
Initial inklings of promise in the Buzz Williams era at Virginia Tech came twice against Syracuse early in 2015.
At the very beginning of the year, an overmatched, scrappy unit came back from 20 down (sound familiar?) and had a chance to win at the buzzer in Cassell Coliseum. A month later, the same loss-stricken Hokie team rolled into the Carrier Dome and fell on a last second shot.
Two different settings, two narrow defeats, both which seemed to foreshadow bigger things to come. And in Tech's only 2016 trip to upstate New York, it looked like their fortunes would finally turn.
Up seven with just over 90 seconds to go, Williams' squad looked to put the finishing touches on a game they controlled from the jump. Expertly killing clock, the five maroon-clad players had a bit of swagger and the slight curl of a winner's grin on their faces. Junior guard Seth Allen beat a trap, drove straight to the basket with confidence, and watched a layup spin around and out.
And after that, everything happened in a matter of hazy body blows:
Orange guard Malachi Richardson hit a subsequent fast break three pointer (Tech's lead cut to four).
Allen clanked another close one, and 'Cuse answered with a dunk (the Hokies' once-impregnable advantage now down to a flimsy two points).
Justin Bibbs split at the line after a foul (his team just up three).
Senior Michael Gbinije drills a tying triple from somewhere out by the popcorn line (tied up with 26 seconds to go).
Bibbs missed a potential dagger, and the rest lead down an almost predictable path of a devastating fall. The Hokies couldn't keep up in the extra period, and lost another tight one 68-60.
But unlike any of the other games dropped down the stretch, this one will hurt the most. Not only did Williams' team have a steady hand for the majority of the contest, their opponent did all they could to give everything away early. Syracuse shot a dreadful 29% in the first half, saw a handful of starters pick up quick fouls and struggled to contain Tech's ability to attack their infamous 2-3 zone.
But despite all which went their way, the Hokies found themselves in a fight throughout. Turnovers haunted them, and a small lineup couldn't consistently stay on the glass and the offensive rebounds they gave up helped the Orange find their streak from outside. By the final whistle, every Virginia Tech player looked the opposite of what they had just minutes prior, their assuredness crumbled as Syracuse padded to their OT lead. An elusive road win was in their hands, and the youngsters still couldn't quite grab hold until the horn.
"I thought they made some great shots," Williams said. "We could have handled it slightly better than we did. We missed some layups that you probably have to make on the road. I thought we handled it much better than we did last year in the same situation. But there's still room for improvement, for sure."
A balanced stat sheet saw Bibbs end with 16 and 11 boards, Zach LeDay with 13 and 8, and Allen with 11, four rebounds and four assists. But it wasn't enough to overcome the mistakes down the stretch or the Orange's newfound deadliness from behind the arc in overtime.
"I thought some of the things that we did defensively were good," Williams said. "Maybe some of the shots that they typically make, they missed in the first half. I thought they made some really great shots to close the game out. They made winning plays in overtime."
Buzz and company head back to Blacksburg winless in their last five, two of which were decided in the closing moments. They'll host 14-win Clemson on Saturday, and look to show more than an inkling of their prior success back at the Cassell.
A few quick thoughts
This was always going to be one of the tougher turnarounds of the season. A NBA-like road swing of two games in three days across a pair of states is destined to be a disaster for even the best in the conference. With no time to lick wounds post-Pittsburgh, the team had to do their best to regroup in an adverse situation. There was no time to head back to Blacksburg and correct things in the comforts of their cushy practice facility, it was simply on to the next one.
One of two things often happen in situations like this. Bad habits are either compounded off the blowout, which means a larger and more depressing bash-fest, or there is an eagerness to wipe the bad taste of a loss out of their mouths and causes a renewed focus.
On Tuesday night, Buzz's bunch came out firing. They were prepared, energized and looked like the better team for much of the game, a testament to everyone involved regardless of the final score.
But here's the thing. There's a reason this one hurts more than a slip up in the last few minutes a year ago, or even last month. As results like this start to pile up, the narratives changes. They're no longer a scrappy, young squad of outclassed guys who can keep things close in every third or fourth game, but instead a group who can go into nearly any environment and potentially pull out a win.
Now, it may seem ridiculous to insinuate the expectation of competitiveness night in and night out, but haven't they shown us the ability already? The majority of 2016 has been littered with close calls going one way or the other, and watching a game that should've been over mutate into another cardiac event turns the stomach.
They're not good enough yet, as Tuesday exemplified, but there are enough players in the lineup and enough good coaches on the sideline to provide the presumption of a tight one whenever the team hits the floor. And that, my friends, will come with its own share of pain.
