
Along with the promise of an up-tempo offense, and hard, smart, tough play, the Justin Fuente era of football at Virginia Tech has draped a veil of secrecy over the Hokies. It's not necessarily done for nefarious reasons, but there's been a shift in how the program interacts with those outside of Merryman. Closed scrimmages and podium-processed interviews at media events allow Tech to draw the curtain as little, or much, as it wants. Though annoying, it's a brilliant way for the Hokies to control their message.
And nothing has had its coverage impacted by this new stealthiness more than the competition at starting quarterback. Outside of brief Snapchat clips, and a bland spring game, no one's seen much of the five players vying for the job, and it's anyone's guess as to who'll win by week one.
Though Fuente has indicated senior Brenden Motley and JUCO transfer Jerod Evans are in the lead, it's unclear how the battle's going. Is it Motley's or Evans' to lose? Can anyone make up ground? But just because we have no information on the race's progress, doesn't mean we can't speculate wildly about its outcome.
And since it's June and we're still months away from football, we can analyze the race for not just what it means on the field, but off it as well. Because with each player comes a slew of different storylines, both positive and negative. And though you can make an argument as to why it'd be cool to see any of them in the starting job, you can just as easily make a rebuttal as to why they won't.
Brenden Motley
What it means if he wins: A Motley win is far and away the most feelgood story. Let's look at a timeline of his career:
A three-star prospect who directed a run-focussed Wing-T attack out of nearby Christiansburg High School, Motley was tagged with the dreaded "ATH" label. Even though his skills projected well to the defensive backfield, Tech offered him with a promise he'd get a shot at QB, which seems nice but it came with two problems.
For one, it came from Kevin Sherman, Mike O'Cain, and the rest of a soon-to-be-deposed offensive staff. That's like your high school girlfriend promising to take your virginity, but promptly moving across the country after her dad got a new job. You may still have sex before you graduate, but you'll need to move on and impress someone else.
Secondly, how many times have we seen guys like Motley have "chances" under center? Quite often it amounts to an hour or two worth of practice in the first week of spring ball. Remember Carlis Parker? Carlis had a shot to stick in the QB room, which lasted all of two days until he split out and started to catch passes (albeit still in a yellow jersey).
But Motley stuck. Mostly to the back wall of Scot Loeffler's (probably dimly lit) meeting room. He sat behind Logan Thomas, Mark Leal, and Michael Brewer. Though young, he seemed destined to don the Cory Holt Memorial Headset for backup signal callers known more for their antics on the sideline, than their action on the field.
But a Brewer broken collarbone against Ohio State last season temporarily landed the job in Motley's lap, with no clear starter returning in 2016. To survive two regime changes and countless minutes on the bench? It's the perfect rise for a local kid who's worked his ass off to start as a senior.
Why it won't happen: Anyone other than Dave Doeren and whichever poor souls were in West Lafayette last year knows Motley wasn't particularly good. He went 3-3 as a starter, struggled with accuracy, and didn't provide enough with his legs to make up for it. Fuente's stressed the ability to make high-percentage plays consistently, and there are obvious doubts on Motley's tape to question his capacity to do that.
Jerod Evans
What it means if he wins: Because he's the guy Fuente brought in, Evans now represents more than just a talented JUCO prospect.
The most important part of Fuente's new regime was the need to drag Virginia Tech football into the 21st Century offensively — a complete overhaul of the offense and an effort to pave over all the transgressions of Hokie squads past.
No jumbled attempts at halfbaked scheme changes (remember O'cainspring's "up-tempo pistol"?), or unidentifiable messes (try to explain the Scot Loeffler era without using the words "confusing" or "inconsistent"). What the Hokies needed most, more than a new coach, is a single offensive identity everyone buys into.
And now the coaches know what they want to do, and selected their QB to do it. The Fuente/Evans pairing signifies a clean break from the offensive cluster f--- of the last half decade as they head into the future.
Why it won't happen: There's an underratedly large transition between junior college and division one ball. It's not necessarily the level of competition, but everything else involving the jump to a big university. Can he handle the change in the quality of classes he has to take? How will he transition to living over a thousand miles from home? Just think about what a move like that means. New friends, new town, new start to life.
And what if this competition extends longer than initially thought? Upon his commitment, many (including myself) assumed Evans would grab hold of the starting spot and never give it back. As of today he hasn't, and if Motley keeps it close will it hurt his confidence? And if anyone other than Evans wins, does it bring this staff's ability to evaluate talent into question?
