
For the first two quarters against Furman, new Hokies starting quarterback Brenden Motley looked like a timid freshman. But after halftime, a switch flipped for the redshirt junior.
The light truly did come on for Motley and the rest of Tech's offense in the third quarter, as the team managed to score 21 points in the period in its 42-3 blowout win over the Paladins. The offense as a whole managed 583 in total, the most since offensive coordinator Scot Loeffler took over the unit back in 2013.
But the final boxscore was mostly an afterthought. Instead, the team needed to see what it had with Motley, and he delivered.
"I think his play gives us a lot of hope," said Frank Beamer after the game. "I don't think he flinched a bit. He's very much in control."
Although he started 7 of 14 for 113 yards, in the third quarter alone he completed 9 of 10 passes for two scores, with one ball that would've been a score had Cam Phillips not barely gone out of bounds.
"In the first half, he didn't do a very good job of seeing the coverage," said offensive coordinator Scot Loeffler. "There were some plays out there that were available that we didn't make. Then in the second half, I think he did a really good job of seeing the coverage, seeing the picture and making plays."
Motley also got plenty of chances to show off his vaunted running ability, rushing four times for 38 yards and a score.
Yet the staff also made it clear that they wanted to see what they had with true freshman Dwayne Lawson, burning his redshirt in the first quarter and giving him the reins of the offense for the bulk of the fourth quarter. He looked every bit the freshman at times, but managed a few nice plays to finish 3 of 7 for 51 yards, as well as 51 yards rushing and a ground TD.
"It was pretty much smooth sailing," Lawson said. "I was excited to get my feet wet a little."
But Loeffler didn't think Lawson's maiden voyage was quite so smooth.
"Mentally he was exceptional, and that's a good sign with a freshman," Loeffler said. "He was sporadic with his technique. He's going to be a great player, there's no question about it. But he got to learn today that everything matters. His footwork was sloppy, his technique was sloppy, he got ahead of himself at times."
Lawson certainly made his share of mistakes, most notably with a number of low throws, and combined with Motley's performance, it seems that there wasn't enough about his limited snaps to convince the coaches that he deserves to unseat the starter next week against Purdue.
"Even though we started a little slow, I felt confident," Motley said.
As the game opened, all eyes were on Motley. The first drive wasn't particularly strong for the new starter, as he missed badly on both of his attempts. The Hokies even gave the Lane Stadium crowd some heart palpitations by sending in Lawson for a single play after Motley's helmet popped off, a telling sign for Chris Durkin's status on the depth chart.
"I was ready, I had my helmet on, ready to go if anything happened," Lawson said.
But the drive, and the one following it, ended in a punt, as the Hokies got off to a slow offensive start that was thoroughly emblematic of their other early-season matchups with inferior teams.
It ended up being the defense to put the first points on the next series. The defensive line started ramping up the pressure on Furman QB Reese Hannon, and on second down, he felt the rush and tossed the ball directly to LB Andrew Motuapuaka. He scampered in unopposed for an 18-yard score, Tech's first pick six since Kendall Fuller managed one against UNC last season.
"All of a sudden the defense puts us on the board and it's a different game," Beamer said. "A different feeling over on the sideline. I thought that was huge as far as the overall ball game."
The defense managed to force a fumble on the next drive, with DT Corey Marshall coming up with a strip sack to give the Hokies the ball on the Furman 46 yard line. Yet once again, the offense couldn't capitalize, and A.J. Hughes was called on once more.
After a few more punts back and forth, Motley and company finally hit their stride. He managed to find TE Bucky Hodges down the field, and after a few nifty moves by Temuchin, the Hokies ended up with a 46-yard gain to the Paladins' 31 yard line.
But that success nearly stalled as the second quarter opened in the middle of the drive. Motley managed to run for seven yards on third down, but the Hokies were left with a 4th and 2. Beamer chose to get aggressive, drawing up a Trey Edmunds run.
He exploded for 19 yards down the sideline, going out at the four yard line. Motley then got the call, taking it in himself to give Tech a 14-0 lead.
On the Hokies' next series, Motley trotted out for the first play, but then Lawson returned. He carried the ball straight ahead for five yards, but Motley returned immediately.
He managed to complete a ball to Isaiah Ford and after a nifty juke move, he gained 10 yards. Lawson came right on back and ran the exact same QB lead play, this time getting stopped for no gain. Motley connected with Ford on a nicely timed comeback route for 11 yards, but the drive stalled soon after that.
The Hokies ran out Joey Slye to try a 45-yard field goal, but he was both wide left and a bit short.
The Paladins found some offensive momentum on the next drive. With eight minutes remaining in the half, Hannon engineered a drive down to Tech's 42 yard line.
