
The Virginia Tech offense should look a little bit heavier this fall. The Hokies' offensive formations and personnel packages that is.
"We got three tight ends that are really good players," Michael Brewer said at ACC Kickoff. "We feel like they can all play on the field at the same time. I think you'll see a lot of two tight end sets. And obviously you'll see some three tight end sets. You'll probably see a lot of two tight end sets, and then be able to have them flex, have them tight, basically put a lot of strain on the defense because of the multiple things they bring to the table, in the run game and the pass game."
Virginia Tech will try to leverage its favorable situation of three versatile, and proven, tight ends on the roster, and create mismatches in both the pass and run game.
"I think the real positive thing about our offense is three tight ends there, that are tough kids," Frank Beamer said at ACC Kickoff. "They'll block inside for you, then you get them out in space and they get matched up on a linebacker or a strong safety and they give you some options there. They're good in space."
Bucky Hodges is perhaps Tech's most talked about option at tight end, and for good reasons. The redshirt sophomore has a unique combination of size (6-6, 249), speed (4.46 second 40-yard dash clocked in 2014) and athleticism (38.5 inch vertical jump measured in 2014). At times last season, Hodges looked like an athlete playing tight end. Bucky transitioned from QB to TE while on the scout team in 2013. To take the next step, he'll have to become a more polished route runner.
"We spent a lot of time throwing with the receivers and the tight ends, and pretty much making the tight ends run everything that the receivers run," Brewer said. "That's not to say that they will in the fall. That's asking a lot for those big guys. But for them to just get better and learn things from Cam (Phillips) and Isaiah (Ford), the way that they run routes, has been beneficial for those guys."
According to Brewer, Hodges has been preparing for a more demanding role this season.
"He had a great spring," Brewer said. "This summer he's just been working on getting in shape because he knows he's going to get in the game a lot. He's got to be able to play as much as he can for us, because he poses such a threat on the field with his ability to split out and come in with his hand on the ground. So he's been getting in shape. He's been learning more and more about the offense. The sky's the limit for him."
Redshirt senior Ryan Malleck and redshirt sophomore Kalvin Cline round out Tech's trio of talented tight ends. Malleck earned the George Preas Award as the offense's most valuable performer of spring practice.
"What's so crazy is, we didn't show as much last year, but Malleck is a very good route running tight end as well," Brewer said. "Don't be surprised to see him more involved in the pass game this year as well. He's looked great out there."
Cline caught 26 balls for 321 yards and 2 scores his freshman year. However, his 2014 campaign was cut short because of a knee injury. According to Brewer, Cline is 100%.
"Seems like he's been hurt, healthy, hurt, healthy ever since I got here," Brewer said. "Kalvin was a guy with how much time he missed with all of his injuries, he just needed reps. That's all he needed. He got a lot of that this offseason. He's been improving each week. Every time we go out there he looks better. His hands are good. His routes are starting to get better. He's a big enough guy to where he can put his hand in the ground and block as well. I'm sure he'll fall into the mix as well."
Scot Loeffer will have the necessary tools at tight end to create a slew of favorable situations for Tech's offense.
"Having the tight ends that we do in Bucky and Ryan and Kalvin. If we can keep them healthy this year, and they can continue to improve like they have been, they're going to be a weapon for us," Brewer said. "We can use them in the run game and in the pass game. They create mismatches for people. It causes teams to play to our personnels, which is a problem for them, because our personnel, all three of those guys can get out and play receiver, especially Bucky. You're playing two tight end personnel then you put Bucky out at receiver, put him out in a route, and it's difficult for linebackers to match up with him.
However, while Tech is set across the board at tight end, the Hokies are in search of depth at wide receiver.
Willie Byrn, who hauled in 47 passes in 2014 (second most on the team), was a senior last season. Flaky-productive, Joshua Stanford left the program before last year's Military Bowl. Kendrick Holland and Carlis Parker both showed glimpses of potential, but left the program in the offseason prior to spring practice.
"It's still a project right now. We need at least two more to really step up," Brewer said.
