Hokies' Recruits, Commits Call Beamer's Retirement "Shocking" Yet "Understandable"

Prospects considering becoming Hokies detail how news of the iconic head coach reached them, and what it could mean.

[Mark Umansky]

The news of the seismic change coming for the Virginia Tech football program rippled out on a sleepy, unassuming Sunday afternoon.

Indeed, as word about Frank Beamer's plan to retire at season's end spread across the country, one high schooler committed to play for the Hokies felt the news awaken him almost like a bad dream.

"I was taking a nap and my father called me about five times and I didn't wake up until the fifth call," said 2016 CB Myles Wolfolk of Upper Marlboro, Md.'s Wise HS. "I answered and he told me and I was like 'woah,' it just kind of hit me by surprise. It was shocking."

Wolfolk admits that he knew the 69-year-old Beamer was no spring chicken — he simply hoped Beamer would hang on long enough to coach him someday.

"I didn't think it would come this year," Wolfolk said. "I knew he couldn't coach forever, so I knew it would come one day, I just really didn't think it would happen after this year, so it was kind of a surprise and I just was shocked."

That seems to be the prevailing feeling among recruits and commits alike as they confront the reality that Beamer won't be stalking the sidelines next season.

"I was a little bit disappointed, I'm not gonna lie, but it was going to happen at some point," said 2016 OT and Tech commit Patrick Kearns of Rome, Ga.'s Darlington School. "I mean, his coaching career's come to an end, so it's understandable."

But recruits wouldn't have to go long pondering what Beamer's retirement meant for their future at the school before the Hokies started reaching out. Wolfolk and Kearns both say they heard from Athletic Director Whit Babcock Sunday afternoon, as he did his best to reassure them about the program's future.

"With me being an early enrollee, they wanted to reach out to me and make sure that I'm not tripping out, going crazy over this situation," Wolfolk said. "They wanted to reach out to me and let me know that they should have a new coach coming in, not very soon, but soon enough before I get there (in January), so I should have a chance to meet him."

Kearns said he didn't hear quite the same message from the AD, but believes it was reassuring nonetheless.

"He just wanted to tell me that they still wanted me and everything's going to be alright at Tech, and I'm sure it will," Kearns said. "He's got a great record of hiring really good coaches, so we'll see who he gets."

2016 LB Victor Greene of Spotsylvania's Courtland HS, another Tech commit, said he also heard from Babcock about the news, and he noted the AD did his best to be realistic about the effects of Beamer's departure.

"He just was informing me that he thinks more schools will get in contact with me," Greene said.

Babcock wasn't the only one working the phones, however. Wolfolk said he heard from both DBs coach Torrian Gray and Chuck Cantor, director of player personnel, in the wake of Beamer's announcement.

"It was a similar message, just that everybody's sad to see Beamer leaving, and they just want me to keep my head straight, they don't want me to panic over this situation," Wolfolk said.

2016 CB Troy Pride, a Hokies commit out of Greer (S.C.) HS, says he's also heard from both Gray and Babcock about the changes coming.

Pride previously admitted that Gray's status with the school would likely affect his commitment to Tech, and, with recent visits to high profile schools like Notre Dame and Tennessee, it's clear he has other options on the table. Yet Gray wasn't offer to much clarity about the future in their initial conversations.

"He says he can't say 100 percent," Pride said. "But if he's there, he wants me there as well."

Kearns took the opposite approach, taking the initiative to reach out to his potential future position coach.

"I also called Coach (Stacy) Searels and talked with him and he said 'be patient' and 'we'll see what happens,' that's really about all I've got right now," Kearns said.

Kearns said he trusts that Searels will "keep me updated" on the process in the coming weeks, a clear sign of his tight bond with the coach who grew up not far from his hometown.

"I'm still 100 percent committed to Virginia Tech right now, the only thing that would only make me question it a little bit is if the whole staff leaves, my position coach primarily," Kearns said. "But I still think there's a really good chance I wind up a Hokie...the one thing that would make me question a little bit is if my position coach, Coach Searels, was no longer on it, which hopefully that won't happen, but we'll see."

Wolfolk has a similar view when it comes to his commitment, particularly as it relates to Gray and defensive coordinator Bud Foster.

"It would be hard for me because those three, Coach Foster, Coach Gray and Coach Beamer, were a big part of my decision in committing to Virginia Tech," Wolfolk said. "If they leave, depending on who the next coach will be, it would be hard for me be able to stay 100 percent committed because I would definitely have to like look at other schools if they were gone."