But Bud Foster's group regained control soon after that. Hannon lost eight yards after fumbling the ball briefly, then Woody Baron almost single handedly ended the drive with a tackle for loss and a sack.
Motley completed a pair of long balls to Cam Phillips, one going for 21 yards and one for 13, on the next drive, but the Hokies still couldn't get anything going.
There was a brief bit of controversy involving a waved-off interception by Fuller in the Paladins' last series before the break. The referees flagged Brandon Facyson for pass interference in call that, while the replays seemed to justify it, made defensive coordinator Bud Foster positively livid.
"Do I need to say anything more about it?" Foster joked after the game. "I didn't see much, not even on the replay, I thought it was a great play...It should've been a pick."
Furman's drive stalled nonetheless, and the Hokies took a 14-0 lead into the locker room.
Yet it seemed the halftime break did a world of good for the offense. Travon McMillian busted out for a 63-yard run on the very first play of the second half, and after a few more plays including a 10-yard run by Motley, the new QB1 managed to find Ford in the back of the end zone from the one yard line to make it 21-0.
The Paladins got a 49-yard field goal on their next drive to end the shutout, but the Hokies stayed hot for their next possession.
Motley started things off with a nine-yard pass to McMillian, then kept the drive alive with a 23-yard pass to Ford on 3rd and 19.
Ford got the call for a running play, picking up seven yards, then Motley found Phillips down the sideline for a 30-yard completion that very nearly ended in a touchdown. Edmunds pounded the ball in from the one yard line and the rout was on, 28-0.
Adonis Alexander intercepted Hannon on the Paladins' next drive, and Motley uncorked a pretty pass to Ford on the first play of the possession for a 32-yard touchdown. His initial jitters were very clearly a thing of the past.
Motley hit Phillips for a 16-yard gain on his next drive, but once the third quarter ended, his day was done.
Lawson strolled onto the field, and managed to reel off a 10-yard run, then complete his first college pass to Kalvin Cline for 31-yards, before managing yet another 10-yard dash.
"He made a great first throw that I thought was really great for a young guy," Loeffler said.
But Lawson managed to miss low on all three of his next passes, leading to a missed field goal by Michael Santamaria, subbing in for Joey Slye.
Lawson alternated with Durkin on the next series, making a few nice throws, particularly one completion to Kevin Asante on the sideline for 13 yards. Yet most of his biggest plays came on the ground, as might be expected of a freshman uncomfortable making reads, but he did manage to run for a four-yard score in what the Hokies surely hope turns out to be the first of many in his Tech career.
"He made a pretty nifty run that last play for a score, I think he's got a bright future," Beamer said.
For now the Hokies' focus is on the immediate future with the team's first road trip on the horizon next week.
The team seems to have escaped the game without any major injuries — head trainer Mike Goforth noted that Motuapuaka suffered a left knee sprain, Bucky Hodges bruised his right quad and Sam Rogers sprained his left ankle, but none of those should be anything serious — and now they're preparing for a Boilermakers team that Foster cautions is "improved" from a season ago.
"Are we right where we need to be? No," Loeffler said, using his favorite rhetorical question. "But we're going to work our tails and get ready for a very physical football team coming up this week."

Comments
It was a great game for the Hokies...Wish we blocked a punt for TD to complete the Trifecta but I won't complain about that.
Motley reminded me of Bryan Randell
Lawson reminded me of a Young Vince Young
Durkin reminded me of Tebow (Under Loeffler at FL),
Let the hype train begin!
http://media.tumblr.com/bcbb80613f0e413ef644a31359ed8bdf/tumblr_inline_mriykfmQJZ1qz4rgp.gif
Glad the second half made me put away my #FullerForQB campaign materials. Motley looked pretty good once he got past the jitters, Lawson looked like a freshman with a butt ton of potential. Let's keep the momentum going.
Also, why isn't Travon McMillian playing a LOT more? Dude is good.
Biggest takeaway from today...
On 5 days prep we smoked a team easily... That's better than we did in 2010. So look out, ACC.
I agree with the result today. I still think if we play a better ACC team like GT and have a sluggish first half like that we're in serious trouble. Overall though, a great showing by the good guys.
Yeah, GT is probably going to be a swift loss, especially if the linebackers don't improve.
What a difference the new offense coaches have made on recruiting. I'd like to see us do better on FGs (though no complaints about the kickoffs), but solid performance by all 3 sides of the ball. Our team needed this win badly. I hope those who left the game banged up, will return soon.
I know a lot of people on Twitter were upset with how Loeffler handled the Lawson-Motley duo ("put him in for the series!" "They're running the same plays, so what's the point!" etc, etc). However, I was a big fan of it. Get the young guy in and let him get hit and see how the game's going without having all the pressure of getting the drive going all by himself. The running game did some great things, Motley got going, Lawson had a couple nice moments, and overall I feel much better about the offense than I did three days ago.
