
My dad always tells the story of the time former Virginia Tech running backs coach Billy Hite filled in as offensive coordinator during the 1994 Gator Bowl. Then Tech OC Gary Tranquill left to take a job a Michigan State, and even though Frank Beamer had already hired Rickey Bustle to take over next season, he needed Hite's services against Peyton Manning and Tennessee.
Hite dressed and acted the part. He donned the headset and game planned, but he didn't call plays. Instead, Frank took the play sheet himself and decided what the offense would run on every possession.
When asked why Hite would not call the plays, Beamer laughed.
"'Hey diddle diddle, we're coming up the middle!'" Beamer sang, teasing his running backs coach. "I don't want none of that."
"Hey diddle diddle, we're coming up the middle..."
It's funny in the kind of Frank's lame dad joke way, and hilarious if you think about Beamer calling plays in any other era of his career. Could you imagine him taking the duties away from Scot Loeffler, a man who prides himself on schemes with more verbiage than the Harry Potter anthology?
Tech was steamrolled 23-45, by the way. And most effective part of the offense? Dwayne Thomas' 102 yards on the ground. Maybe the head coach could've used a little more of Hite's expertise.
The point of this story is to show how Virginia Tech has always run the ball. At their peak, the Hokies won 10 games and pounded defenses on the ground. When nothing else was right, the squad could still rely on the likes of Thomas, Ken Oxendine, Cedric Humes, or any number of other guys to play the role of safety blanket.
I mean the Hokies had to play Nick Sorensen, a safety, at QB for three games in 1998 and won two of them. You think they managed to survive the stretch using the Run-N-Gun?
And it stayed that way through David Wilson's record setting 2011 campaign. And then as the program took a turn for the worse in 2012, so did its rushing attack. The days of thousand-yard backs seemed long gone as Michael Holmes, J.C. Coleman, Trey Edmunds, and a litany of others plowed their way into the ass of a lineman 30 times a game.
But last year, a mini-renaissance occurred in Blacksburg. In just a half season's worth of starts, Travon McMillian brought the ground game back. He rushed for 1,043 yards, averaged 5.2 yards per carry, and stuck it in 7 times. Most importantly, he gave Hokie fans what they'd been searching for since Wilson's departure — a ground threat who's both reliable and explosive.
Consider that production along with McMillian's three remaining seasons of eligibility, and the youngster seems set to be Tech's offensive focal point for many years to come. In fact, considering he just put forward one of the most impressive displays by a Tech freshman back in the last two-and-a-half decades (in my eyes it was behind Ryan Williams in '09, and tied with Kevin Jones in '01), isn't it appropriate to wonder how much damage he could do over the rest of his career?
It's easy to let your mind wander when a player puts forth the kind of debut McMillian did. Personally, I know visions of broken records, twelve-hundred yard outputs, and double-digit win seasons dance across my brain when thinking about his potential. But then I force myself to pump the breaks. McMillian had a fantastic 2015, and he may put up those kind of numbers for the rest of his career. But there are a few factors standing in his way.
The first is workload management. At his best, the tailback is a speedster. Turning the corner in a blur, breaking a tackle and streaking his way to the end zone. It's tough to stop, just ask Dave Doeren and the rest of N.C. State's squad.
Side question: Do you think there were any Wolfpack fans who only watched Tech in their game against State and assumed the Hokies were good? Because between McMillian's coming out party, Isaiah Ford's three touchdowns, and a suffocating 270-yard defensive performance, they left quite the impression.
Side note to the side question: Tech's thrashing of the Pack was kind of like meeting someone at a friend's party and lying about what you do for a living, because what the hell? You'll never see them again. There are at least four people who lived in the greater Washington D.C. area in 2010 who think I'm a NASCAR pit chief.
Was it an absurd lie? Yes. Do I know anything about racing? No. Did people buy me drinks because they thought it was cool? Of course, but only Coors Light and Wild Turkey, because I'm nothing if not a loyal brand man to my fake NASCAR Xfinity Series team.