While it's not fair to judge off a single player, Evans is the guy everyone is watching. And if he falls flat, people will wonder why he was signed in the first place. JUCO guys, especially quarterbacks, aren't brought in to be backups. Why waste a scholarship on someone with half the eligibility of a freshman, just to see them leave after two years pulling pine?
The coaches went out and got a guy from the outside who, in their minds, could start right away. If, for whatever reason, he can't? There'll definitely be some questions.
Dwayne Lawson
What it means if he wins: Lawson's development is still the most important thing for Tech's perception amongst recruits. He was a talented, highly touted, dual-threat guy out of high school. And although the program's had its deficiencies elsewhere, they've done okay with those kinds of players historically.
Should Lawson thrive, he's another player in Tech's long line of successful multi-talented quarterbacks to dazzle crowds at Lane Stadium. And after he tears up the field, the coaches can point to him in their pursuit of the next upper echelon, mobile signal caller.
Why it won't happen: Loeffler and company should be sued for damages for the way they handled Lawson in 2015. Though he was the most interesting guy in the recruiting class, he was obviously not ready to go. But in what was probably a desperate attempt to garner some semblance of hope from the fanbase, Lawson spent what should have been a redshirt year on the sideline as a little used reserve.
He was too raw, and it was apparent the moment he fired missiles at the shoelaces of poor Kevin Asante in garbage time against Furman. Did the decision fundamentally stunt him? We may never know. Motley and Evans have already separated themselves from the pack. What if Evans wins? Would Lawson even stick around for two years and wait for his chance to start as a redshirt junior or senior?
Josh Jackson
What it means if he wins: I'm a child of the 90s. Two of my three favorite sports movies growing up were The Mighty Ducks and D2: The Mighty Ducks. The star of those Ducks teams was a player named Charlie Conway. Charlie Conway? Played by the actor Josh Jackson! THINK OF ALL THE MIGHTY DUCKS JOKES WE COULD MAKE.
I'll make this proclamation right now: if Fuente wants to endear himself to this publication, he names Jackson the starter today. And if not? We rollerblade around his neighborhood with sweatshirts tied around our waists like hooligans, yelling "the quack attack is back, Jack!" until he gives in. It's just how we at The Key Play dot com roll (pun intended).
(I was just informed that I have no standing to speak for any of our other writers, and especially not this website as an entity. This plan may need tweaking.)
(Also for anyone wondering, my other favorite sports movie is Space Jam. It constantly battles D2 for the defining film of my childhood. I was a weird kid.)
Why it won't happen: Did you just read the nonsense I wrote over the last four paragraphs? Aside from a 5-of-9, 35 yard spring game performance, it's the most I know about Jackson.
Jack Click
What it means if he wins: I know it's a stretch, but let's play out this scenario for just a second. Justin Fuente transformed Andy Dalton from an awkward ginger whose only other collegiate offer was UTEP, into an awkward ginger who's also an NFL starter. He then took Paxton Lynch, an unheralded kid out of Florida, and made him into a first round pick with the confidence to wear sunglasses indoors on national television.
If Fuente can come to Blacksburg and turn Click into a Power Five performer, he can do literally anything he wants with someone who throws a football. He instantly lives up to every single bit of the hype as a quarterback guru, and fans would beg Whit Babcock to give him a lifetime, trillion dollar contract.
Why it won't happen: He's a walk-on. I had to look him up 46 times on Hokiesports just to make sure his last name is actually Click and not Glick. And as of this writing, I'm still not sure. Have fun on the practice squad there, Click. Or Glick. Whatever. Try to avoid getting squashed by Tim Settle.
And so it remains to be seen who will take the first snap against Liberty in early September. My money's on Evans, but I doubt we'll find out who QB1 is any time before game week. But whether it's Evans, Motley, or one of the youngsters, they all bring intrigue along with them.

Comments
Common sense kinda dictates that it'll be Evans. But only time will tell. IMO, I thought
Click(or maybeapparently it was Jackson...one of the young guys either way) looked the best at the spring game. And that was playing with the twos...I'm not sure we'll get stellar QB play this year but I think the future is bright at that position. By 2018 we might be talking about first round draft status for our QB. It's been a long time since we've done that.It was Jackson. I think he will RS (as stated below). I just get the impression that this kid is a baller.
thanks!
To be fair though, Click really impressed me at the spring game...I don't think he'll be the guy, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him be said guy down the road.
Biggest disagreement with this writing....The Sandlot > Space Jam
Yeah I was gonna say the author was definitely a weird kid. Sandlot FTW.
Brian, you most certainly do not speak for me.