I dunno. I can see your point, but putting in Lawson on a 1st & 15 at that point in the game to run a QB keeper was just... mindboggling is the only word for it.
Why? It wasn't ideal, but hey, you're probably not gonna find an "ideal" spot to put him in anyways. The kid picked up a few yards and then Motley had a manageable 2nd down to work with. They wanted him to get his feet wet when the game was still "undecided" (I doubt they would have played him there if they weren't confident they'd win), and they did. In the moment, I wasn't sure how I felt about it, but I think it was the right move. See how he responds to a bit of pressure without putting the weight of the world on his shoulders.
Call me old fashioned. I just don't think that was the play you put your green qb in on.
I'm not going to belabor the point -- just my opinion, and all's well that ends with a Win.
Bingo, we won!
Nice gAme but it was a div II school, will not board the hype train unless we boil some blood next week...
Furman is not D-II. FCS is I-AA.
Meh, not DIV I is div II
Except it is Div 1...
I think you're missing a "-A".
if you ain't first, you're last?
kinda like LFC...
poor week for us reds huh..
It was a starting point. The offense looked worlds better midway through the 3rd quarter than they did midway through the 1st. Got a lot of good stuff to build on as competition ramps up.
Motley impressed mightily.
Ford & Philips looked good, with room for improvement. Asante & Knowles looked good as well I thought.
Lawson definitely looked like he's got a high high ceiling, but he needs work.
Durkin looked pissed off. Seriously. Put him in the I with Rogers and Peoples, and let R&P lead block on a keeper, and you may take out the entire opposing D on one play.
Loeffler impressed as well. Very good game plan with the exception IMO of the odd QB subbing in the first half.
RB's looked lively, although I thought Trey wasn't quite hitting the hold as hard as he should. I think that most likely goes away with game reps.
DBs looked better than last week. I think the PI on Faycson was ticky-tacky. Not sure why we seem to get so many calls against us in those situations.
Chuck Clarke is a man playing among boys. May be too dangerous to be on the field. He hits so hard our own players get collateral damage from the shrapnel.
Malleck looked like he should be starting for a pro team. Big. Great blocking. Great routes. Great hands.
Cline is definitely looking like he's back, and better than ever. Looked bigger, stronger, and still fast.
Our O-line is obviously much improved.
If we could get our mike LB situation squared away, we still have a good chance for a special season.
One more thing: Red zone offense so far this year is spectacular.
Clark was seemingly in on every tackle. Very smooth move to safety
I thought it was odd at first as well.
But then I thought about it and I think Lefty was putting in Lawson, situationally.
Its 1st & 15, let's see how he handles being behind the chains. Motley just ran this play, now lets let Lawson run the exact same play, now that the D has seen it.
If Lawson comes in this year for "real" playing time, it will be in an odd situation.
Trey confused me. First few carries he all but broke down and ran in place before contact.
Yes! I have been so frustrated with our red zone production for the past 4....5......6.....? years.
You can't beat good teams with field goals. You have to put the ball in the end zone. I think we finally have an offense that can do that.
85.7% red zone TD%, tied for 16th in the nation. No way the percentage stays that high over the season, but given that we've played both the best and the worst teams on our schedule, it probably isn't a completely bogus stat either.
I'd like to see what it was from 2009 to 2014. I bet the FG to TD ratio is skewed the wrong direction.
Not so much. Per cfbstats.com:
2009 - 53 opportunities, 88.68% scoring (ranked #13 nationally), 60.38% TD/28.30% FG
2010 - 62 opp, 90.32% scoring (#6), 73.02% TD/17.46% FG
2011 - 70 opp, 74.29% scoring (#103 OUCH), 50% TD/24.29% FG
2012 - 41 opp, 87.80% scoring (#18), 51.22% TD/36.59% FG
2013 - 42 opp, 73.81% scoring (#112 OUCH), 54.76% TD/19.05% FG
2014 - 48 opp, 87.50% scoring (#34), 52.08% TD/35.42% FG
So we've been up and down in terms of overall scoring %, but the main issues with our offense have typically been GETTING those red zone opportunities. Took a nose-dive after 2011, with the slightest uptick over 2012-2014. Once we get to the red zone, we're converting TDs at about the same rate, but sustaining drives well enough to get downfield has been the issue for years. 2011 looks like quantity over quality - we were in the red zone a TON, hence how we were able to score enough to win a decent number of games, coupled with explosive playmakers who could break off a big run/catch and score without being in the red zone first.
What this says to me is the last 4 years, we basically only score a TD 1 out of 2 trips to the red zone. That isn't how you win football games. Field position and field goals are a good strategy when combined with stellar defense, clock management and good special teams but getting into the endzone is what makes a great team.