When Gray and Babcock reached out, Wolfolk said he did his best to be up front with them, telling them "I am going to look at my options, just in case anything goes bad."

His list of potential suitors increased by one in the wake of Beamer's departure, as the Wisconsin Badgers decided to extend him an offer on Monday.

"I'm very grateful for it, and it's good to know that schools are still interested in me and that I'll be a big impact player for other schools," Wolfolk said. "it's good to know that other schools still reach out to me after I'd already committed and after this whole situation, it's just nice to know, reassurance, I guess."

Wolfolk held offers from schools like Clemson, Kentucky, N.C. State and UNC before he committed to Tech last year, and he admits that "Wisconsin would definitely be a good look for me and so would a lot of other schools," but nothing is set in stone just yet.

"Right now, I just want to do my research and talk to my family, make sure I'm making the right decision," Wolfolk said. "We're also waiting for the coaching situation at Virginia Tech, what's going to happen, is Bud Foster gonna get the job, is Coach Gray gonna stay, we'll just wait and see what's going on before we make any decisions."

Greene agrees that he's anxious to see who the Hokies end up hiring, but Beamer's departure affects his commitment "in a way" but "not much, though."

"I hope the new coach would have similarities to Coach Beamer," Greene said. "Preferably (they'll promote someone on the staff) because I wouldn't meet the new coach until I got there and I have chemistry already with the coaches on the staff."

But for all his concerns about the future composition of the staff, Kearns says he's content to leave the decision in others' hands.

"That's not my decision," Kearns said. "I trust Mr. Babcock to make the best decision."

Of course, Beamer's departure and the selection of a new head coach affect more than just the team's current commits — the team is still trying to reel in several prominent 2016 prospects that now have to weigh the program's merits sans the only Hokies head coach they've ever known.

"My reaction was shocked because he's been in the coaching business a long, long time," said 2016 DE Zack Gilbert of Charlotte, N.C.'s South Mecklenburg HS. "(I was) hoping he still had enough time for me."

But in the change, Gilbert sees both disappointment and potential.

"I think the program is gonna take off and make big time changes, just like Pitt did," Gilbert said.

The favorable comparison to Pat Narduzzi's surging squad comes as good news for the Hokies, considering that Gilbert's commitment will likely come down to either Pitt or Tech.

Gilbert said both Cantor and DL coach Charley Wiles have reached out to him to try and keep him in the fold so far, and he said their description of the program's future "looks bright and it looks good."

Those two recently got a chance to press their case to Gilbert in person when he made his official visit for the Duke game, but soon he'll give Narduzzi and the Panthers the chance to do the same.

He was originally planning on taking an official visit for Pitt's game against Notre Dame this weekend, but the SAT forced him to change up — now, he expects to take the trip on Nov. 21 for the Louisville game.

In the meantime, he hopes to hear from Foster and Beamer themselves for more information.

2016 DE Nick Coe of Asheboro (N.C.) HS is also looking for more guidance on the program's future as he contemplates the head Hokie's exit.

"It was upsetting because I would've liked to have played for Frank Beamer," Coe said. "Now it's still OK, but it's not gonna be the same."

As of Monday night, Coe said he had yet to hear from anyone on Tech's staff about the change. The last time he spoke with anyone from the Hokies came before the news broke, after a knee injury he suffered last Friday forced him to reschedule his planned official visit to Florida State this weekend (which has since been rescheduled for Nov. 14).

"I talked to Coach Wiles a little on Twitter about my knee, and I just told him how it went out of place and came back in," Coe said.

Though Coe reacted with consternation to the news of Beamer's departure itself, he remains unsure how it will ultimately factor into his decision.

"It doesn't really affect it," Coe said. "Kind of, it's weird. It's complicated."

2016 DE Patrick Jones of Chesapeake's Grassfield HS remains similarly unfazed by the change.

"I didn't really have any reaction, I was just curious to see who would be next," Jones said.

Jones said he's been talking frequently with recruiting coordinator (and area recruiter) Bryan Stinespring about what exactly the future might hold, even if details remain murky.

"I talked to Coach Stinespring (Sunday) night and (Monday)," Jones said. "He was just saying that they're all gonna be there still and that I'm still they're top guy that they want to get up there."

Like Gilbert, Jones is fresh off hearing that message from Tech's staff in the flesh. He also took his official visit for the Duke weekend, an experience he called "really good" overall, and he heard Stinespring and Wiles talk plenty about why he should become a Hokie.