McMillian averaged 7.1 yards a carry through Tech's first seven games, but was limited to 8.5 touches per. Then, Shane Beamer used the youngster up with a vengeance. During a three-game stretch against Duke, Boston College, and Georgia Tech, McMillian racked up 382 yards on 86 attempts (28.67 carries per game), and left no gas in the tank to finish things off.
McMillian — a former high school quarterback — never shouldered that load before. He was rammed into the teeth of a superb Boston College defensive front 33 times. No other back had more than three touches against the Eagles. He went from 59 total attempts in his first seven games, to 62 in his next two (Duke and BC).
And the freshman limped, quite literally, into the final two regular season matchups against North Carolina and Virginia. His lack of pop was noticeable, and McMillian's production dipped to 4.12 yards per carry even with more moderate usage (19.5 attempts per game).
Did McMillian's decline in output provide guidance for the maximum number of carries he can handle?
It's in no way a knock to say McMillian may need a limited number of rushing attempts to be at his most effective, not everyone can play for Nick Saban and run until their legs turn into nubs.
Baylor's Shock Linwood hit over 1,300 yards on 196 rushes. Before injury, Notre Dame's C.J. Prosise ran for over a thousand yards despite never carrying more than 22 times in a game. You can even look at Florida State's Dalvin Cook. The Seminole piled up an incredible 1,691 yards, but it's fair to assume with a full season's worth of starts, McMillian 200 attempts would've ballooned past Cook's 229.
The more teams speed up the tempo, the more skill position players are shuffled in and out to play as fast as possible. For instance, look at the Justin Fuente/Brad Cornelsen offense over the last four years. In their time at Memphis, no player had more than 201 carries. And in three of those four seasons, at least three different players rushed over 80 times.
Though it could hurt McMillian in a historic capacity — he may never break a yardage or touchdown record — the new offense could maximize McMillian's efficiency without taking a hatchet to his lower body halfway through the fall. Combined with a quarterback who's a threat to take off (and can bear some of the rushing responsibility), Travon could be one of the most dangerous weapons in the ACC in 2016.
Whether or not it happens, however, depends on the other thing standing in his path: his current standing on the depth chart.
Fuente noticeably tepid on analysis of McMillian. On RBs: "We have a lot of work to do there." #Hokies— David Hale (@DavidHaleESPN) July 26, 2016
Throughout the spring, McMillan was about as invisible as a thousand-yard back could be. The trend started early in April when Zohn Burden made it public McMillan would not inherit his starting role.
But Zohn Burden, the Hokies' former receivers and current running backs coach, made it clear Tuesday that there's no depth chart set in stone at the tailback position.
"Travon is a competitor and he understands that it's not about last year, it's about right now," said Burden. "It's about moving forward and getting better and working his butt off and competing everyday. Like I said, it's a competition. He's gotta earn everything with me as a new position coach, but also with a new offensive staff. It's more about him just getting out there and proving himself every day."
And after such a warmly enveloping quote, McMillian surely came out in a big way in the spring game to secure his spot, right?
Not exactly. And by not exactly, I mean he had four carries for 11 yards. Talk about sticking it to the haters.
So what happened? Did he come in overconfident? Did rejoin practice out of shape? Did Shai McKenzie and Marshawn Williams take him hostage like some sort of weird Celtic Pride remake?
A more realistic scenario, though neither as fun nor as weird, is the staff identified players that better fit their scheme better. As much as it stinks, sometimes once productive performers aren't held in as high a regard by a group of new coaches.
Maybe Fuente, Cornelsen, and Burden just think Deshawn McClease fits their scheme better. Or an inside/out hydra of Sam Rogers, Steven Peoples, McClease, and McMillian can all split carries with whoever ends up at QB.
Or maybe Shai McKenzie is healthy after three years of knee problems. It seems implausible, but unlikelier things have happened.