True freshman wideouts Isaiah Ford and Cam Phillips blossomed into reliable pass catchers last season. Ford led the Hokies in receptions (56), receiving yards (709) and was second in receiving touchdowns (7). Phillips wasn't a pushover on the field either. He racked up 40 catches, 498 yards and scored 3 touchdowns.
Over the course of preseason camp in August, Tech needs to coach up the receivers underneath the duo on the depth chart to round out its two-deep.
"How well we develop the wide receiver position will be a big part of our football team," Beamer said.
Demitri Knowles, Jaylen Bradshaw and Kevin Asante among others are all in the fold.
From Brewer's perspective, he wants players that can simply execute on the field.
"(Demitri Knowles) got the most experience of those guys that are right now playing backup roles," Brewer said. "We feel like he can help us out a lot, especially (as a) down-the-field threat with his speed. He's just got to go out there and perform come camp, and I'm sure he will. We'll see how it goes."
"He (Jaylen Bradshaw) looks a lot better this summer than he did last fall," Brewer said. "I remember throwing with him this summer and kind of going, 'is that the same kid from fall?' He's gotten a lot bigger, he looks better, his routes are more crisp."
In certain situations, the Hokies will be able to cash-in on their riches at tight end to offset any insufficient depth at wideout, but it's a momentary, and not a season long cure-all.
"Looking at Bucky Hodges, Malleck and Cline, those guys give you flexibility and affect the wide receiver position a little bit," Beamer said. "When you've got guys that are tough enough to be on the inside and athletic enough to be on the outside, you've got something pretty good, that's what I like."
During spring practice, Loeffler noted that Ford and Phillips played too many snaps last season, and that may have affected their production down the stretch. Tech will need more than just a seat filler when either one is catching his breath on the sideline.
"We'll see who that is in the fall," Brewer said. "We made that a big point. So they know where we are at with that. Usually what happens, from what I've seen, is once you get into camp after that 3 weeks they'll declare who the next two guys are. It means something to them, and they have been working at it. I don't know who it will be, but we'll figure it out."

Comments
If I were a WR recruit I would be jumping at the chance to get on this offense. if you are really good you could get into the rotation as a true freshman. that has to be a big selling point.
also I see Ford reaching 1000 yards his junior year. I don't think anyone quite makes it this year because the ball will be spread around. but Ford's 3rd year he's going to be the one to finally get that record.
Unfortunately by then we'll have a newbie at QB, which tend to lean heavily on TEs .
1000 from Ford doesn't seem likely. I think only a truly explosive athlete will accomplish that here. Some one that is gonna turn a short play into a long one. In order to get 1000 yards, that's a lot of 100 yard games.
I think Lawson will be far enough along and has the arm big enough to be hitting Ford all over the field, including the deep ball. Ford put of 700 yards as a true freshman. I only see improvement on that if they keep slinging the rock. I still think it will be Ford, or Bucky if he is still around and plays wide a lot more.
VT needs Tino Ellis!
not feeling too hot there but we will see in a week or so
He averaged ~55 yards/game last year. He'd need to average ~77 yards/game to get 1000 yards. It's reasonable to think that's possible- he should be better this year, and the passing game should be better.
I think Marcus Davis was the closest we've ever gotten to 1000 yards receiving (around 45 yards shy).
I'm positive Ford can do better.
1999 Andre Davis 35 962 9 (Single season VT record)
2000 Emmett Johnson 34 574 3
2001 Andre Davis 39 623 7
2002 Ernest Wilford 51 925 7
2003 Ernest Wilford 55 886 3
2004 Eddie Royal 28 470 3
2005 David Clowney 34 619 3
2006 David Clowney 34 424 0
2007 Josh Morgan 46 552 5
2008 Danny Coale 36 408 0
2009 Jarrett Boykin 40 835 5
2010 Jarrett Boykin 53 847 6
2011 Jarrett Boykin 61 761 5
2012 Marcus Davis 51 953 5
2013 Willie Byrn 51 660 2
2014 Isaiah Ford 56 709 6
I knew it was between both Davises. Picked the wrong one, and they were only apart by 7 yards.