This should have been a different article, one talking about Williams' win in Syracuse and another benchmark in the progress of this reborn program. Instead, it's just another post both written and read before. The Hokies fell in another heartbreaker, let's see if this time they can bounce back.

Comments
This was an absolute, absolute heart breaker.
I think Allen drove too soon with around 15 seconds still on the clock but maybe it didn't or wouldn't have mattered. If Bibbs makes the second foul shot maybe. They made more free throws (20) than we attempted (13) but if we had made more than 7 of the 13, maybe. But it is absolutely true that we gave this one away no ifs, ands or buts. Those 3 threes they made at the end were out of this world - the one literally!!!! They were clutch on theirs and we clunked on our crucial shots.
Man, I forgot they were playing until I saw it recording on my DVR last night. I'd figure I'd watch it later since my wife isn't to keen on us watching basketball once the kids are in bed. Anyhow, after reading this I'm glad I didn't. Ugh. I hate it for the team and it's got to be tough playing quick turnarounds. Has to be frustrating to Buzz as well not having as much time to fix things he needs to at certain parts in the season. Oh well, they are doing better than in the past but still a ton of room for improvement.
This one hurt. But wow those three pointers Syracuse made were ridiculous. You don't see many teams making those shots as consistently as it felt like they were, especially the one that was practically at half court. Onto the next game and hopefully they can pull off the win at home.
EVERY team makes those against us...
I think just the past two games they have
And Louisville, and Iowa State, and Northwestern and Duke.
Those are all pretty damn good teams that expect to make those shots, so
Another game lost in the last few minutes, when this team learns how to finish games they will be very hard to beat, the future looks bright.
Close games (1 possession games or OT games):
Ala St (L), UAB (W), NW (L), NCSU (W), UVA (W), Wake (W), GT (W), ND (L), Syracuse (L): 5-4
If you want to include UNC (5 point loss) and Louisville (8 point loss), we are 5-6.
That is if they don't loose heart first. Buzz brought them into the game with their heads held high and with great anticipation, it just looked like they ran out of gas. Such a a heart breaker.
Maybe it's because I didn't watch all of this one, but I would argue last year's game up there hurt worse. We were up 13 with the ball and 6 minutes to go IIRC, and lost in regulation. It was a much longer, slow motion trainwreck than the last minute and a half were last night. Of course if you factor in the OT last night, I guess they were about equal. And last year's win wouldn't have brought us to .500 in the ACC either. Bottom line - they both felt like a punch to the stomach.
VT should have won this game. Buzz had 3 timeouts and when things started to go south, he was late calling the TO. You could see the players were getting anxious and Seth Allen was not making very sound decisions. He plays too loose on both sides of the ball. That dagger of a 3 that Syracuse shot, SA should have been somewhat contested but He wasn't even looking at the player, he was worried about a back side pick. You knew Syracuse would start hitting 3's because of the law of averages. They just waited until the final 90 seconds. Tough loss, but sweep it under the rug and get ready for Saturday.
There was a out of bounds situation with 7 on the shot clock, under 2 minutes with us having 3 TO's... I was stunned Buzz did not call a TO and set up something. Not sure what he was thinking.
Still, these are teams (UNC, Louisville, ND, Syr) that Vegas has -10 or more against us and we are right there, with legitimate chances to win. And don't forget thats with 3 of our top 8 players injured.
This game was over as soon as it went to OT. Luck of the home court, gave Cuse' some absurd 3s to finish it off.
Another chapter in 'Live and Die by Seth Allen, a Hokies Tale'. Tonight we died by the hand of his late game aggression. Use the clock, Seth.
This game hurt, I swore, alot. We did everything we needed to win, for the first 38min. ACC road games are no easy feat, and we're becoming dangerously close to winning them again.
Wife blames this one on Buzz. Wanted him to get the guys to foul 'cuse when we were up by three and 20 sec. left on the clock. Can't fault her logic. This game hurt.
John Calipari lost a national championship the same way.
Can't fault that logic, get the wife out on the hardwood.
The loss in 2015 hurt but this one was really painful because where 2015 was lost because of lack of depth and talent. 2016 however was lost due to failure to execute fundamental basketball.
1) Failure to make shots at the rim. We missed 4 layups or dunks in the first half and 8 more of the same in the second half. 24 points left hanging at the end of the night.