Can't agree more about the red zone offense. We have been so shaky with that ever since Ryan Williams left. Great to see us be able to Stick it in, stick it in, stick it in. (Still wish he could get that chant back)
I loved and I mean loved the rb duo of Edmonds/McMillan. I know jc went out with an injury and I hate that, but damn McMillan really impressed me. this kid could be a real game changer in the next few years.
He could be a gamechanger now. I wasn't a big fan of how Trey was running, but McMillan was quick and decisive. He got to the hole and busted through it. Him and Lawson (when he actually knows what the heck is going on) in the backfield will be a whole lot of fun to watch in coming years.
Yup. The read option is going to be a potent weapon for us.
I love Brewer, and wish he hadn't been injured, but he is never a real threat to run the ball. So very excited to see Motley or Lawson adding that to Loeffler's arsenal.
Yeah, if Lawson or Motley ever get things down to where Loeffler really trusts them to run all the nifty things at the bottom of the playbook (like throwbacks to the fullback) and those timing routes to Malleck (both Lawson and Motley were a bit late on throws over the middle), this offense could be extremely difficult to defend. As it is, I'll take 580 yards and 35 offensive points against an inferior opponent, considering we went in with no clue what our QB would be able to do.
Those throws over the middle are crucial. With us using two TEs a lot, we have to be able to work the middle of the field to open up the boundaries for Ford and Phillips. We were successful doing that against aOSU before Brewer got hurt.
Lawson's height certainly gives him an advantage on those plays. Motley is significantly taller than Brewer, but Lawson-to-Bucky would be like two kids in a treehouse playing keep-away from their little brother on the ground.
My take away is that the coaches are praying for an accelerated learning curve for Lawson. They want him to be great but he's not yet. In the mean time motley is going to be serviceable and maybe even pretty good, but he hasn't had a stellar injury record either. I don't know where Durkin falls in this shuffle. I want to see him more, but how?
Durkin's the emergency guy, or maybe short-yardage (although the term "Lawson-dozer" was thrown around on more than one occasion). It's Motley's show for now, but Lawson showed a heck of a lot of talent today. Exciting stuff.
My thoughts exactly. Motley is the present, Lawson is the future.
With Josh Jackson inbound, who bears some similarity to Lawson's game.
Can we please not already start to talk about our QB controversy next year? Lol. I just can't take it. Arguing about it now is enough for me.
I'm not sure how many folks were in attendance that might have seen, but they basically took the "Welcome to Sacksburg" shirt and put it up on Hokie Vision and added a sack to it after the first sack.
That's a bummer. That means the probably had it lined up for the osu game
Yeah....real bummer. /s
I saw that and immediately thought of the impact TKP is having on the media.
Joe has something here to be proud of.
They did it for the other sacks as well.
KC had some good runs. Trey was ok. I like what McMillan has and thought I'd see more of shai. I'd be surprised if shai hasn't moved up the depth chart with a full week of practice in the game
Motely looked as about expected. Slow at first but then started to get rolling. Seemed a little slow in his reads to start but didn't seem to make bad decisions which was good. Also seemed to stay in the pocket a bit longer after the half which I liked. After seeing Lawson's passes Motely is definitely number 1. Lawson has an ups wide but he's not ready to take the reins yet.
Couldn't really tell about AMs play today. His pick six was nice and almost had a second on the next drive. Still surprised I haven't heard Dadi's or Ken's name called. Not sure but I don't think I saw them a ton on the field today. Figured bud was trying to get in game reps for his backups mostly today. Could be wrong.
Anyhow, good game overall. Slye was booming it. Ready to see the game against purdon't.
Shai looked slow today and the giant knee brace probably didn't help.
I said all along Mcmillian was the best RB and Lawson should play if you intend on him starting next year
This year is last year's next year. Just sayin because it can't always be about next year.
Except last year you had a 4th year Jr and no freshman quarterback of the future but a promise of another year and this year you have a 5th yr senior with no future heir apparent unless they get some playing time
Lawson is our starting QB next year even if he sits out the rest of the season. Trust the coaches to make the right call on who plays now. If Brewer was healtht, Lawson would be clipboarding it.
If Motley looks anything like what he looked like in the third quarter today, he'll be well nigh impossible to steal the starting spot from. He looked thoroughly comfortable with eventing Loeffler wanted him to do.
false. Lawson was going to play this year even if brewer was healthy.
Why does that make it false that Lawson would be carrying a clipboard and learning the offense by watching Brewer play? You can still be the third string QB and spend most of the game taking notes.
I'd rather try to win an ACC championship this year with our best (available) QB than try to prepare a back up for next year. If Lawson is our best available QB, then he should play, but I think it's clear he's not (yet).