Ya I honestly didn't remember marcus having that big of a year, so was surprised. Just posted it for some perspective on what elite WRs may look at in terms of production from our WR groups in the past years.
Imagine what he could have done if he'd gone hard on every play? He probably dropped enough passes that if he'd caught just a few of them, he'd have broken 1000.
Must be why he never blocked, trying to make his stats look better.
If bowl stats counted in 1999, Davis would have finished the season with 42 reception for 1070 yards after his 7 catch 108 yard performance in the Sugar Bowl.
I can agree from the PT standpoint, but if you were also looking at how WRs historically have done in VT's offenses how excited would you be? Until we have some WRs blow up yardage wise it's going to be hard to sell the top guys IMO.
Let's look at Clemson for example (mainly because they land stud WRs every year):
2014: mike Williams 1030, artavis scott 965
2013: Watkins 1464, Bryant 828
2012: Hopkins 1405, Watkins 708
2011: Watkins 1225, Hopkins 961
It's easy to sell the WRs when you have a history of getting them the ball and an OC that shows how he is going to utilize them.
well they don't have said OC anymore so maybe thatll help us!
Definitely agree that if they don't have similar success this year it will be used against them, but with the talent they were able to stock pile and with Watson at QB I'm guessing they will maintain their 1000 yard WR streak this year.
that would make sense if VT was running a similar offense as they have historically, but they aren't so apples and oranges. it would not take much more to get a single player to 1000 yards. if our offense had played consistently last season Ford would have been damn close already.
I don't think we're going to have a reciever hit 1000 yds as long as Frank is here. We've always been a run first offense, even now. It's just that our running game has been nonexistant the past 3 years. Once Lawson comes, who can run the ball as well, I expect that philosophy to come back. Our offense doesn't work well for someone to get 1000 yds a year, so it will be difficult for Ford to accomplish that even in 2016.
it makes sense to recruits. they want to see offenses that have WRs as a focal point. we can't sell that. maybe in two years we can if Ford keeps developing like you and I think he could, but until then what do we really have to sell other than PT and hypotheticals?
NFL readiness, playing against some of the best DB's in the game every day, getting a great degree.
And that differentiates us from our competition how? We don't send many WRs to the NFL despite having success with DBs, so that is a tough sell. The recruits look at your qb situation, your offensive philosophy and how WRs have done in recent years. If you were an elite WR would you really look at VT if you weren't a VT fan to start with?
The same could be said of GT or any run first team. WR and QB are two positions where what school you go to doesn't matter in fact sometimes the "top" schools struggle with their players in the NFL, see SEC and QB's.
Because GT has had no success developing/getting WRs to the NFL despite their run first philosophy? Not like they have two of the top WRs in the NFL currently...
Weren't both of them already on the roster when Paul Johnson was hired?
Demaryius Thomas was already a starter when Paul Johnson came. Calvin Johnson never played for Paul Johnson.
Ok, agree on that. It's similar to what I am saying about DE's and closing on a elite 5 star there.
if dadi and ken can get drafted fairly high (4th round or better) I think Bud and co will have a much easier time navigating the negative recruiting about our scheme not getting DL to the NFL.
I actually think it depends more on Ken than Dadi. Dadi could be a high draft pick but is likely destined to be an OLB in the NFL. Ken has the size to stay at End (at least in a 4-3) and part of the knock is that when Bud's DL get to the NFL theu have to switch positions. It also shouldn't hurt that Maddy should still be a DT at the next level. After this year Bud should have 3/4ths of his DL get drafted (unless Ken has a great season and declares and then 100% could easily be drafted) which should be a huge statement and something he can sell right away.
agree to some extent, but it's not uncommon nowadays for college DEs to convert to 3-4 OLBs in the NFL. Becoming more and more common.
I don't know why you're being downvoted. College DE's move to OLB all the time. It's extremely common
Could not care less about the legs/downvotes etc. Some people just choose to not live in the real world. I understand being a fan, but you can still be objective at the same time.