2) Failure to manage the clock: On at least five of the second half missed attempts above, they came with over 20 seconds left on the shot clock. That doesn't include Allen's late three attempt with 27 seconds remaining on the shot clock that came immediately after an inbounds pass. He was frustrated the official didn't call a foul at the line and seemed to take the mindset of "I will show you official" and clunked it. That's almost a minute and a half. How important was that when we were up seven with two minutes to go.
3) Failure to remove opponents in foul trouble - Tech allowed their top scorer to stay in the game after getting his fourth foul with 5.31 to go in the game and yet we never managed to get him fouled out. He scored 7 of their last 22 points plus a rebound. Their second leading scorer managed to add a bucket and a rebound before he fouled out early in overtime. That's nine of their last 22 points from players with four fouls.
4) Piss Poor Stat Line of the Night: Jalen Hudson, (0-7 from the floor) 0 - 4 from behind the line. 2 points and 3 personal fouls in 18 minutes of play.
5) Running away from taking the shot in OT/3 Pointer as part of the game plan. On one of our OT attempts, the ball handler at the top of the key was stuck while at least four Hokies ran away. No one wanted to take the shot with about 50 seconds left in overtime. The one that infuriates me the most is Justin Bibbs because he is the only player on this roster that is consistent enough from outside. He also needs to be able to create his own shot consistently. There were too many times last night that Syracuse sagged off him when he had the ball at the top of the key at about 25 feet and not once did he step in and drain a shot. I am not saying he needs to consistently shoot from 25 feet or more, although if he wants to make the NBA, it would greatly benefit him to start to get to that range, but he has to be able to keep defenses honest. It seems he is only comfortable taking the catch and shoot type shot right now.
In terms of taking threes, we went 5-11 in the first half but only 2-10 in the second half from behind the arc. A big part of that was who was taking those shots in the second half and 0-3 in the extra time. In the first half, we were extremely patient and worked the ball around until they got an open look. The second half saw us rushing shots way to often, and not particularly from ideal locations on the floor in terms of angle of the shot to the rim.
The Ref's putting the orange on the line again and again in the second half kept them in the game until they finally got hot shooting the ball. Then those three's rained from the heavens and put them tied, and then ahead.
Live by Seth Allen, die by Seth Allen. He missed how many shots in the second half?
As for overtime, we are behind and passing the ball all over and not driving to the basket. Did they not realize time was running out?
It seems like every time you say something bad about Seth Allen you get down voted. It seems to me somebody better start watching the game and in particular watch what he does instead of looking at box scores. There was a reason he left Maryland. I agree you live and die with his shooting but his shot selection leaves alot to be desired at times.
Seth was hot against Pitt and I give him credit for it and he started hot last night. He has especially improved his three point shot. But we seem to either have a hot Seth and he gets to the line for free throws (and makes them) or the rash Seth who makes shots that leave us shaking our heads.
Should have, could have, just get some more wins.
This was one of the worst performances by Seth Allen ever. His shooting was horrid, he couldn't dribble the ball, he single-handedly ruined a somewhat decent game by the rest of his team mates.
Yeah, one of these days we need to have the complete conversation about Seth Allen. He does so much good, but his bad is so glaringly bad that it can cover up the benefit he provides to the team. I've always found Bill Simmons' writing entertaining and he has a theory about this that, like all of his theories, is completely unprovable but is fun to think about. I keep coming back to it when I think about Seth. It's his "Ten Percent Theory". Here's a link to the piece where he throws it out the first time.
Seth Allen fits this perfectly. His energy getting to the rim scores us a lot of points and provides a spark for the rest of the team. I think LeDay has benefited greatly from Seth Allen because defense has to help stop Seth, leaving LeDay the chance to clean up. BUT... Seth Allen's energy and aggressiveness leads him to take an ill-advised 3 with 27 seconds left on the shot clock late in a game where we have to hold onto a lead. That's a pretty brutal 10 percent of his game that is a glaring fault.
That of course leads to the question of is it "worth it" to have Allen on the court. Even though I am developing ulcers and consistently wish I had a prescription of Xanax, I give a resounding YES to Allen getting the amount of playing time he gets. His energy is irreplaceable and his points are key to keeping us in games. And he really could work on these faults. He just needs to listen to the voice in his head saying "DON'T SHOOT!" whenever there are 27 seconds left on the shot clock.
One more question: Do you all get the feeling that Buzz is hesitant to pull him back or make him be less aggressive?
I actually feel Buzz has no other alternatives on the bench. When Hudson doesn't contribute, where can you turn to. I personally aam surprised by D Wilson's playing time but it is probably for the same reason. Who else do you have?