"They just said they thought I was a really talented guy and they needed to keep in-state talent in state and that I'd be a perfect fit for Virginia Tech," Jones said.

Freshman LB Tremaine Edmunds hosted Jones for the visit, and he said the youngest Edmunds helped him explore the area.

"We just hung a lot on campus and then went downtown for a little bit," Jones said. "It was really nice."

He also heard from RB DeShawn McClease, another player from the "757" who was able to offer some advice about the coaches that ended up being more prescient than the freshman likely intended.

"He pretty much told me that whatever the coaches are saying, that's what they really mean," Jones said.

But going forward, Jones insists that neither his recent experience at Tech, nor the news of the impending coaching change have him ready to make any proclamations about his recruitment just yet.

"I'm just trying to keep all my options open," Jones said.

Among Jones' options are both N.C. State and Pitt, and he plans to take official visits to each program on Nov. 21 and Nov. 27, respectively, before committing in time to enroll early in January.

But while Jones and Gilbert have likely made their last visits to Tech before finalizing their college plans, many of the others still have plans to return.

Pride hopes to visit again as soon as this Friday, after initially planning to come to the UNC game.

Coe has long planned an official visit for Tech on Jan. 21, and he says that remains his goal. In a perfect world, he hopes that the team will have a new coach by then to allow him to make a more informed decision.

Wolfolk is also "still trying to set up" his own official visit, preferably once his own football schedule wraps up by the winter months.

Because he's still unsure of the timing, he's equally unsure whether that visit will take place by the time Babcock installs a new head coach.

"If he was there, then of course (it would be about) meeting him, getting to know him, how he likes me, how he likes my family and how I'll fit in with his play style," Wolfolk said. "If he's not there, then just seeing how I'll be able to live at Virginia Tech for my next four years."

Kearns is also trying to set up an official visit in the same time frame, targeting the weekend of Dec. 12 for his Tech trip.

However, he's also eyeing a visit in the more immediate future.

"The plan is to go to the UNC game, my family and I think we'll do it," Kearns said. "It just depends on travel time, if it's a noon game or a night game, it depends on which one it is if we can go or not."

Greene also plans to be in attendance for Beamer's Lane Stadium send off, with an official visit to come sometime in November, and he can't wait to see the atmosphere for the head coach's final home game.

"I think the atmosphere will be crazy, knowing the Hokies' crowd," Greene said.

Kearns thinks that sounds about right, even though the whole affair will have a melancholy tinge.

"It's going to be electric," Kearns said. "I'm sure everybody is going to want to be there for his last game and hopefully they can send him out in the right way, they can win out and win a bowl. He's a legend, and I'm sorry he's leaving, but I completely understand."

Wolfolk says he'll feel the loss more acutely as he grapples with the fact that Beamer's departure is no dream, but rather a stark new reality for all involved with Tech football.

"I was very excited to go into Beamer Ball, everybody talks about this tradition, telling me about it, it sounds very fun," Wolfolk said. "He was a real cool, fun guy and I just wish I could've seen him in action."

Comments

Damn, Babcock working the phones with recruits...is that a normal thing for an AD to do when a coach is leaving? It feels like no, which makes me appreciate him that much more. I'm beginning to suspect he's setting the bar too high for himself and we're going to be disappointed in his new coach because it's not Bear Bryant. But then I think about the Buzz hire and get a tingly feeling all over...

I have a feeling that no football coach alive is as cool as Bear Bryant was in his first year of coaching.

2026 Season Challenge: TBD
Previous Challenges: Star Wars (2019), Marvel (2020), Batman (2021), Wrasslin' (2022)

"I talked to Coach Stinespring (Sunday) night and (Monday)," Jones said. "He was just saying that they're all gonna be there still and that I'm still they're top guy that they want to get up there."

Kinda points to Bud or Shane.

Shane is not going to be the next head coach. If you believe that then I have some land to sell you. Maybe if he takes a non P-5 head coaching job and does well there could he return as VT's head honcho one day. If his last name was not Beamer he wouldn't even have been our RB coach. He has enough trouble with that as it is.

"Give me a fu¢king beer", Anonymous Genius

I agreed with you until you said

If his last name was not Beamer he wouldn't have even been our RB coach

Do you think he got all his jobs and kept them because of his last name?

Wet stuff on the red stuff.

Join us in the Key Players Club

So you think if he was Shane Smith we would have let Hite go for him? Has our RB production not drastically dropped since Shane arrived?

