Slept On It: Hokies Kicked It Old School in 26-10 Win Over Boston College

Virginia Tech used a tried and true formula to knock off the Eagles on the road.

[Virginia Tech Athletics]

It's human nature for us to become enamored with the hot new trend or device. We're easily distracted by shiny objects and are quick to evaluate our existing possessions as soon as something "faster," "more powerful," or "more efficient" comes along.

In a period in which high octane offenses put up dizzying point totals and blow up box scores, it's only natural for those without to fantasize about the prospect of endless excitement.

Being a Hokie football fan is no different.

For as long as I can remember, Hokie Nation has wondered out loud what it might be like if Tech had an offense that could blow the doors off opponents.

"Could you imagine how great the Hokies could be with a Chip Kelly/Mike Leach/Art Briles/Chad Morris offense to pair with Bud's defense?"

It was as though the only way Tech could reach the top of the mountain was with a video game offense. Forget about the fact that Alabama was winning national championships running a boring, pro-style system. Or that Stanford won Pac-12 titles over sexier teams like USC and Oregon by lining up and running the ball down their throats.

Some of Frank Beamer's best teams were the ones that played strong, fundamental football and were quick to punch the opponent in the mouth before they knew what hit them. It didn't need to be flashy or attractive. Style points never mattered.

On a beautiful afternoon in Chestnut Hill, the Hokies were able to get back to basics against a fledgling Boston College squad. They went right at the talented BC defense with a balanced attack. They hounded the Eagles' offense; terrorizing the backfield and attacking the football. It was a return to a more classic Beamer brand of football. It wasn't perfect, and it definitely wasn't sexy.

For a team struggling to find their footing, heading north to take on an injured and inexperienced Boston College squad couldn't have been timed better. This Hokies team was sorely lacking confidence and needed to prove to themselves that they weren't overestimated heading into this season.

It's been a long two months; three if you count fall camp. We've watched this team rise and fall like a battered ship adrift in hostile seas. They have experienced the dismissal of a talented safety, the loss of a defensive stalwart and the absence of the starting quarterback. A deep and potentially dangerous backfield toiled for weeks like beggars asked to make a five-star dinner from table scraps. A defense poised for unparalleled success has been reduced to hobbled veterans and fresh faces. All the while, the legendary coach was left wondering whether the game had passed him by.

Nine weeks ago, this team was tabbed as a dark horse in the ACC title hunt and a dangerous opening opponent against the defending national champion Buckeyes. I can't help but look back and feel as though somewhere along the way this team forgot who they were. Maybe they never really knew the answer.

Saturday's game was fascinating to me, if only because it was so unremarkable. The Hokies played solid football en route to a relatively easy victory. They had their struggles and still found ways to hurt themselves with dumb penalties and ill-timed turnovers. But they played hard until the very end against a team that has made a living beating opponents at the point of attack.

If there was any point in the game that best exemplified this, it was the way the Hokies closed the game.

After a Boston College field goal cut the Hokies lead to 13 points with 8:09 to go, the Hokies ran the ball eight straight plays — seven of which were Travon McMillian carries — to gain two first downs and chew 5:04 off the clock.

1 and 10 at VT13 McMillian, T rush for 2 yards to the VT15 (Daniels,S).
2 and 8 at VT15 McMillian, T rush for 9 yards to the VT24, 1ST DOWN VT (Mcclary,G).
1 and 10 at VT24 McMillian, T rush for 2 yards to the VT26 (Mcclary,G).
2 and 8 at VT26 McMillian, T rush for 6 yards to the VT32 (Daniels,S).
3 and 2 at VT32 McMillian, T rush for 3 yards to the VT35, 1ST DOWN VT (Landry,H;Daniels,S).
1 and 10 at VT35 Rogers, S rush for 2 yards to the VT37 (Wujciak,C).
2 and 8 at VT37 McMillian, T rush for no gain to the VT37 (Daniels,S).
3 and 8 at VT37 McMillian, T rush for no gain to the VT37 (Landry,H).
Timeout Boston College, clock 03:15.
4 and 8 at VT37 Hughes, A.J. punt 48 yards to the BC15, Alston,S return 7 yards to the BC22 (Shegog, A).

After an A.J. Hughes punt, Dadi Nicolas' stripped Eagles quarterback John Fadule and recovered the loose ball.