Additionally, Fuller, Facyson, Dadi, Luther and others could/will be gone next year. I'm sure they would be pissed if after grinding it out for the last two+ years, we didn't field the best offensive possible.
Facyson is not leaving if he really wants to become a doctor.
If he can get that NFL money, there's no reason why he can't go to the NFL, fill up his bank account, then return to get his degree before heading to medical school.
If I remember correctly he wants to become a heart surgeon that is 12 years of training/schooling after college. He would also have to have taken MCATS and done well his junior year of college which take a lot of time to study for. I can't see him passing up getting his bachelors at least before he leaves.
Comment/question related to this. I have a few friends that went to med school, and a few others that didn't make it. One of the comments I have heard from all is that gaps in education (i.e. time not spent in consecutive years of schooling, or at minimum, getting meaningful medical/research experience) hurt their applications or the applications of people they knew. I'm hoping Brandon has good advisors (in and out of football) that will tell him the reality of the decision he would face. If he jumps ship to the NFL to make some money, given what I have heard, that will not be good for his future as a doctor. Anyone else with more insight able to comment? I'm the wrong kind of doctor to really know about this, aside from what I've heard.
I think a safety from Miami did that (Rolle) - at least that was the story at the draft. Good kids.
he can't stay on the field for a full game. he's not going anywhere.
To further what Joe said above...
According to the Association of American Medical Colleges, the median four-year cost of medical school (including expenses and books) was $278,455 for private schools, and $207,866 for public schools in 2013.
Minimum NFL salary for an active NFL player is $420,000. Minimum salary for a player on the scout team is $5,200 per week ($88,400).
I don't know how many classes he has left to finish his undergrad, or his parents financial situation, but assuming he's getting close to graduating, his parents don't have $200-300K laying around, and he still wants to be a doctor, I do think the NFL is his fastest, smartest route there (especially given his injury history).
I'm pretty sure both of his parents are college professors or something. If I remember correctly, they are well educated and financially stable enough that they could likely support his med school ambitions.
EDIT: Scratch that about the professors, they were principals in Dubai. Not sure what to expect financially with respect to that.
I'd like to see an analysis of all the big penalties.
I know after the PI call on the pick, the crowd had had enough of it.
The booing went on for an entire series.
Some thoughts...
It will sound strange to say after only giving up three points, but the back 7 of this defense really worries me. In particular the Mike and our corners. I think facyson is still playing timid, which will be a problem against a good passing O. And I hate to pile on the kid, but Moto again had a tough game IMO, pick six notwithstanding. He really seems to have trouble reading plays, and gets caught up in the wash way too often. Unfortunately, I dont see Huelskamp as an upgrade, so I'm hoping for the light to come on for 54.
Chuck clark's a bad man. So is Ryan Malleck. Those kids are gonna be playing on Sunday's.
O-line seemed to do well, as they should against a I-AA squad.
Travon McMillan is our best TB. Kid just knows how to play the game. Has a nice blend of speed, size and wiggle. The more carries he gets, the better he's gonna get. Did Shai look slow and hobbled in his gait to the rest of you? I know he's not going to, but he should probably redshirt and fully rehab that knee, b/c he sure didn't look close to a 100% to me.
I have been very strong in my opinion that I think you go with Lawson and build for the future, and that first half only strengthened my opinion of that. But I will say this, Motley looked like a different QB in that second half. He was reading the field, stepping in to his throws, and delivering with some zip. The biggest difference b/w a Brewer and a Motley though, and really any green QB, is the ability to see the field and anticipate with his throws. Motley still waits for receivers to come out of their breaks, which leads to his throws being late and has him throwing in to coverage way too often. Brewer anticipates where the receivers are going to be and makes his throw before the receiver breaks so it's delivered at the optimal point of separation. If Motley, or Lawson, can pick this up, they should be fine, especially with their run threat. If they can't, gonna be a lot of three and outs and INT's when they play against the big boys.
Overall, I felt good about our performance today, coming on a short week. And I feel a lot better about motley after that second half, if he remains our starter for the rest of the year. Need to further build on this next week against a subpar Purdue squad.
Was incredibly impressed with Motley today. I was really concerned about whether or not the passing game could flourish with him at first, but he really came out and seized up the QB1 spot today. I think he really came into his own today and will be a great leader for us.
Lawson is going to be a great QB for us. He has size, speed, strength, and a great arm. Made some nice throws today, but as expected, was more comfortable running than in the passing game. Will be interesting to see how the QB rotation is handled going forward, but I think Lawson sees the field a lot.
I don't know how, but I'm telling you right now: Chris Durkin has GOT to be on the field somewhere for us. That dude runs with an attitude and delivers an angry blow. He also has a great burst and some nice quick cuts/jukes. Whether or not he is a QB going forward, he needs to be on the field for us. Really loved what I saw from him.