Major League for me. (And no, am a child from...before the 90s).
Youth. Are those movies different from Dora the Explora or Sponge Bog Squared pants?
Hard to argue with 'Wild Thing' Vaughn, Cerrano (KFC anyone?), and Bob Uecker
Uecker I recognize. Just spoofin' though. This site makes me feel old every day.
It's all relative. Movie's worth a watch, though. Hands down, my favorite sports movie.
MAjor League is the Blazing Saddles of the sports genre. Love it.
Definitely falls within the 'periodic watch' category
Half the time during the spring game I was concentrating so hard during the misdirection plays trying to figure out who had the ball that I never noticed who was in at quarterback at that moment. Hopefully, our opponents will have the same problem.
I think it will be...
Starter: Evans
Back up: Motley
3rd string: Click
Both Lawson and Jackson (should)/will RS
The virginity comment had me a little concerned but then like "ohhh...pretty solid analogy." Will use that down the road.
I find it to be a great icebreaker for "why you should let me date your daughter, sir!"
Damn you need a leg just for the awkward ginger comments, that game me some chuckles
I honestly would not be surprised if a starter is not named by the Liberty game. I have a feeling we will see a healthy dose of both Evans and Motley in that game. I'm not sure if it has as much to do with one not separating himself from the other, but possibly more about Fuente playing his cards extremely close to the vest. I don't think we will find out anything substantive about this offense or our QB1 until the Battle at Bristol.
We've had tremendous success with dual quarterback systems in the past
Coach London, is that you?
Half of that picture automatically makes me really nervous...*coughSEVENcough*
Yes we should do something like this again, I think it would be a good idea and not a trainwreck
I like the effort but I'm not sure they were truly a two quarterback situation. I liked both though. I wasn't the Glennon hater like so many folks I knew, but it was frustrating to watch the sacks.
I don't know, after the Georgia game where he turned the ball over like 4 times in 4 series, there was a lot of ill will headed his way. But he is a nice guy.
Turn overs by the same player on back to back series has been known as the Glennon Special since that game. The Double Glennon Special was a sight to see.
Oh hello. They were both MVP of the ACC championship game.
Glennon will always be a hero to me after he F'd Matt Ryan in the 2007 championship for all of us.
I don't think Fuente is going to have a dual QB system, but I think we may not have a clear cut starter going into game 1. I think we will see both play considerable time vs. Liberty, and probably with a very vanilla gameplan. I think we see the full offense unveiled vs. Tennessee, and will probably find out who our starter is then.
plausible
I agree that we could see a heavy dose of both QBs in the Liberty game. I also wouldn't be at all shocked if we only saw one QB even in a blowout. More reps of live action can't be a bad thing and ahead of the Tenn game there is a good chance Cornelsen/Fuente want their starter for that game getting as many snaps as possible to get comfortable with the offense.
It also wouldn't surprise me if we don't see a vanilla offense (though I fully expect to) if you submit to the theory that the more we show Tenn the more they have to plan for. If you overload them with info they may lose track of the details. Try to do too much and you won't do anything well. But I'm excited to see how Fuente conducts his business. I'll be watching both games very closely to see how he attacks them.
I think Fuente has a certain element of surprise in his favor going into the UT game. They probably are studying Memphis film, but they (and even us) don't really know what Fuente has up his sleeve and/or how he is going to utilize our players in his system. I think the uncertainty around who will be our QB and even what we have at the QB position plays into our favor. Motley has 6 starts on film from last year, albeit in a totally different system. We don't really know what we have in Evans right now, other than he was very highly-touted coming out of JUCO. I think Fuente will probably be pretty mum on the QB competition going into the Liberty game. We haven't really heard much information at all on anything, other than some snapchat clips and the very vanilla spring game. It definitely will be interesting to see how he handles this once camp starts.
Why does everyone say this?
Because there is no game film of a VT offense run by Fuente's staff. Just the spring game which could be a smokescreen.
UT can watch Memphis film all day long, but no one really has a clue how Fuente is going to utilize our roster at VT. Very limited film available with our players in his system.
I agree to a certain extent....
What UT is going to find in Fuente's Memphis O (and I'll guarantee you they're watching TCU film too) are tendencies and patterns. Yea, it's not with VT's personnel, but it's not like Fuente is completely reinventing his offense with VT's roster. Granted, we could probably say with confidence that he has wrinkles up his sleeve and now has the personnel to do different things within his style offense that he was unable to do or decided not to do at UofM, but UT can still benefit greatly from watching Memphis (and TCU) film. To think that UT is going to be these bumbling idiots scratching their heads out there because they have no clue what's going on is horrendously nave.