"Give me a fu¢king beer", Anonymous Genius

Let Hite go? He was retiring; the position was going to be open, anyway.

"Exit light..."

Facts have no place here.

Wet stuff on the red stuff.

Join us in the Key Players Club

Per TSL he was basically forced out, kinda like Cav.

"Give me a fu¢king beer", Anonymous Genius

down a leg for stating what insiders on TSL had said at the time? wtf

"Give me a fu¢king beer", Anonymous Genius

Uncalled for I agree. I mean your wrong but still no need for down votes.

Wet stuff on the red stuff.

Join us in the Key Players Club

LOL. thx.

"Give me a fu¢king beer", Anonymous Genius

Hite was more or less ready to retire. Cav not so much.

Wiley, Brown, Russell, Drakeford, Gray, Banks, Prioleau, Charleton, Midget, Bird, McCadam, Pile, Hall, Green, Fuller, Williams, Hamilton, Rouse, Flowers, Harris, Chancellor, Carmichael, Hosley, Fuller, Exum, Jarrett

More or less. Mostly frustrated with what the world of recruiting had become. Also had been having trouble with his eyes.

"Our job as coaches is to influence young people's lives for the better in terms of fundamental skills, work ethic, and doing the right thing. Every now and again, a player actually has that effect on the coaching staff." Justin Fuente on Sam Rogers

Has our RB recruit quality not drastically dropped since Shane arrived as well? Sure, you can polish a turd, but in the end it's still a turd. Not saying our players are turds, but they aren't of the same quality as the ones Hite had to work with.

I don't care who you are, when your predecessor lands Darren Evans, Ryan Williams and David Wilson in consecutive draft cycles, you aren't going to continue that momentum. It's full on redonkulous that we landed all three of them.

JCC was rated the #4 running back in the nation when we landed him. McClease is a 4 star. Recruiting has been solid.

"I liked you guys a lot better when everybody told you you were terrible." -Justin Fuente

I agree, but my point is that to say that production has dropped off is to discredit the quality that they each had to work with. Evans, Williams, and Wilson were all better RBs than what Shane had to work with. And yes, I know Shane had Wilson for a year. CURRENT recruiting is solid now with Shai, Marshawn, and McClease, but JC has been underwhelming in production, part in due to his stature but also due to poor OL recruiting. Having Trey and Holmes hampered Shane's ability to produce. Don't get me wrong, Trey fights and I appreciate what he does, but again, he's not near what we had with Hite.

The RB injuries have been pretty bad since David Wilson left.

Trey Edmunds, Marshawn Williams, & Shai McKenzie have all missed 1+ season, JCC was nicked up much of 2013, Jerome Wright was lost for the last few games last year. Then throw in the Michael Holmes debacle and that didn't leave a whole helluva lot to work with the last 3 seasons.

Also a fair assessment. So can a lack of production be blamed on Shane? I argue that there are equal parts playing against him that limit his ability to be productive.

Shane is a good recruiter he recruitted Fisher, Caleb,Mckenzie, NIjman, Reavis, Clarke, Alexnander. Yea some of those didn't work out but that is a lot of 4*

Not trying to put down Shane's recruiting, but specifically our staff's ability in RB recruiting.

Mckenzie, JCC, Williams, Reid were all 4* running backs

I commented above that CURRENT recruiting of RBs, including Shai and Marshawn, is improved. But we had to play Michael Holmes at RB after Wilson left. Talk about a drop. And with regards to JC, love the kid, but his stature and inconsistent offensive line play don't help him be productive and show of his talent. Reid...has he done anything? Honestly, I really don't even know. Can't say I've even seen him on the field. Again though, We had a string of strong running backs and that died after Wilson left. It came back up last year, but injuries got in the way.

Coleman may not have lived up to expectations but he was a highly ranked recruit in the 2012 class, same with Reid in 2013( he ended up going to a prep school). We had a dip in running back recruiting from 2010-2011 but since then we have signed at least 1 4* running back every year for four years in a row. It doesn't look likely we will sign a high ranked running back this year but with 3 more years of Williams/McMillian/McKenzie/Reid and four years of McClease it may not be a huge concern. Th

We didn't sign a 4* RB in 2013. If you're counting Reid, he was an Athlete, borderline 4*, most considered him 3* and yes, prepped. It was accepted that he would play RB, but he was also a CB so it's hard to dictate what his ranking would be if he was only a RB.

247 lists Reid as a 4* RB for the 2014 class., Rivals lists him also as a RB

During prep school he was reclassified as a RB. Still, not a 2013 signee and not a 4* RB in 2013.