I also hope we see a lot more of Travon McMillian. He is a game changer.
I'll tell you how...MLB.
re: Durkin
I think he's got potential to be a really good fullback and replace Sam Rogers after he graduates. We obviously don't know about his recieving abilities, as he's currently on the other end of the throws, but he looks to have all the other tools needed to flourish in that role.
Steven Peoples will be the FB after Sam Rogers leaves. Although, replacing Rogers might require at least Peoples and Durkin combined. With his height, Durking may be better as a TE, replacing Malleck.
If Durkin doesn't stick at QB, I see him being an outstanding TE and/or H-Back. Could use him in all sorts of ways in the running game as an H-Back, a la how OSU used Braxton Miller. Has excellent size, great power, and nice speed/quickness. Regardless, he's a guy that I want on our team.
Motley threw some great downfield passes. He struggles with underneath throws and is tentative on a lot of his reads. He's the Bizarro World Brewer- they have opposite skill sets.
Motley consistently over throws deep routes. I think he's going to be alright tho.
I would rather the deep route be overthrown than under thrown.
often times underthrown balls can result in a PI call that will move the offense and give us a fresh set of downs. I don't think underthrowing a deep route to a receiver who has a step on 3rd and long is a bad idea. Worst case scenario the DB makes a great play on the ball and it's effectively an arm punt. Best case scenario the receiver is able to wrestle it from the DB and get the first down. Most likely outcome is incomplete pass which is equivalent to the overthrown ball. The chance to get that PI is worth an underthrow IMO
I feel like we're never that lucky to get the PI calls for us. It'd be much more our luck to get the PI against us. I wonder if this works more against us because the technique our DBs use?
I just got home from Blacksburg. Our 3 QB system was impressive, but just wait til Brewer gets back and we unleash our 4 headed QB monster on the ACC.
The hydra qb system. Put all four in at once. They'll never see it coming
My takeaways:
1. We're going to be ok.
2. It's fun to see talented players make Lefty's offense work.
3. I think Lawson was staring down his receivers.
4. Slye should get some looks at Mike.
WRT # 3, Motley stared down every receiver as well.
That won't fly in ACC play.
Thought he did a much better job in the 2nd half of going through his progressions.
Agree, 100%. He went through all of his progressions multiple times later in the game. Definitely stared them down the first 2-3 drives.
The first good progression I noticed he threw a swing pass to McMillian that went incomplete, but then on a later series they ran the same play and he made a great pass to McMilllian for a good gain.
The coaches are going to be hopping mad over 10+ penalties of which 3 were personal fouls.
I honestly think on a lot of those fouls, the coaches will review the film and then tell the guilty player they don't want him to alter how he would play the exact same situation at all. There were some real ticky-tack calls by whoever the ACC picked up off the street to officiate this game.
Meh...
It was Furman. Coastal Carolina put up just 3 less points on their D then the Hokies did. Furman's defensive line looked like eight graders in person. Tiny dudes. The Hokies should have mowed them down for 500 + yards.
Still worried about the D backfield. They seemed to have constant communication issues. It was also unsettling to watch Furman get loose on that speed option.
At least we survived the short week. On to Purdue. That's looking like a good test for this team.
Also, got to hang out in Blacksburg, and watch some football. All good.
Didn't we put up 500+ yards?
Yes, 583 yds.
Coastal is the number 1 team in FCS who has a cohesive offensive unit not one trying to test out players. Just becaus they are an FCS team doesn't mean they can't put up a fight. Ask Auburn, Kansas, Washington State and Arizona State teams that.
Coastal is FBS now (Sun Belt). They start next year.
They still have to transition. So FCS this year and the number one ranked team. I live 20 minutes from their Teal field.
Naturally. They're not an official Carolina FBS team until we play them every year.
Sorry, NC State....
Nothing we can do there, conference says we can't play every year. ;)
Coastal Carolina had to put up all those points because their defense gave up a boatload. And VT did run up over 500 yards on them.
Agreed, very little can be taken from these FCS scrimmages. Motleys problems, like most QBs, manifest themselves when there is pressure and covered receivers. FCS talent like this doesn't offer much test in those two areas.
Purdue is not very good, but you are right in that it will be a good test for this team. Looks like Purdue to ECU to Pitt to NCSU is a good progression. Need to get better every week.
But it does give these guys the chance to actually play in front of a crowd, with commercial time out refs dictating starts and stops, dealing with the nervousness, getting hit for real, coaches not standing 5 ft behind them making technique adjustments after every play, hitting WRs truly in stride while awaiting getting hit by the blitz.....
