, you've lost so many times, it's not like that lingers around very long."
The fact that the Tigers hit so many jumpers should be troubling for the Hokies, considering that Brad Brownell's squad is at the bottom of the conference in shooting. Don't let the numbers fool you, however. This performance was no fluke.
"I don't know if [Brownell] would say they took many bad shots," Williams explained. "I think they executed and took practice shots, and the shot that you practice are the ones that typically go in."
As many Buzzketball fans can attest, this season has been full of abnormal shooting performances for Tech opponents. Not only did the Tigers come screaming out of the gate on Saturday afternoon, but Florida State, Pittsburgh, Notre Dame and Louisville all bettered their three point percentages on the season.
Having a team or two shoot better from deep than they have the rest of the season is an outlier. When it happens in 50 percent of your conference games? That's no longer chance, it's a trend.
First off, I don't think that this is an effort thing. I know that seeing wide open jumpers may give off the impression of lazy defense, but considering that these guys play their hearts out every time they step on the court, can you really question their hustle?
To me, this is another example of Tech's size issue. It's simply tough for Adam Smith, Devin Wilson and other slim guards to consistently run through the picks of opposing big men. Against teams that also play small, the Hokies can switch on many of those screens. But when playing a few competent big men it's a lose-lose. Switch and you're likely to give up an offensive rebound, let your guards fight through them and you're vulnerable to giving up open looks.
The latter happened on Saturday. And while it's infuriating to watch the Hokies give up oodles of treys, there's not much that they can do about it. Opponents that play more than one capable front court player will consistently give them problems. Unfortunately for Buzz's bunch, that's the majority of the ACC.
Another interesting thing to take away from this train wreck of a contest is looking at who is getting consistent minutes. Williams has been upfront with everyone about this topic for his entire tenure thus far. He's going to play the guys who have been playing and practicing the best.
Apparently that means less Devin Wilson. Since the point guard played most of the game against Pittsburgh, his playing time has decreased dramatically. He's now been relegated to the bench, acting as a sixth man during the last two games.
I've covered the reasons as to why Wilson is an awkward fit in Blacksburg, so I'll be brief. His lack of a jump shot takes away from everything else his team is trying to do. Since Devin's defender knows that he is almost a non-factor from the outside, why guard him closely? Instead the opposing player can crowd the paint, run out on another shooter or sky for an uncontested rebound.
That's not to say that there's nothing Wilson can bring to the table. He's good when dominating the ball and attacking the hoop, drawing fouls and creating chances for others. It is telling, though, that Jalen Hudson has been competing for Wilson's minutes. It seems that as Hudson's minutes increase (like against Clemson or Syracuse) it comes at the expense of the sophomore point guard.
I'm not going to speculate what this means for future seasons, nor do I feel comfortable guessing what the coaching staff is thinking long term. But I do know that at least right now, Wilson is not one of the team's best five players.
If we were to learn anything from this game, it's that Virginia Tech basketball still has a very long way to go. Though there will be a handful of positive results, blowouts like this are also bound to happen.
This is the time of year that usually hits a young roster hard. It's nearing the end of a long season, and sometimes bad losses can pile up. If the Hokies can regroup after a game like this, it's a small victory in itself.
It will be interesting to see how Hokie Hoops can bounce back on Wednesday when they head to Coral Gables to play Miami. And if there's anything that this unit has shown, it's that they can come back after a tough game. I'd expect a mid-week grinder against the Hurricanes.

Comments
Bless you for watching the entire game, and then being able to put together a well-thought out evaluation.
Everytime I want to get excited, the balloon gets deflated again.
But I agree, I don't think that it's effort; we will get better with talent, etc.
I know Wilson isn't a great shooter, but it seems like last season he tended to pull up and take a lot more 12-15 foot jumpers around the foul line. This year if he isn't taking it to the hoop, then he's not shooting. I don't want him pumping up shots, but its almost a liability having him on the court at times because it almost makes the game a 5 on 4. Hudson is definitely someone I hope develops into a very good player
I just hope we are able to keep the freshmen who are able to help next year's team. Bibbs, Hudson, Hill and Mueller are critical. Pierce hopefully will take strides next year.
There is a lot Pierce needs to improve on... it seems like he forgets he's 7 feet tall and doesn't seem to play very aggressively. He seems timid and has trouble just holding onto the ball. Virginia Tech is one reliable big man from being a middle of the conference giant killer.
When a guard drives the lane we have no answer. We don't have anyone down low who can really alter shots on a consistent basis without fouling. So anytime this happens, we are caught with our pants down. Either we collapse the defense down to bring an extra guy in, leaving a man wide open for an uncontested kick out 3 or we play it straight up asking Pierce or Henry to contest the shot cleanly, which they have proven they cannot do. And when we do everything right and the shot is missed, we're still in trouble because we don't have anyone in position for the rebound. And what makes this even worse is that we are getting absolutely no offensive contributions from our big men this year so we aren't able to get the ball in positions to consistently get opposing big men in foul trouble, so we are forced into collapsing the defense on drives leaving those guys open for practice 3 pointers in an effort to keep our big men in the game as long as possible to at least keep their bigs from dominating us like what happened when Syracuse whipped us the second Pierce and Henry fouled out.