Three more Travon McMillian carries and a 32-yard Joey Slye field goal iced the game.

Not counting the kneel down to close out the victory, 13 of the Hokies' 17 fourth quarter offensive snaps were McMillian carries. Sure, he only gained 27 yards on the ground; but against the No. 1 rush defense in the nation, the offense went right after the BC front and was able to take 9:20 off the clock and grab a much needed win.

You may think the play calling was stubborn, clamoring from your couch for Lefty to mix in some play-action or screens. Why get fancy? Why would Tech put itself in a vulnerable position when they have the talent to go right at the Eagles?

Much like those great Tech teams of yore, the Hokies didn't need to earn any style points to close out Saturday's win. If anything, dictating the game exhibited more authority than cowering to BC's strengths.

That's the team I want to root for — the type that refuses to back down and deviate from their approach. It's a fine line between resolve and stubbornness, differentiated by one's ability to out-will the other.

If there's one thing I hope this team takes away from Saturday's win, it's that they possess the willingness to succeed in all phases of the game as a collective. A football game is full of thousands of small battles, each of which have a direct or indirect impact on the outcome. This season has been characterized by momentary lapses that have snowballed into backbreaking mistakes and failures.

Against BC, the Hokies were able to pick themselves up after potentially damaging results. After Michael Brewer's under thrown fade to Bucky Hodges was intercepted in the end zone, Andrew Motuapuaka picked up the offense with a strip-and-score on the very next play. When the offense was forced to punt late in the fourth, Dadi Nicolas took the ball away to set up Joey Slye's fourth and final field goal of the day.

Until recently, Virginia Tech made a living winning games like that. Hopefully after Saturday's win, this locker room has begun to realize they have the ability to do the same.

Comments

We need a Slept on It: Beamer Announces Retirement this week. The BC game almost plays second fiddle.

2026 Season Challenge: TBD
Previous Challenges: Star Wars (2019), Marvel (2020), Batman (2021), Wrasslin' (2022)

I can't help but look back and feel as though somewhere along the way this team forgot who they were. Maybe they never really knew the answer.

Despite the defensive issues and running back rotation shenanigans, it's still a solid answer to say that Brewer's injury took the heart and soul out of this team. Motley performed well as the backup-turned-starter, but watching Brewer lead the offense against BC gave me nothing but feelings of "if only he'd been healthy."

All of our games could have been wins if our offense had been just that much better on a couple of drives, and I think that Miami game is a whole different beast without Motley under center.

Water under the bridge.

2026 Season Challenge: TBD
Previous Challenges: Star Wars (2019), Marvel (2020), Batman (2021), Wrasslin' (2022)

I agree, this offense and team looks different with Brewer out there.

Doubt we would have won all of them since McMillian had not been given a prominent role until a few weeks ago.

Still, agree 100% with the sentiment. Brewer looks great out there and the offense made a stout BC defense look average. What. Could. Have. Been.

It's crazy to think that Beamer retiring now could be because of a broken collarbone

I wonder how different the ECU and Pitt games would have been with this back rotation?

It's nice to see a running game that has been largely MIA for the last 4 years.

Looking back, I just wonder how good this team could have been had Brewer not gotten hurt. I know there is a next man up mentality but I feel that has been a problem at the QB position since we had Tyrod & Sean. Hopefully with Frank retiring, this team will be able to get fired up and win out to give CFB the finale he deserves.

How many yards did we get in the second half? My gut says it was Pittsburg bad.
I get being conservative. However you have a team that lacks depth and don't put the game away to get the backups some game snaps.

About 40 yards total in the second half.

I believe there were 3 drops in the second half that would have extended drives. Bucky, Ford, and Cam's fumble after converting on 3rd down. I would argue the play calling was effective. BC has a historically bad offense. We won it in the first half. There was no need for unnecessary risks in the 2nd half like Pierson said above.

Exactly...we didn't need the UGa Chick Fil a bowl repeat

"look at this...this is beautiful, these people are losing their minds" -Mike Patrick

Don't get me wrong, I'm glad we got the win but it really seemed that we struggled offensively. BC obviously did a great job defensively holding us to one touchdown when we had the ball with the rest of the scores coming from 3-pointers and one stripped ball for a touchdown. What we did well was to waste time in our favor which, I guess, is a strategy but it's almost one of last resort.