Or maybe it's all a ruse. Maybe McMillian, through all the questions over the last six months, was put on the Isaiah Ford plan. Ford's so important to the overall production of the offense, it doesn't make any sense to expose him to extra contact in practice. Why do you think Bucky Hodges left the spring game after a handful of plays? Some guys are too important to risk injury in a glorified scrimmage.
But in terms of McMillian's 2016 production, that's a few too many maybes for my taste. The situation, offensive coaching acumen, and age factor all work in his favor. It should be a no-brainer to pencil him in for quadruple-digit yardage totals in a year of overall team improvement.
And maybe, because of McMillian, the Hokies will finally get back to the offensive identity which kept them afloat over the last two decades. And maybe it'll help Virginia Tech win the amount of games we all once came to expect.
Maybe.

Comments
That's awesome.
Please tell me you were sponsored by Big Red.
Xfinity Series pit chief in 2010?
Reminds me of when announcers mention Dale Sr.'s seven Sprint Cup championships. I always think "you mean Winston Cup?"
Can we be friends?
This is how I imagine the coming season will go for Travon and probably Isaiah and Bucky too. Their touches and totals will probably go down as the ball gets spread around more, but they will be electric when they do get the ball.
Funny, I thought last season we were saying that without consistent touches, McMillian couldn't get into a rhythm and live up to his potential. Now we expect him to get fewer touches and still do fantastic every time he touches the ball. Sorry. Not buying it. I mean I hope it happens, but I think the pace of our offense and the need to swap out skill positions regularly will be detrimental to stats per touch, not just overall stats.
I think you make a good point. But....counterpoint:
This offense is going to be a lot more simple for the players to pick up. The problem with Loeffler's offense was that it was so complicated the players had to get into a groove in order to be productive. They had so many things to think about that their mind was "tying up their feet" and when they got one or two plays in a row and then got pulled out they couldn't get anything going.
In Fuente's less complex offense the RBs will all be used the same way (as opposed to putting RBs in situationally based on their strengths) and they will have more defined roles. They should be able to come in and run the same play they've been running over and over and over in practice and not see too much drop-off...
big difference in the way each rb was used last year. You could call the play based on what RB was in the game early in the year. 3rd and 2 expect Trey to come in rb dive.... JC comes in and its going to be a zone read or misdirection. McMillian comes in and its going to be a more power look with pulling guards.
If you watched Memphis this past year every RB they used got production without being blatantly obvious with the playcalling. Travon probably won't get 200 carries like he did this past year but I can see him at 140 range while still getting 4-5 yards per carry.
Memphis ran it 18 more times than VT while producing 10 more TD's and 262 more yards. That's massive IMO, add 10 TD's to VT's production and we probably beat Duke, ECU, UNC and Pitt.
So in the end yes McMillian's usage will go down but I wouldn't say his production would go down in terms of YPC and TD's.
Another comparison-> Sam Rogers 61 Carries for 260 yards 2 TD's vs Jamarius Henderson 60 carries for 320 yards and 4 TD's
Memphis ran it 18 more times than VT while producing 10 more TD's and 262 more yards. That's massive IMO, add 10 TD's to VT's production and we probably beat Duke, ECU, UNC and Pitt./em>
WADR, I just never understand how one can reasonably just transfer stats to two totally different situations and predict the result. There are way too many variables to come to conclusions. Memphis got those stats playing Missouri State, Kansas, Bowling Green, USF, Tulsa, Tulane...
We would never have a schedule like that. And even if we somehow managed to play the exact same teams, there would STILL be variables like injuries, weather, time of year played, etc. that would make comparisons, true and accurate comparisons, impossible.
We can't possibly know for sure that the Fuente offense will get those extra 10 TDs against totally different, and I would argue, better, defenses.
I think our offense will be better, (let's hope so, for the love of God) but I don't think you can just "add 10 TDs to VT's production" because Fuente had that kind of success at Memphis. I suppose you could kind of reach, and say that he has better players at VT with which to do it, so the theory holds. But I still think the variables are just too fluid and diverse to ever predict results that easily.