You're right I just think that if the knock on Bud is that all his guys have to change position to have an NFL career then I think it's important for some of his guys to stick at their position. I don't think they all do, but when's the last DE that Bud coached that stayed at DE? To say that we've been struggling to recruit DEs is a bit of an understatement and that has something to do with it.
Chris Ellis maybe? I know they drafted him as a DE but I think they switched to a 3-4 either that year or the next and tried to move him. Jason Worilds was drafted as an OLB by Pittsburg. Darryl Tapp back in '06 played DE a lot of years in the league and even played some OLB depending on which team he was on. Think he was a DE in Detroit last year.
Worilds was definitely drafted as an OLB and did well. You are also correct about Tapp being a DE last year but he's bounced around between OLB and DE. Either way that's 2 guys that have had a career in the league, only 1 sort of at DE since 2006.
the only one I can recall other than bruce to stick at DE for a long time was john engelberger.
The knock isn't that they switch from DE. That happens everywhere. Even elite guys like Clowney know they'll probably be moved to OLB. The knock is that our guys just flat out don't produce at the next level. Worilds was the only solid NFL player.
The knock for DT is being undersized though because no NFL team is going to start a Hopkins sized DT and there isn't a path for easy position change
I think it's both. Our DEs haven't even been looked at as an End in the NFL. Clowney did and could be either. I do agree that being productive is the most important thing but Bud/Wiles get knocked for moving bigger DE recruits inside instead of keeping them at DE which just solidifies what you just said.
We seem to be able to recruit DT pretty well, but DE concerns me.
Scary to think what these 3 can do if healthy. Throw in a Tank for some Wild Turkey plays and this will be quite a beefy O...
Bring in some no WR sets to give Ford and Phillips a break. Let Brewer have some plays off with the tank in the wild turkey like you mentioned. Maybe we'll pass to our TEs or maybe we'll just bulldoze the defense with a 1 one two punch of Rogers and Juice*.
*Assuming Marshawn is healthy, of course. He's my favorite RB with a "run over your @$$" mentality.
I think we're really going to regret losing Moorehead. His impact on the program was immediate.
Well we've yet to see what Burden can really do. All indications are that while he's nearly a polar opposite in terms of personality compared to Moorehead, his track record is strong in both development and recruiting.
Agreed, he was very good. Remember how much consternation there was about WR's not catching the ball with the guy before him (was his name Sherman too?)? It was brutal. Even going back to Tony Ball, who became a very good coach at UGA, there was a lot of WR inconsistency. AMo had a huge impact from Day 1.
Or maybe it was Rogers, FB pissed that he'd drop a ball and hit the JUGGS machine, motivating WRs too.
Just a thought, but perhaps a downside to Moorehead, especially his first year, was his lack of experience. What happened in that first game against Alabama was almost laughable. Yes, we could argue the why's and at whom to throw blame, but from what I read about Zohn's entry into Virginia Tech, he immediately went to film to see what he had with an eye to improve individual weaknesses. I think Moorehead kind of acquired that on the job and he'll always look back and shake his head about that game and know he could have done some things differently to prepare his group for it. Burden's probably been there and done that.
Has anyone found out where Parker, Holland and Stanford ended up going?
No news on any of them, but Stanford's twitter seems to indicate he is still in Blacksburg this summer.
I heard this week Stanford is looking to transfer. Forgot where though.
#Sources
Year after year, we hear Frank&Company saying something about using our tight ends more, maybe that trend has started to become reality. As for snagging wide receiver recruits, I agree that until we can show that we actually value the passing game for real, we're going to struggle to land them. I have harped on this for more than a decade, and it seems like we almost get going, but again, maybe we're actually beginning to see the light. Either way, it looks like we have a good crop of pass catchers now, hopefully Frank will loosen the reigns a bit and let them play too.