The game played out exactly as I expected except I completely applaud the injection of Lawson in for single snaps. Trying to get him slow rolled into CFBall but not stalling drives.
I applaud the coaches on a good job of installing confidence and timing into Motley while introducing the other guys and having a full quarter to get everyone playing experience.
I expect to start a little quicker against Purdue next week and to keep this ball rolling.
Good job overall.
Like someone in the live game thread said, hitting a receiver in stride is hitting a receiver in stride. Regardless of the level of the opponent, Motley's balls were exactly where they needed to be. That proves that Motley can be a passing QB. Will it be more difficult to make reads against a better defense? Absolutely. But his performance against Furman proved that Motley does indeed have the skill set to be a QB in Lefty's scheme and not just a wildcat QB.
Yessir.
Ehhh, to each their own. I put a lot more value in hitting a receiver in stride when you are being pressured and when that receiver is covered.
or when the team has DBs that are capable of providing decent coverage and forcing you to go through your progressions. In the 2nd half WRs were running around like in a skeleton drill. Still motley threw some very good balls with arm strength that brewer probably couldn't make, but threw 2-3 balls throughout the game that are ints against better competition as well.
Well, ideally I'd just like to see our OL be good enough to not have our QB get pressured, whoever it is. So far, they're doing a much better job of that. Obviously we'll see what kind of pocket presence Motley has as the level of competition improves. I'm hoping outings like he had against Furman give him the confidence to remain committed to the pass under pressure.
As for the receiver being covered, one thing I've noticed so far this season is Lefty's route design is getting a receiver open on just about every attempt. So hopefully we don't see Motley trying to thread the needle into coverage too much this season. If he does, he's probably making bad reads in his progressions.
OL protection, and run blocking, has been by far the most encouraging thing we have seen this year.
did we allow any sacks against Furman?
no just 3 QBHs. We shouldn't allow any sacks to teams like that, so mission accomplished.
So we should print some more T-shirts?
we have t-shirts for the OL not giving up sacks? If so, sure.
I was referring to the famous "Mission Accomplished" shirts from last year
French did writeups on Lefty's "Triangle" route schemes, suffice to say, someone is ALWAYS open...but can you get through the reads and make the throws?
was it French or Mason? I honestly don't remember...could have been either one I think.
I agree - doing what we were supposed to do against Furman was good for our team's confidence.
Excellent recovery. Wondering why there wasn't a lot more of JCC and Rogers. Puzzled.
It would be unfair to unleash Sam on a 1-AA team.
Truth
Think JCC hurt himself early on.
JCC got banged up.
They both got injured early on.
Was traveling today. Read up on it. Thx. Hope he's gonna be ready to go for Purdue.
I loved the raw talent I saw from Lawson today just gotta wait for the mental stuff to come along, I'm very excited for the future.
Good to see OLine working cohesively. They and the RBs picked up blitz well. I believe I saw only 1 false start by our guys.
First half was tough to watch, but 2nd half more than made up for it. Glad Motley got his feet wet under manageable conditions. Lawson will be good, but needs this year to get up to college speed.
Proud of the way the guys bounced back, especially on a short week. Still much to work on, but we are moving forward.
OT, but did anyone see Brewer on sidelines? Any updates on when he can start rehab?
Go Hokies!
He was in the box with the coaches.
1 false start, 1 holding penalty. A second holding penalty was called on Malleck during a punt attempt but that isn't on the OL.
Procedurally, the line is light-years ahead of where they were last year. I know nnot everyone is sold on Searels', but in the early going, he's proved himself one hell of a coach. Even if he likes to give the writing staff here aneurisms by the way he reps his players in practice.
If the progress shown in these two games continues, you can mark me down as sold on Searels. I was pretty critical of his unit last year -- seemed like he didn't get much accomplished in his first spring and summer. So far this year he has overcome all my criticism. I just want to see him build on that success from here on out.
My #sauces have found the source of Durkin's trucking ability. It's all about the diet.
This is going to blow Mike London's mind. He'll be all like "Donuts? I'll take 3 dozen!"
Next thing you know it's 36-donut again, and in the hysteria he tells his qb to take a knee in the end zone.
I watched this game at the fox and hound in Mason OH. The manager put it on right next to anOSU. It was fun to watch. Mainly second half. I am not sold on our D at all. Bud has to realize that with this level of play from our front 4 the Mike is going to kill us against Miami. I really think they are going to need Ricky W in there before the season ends.
Regarding theRB's:
After seeing Travon run, and also seeing JCC attack the line this season I wonder why Shai isn't redshirting?
It would be one thing if he looked like he did last year, but he looked noticeably slower (as many have mentioned) and we already have 3 capable backs in front of him. I have to question the logic of SB and SL burning a year of eligibility on a promising RB when he is clearly not a 100% and will get limited playing time?