JCC, Williams, McKenzie, McClease were all 4 star RBs. Edmunds and McMillian were also 4* athletes who were projected at other positions. That's SIX 4* athletes in Beamer's running back room right now. Not exactly a problem with the VT "staff's ability in RB recruiting".

It's not the recruiting that's been the issue. It's the injuries to the recruits that has been the issue.

Again, above I said recent has been improved. Before Shane arrived, we signed no RBs in 2010. No need to right? We had Wilson, Williams, and Evans. No way ALL of them could leave early, or so we thought. 2011, the year Shane arrived so recruiting class not on him, our best RB was Michael Holmes, 3*. 2012, 4* JC was our top back and after him was Chris Mangus, 3* and now transferred out. Our money was on Drew Harris. If you want to point to where trouble started in the RB group, that's it right there. Not getting our prize RB that year. Also, that year we signed Trey Edmunds, generally considered a borderline 3/4* OLB, but most considered him 3*. 2013, best RB was Jerome Wright, 3* who we moved to FB. It wasn't until 2014 that we picked up some good RB recruits in 4* Shai and borderline 3/4* Marshawn. So that's 4 recruiting classes without only 1 quality RB. That's a lot of eggs in one basket and not a good sign.

It gets difficult to compare back further because some recruiting services didn't exist back then and even if they did, the evaluation has changed. But 2006 we signed 2* Kenny Lewis Jr. 2007 was 3* Darren Evans and 3* Josh Oglesby. 2008 was 4* Ryan Williams. 2009 4* David Wilson. We got back to back 4* RBs, had both of them drafted and win awards, and then it took us 3 years to get another, then 2 more years after that.

I'm not sure what your point is...

That RB recruiting wasn't good right before Beamer got here? That VT hasn't gotten an elite back since David Wilson (and frankly they've only ever gotten 3 elite TB recruits I can think of and two were back-to-back)?

We fueled our program with good backs during the end of Hite's tenure which really helped him look good. Now, we have a few, but it's too little too late as people have already judged Shane incompetent at coaching RBs. We went from Darren Evans, Ryan Williams, and David Wilson to Michael Holmes and Martin Scales. There was a drop and now people complain about him not being able to produce, but the quality of which to work with is not the same as there was prior to him arriving. My point is that is production on Shane's shoulders solely? I say no. Injuries to our best talents hindered him and poor OL recruiting hampered our run game. JC, Trey, Shai, and Marshawn have all been injured in separate seasons and sometimes in the same season.

Yea I don't think people have a problem with Shane's ability to recruit or coach running backs but rather his insistence on the running back rotation when it was clear to practically everyone that McMillan was the most talented back (possible exception of a healthy Mckenzie)

Not sure who Fisher is. I'm pretty sure you made him up...

Using /s is for cowards.

still have no idea what happened to Caleb.

might be the most confusing recruit (in terms of finding a position) we've had in a couple year.

I'm impressed our Assistants are staying in touch, esp. considering all the rumors of new coach prospects. I'd have a hard time if I were in their shoes. Just proves their LOYALTY to VT, which we won't get with a new staff. Hire Bud, give him the shot he deserves for being loyal, promote TG. Damn, glad I'm not Whit! But loyalty means a lot to these recruits, players n parents! We ARE Virginia Tech! Let's stay that way! Please just say NO to RichRod! He's the polar opposite of CFB n our staff. If we get a new guy, be ready for transfers n decomitts, as lots came to play for Bud n TG n CW. So it's going to be a bigger rebuild. So taking a chance on Bud may not be so bad. :) I do want a faster offense.
To go off subject, why haven't we looked at Brohm at W.Ky? He looks promising n played LSU tough for a half finishing with 21pts. :)
Trusting in Whit. To look at our loyal and professional staff we have, has to be hard to cut the cord so to speak!

MLWalthall

Just proves their LOYALTY to VT, which we won't get with a new staff

How can you be so sure of this? I think it would be possible to hire a new coach who would stay loyal to VT and instill that in his staff. I'm not saying that it will definitely happen, I'm just not ready to say that it definitely won't happen either.

Onward and upward

Agreed! But chances are much slimmer with ppl that didn't attend VT or work for CFB for many yrs. But you've right, no guarantees.

MLWalthall

Everyone just stay calm! NOBODY PANIC!!!

This was great- thanks Alex!