Am I really the only one who was looking at 3 proven tight-ends and thinking...I remember when Stanford thrashed us in a bowl game using 2 and 3 tight-ends sets...??? I want them all on the field, and I'm not worried about the depth of WR's. With (what's the terminology? 1-2 set I want to say, meaning 1 RB and 2 TEs) a single back two tight-ends set, you've got the ability to put whoever in at receiver, and the defense is still guessing...run or pass? run or pass? Heck, they're gonna buy the run hard with "other" receivers out there, all crossing routes and let brewer find the open short throw for a first down. And finally, those tight-ends can definitely help an oline that is still admittedly inexperienced, but notably more athletic. The tackles just have to take the inside guy, and let the TE slow the outside guys. Yes, I am drinking the koolaid, and the last time I did was TTs senior year...
I was thinking the exact same thing with regard to that Stanford team. They did an awesome job of utilizing those TE weapons!
Really wish Deon Newsome was more than just a jet sweep guy for the offense
Yep, can he not catch? Cant run routes? There wasnt even a mention of him. I guess it will be Knowles and Bradshaw if anybody is going to step up. Newsome needs to get in the mix.
Last I heard his hands weren't that great, apparently not even good enough to challenge guys like Bradshaw and Asante.
Also no mention of Joel Caleb in the transcripts.
I'm hoping some 3 TE sets can really help us in the redzone as well. Flex Bucky out and he's a huge size mismatch. If he's one on one out wide against a corner near the goal line, I'm throwing the jump ball all day. Or we can line all three up tight to the line, put Trey and Rogers back there, and put Durkin in as wildcat to play some power football. I'm sure Lefty is excited about the endless possibilities.
How about these two for something new: Durkin and Peoples? Some power whoopazz.
I am 100% in agreement with French that Durkin needs to be our wildcat/goal line power QB. The guy is big, athletic, and built like a truck. Lawson and Motley are definitely athletic and give us a huge run threat, but neither are anywhere near as physical as Durkin at 242 lbs. running the ball. Durkin has some wheels and moves himself, too. Just makes total sense to keep Motley healthy and a redshirt on Lawson when we have Durkin. Guy has a cannon arm too; while maybe not consistently accurate right now, I have no doubt he could fake the handoff and hit a few deep bombs.
Anybody else hear about these multiple great TE's and remember 5 years ago when the patriots were destroying everybody with Gronk and Hernandez? They had wide receivers with big yards, because if the defense played the TE's the WR's were open. If they played the WR's the TE got huge numbers. They also ran the ball effectively because the defense was ALWAYS looking for the pass.
I think Tom Brady may have helped that offense too
Well you just deflated his whole theory...
Nah, I think Brewer can step up with the line protecting him. Brady mainly throws short and intermediate length passes.
Sorry, let me try that again, with feeling:
We already had threads on that. I was trying to avoid the possible mistakes of the people involved.
Sorry, I must have missed that one.
And just FYI; I wasn't trying to be mean either, I just thought I had been too subtle.
uses same joke twice...gets double the turkey legs.
that's TKPing like a boss
Man, what I would do to have the coach who taught Brady in college. What a massive advantage that would be.
I seem to recall he got the crap kicked out of him by anOSU and Purdue. Too lazy to look it up, just remember playback from ESPN (anOSU) and headline in the papes (Purdue).
You going all Newsies on us?
And Lefty coached Brady. Just sayin'...
psst
scroll up three or so comments
read Alum07's comment
drink
Can't wait to see a couple of three TE sets with a screen to JC with Mr. Rogers leading.
Defense wouldnt even see JC until he popped through the other side.
JC is gonna make a big play in a big moment on a screen play. He's just too good at this for it not too happen. It has to be the perfect timing and not too obvious, but I know Lefty is waiting to use it.
A few years ago Bielema had 3 NFL quality TEs at Wisconsin (and a weaker WR corps). He played all 3 at the same time quite a bit. They threw to them, they were devastating run blockers, and they complimented the Badger's power running game really well. It will be interesting to see if the Hokies do something similar.
Wasn't excellent o-line play a key element at Wiscy? Ours is still yet to be determined.
There is a big need for Tino Ellis!
Not gonna happen. I'm calling it.
I've got it...Lawson to WR! OSU's doing it...
WR? No, Lawson to TE!
Would you say we have a Plethora Jefe?
Yea, everytime with this word.