I wish I could add an image attachment of the stat box... but just because you brought it up, look at Wilsons espn page.
Is that not the most ass-backwards stat line you have ever seen, looks tipped on its head. How many players go from being option #1 as a freshmen to #6 (Debatably even lower) as an upperclassmen.
Anytime I have to write about something more than once a week, I am more frustrated with the coaching staff than I am with the player. When something is allowed to continue happening with little correction then I begin to look at Buzz and his assistants.
1) Be it Seth Allen and failure to manage the clock effectively or improve his shot selection. (See this week's improvement in his three point shooting - Attribute that to coaching and practice)
2) Also look to Kerry Blackshear taking terrible fouls on the perimeter or immediately after giving up a rebound down low. (Little to no corrections have been noted)
3) Look at Bibbs not asserting himself to be able to create a perimeter shot when he has the ball and a defender to beat. (Little to no improvement, but we have seen him be more aggressive in the last couple weeks of taking the ball inside)
4) Devin Wilson/ Robinson/ Henry/ Pierce/ Hamilton (Zero offensive game) We have now occasionally seen spurts from Henry here but thats about it.
Major flaws on the floor fall to the coaching staff to work to improve them. So far they seem to have to focus on one major items at a time. Last item before Allen's three point shooting was the teams free throw shooting as a whole. Its a slow process though.
100% agree that it does fall to the coaching staff, but when you look down the bench what do you see? I see projects, injuries and somewhat of a lack of talent. It will take time and we are on the correct path, but you can only do so much with what you have. It's not like we are loaded with McDonald All-Americans, but we will get there. Personally I am pleased with this season, the quick start probably gave us a little false hope of where we really are at. But I'm OK with. that too.
I agree. Overall the season has been fun to watch. More so than many past seasons.
Good points, I really enjoyed the BS piece as well.
I share the same sentiment on Allen, the greatest is that late game composure/awareness, leading right to your question... Yes I feel Buzz is hesitant to reign him in, especially late. Unlike me, Buzz hasn't seemed to lose confidence in him in the final minutes. His free throw % may have a lot to do with that fact though. But can you actually bench him late? We have seen Buzz interchange him and Devin Wilson late, just to get a defensive boost.
The thing is, we rely on that aggression all game long and I dont think there is anything near a capable replacement for Seth Allen. The closest being Jalen on his occasional Tyrone night. Without Allen, I wonder if our guards would force any fouls all game. Allen on the drive is the main reason we find space amongst the defense, Robinson seems the better facilitator, but cant create his own shot in an instance. Allen is the most prolific free throw shooter, and draws contact on damn near every layup, whether the zebra's are whistle-happy or not.
He does so much for us, yet makes such poor decisions down the stretch. How the heck do you combat this - how the heck can you change the instinct of a player with his experience? I can't imagine Buzz hasnt mentioned the thought.. 'hey seth you played really great last night, but those forced shots and aggressive drives lost us the game, again' in coach-speak. Everybody knows the refs dont like to blow the whistle on contact during final second drives,and driving to the hoop has to be the highest contributor in his scoring totals.
At the end of the day/game, Bibbs can't create his own shot.. and Allen doesn't put in the effort to look for open teammates, it is very clear he wants the ball in his hands. This is a bad strategy, given a defense knows to key on Allen and his relatively poor outside shooting %.
All Buzz needs to do is make him realize one thing:
Part of the problem there though is how often have we had that kind of lead late in a game. Have to fake it until you make it. We wont ever get used to having leads until then. Allen yesterday, 33% from floor, 33% from three, 1-2 from line. 4 turnovers and 4 missed dunks/layups plus the three with the whole shot clock remaining.
This one was nearly as crushing as the ND loss. When we take a lead the game becomes ours to lose and it makes watching difficult and nerve-racking. I hate to question not using the timeouts and Allen's shot choices but I can't help it. Also Buzz seemed quite subdued this game. Was I the only one to notice this?
I definitely haven't lost faith in this team (or Buzz) but damn if it isn't hard watching these games where we're right there with great teams and then we just seem to lose it at the end.
On to the next one.
Well, he did only strip down 1 layer. I think he only made it out of the sportscoat. If that's any barometer for his energy, then yes 'subdued' would work.
I was waiting for the pencil to snap but it never happened.
Tie stayed on, too.
2 missed layups in the final 90 seconds...
There really isn't much else you need to look in why we lost. Have to be able to finish the deal late in games. Hopefully the program learns and this doesn't happen in future years.
first game to make me sick mad n lose sleep in a while good and bad! gotta finish guys