Long story short, we need size... Badly. And we need the guys with size to score. If we can't get that to happen games like yesterday will become the norm in the ACC.
Far too many posters wrongly assumed that Wilson would be a key this season just because he was a key in the offense under Johnson. He exhibited many weaknesses last year that folks ignored only because he was less bad than most of last year's roster.
The difference is that Buzz has an actual offensive/defensive philosophy and a grasp of how to implement it. Wilson has not shown that he is willing to accept his role and responsibilities in it thus far.
That's why I've said since early in the season that I expect him to either leave the program or to earn minimal playing time in the future. Unless he changes, that is being proven to be the case. We have better options already, and far better options next season at his slot. It would be nice to see him play the way Buzz repeatedly tells him he has to play for the team to succeed, but that is on Devin to actually accomplish.
Is it willingness, or is it capability? Seems like Wilson wouldn't be around at all if he wasn't trying his best, given Buzz's approach. Maybe he just can't pull it off.
What is being asked of DW is not beyond his capabilities. Defensive effort, offensive keys of focus that are easily comprehended. He's not being asked to carry the team or score 20 a night or dish a dozen assists or the like. But, as I said above, the future looks to hold reduced minutes - which proves Buzz is not pushing him off the program - or the possibility that Wilson decides on his own to leave. Buzz isn't pushing him out, he is just going to other options who are willing to give the focus. It's not a matter of talent.
Kid can't handle the ball the way an ACC PG needs to. Part of that is because his supporting cast is poor in handling the ball.
Extrapolating a reduction in minutes to leaving the team is a bit much. If he performed he wouldn't have reduced minutes, because the coach would leave him in.
Kid didn't upgrade his game over the summer. Yes the team ball handling capability went down but he's gotta get better with the tre and he's gotta be able to handle the ball much better. Handle and tre, then you gotta think about running an offense. Hope he can get it turned around this summer, IMHO this is the biggest gap on the team.
Until someone shows they can handle the ball better than Wilson (yes he is not great), he's got a spot on the team. I don't know how this team has made it thus far. Play enough little guys and eventually one of them can find a soft defender to run the offense on. Ugly way to play for sure.
I'm almost certain that Seth Allen will jump him next year and part possibly Justin Robinson too. He highest ceiling may be at WR in football. Seriously.
I agree with you 100%. DW should really consider switching to football where he was an outstanding reciever.
But then, looking at our WR corps, he might be buried there too...
I live in Clemson country, and went to this train wreck of a game. Brian is right on about size. And you see it on both sides of the court. Our guys are shorter and not as strong.
On offense, we cannot post up. Just not big enough or strong enough. Guys heading to the basket hear footsteps of shot blockers leading to poor dish offs, turnovers, or just plain getting shots blocked. Clemson had five blocked shots. We had one.
On defense they cannot fight through screens. If they switch off they are feeding the big guys. We give the opposing side too many second chances by not getting defensive rebounds. On virtually every rebound that was contested, Clemson got the rebound. Our opponents have stellar days on offensive rebounds when they play us. Clemson had nine offensive rebounds (as to our four).
Because of rebounding problems (due to our size) Clemson had 86 total shots (2 and 3 pt combined) compared to our 62. That stat alone is why we lost and continue to lose. And due to our size, that is not going to change.
So, Clemson isn't good, right? I don't know any of those players and they have the (...checking to see if Gregory is still employed by GT....) the 2nd worst coach in the ACC.
one game, all that. But, still.
Clemson is a borderline bubble team. They recently gave their coach an extension after last season. He is far better than the 2nd worst coach in the conference.
Really? Gregory and BC's coach aren't good, so that would be my bottom two. Then who? Manning has done some nice things at Wake this year. Gottfried is still a great recruiter, if he can't do anything with them. Then....Buzz? Larranaga? Dixon? Hamilton? All are better than Brownell.
So that's 9 coaches. The other 6: Coach K, Roy, Bennett, Brey, Pitino, Boeheim
1. Coach K
2. Pitino
3. Boeheim
4. Roy
5. Bennett
6. Brey
7. Buzz
8. Dixon
9. Larranaga
10. Hamilton
11. Gottfried
12. Manning
13. Brownell
14. BC's coach (his name is apparently Jim Christian)
15. Gregory
So Brownell isn't the 2nd worst coach in the conference. He's like third. Maybe fourth.
I'm watching Georgia Tech take it to Clemson right now and wondering how this game went so badly for us.
I mean really, Clemson just air balled a 3. Guess they used up all their shooting touch against us.