'Its easy to grin, when your ship comes in, and you've got the stock market beat,
but the man worthwhile, is the man who can smile, when his shorts are too tight in the seat'

seems to me that we absolutely need the following 4 coaches to stay- Bud, Searels, Gray and Zohn.. That's a lot to ask for a new HC to come in and accept. Wonder if that would even be possible.

You are right, I think we absolutely need some kind of tangible legacy of Frank on this team at least for a few seasons

Sean

If we're going to keep Beamer's staff, why not keep Beamer as well?

If you're going to change something, go ahead and change it.

Beamer's tangible legacy is his record and the prominence of VT football.

I know once guy who could accept it.....

Sorry, I had to.

Can we have Aaron Rodgers call the recruits?

"Five letters here just for everybody out there in [HOKIE]-land: R-E-L-A-X."

Alex this is incredible stuff...you just keep getting better and better future is bright for you son.

Sean

The best way to gauge how many assistants are asked to leave would be to look at how other programs have handled coaching turnover.

TAMU fired long time coach R. C. Slocum and brought in Dennis Franchione who essentially brought his whole staff from Alabama (and fired who was then, A&M's OC who is now their current head coach).

Saban, in 2007 brought in a whole new staff.

Jim Harbaugh pretty much fired everyone at Michigan except for the DC, who he demoted to the DL coach.

I'm guessing that there's going to be significant turnover on the assistants this year, and the guys who are retained, if any, will likely be replaced within the next couple of seasons, unless Foster is hired, and who knows what he would do, or who he would replace.

There are generally 20+ coaching changes every year. Three examples are anecdotes, not evidence of anything.

And the three examples you chose - already big name coaches moving to programs with elite resources probably aren't particularly relevant to VT.

Just took a peek at Memphis Coaching staff and Houston Coaching Staff Changes when the new HC took over.

Houston had a complete clean house.
Memphis had 1 coach stay, that coach was LB coach Galen Scott who was moved to D. Coordinator/LB. Galen worked with now coach Justin Fuente at Illinois State from 01-06.

If I were Justin Fuente, after taking over a team that won 3 games in 2 seasons I'd get rid of the staff too.

Houston had to restock because, at least on the offensive side, Sumlin's staff went with him.

No, I *don't* want to go to the SEC. Why do you ask?

We don't love dem Hoos.

Herman didn't replace Sumlin, there was a guy in between who won 7 games a year.

Good catch, although Levine was fired too. You can put the change from Levine to Herman in the same boat with the Memphis reshuffle.

No, I *don't* want to go to the SEC. Why do you ask?

We don't love dem Hoos.

Unless VT hires one of those guys, that's just more anecdotes. And even then, those programs were hardly comparable to VT -- in either the state of the program being taken over or the track record of success of (at least some of) the existing staff.

Do you really think "Memphis" had anybody remotely in the same league as, say, Bud Foster or Torrian Gray - or even Stacey Searels - on that staff?

Well, Alabama was horrendous up until Saban took over in '07, and also facing sanctions from the NCAA. Saban overhauling the staff that year was probably as much a move to erase the Mike Shula era as it was to set up his own.

Even Alabama fans disavow the Shula years.

No, I *don't* want to go to the SEC. Why do you ask?

We don't love dem Hoos.

I think a significant difference is, most of those cases featured schools that had just fired their coaches, and the replacements came in to a situation where you would expect them to clear house. Also, I'd expect that there are a large number of offensive-minded coaches that would give anything to have an elite DC like Bud on their sideline. I think the only way Bud doesn't stock around is if we bring in a defensive mind at HC, or if Bud doesn't see eye to eye with whatever offensive mind we bring in, and leaves of his own decision, or if we find a coach that already has a top-tier DC that he's been working with for a long time.

Jimbo Fisher got rid of about half of Bowden's staff. He retained famed DC Micky Andrews, then the next year he brought in Mark Stoops.

I stand by my assertion that we will see significant turnover of assistants after this year.

Also, keep in mind, even if the new coach wants them to stay, they might not want to. They were likely more loyal to Beamer than for Tech. The younger guys probably want a shot a being coordinators elsewhere (TG for example).

Man i'm glad we have a solid AD who will pick up the phone like that. I hope it helps out and we don't lose (m)any recruits for next year. Being honest with myself, it isn't surprising that incoming players would take pause when the HC retires. If it was a close call between VT and another school this really might have an effect on their decision unfortunately. But hopefully with Whit calling them and being proactive like this they will be rocking orange and maroon next fall.

Man, that feature photo shows a man who needs a rest. Sad.