In any case, I hope this helps to turn the momentum for the rest of the games where our offense AND defense are firing on all cylinders. I'd like us to get 23 bowl appearances for Frank Beamer's legacy.

get some dum-dums!

Don't get me wrong, I'm glad we got the win but it really seemed that we struggled offensively

I thought our offense played really well considering who we were up against. We blew out BCs avg rushing yards allowed stat for the season. It was a statement by our offense. We challenged BCs strength and we got the better of them. I see nothing to be ashamed of with that.

Onward and upward

Not really, we put up a lot of yards in the first half. Given how bad BC offense is Frank opted to play safe and just run the ball and waste clock in the second half

Don't get me wrong, I'm glad we got the win but it really seemed that we struggled offensively.

To put our offensive performance in perspective, in their 6 losses to P5 teams, BC has given up 3, 9, 14(Fl. State), 17(Louisville), 26(Hokies) and 34(Clemson). Clemson's offense is part of a higher echelon than ours or any of those other opponents.

I would be ecstatic with a 26-10 victory, with one TD scored by the defense and 4 FGs, every game day, no questions asked. It was Beamer Ball. It's not always pretty, but more often than not, you come away with a W!

Hokie in West Africa...sadly, I can't jump up and down hard enough for it to be felt in Lane

FSU only score 7 on offense.

Wet stuff on the red stuff.

Join us in the Key Players Club

We didn't struggle in 1st half on O. We had 235 yds

"look at this...this is beautiful, these people are losing their minds" -Mike Patrick

I would like to say this Moto really responded and turned in a heck of a game as far as I could tell. He was stripping balls, getting pressure on the qb, and seemed to be in the holes like he is supposed to. Maybe the light has finally turned on.

I just got around to watching the end of the Duke game this afternoon. Having seen his improvement the last three or four games and the Boston College game out of order, I really felt bad for him on that last play, rather than critical. Did he take a bad angle? I don't know; don't care. He was in the backfield again, against a very good running QB.

___

-What we do is, if we need that extra push, you know what we do? -Put it up to fully dipped? -Fully dipped. Exactly. It's dork magic.

Motu seems to have been playing the edge. He took a good enough angle to contain but not good enough to tackle (and he lost his footing). Someone said he was supposed to have help up the middle -- if Dadi had not been tackled by the fullback he would have been in position to make the play.

"Our job as coaches is to influence young people's lives for the better in terms of fundamental skills, work ethic, and doing the right thing. Every now and again, a player actually has that effect on the coaching staff." Justin Fuente on Sam Rogers

Absolutely with you on the old school perspective. We've been clamoring for the smash mouth brand of football that caused teams to say VT was the most physical team they'd played all year.

This really summed it up: "Much like those great Tech teams of yore, the Hokies didn't need to earn any style points to close out Saturday's win. If anything, dictating the game exhibited more authority than cowering to BC's strengths." Or as Lee Corso would say, "We're coming right at you. Just try and stop us!"

HTHokie93

On the final drive my wife said something about scoring one more touchdown and I said, "No, this is a Frank-Beamer-coached team. There won't be another score." My daughter said "That's rude!" and I had to try to explain what I meant. I wish I had your words available because you wrote exactly what I was thinking.

Some coaches would have done something flashy there, and some coaches would have done something stupid. Some would have run up the score. But I knew exactly what Frank Beamer was going to do: take the shortest distance between where he was and winning the game.

"Our job as coaches is to influence young people's lives for the better in terms of fundamental skills, work ethic, and doing the right thing. Every now and again, a player actually has that effect on the coaching staff." Justin Fuente on Sam Rogers

While it was incredibly boring, I liked our 2nd half for the most part. We knew we had a team who was bad on offense and we just needed to play ball control and field position and not make mistakes and we win. The old Woody Hayes saying, there are 3 things that can happen when you throw the ball and only 1 of them is good. In reality there are 4 with the sack being the 4th so to his credit, he was being generous saying that 33% of the outcomes are good. We did what we needed to do and we won. We got help from the refs which was nice for a change but we moved the ball enough to eat A LOT of clock in that game. I'll take it all day and twice on sundays.

"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken" - Colonel Sanders via Ricky Bobby