I would say that "a certain element of surprise" is not mutually exclusive with the other team being able to benefit from past film of Memphis and TCU.
I don't expect Tenn's defense to look like bumbling idiots out there. I'm just hoping that the uncertainty of who they're up against slows them down a half step here or there. I also think it's noteworthy to point out that Tenn has a new DC this year. I'll be watching their defense closely on Thursday when they face off against Appy State. Should be interesting to see how they look.
I think the combination of Tenn having a new DC and them not having a whole lot of game film on Cornelsen's version of the VT offense will be the biggest advantages we have offensively. It would be strange to me if we don't try to take advantage of that.
Absolutely. Both teams' personnel are learning new systems and I would fully expect there to be a few breakdowns here and there due to system inexperience on both sides. Here's to hoping those breakdowns benefit rather than hurt the Hokies.
I think you're right. It could be a sloppy game when VT is on offense. I guess we'll see what happens...
I want to post something negative about Motley being named the starter, but I just can't. I just like that kid. I hope he has worked his ass off, and manna rains down from the sky on his qb skills. He's gonna need it.
and yet:
I guess I'll clarify.
I would like for Motley to be QB1 because it's a good story. I'm just not sure about his skill set.
I'm rooting for Motley. I think he has the tools to be successful. It's probably far-fetched but I still hope he can do it. I like the idea of a local kid turning out well, The guy who put in a lot of time and a lot of work and many years.
I'd venture many more than I were excited to hear about the JUCO stud Evans coming to our school. I'm hoping he has as much success here too. But before writing Motley off, it could be perhaps he learned a thing or two last year and that Fuente's system actually fits him better. Nothing could have been worse for him than the ambush he was led into against Pitt last year. The coaches should have been suspended for two games for that one. I'm placing all my turkey legs on nothing like that happening this year to any of our QB's.
I hope we have a "1A" & "1B" thing with Evans and Motley. Only because, as experience shows, you're likely to need 2 QBs.
Unfortunately over the last couple years, it's been 1A and 1-AA.
I think the youngsters call it FCS these days.
Doesn't fit my narrative. How about 1A and NAIA.
More like C-USA and IAA
Not a well written article. Jackson and Click both have done good work this year and Motley deserves more respect than this.
Not a well written sentence... sorry I couldn't help myself.
One's a true freshman and the other is a walk on. They can do good work and still not be on the level of other players
What about the Motley section do you disagree with? That he faced some long odds sticking at QB, especially given our penchant for giving QB/ATHs "shots at being a QB" and then quickly changing them to other positions? That he's had to roll with two staff changes and has stuck through it? Or was it "he went 3-3 as a starter, struggled with accuracy, and didn't provide enough with his legs to make up for it?"
The first two are really impressive and I feel like Brian's article did a good job of conveying that. The third point is....well, to put it plainly, the truth. I know the entire offense struggled during those 3 games he lost as a starter (see: Pitt) but his QB play ranged from good to outright awful.
Now, as for this:
Welcome back.
Here is the reality (and this is coming from someone who hoped that Motley would win the job going into the spring.) Fuente's offense has very simple reads in the passing game. In the spring game, Motley was still incredibly slow with his reads, and often his inaccuracy stems from throwing the ball well after the receiver comes out of his break. Nothing in the little bit of film that was available in the spring suggests otherwise, nor do his performances last year.
Now, even more important than the passing game is that Fuente requires tons of reads and very nuanced footwork and mesh point fundamentals in the run game from his quarterback. Across the board, Evans was faster and more fundamentally sound on his reads, reverse outs, and riding the mesh points. That, by itself, I think will separate Evans. Evans passing game performance will be what could potentially put this offense to the next level. He has to be accurate.
Of the younger guys, I was really impressed with Josh Jackson. He looked sharp against lesser competition.
I really don't want to see a two quarterback situation. I like having a guy to rally behind with solid backups to put pressure on and get support from. I'd be happy with a Evans, Motley, Click as 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. But I defer to Fuente obviously.
Fuente is a former QB and offensive mastermind. I'm 99% we won't have a two QB system.
Edit: grammar
Last season Motley started the easier part of our schedule (Furman, Purdue, ECU, and some ACC games) and Brewer the harder part (OSU and meat of the ACC schedule). Despite the tougher competition Brewer still played better. Obviously Motley was learning and could be better this year especially under the tutelage of Fuente and Cornelsen. However, based on his performance last year I am hoping Evans or Lawson becomes our starter and Motely continues as a solid backup.
