
The 2015 Virginia Tech football season was one of the more difficult autumns I can remember. Between the uneven play on the field and the culmination of Frank Beamer's Hall of Fame career, Hokie Nation was hardly short on emotions. For many people, Frank's retirement came a few seasons too late. For others, it continues to be difficult to move on from the only head coach they knew.
For years, Virginia Tech football had been characterized by three things: A blue-collar defense; focused and well-coached special teams; and an enigmatic offense.
Since Frank taught the nation a lesson in the importance of special teams during the 1990's, the Hokies' performance had steadily regressed back toward the mean (due in part to opposing coaches hopping on the Beamer Ball train). Despite having an array of talented signal callers and dangerous running backs since the 1999 season, the Hokies often made a living winning in spite of their offense rather than because of it. Ricky Bustle, Bryan Stinespring and Scot Loeffler each had their moments, but — outside of the Michael Vick era — each of the three struggled to put together a consistently dangerous attack.
Relying on Bud Foster's defensive unit has always been a major source of pride among the Virginia Tech faithful. There is something empowering about knowing you have one of the brightest defensive minds in the country scowling up and down the sideline. We've all witnessed vaunted offenses wither and die at the hands of Bud's defense, overcoming perceived talent gaps, "innovative" offensive systems and hostile environments to give a huge middle finger to the national pundits that discounted the Hokies.
With the hiring of Justin Fuente (and the subsequent retaining of Bud Foster) this winter, Whit Babcock and the university planted a flag in the middle of the college football landscape. Gone are the one-dimensional Hokies of old, where a handful of touchdowns is all you needed to leave with a victory. In their place stands a program with brilliant minds on both sides of the football and an unrelenting desire to leave you bruised, battered and winded after every play.
Like you, I've spent my offseason reading about and watching film of Fuente's offensive system. I have tried to envision the Memphis offense in orange and maroon, darting all over Worsham Field at a breakneck pace. But every time I give my imagination some rope, I'm immediately struck by the prospect that our dreams of a high-octane offense may not match our expectations.
Listen, I'm a pragmatist. Fuente has been incredibly successful as an offensive coordinator (TCU) and as a head coach (Memphis), proving he isn't just a flash-in-the-pan by resurrecting a program that was one of the worst in the nation using unheralded recruits. Logic states, Put him in a major conference program and he could do wonders! Put him in a recruiting hotbed like Virginia and the sky's the limit! But would you fault me (or anyone else, for that matter) for expressing my anxiety over the new look Hokies?
Change is hard. Whether you're moving to a new town, going off to college or starting a new job, the anxiety that courses through your veins reflects the equal parts dread and excitement that come with new experiences. Take it from me: I spent the first sixteen years of my life living on the same street, only to have spent the next sixteen years living in ten different places. The first day of each new experience freaks me out the same as the previous.
But that feeling in the pit of my stomach is what makes life so compelling. It is the same feeling I got when my parents said their goodbyes at the beginning of summer camp as a kid; in the first few months that I was dating my wife (*ahem* I mean, every time I look into her eyes); and when her and I were alone with our newborn son for the first time. The fear of the unknown. The overwhelming thought of, "What the hell have I gotten myself into? Am I ready for this?"
After years of wondering what a post-Beamer team would look like, we're finally faced with that reality. The electricity of his successor's offensive system paired with the post-hire air of secrecy surrounding the program only adds to the intrigue. I feel like Hokie Nation has been grounded throughout this process, recognizing that this will not be an overnight return to excellence. But be honest with yourself. Are you as pragmatic internally as you appear to be externally?
Following a legend is an unenviable task. College football's history is littered with coaches who have failed to carry on the winning traditions established by their predecessors. For every Jimbo Fisher, there is a Derek Dooley reminding fan bases that the grass isn't always greener. Moving on from a legendary coach is no different than a long-term relationship. The question becomes how tight is your head screwed on in the aftermath and is your next lover your soulmate or simply a rebound?
Compared to a lot of other programs in transition, Tech fans should consider themselves lucky. Sure, Frank didn't hand over the keys to a national title contender, but the cupboard is far from bare and the foundation is solid. Over the years, the program did grow stale and in dire need of a fresh set of ideas. An energetic Justin Fuente was hired to modernize the Hokies, and after months of behind the scenes work, Fuente and his staff are set to reveal the 2016 edition of the Hokies.

Comments
Well said.
Agreed.
Indeed
OK, I'll admit it...I'm internally expecting us to whip UT to start the year but externally I'm playing the whole "ohhh yea Tennessee is going to be tough, we probably won't win that one." This is probably at least partially because I live in Knoxville.