Can't give a leg for that cold splash of reality but agree with where you are coming from that Memphis numbers will not translate directly. As a counterpoint, let's accept that the pace of the Fuente/Cornelson offense will result in a marginally more productive offense operating with markedly more plays per game. While there will be more backs and receivers involved in the output, there will be more touches to go around too. It would not be an automatic to say we will improve the PPG by 7 points but I would not bet against it either. I'm not sayin, but.....just sayin....
"Memphis got those stats playing Missouri State, Kansas, Bowling Green, USF, Tulsa, Tulane..."
Yes, but keep in mind, you're assuming the difference between Memphis' talent and MS, K, BG, USF, T,... would be roughly the same as it would be for VT. Not so. That was one of the selling points on the VT HC job opening - full cupboards with better talent.
Actually, we'd go undefeated!
3 TD's for OSU
2 TD's for ECU
1 TD for Pitt
2 TD's for Miami
1 TD for Duke
1 TD for UNC
___
10 TD's
Simple math!
Its horseshit but I love it a leg for you Jeep!
Even if there were half that total, it would have reversed the result in 3-5 games. Our record changes significantly at that point.
he carried the ball too much at the end of the year and you could tell he was worn down. He should still get the majority of the carries but someone needs to become a legitimate 2nd option to take 25-30% of the snaps.
I'm good with this.
It's Schrodinger's McMillian, he is simultaneously getting too many and not enough carries until we look at the stats and can complain on the internet.
That's....incredible.
I agree. He's pretty good for a big guy.
I'm just big boned actually.
I should, at this point, add the obligatory "that's what she said".
Bold prediction. DJ Reid ends up with the second most carries this year and the most RB rushing TDs
I'll take all of your money you have to offer on that one
Yep. Go get a 2nd mortgage, I'm ready for your cash.
I've heard from very reliable #sauces that Travon is the top guy heading into camp, no question - not sure if he was in the dog house or on the Isaiah plan but apparently he's done very well in the summer program. CJF is expecting big things from him this year.
On a separate note, I think tech got caught flat footed when it's top 3 running backs (Williams, Evans,Wilson) all declared 1-2 years early. I don't think the coaches were prepared for that and the cupboard was left completely bare overnight. A few recruiting misses and they never recovered.
Yeah, the biggest issue with the Williams/Evans/Wilson stable of RBs was simply not enough carries to go around for everyone. Because of Evans' injury, we have to blow Wilson's RS and play both he and Williams (both had plenty of potential but we had major question marks at the position going into that '09 season).
I honestly think we will see some attrition at the RB spot now sooner or later. We have 4 sophomore RBs in McMillian, McKenzie, Williams, and Reid. Make it 5 if you throw in Peoples to the mix. There simply aren't enough touches to satisfy everyone.
I would argue the RB Rotation/depth chart has not been right since Branden Ore left "unexpectedly".
I also had heard that Fuente talked about McMillian being tentative in the spring but has had a great summer. In my mind, there's no doubt he'll be the starter in the opener. Behind him, who knows.
Beamer/other coaches almost certainly encouraged all of them to enter the draft early. 3-4 full seasons at running back is too risky and does too much damage to your body before you make it to the league. If you have a player's best interest in mind, particularly a position like that, you tell them to go on and take the money. Plus, the coaches have said they encourage top flight players to go early if they will go in the first few rounds, and Evans has a family to support.
I agree they encouraged them to go (and they should have gone, even though it may not have worked out long term). But at the time, I do not think the staff could have predicted all three RB's were going to leave early - in the past I believe KJ and Shyrone were the only ones to leave early from that position (and to my recollection MV1 and D-Lo are the only Beamer era players to declare early, at that time).
It was something they had not dealt with in the past and may have caught them by surprise in terms of pipeline and recruiting needs 2-3 years out.