It's week 2 and Shai hadn't seen game action since almost a year ago. I say let's all just be patient and see what happens. Coaches are probably just inching him into the rotation. Feels good to have 4 guys who could all legitimately start if called upon.
OT: I love your name... Reminds me of this:

Watching Trey Edmunds is painful. Ride JC and McMillan.
was hoping he'd be back to his form (around UVA game before he broke his leg) but he hasn't looked good. Still love him in pass pro and as an option receiving out of the backfield.
Quick thought from me about some of our fanbase (not all you wonderful TKP attendees)
It was the 1st quarter, less than 10 minutes in, and we had just gone three and out again-- the guy sitting in front of me whips out his phone, and proceeds to text his Hokie group chat that "we're done for the year, our offense and defense sucks" and then proceeds to leave the game.
I know there were some doubters about Motley, and there will continue to be. Give the kid a chance. He won a state championship at Christiansburg, he knows how to run an offense.
OK. Rant over. It was a great team win yesterday, and I'm excited to see what Loeffler can come up with that will compliment both Motley and Lawson going forward
People like that have way more going wrong in their lives than just the struggles of their team on the field. Some people are just pervasively miserable.
He probably had to poop and doesn't like to poop away from home so he was looking for any excuse to get back home so he could poop. Probably.
There is a strong hint of personal experience to this post.
I'm an any where, any time kinda guy. I've seen my fair share of good and bad. I'll have to say the best bathroom I've ever been in was at the Hard Rock Casino in Tampa, FL. I've never been to Vegas so I imagine the casino bathrooms out there are on par too.
ProTip: Hospitals have the most consistently clean public bathrooms.
Or he left his windows rolled down and was afraid it might rain.
Liked Motley's performance in the second half on his 10 to 20 yard passes, which help spreads a defense.
Long time since our defense gave up so many repeated plays for good gains around the ends, i.e. end sweeps and option plays. Normal support players weren't there to extend the line coverage, such as linebackers, safeties, rovers, etc. Are we running a different defensive scheme or were they pulled away covering other responsibilities?
Sometimes I feel we are a bit too critical when it comes to games like this. FCS opponent, we beat them by over 35+ points, the offense (with a new QB) working the kinks in the first half and Loeffler got to see what works best for Motley. I am feeling something big coming! LB still worries me...
I know it was only against Furman, but as was said repeatedly during the spring, I'll take making excuses for why our offense is doing well over the alternative any day of the week.
Loved Motley but he's going to be a placeholder until Brewer gets back, then he'll be in and out with Lawson this year as well as next. Durkin could be a new TE after Malleck leaves and Jackson arrives.
Did Bucky look slow to anyone else?
Cam had an amazing effort on that almost TD.
Adonis Alexander will be good at rover. Chuck Clark will be good at FS.
Woody Baron was good. Stephen Peoples sighting! Kalvin Cline returns!
Um, Chuck Clark IS good at Free Safety.
He appeared to be noticably limping on his way back to the line of scrimmage or the sideline after plays. That could explain it. I hope it's nothing major.
Thigh bruise I hear
My biggest concerns are starting slow on offense again and watching the defense give up yards on the option plays.
My least concern is Slye kicking off. That guy has a boot on him. Unless he slips I don't see a team returning a kick this year.
I've had conflicting opinions over this. I kind of liked what OSU's kicker did (with the exception of the kickoff he angled out of bounds) where the kick was shallow enough to be tempting for a return man but high enough for the coverage team to be on top of the returner in a hurry. In retrospect though, not giving OSU's electric athletes a chance on returns and not risking a coverage team injury vs FCS Furman seems like the right decision. I'd still like to see us try it out at some point going forward.
This is connected with the debate about our return team bringing out kickoffs when they usually get to the 15 or 20. Someone (Egbert?) made the argument that this is, in fact, good strategy: the difference between starting at the 20 and starting at the 25 is not that great, but the difference between the 25 and the 35 is significant. So if you can make it to the 35 one time out of four, it's a good decision, even if you don't reach the 20 the other three out of four.
If I've got the logic right, it seems like the other side of the coin to say, it's better to kick the ball out of the endzone four times than to give them four chances to return it, assuming we stop them between the 15 and 20 three times and they reach the 35 one time out of four. Does that make sense?
I just want Slye to kick it out of the end zone every kickoff all year long.
Besides the field position consideration, there's the injury consideration too.
Just don't let anyone return anything.
I agree 100%. Nothing bad comes from making them start at the 25 every time. No chance of a game changing TD return and less risk of anyone getting hurt.
Yes, that was the gist.
As well, the return team needs practice blocking for the runner in a kickoff, it's that unusual a play, it's significantly different.
We were pretty crappy about it early in the season with success in the last couple games.