I was watching some clips of their QB running over SEC tacklers and getting loose in the flat and thought about how ECU's QB did VT's defense and got real worried.
The trick is to make Dobbs throw the ball. He hasn't shown any consistency thus far in his career.
Bingo. Dobbs gets the ball away really quickly but he doesn't do it all that well. Instead of a QB he's like a game manager/additional RB on the field. But he can run fast and he knows it. If we can contain Dobbs we have a chance. If Dobbs runs at will, we're toast. We must also be gap sound and stop Jalen Hurd when he gets the ball. If Moto can't shed blocks and be at the right place and make tackles, UT wins handily.
This was the trick with Dennard Rob in the Sugar Bowl. For the most part, we contained him very well. If not for the special teams mishaps and offensive turn-overs, we would have run away in that game. This is a sound game plan for VT against UT but you have to bet their coaches know this and also know how to counter. Let the chessmatch begin!
Their RB's terrify me.
Agreed I believe last year UT ranked 92nd in offensive passing.
If I am perfectly honest, the biggest worry for me was not who took over but how that selection was made. I don't mean the process, I mean the character.
I wanted to know that we weren't shooting for the moon with a flash in the pan rising star and kept to our blue collar, salt of the earth typology that Beamer endeared VT football to so many including myself.
I can put up with the next coach not working out. I don't want that to be the case of course, but I can deal with it. What I would have hated is selecting someone that was less about the program and football, and more about their career. I'm not saying Fuente is going to stay until the end of days if he is successful but I look at his path and he's left every program he has touched better for the time he's spent there.
Whit and Dr Sands did a great job with this hire. Fuente and their previous big hire Buzz bring a character that I value. Can you imagine if Bronco was our coach and we were all struggling to get excited about our players doing DDP yoga and listening to his dumbass dogma. VT must remain about nose to the grindstone, hard work. And those leading our teams need to embody that win or lose.
Thanks for the article. Good read.
"less about the program and football, and more about their career" the perfect description of Lane Kiffen and Bobby Petrino
Well said!
I would have to disagree with your statement about Bronco. If we hired him, I think the hokie nation would embrace him. We always complained about change, blue collar work ethic, and bringing the grit back to VT football. I think Bronco would have had the potential to do these things at Tech, and the "DDP Yoga" and "earning your locker" would have been interpreted differently by members of our fan base.
I think UVA did well in hiring him, and I hope he brings intensity back to the rivalry. That also being said, I think that even though we would have probably embraced him as our new head coach, we should continue to mock him and his program mercilessly.
The more I look at it, the more confidant I am that Bronco can improve that program. He had consistent success at BYU, averaging about 8 wins a year with some 10+ win seasons thrown in the mix. I do think he benefited somewhat from having players that started out 2 years older than their competition *but* the pool of recruits that BYU recruits from is so much smaller than everyone else that the overall talent level of their recruits probably mitigates that to some degree.
Over the past couple of years he's had some impressive wins and some close losses to some pretty good teams. This is BYU's schedule last year. Highlights include beating Nebraska, Boise, and ECU (see what I did there?). Their close losses included a 1 point loss to a pretty good UCLA team, a 4 point loss to a mess of a Missouri team, and a one score loss to a pretty good Utah team in their bowl game. They also got wrecked by Michigan 31-0 (this loss will prep Bronco for a repeat of 38-0, bro this year).
That pretty well sums up their past couple seasons, too. Consistently beating the teams that they should and taking advantage of P5 opponents having down years to earn victories against teams with name recognition. While BYU is obviously a step down in terms of who they play the bulk of their schedule against, I don't think it's a stretch for me to say that we would have loved to have had similar results the past couple of seasons.
All of that said, I do not think he currently has the overall talent level at UVA to achieve quite that same level of success this year. I see wins against Richmond, Central Michigan, and Wake. UConn is also probably a win but we'll need to see how their team does on the road a week after traveling all the way to Oregon for a loss. So that's 3/4 wins. Who else do they beat? Duke, while they'll be missing Sirk, is still lead by Cutcliffe who always seems to be able to make it work. Pitt with the return of Connor could be quite a challenge for anyone. UNCheat, led by Trubisky, is and should be the Coastal favorite. Louisville? I'll admit I know nothing about them other than their HC is sketchier than Rich Rod. I expect Miami to be pretty good this year. GT? Who the heck ever really knows what GT team we're going to see from year to year? Us? Hahahahahahaha, no. So we're floating somewhere between 5-6 wins.