Both played vs OSU, and it could be argued that Pitt was the best D we played the rest of the season. Not to mention that it seemed like Lefty was putting all his eggs in the Brewer basket, we really have to wonder how prepared Motley was to run the offense when he was forced to come in
That's a good point about Lefty probably not preparing Motely enough. I understand how difficult a job it is to come in off the bench too. Motley had no chance against OSU and that is not his fault. And had Brewer not come back perhaps Motley would of shown some growth in the later games.
and what exactly have you seen from Lawson which makes you want him over Motley? I'm sorry, but this comment sounds like the type of rhetoric you hear from those fans whose favorite player is always the back-up QB. I can sort of understand the infatuation with Evans and I honestly think he'll end up winning the starting spot but I have seen nothing from Lawson which suggests that he should be starting over Motley.
could just be from an eligibility perspective. build for the future if they are close rather than playing the older player.
Exactly. Lawson could be molded this year and make leaps and bounds for the future, not unlike Lynch starting as a RS FR over an experienced senior.
Motley doesn't have that upside.
Hope that happens. He's so talented I hope he gets a couple years as the starter.
It's a shame about last year burning the redshirt and I hope he doesn't end up transferring.
Sorry folks, but as much as you try, Tom Rinaldi isn't coming to campus for a Brenden Motley feel good story.
Give him his token Senior Day start, give him a good Hokie harrah, and let's focus on to someone who can actually take us into the future here...
Let's see...senior day...senior day...Virginia. Here's to hoping if that's a token start, he doesn't have to relinquish it.
I think it's worth stressing that while Motley struggled at times last year, it was in an offensive system that decidedly did not play to his strengths. By all appearances, Fuente's system is much better suited for his skill set, I think he could have a much higher ceiling than people give him credit for. Though I think Evans will win the job, I would feel fairly safe about Motely as a backup, and if he were to win it outright, I'd still feel pretty good about our chances this season.
I agree. He should do much better with the more simplistic reads a Fuente offense uses.
Yes, I believe too that Fuente's system will play to the strengths of Evans and Motley.
For what it's worth, Bud was on the radio this afternoon. When asked about the QBs, he spoke about them in the following order: Evans, Motley, Lawson, Jackson. Note: no mention of click.
I think Fuente already knows #1. But he needs 3 guys ready and for everyone, including #1, to keep working hard to get better.
There is enough talent on this team to compete for the division if he can get a QB who can consistently make the routine plays and Fu & Co know it.
I will be fairly surprised if Lawson plays at all for us in the coming years. I've been thinking since Evans committed that he's Fuente's guy. And Lawson has kind of been the odd man out since then. Hope he can find a spot though!
I wouldn't use the spring game to make a projection of who our starting QB will be. The game plan was all mellow for obvious reasons. The next step in the evaluation is the pre-season when both Fuente/Cornelsen & Foster start game-planning for the regular season. Let the best QB win!
2 QB System? 60% of the time that does not work everytime. Probably down to Evans and Lawson but who knows, Fuente is the offensive guru so lets see who he likes
I think you meant Evans and Motley, Lawson was the least effective QB in the spring game behind Click and Jackson.
So a 2 QB system works 40% of the time? Those aren't terrible odds...
If you know you are the #1 QB going into the off season do you work on your game more or less than if you think you co-#1?
If you think you are the #2?
#3 or #4?
You give all 4 a chance to believe that if they improve enough its theirs, and get them to try their hardest to improve. You start the summer with open competition again, just like you said you would. When it is obvious 1 guy will not start, you give his reps to the others until you are down to 2, and give them reps that gradually go slightly to the guy who looks better.
I think the spring ended Evans > Motley based on what I hear others say the coaches said, but would love to see someone else break out and pass them to start. I want a QB that will win us championships, and did not see where any of these guys were there yet in the spring. I just don't really know enough to have a good opinion now, but its interesting to read everyone else's.
I hope they decide on a QB1 EARLY so that guy gets most of the #1 reps. Quantity of & quality reps early might determine how good the offense is in the first couple of games.
How many Quarterbacks do you think we will see against Liberty? Also how much of our actual offense for this season will be on display?
per French's review, I say we see the same formation and movement every play from offense. Only we only run the same play each snap and rely on our talent to overcome early on. Then, if their defense adjusts to stop us, we still keep running that play and let our defense preserve the win. That way Tennessee sees nothing but one formation and one play. Then when we play UT at bristol, we run different plays out of the same formation and they won't know what bit them. profit.
yes