Jason Worilds also left a year early, I think.
Also Hosley ("at that time" puts Hosley slightly past them, though) and Brandon Flowers who almost left two years early but then only left one year early.
if true_very good to hear
The injuries to Shai & Marshawn is the first time we lost TWO RBs in the same season to devastating injuries...don't really think they were recruiting "misses"
But there were 2 years of underwhelming RB production in 2012-2013 after David Wilson left. JC Coleman was highly touted but didn't produce like we'd hoped. Michael Holmes was just okay, and then was dismissed. Our cupboard was pretty bare before Shai/Marshawn. Then last year McMillian had a breakout year too. But my point is, the cupboard needed to be restocked after Wilson left.
I really like this article, thanks, Brian. I'm happy to hear that there are other who don't read too much into the David Hale tweet. We have a number of guys that can fit into the backfield in a few roles: Rogers, Peoples, McMillan, McKenzie, McClease, and Williams, so it'll take a while for the offensive coaches to figure out which guy fits where in our overall offensive schemes and specific game plans.
I'm content to be patient, but I sincerely hope that Travon is ready to roll and making the most of his opportunities. He left a great impression by the end of last year, so I'm expecting big things out of his career.
Lots of ways to construe "We have a lot of work to do at running back." Could be H-back, could be depth, could be issues with the system, or blocking. Could be that the telegraphing system of rotation we used in the past was because certain backs are too one dimensional. Despite French's great analysis, I do not understand Fuente's offense well enough to know how Travon, or the other backs, would fit where, not to mention any health or conditioning questions. It will be interesting to watch, and look forward to more informed opinions from all.
It's kind of funny to me... but my mindset is that this new offense getting established is more important than any of our players from last year. If we have a 6-6 season where Ford and McMillian get reduced touches, I actually trust Fuente's judgement.
If we go 6-6 this year and ford and McMillan got reduced touches I think many people would be upset with two of our best players not being used much and losing 6 games
Depends on how we look in those losses. We have a more difficult schedule this year. Just want to see us be competitive in every game and show improvement on offense. I don't think going 7-6 (including a bowl game) is a very high bar hopefully fuente is aiming for 8+ wins even with the more difficult schedule.
I think Fuente and the team is aiming for 15 wins, but might willing to settle for 8 in the coaches first year.
I would hope we have enough offense this year that we will not need to try to expand the Motley Package into a game plan in one week for ECU, and that should balance out the OOC schedule. The ACC part looks about the same, and I will be disappointed if we do not win at least one out of Duke, UNC, PITT, Miami, or if we lose to CUSE, BC, GT, or LOL. I'm sure Fuente is aiming to win them all, but I'd be happy with 8+.
I just hope we don't stall ECU for three and a half quarters and still lose on a magical 4th qtr drive.
Whoa there
Seriously, if there is ANYBODY that was able to make it through this entire thread without laughing, I would buy them a shot of "whatever-the-hell-ya-want".
Well, it being being televised on national TV might be a bit of a problem.
There's been much worse programming on television within the last week or so.
My hope is that the coaching staff recognizes and rides the "hot" hand in the game. To me, the combination of Shai, MW, and DJ are more power type backs while TM probably has the most speed/power combination and McClease is that is less power and Peoples is less speed. We need them all to learn and execute the offense.
Brian, I want you to know that this was great fun to read.
I too hopped on board the McMillian hype train, but at this point, I just want the best players playing. Doesn't matter who.
/end Beard coachspeak
Did Shai McKenzie and Marshawn Williams take him hostage like some sort of weird Celtic Pride remake?
It has been so long since I have seen either of these guys rush the ball for VT that I actually forgot they were on the team.
sad face
Or maybe it is very straight forward. He had to compete just like everyone else. We love to read into things that often have nothing to read into. Probably a couple of players really had their spots sown up no matter who the new staff was - Ford, Rogers, Ekanem, Clark, maybe Teller. Everyone else might have been wide open.