I really think the linchpin is how Bronco recruits. They don't have a lot of talent to begin with this year and their top couple of guys (read: Blanding) could be gone after it's over. Can he replace them? Keep in mind, he's been at BYU since 2003 and it's not exactly the easiest place to recruit for. Do we really even have a clue how he can recruit? If the UVA fanbase (I know, I know, they don't show up for the Spring Game) and administration can stick out a couple of bad to mediocre seasons AND Bronco recruits at a decent level they could start seeing the levels of success he had at BYU. Realistically, their administration will have no problem with sticking by him as evidenced by how long they stuck by London. The fan base is.....well, it's UVA.
I think he has a much longer leash than even Fuente, who if the offense shows any kind of excitement and Bud stays by him has about as long of a leash as 2010 Frank Beamer. Broncos superbowl is winning 6 games.
Great points, but I'm not sure about the BYU recruiting/talent thing.
Naturally, it is harder to attract top-tier talent to BYU but there is a subset of players for whom BYU is the end-all-be-all-perfect-fit for what they want out of a school, being the only D1, LDS-affiliated school. Throw in the fact that the players there tend to be older, they had a couple 'natural' factors working for them.
I agree Bronco should be successful at LOLUVA, but if he's expecting to instill a 'blue-collar' attitude at that school, I think he's going to find that it is a whole lot harder than he thinks.
yeah don't get me wrong I think Bronco is going to actually make them relevant again, but I would definitely not be buying into his "philosophies". I like less kitsch with my blue collar mentality. I don't need psychological gimmicks to metaphorically mean something of substance. I just want the substance. His character, while I agree is hard working, would drive me up the wall.
I agree. His antics (and that's what they are) are insufferable. I am 100% confident that if he was our coach I'd feel the same way, and I wouldn't be all that optimistic for the season.
We've dealt with having smoke blown up our skirts for long enough when it came to our offense that we've grown adept to sniffing out the bullshit when its present.
There's a ton of bullshit surrounding the UVa program right now
We may have embraced Bronco as our new coach, but something tells me we'd also be scratching our heads and questioning Whit.
Five. More. Days.
I couldn't agree more. But, this weekend will put it to the test. We must remember, these are young men learning a brand new scheme, we must have patience. They will give us moments of elation, immediately followed by total frustration, even in a single game. We need to trust that Coach Fuente will continue to build them into the team he envisionsaid (and the team we hope for). It may not be fully implemented in 1 season, but we MUST continue to beat UVA.
Good luck guys, we're behind you. GO HOKIES!!
Great piece!
I actually have extremely high hopes for this team for the season. One of the major uncertainties about the new look Hokies is whether or not the offense can make an effective transition under Fuente in year one.
I think Isaiah Ford is going to dominate in this style of offense, and I think that we'll see much improved numbers this year across all categories. Our running game should be less predictably stagnant, and I think playing a fast and efficient Hokie O will wear on teams late in the season. The most intriguing story line of this season, in my opinion, will be how Bud's defense handles playing with a competent offense. They should be able to play more aggressively, and having the offense on the field for a longer period of time (hopefully way less 3 and outs) should keep them rested and rabid. As for outlook: I'm tempted to predict a return to the pinnacle of ACC play, but a less absurd expectation would be contending in the always wonky ACC Coastal and establishing a consistent team identity. I can't wait for Sept. 3!!!
Buzz had some struggle year one. But they got better. Second year, you could start to see his brand succeed and they finished with nine more wins and seven less in the loss column. Year three, I wait with great excitement.
I think the football program will likely mirror the same path as bball - a little struggle the first year but getting better. Of course, I want them to win the coastal & go from there but I have that same trepidation as the writer alluded to. I would be happy though if year two was the year we see the big jump like bball did.
We've got our tickets section 12, Row GG (thanks to a Hokie Club friend) and can't wait for the CJF era to kick off (pun intended). H-O-K-I-E-S!!!!!!!!
Football team has quite a bit more talent than what buzz inherited, but it could still follow a similar path. I'd hope we are no worse than we have been record wise for the last 4 years. Depending on if any jrs go pro this could be the most talented offense we have for the next few years.
One of the reasons I'm a bit more gung ho on football is that the level of competition in ACC plays is lower than basketball. You don't have as many Top 25 teams on the gridiron schedule. Heck, we don't even play a team this year that is in the discussion for the national title (Tenn and ND might get there by mid season). We play a handful every year in basketball.
not likely...starting the season 1-1 isn't going to generate playoff buzz..especially losing to an un-ranked team some are expecting to finish near the bottom of the ACC and miss bowl season
I still don't know why everyone thinks Tenn will start 1-1. App State is pretty good!
starting 0-2 is going to make it even tougher to make it into the playoff conversation by mid-season...even for an SEC team
Anyone not named Alabama would be out of it for sure
We need to focus on executing Fuente's sceme, not worry about what other teams records are or become. We cannot control that, just how we play. If we go out and play smart, strong and consistant, I call that a win. I know others' records are important in ranking, but we cannot control their outcomes. If we prove ourselves, them we can start to posture for added recognition.
I honestly see no reason whatsoever why we should struggle this season.
We were pretty bad last season, same with 2014 really, but still managed to scrape 7 wins. We have much of the same receiving core with one of the best WRs in the league, a premier RB, great leadership in Sam Rogers, experienced OLine and finally an exciting QB (No offense to Brewer, he was a tough guy and gave it his all, but he was physically lacking). Offense should not be an issue.
Defense is less experienced but in Bud I Trust.
There is no reason whatsoever why we shouldn't improve our win count this year from the past few years.
Tougher schedule would be the one thing I'd say. This year's Tenn, ND, UNC, Miami, and Pitt should all be better than any team we played over the last two years not named Ohio State
I'm not sold on UNC being better this year than they were last year...I'd call that a push. Also, with Miami having questions on defense now after dismissing 2 starters they may be relatively even as well. I'll give you ND, Tenn, and Pitt though.
I'm in agreement with you that our schedule is tougher but I just don't think you can say this year's UNC and Miami teams are better than any teams we played last year (not named Ohio State, of course)
I think most of "modern" Hokie Nation, who grew up or started paying attention in the Beamer era, will see this very differently than past coaching changes.
We can talk about the Bill Dooley era, or the Jerry Claiborne era, or even the Ricky Bustle/Kevin Rodgers era, but it's just history. A bygone time. Now, we talk about last season, last decade, "most [x] since [year]", it's all Frank. We see Frank down in Blacksburg, or hanging out at the new Dick's, or blowing up Twitter talking on his iNtelos while wearing a Hedbanz trying to get into the Liberty game without a ticket. This will take a few years.
I am very excited but I also have my reservations about this season. In theory, we should be a very good team. Solid to very good defense with an improved offense should mean 8-9 wins alone. We have a tough schedule this year though and we will have growing pains. I believe that if our QB does not make too many mistakes and doesn't lose games for us, we will be in good shape this fall.
I look at a team that is returning a thousand yard rusher and the leading receiver in the ACC, not to mention Bucky and Sam...and I wonder why we couldn't do better than we did last year. I think we have some guns, but they haven't been as effective as they should have been in the former offensive system. Will we set the world on fire? Maybe not, but there is reason, and room for hope, and I've got it.
I just think we're finally going to have something we haven't had for years:
An offensive identity.
Our starting QB getting knocked out half of the season didnt help things. Same with our defense. To me, the difference between our season going the same as the past several to potentially winning the coastal mostly hinges on staying healthy.
Most good teams are defined by winning close games. If VT beats UNC and Duke last year (winnable games that went the other way), we are a 9 win team.
The last time that VT had this much talent, and was getting slept on this much, it was 2004 and they went 10-3. All respect to Beamer because he left Fuente with a lot of talent, so hopefully the players rise to the occasion.
Those dance moves though, those left the Burg with Frank, he wouldn't share those bad boys
I forgot to add...welcome back!
Thanks, happy to be back talkin' Hokies!
uhhhhhh no. I've spent my offseason reading TKP articles on Fuente's offensive system. Dork magic versus DIY!
Fuck it, go big or go home. There was a time not long ago when this time of year rolled around it was a given we were going to win ten games. The only questions were is this the year we get over that hump and get back to a natty. Winning championships is just as much about character and culture as it is about talent. From the players to the fans we have to get that culture back...we have to know we're winning ten and getting back to Charlotte and hopefully in the final four...let's do it this year!!
Not sure you're really implying this, maybe its just how I read it. But this isn't a chicken or the egg question. Winning games builds the culture for a fan-base, nothing else and it must come first. I guarantee everything you mentioned comes right back next year if we win 11+ games this year. Doubt and apprehension come from losing and changes. We lost many games and made lots of changes so there is a lot of unknown and not much confidence in the fanbase this year. But the flipside of that is, of course, optimism. And I think I speak for most when I say we're brimming with it.