
Even though Justin Fuente inherited an offense stocked with players not much used to his fast-paced, spread-option style, he didn't seem to have much trouble getting the group humming in 2016.
But now that he's got a chance to start putting his own imprint on the program, readying his second full recruiting class at Virginia Tech, he's plainly aiming for prospects a little more prepared to execute his preferred offensive style.
With Signing Day 2017 rapidly fading in the rearview mirror, Fuente and the rest of the staff invited a crop of 2018ers to Blacksburg for a junior day on Feb. 18. And it would seem that whether it was quarterbacks, running backs or even offensive linemen, they were targeting players who aren't afraid to pick up the pace.
"(Offensive coordinator Brad Cornelsen) said sometimes they'll just have signals and names for certain things, and everyone will just line up based off that," OG/C Josh Jefferson of St. John's College HS in Washington, D.C. told The Key Play. "And at St. John's, we had wristbands and stuff, we'd call out numbers. So we really had to work on our conditioning and stuff, just being able to look at the sidelines, see signals, hear calls, know where you're supposed to line up and who you're supposed to block, whether it's zone or man."
T E C H pic.twitter.com/VCtUTdkmRs— Josh Jefferson (@primetime_100) February 18, 2017
OT Aidan Rafferty of D.C.'s Gonzaga HS said OL coach Vance Vice was comparably clear with him about the value of his experience in a "a no-huddle, hurry-up offense."
"He knew I was already capable of not having a huddle between every play," Rafferty said.
Similarly, RB Justus Woods of North Carolina's Charlotte Christian HS says RBs coach Zohn Burden told him all about how his "size and speed and explosiveness out of cuts" would be a perfect fit for Fuente and Cornelsen's slightly unusual demands for a running back in the offense.
"They think it could go well with the fast-paced up-tempo offense that they run," Woods said. "Because I run a similar offense at my high school, so they saw the similarities between the two."
But, perhaps most importantly, the Hokies will need a trigger man suited to making the offense go. That's where Cornelsen thinks QB Quincy Patterson of Chicago's Solorio Academy could come in.
Wonderful visit at Virginia Tech !!! Thank you @HokiesFB pic.twitter.com/a9ICGzn74K— Quincy Patterson II (@quincy_qb1) February 18, 2017
"We actually watched film of games and practices, and he showed me how they read certain coverages," Patterson said. "He was emphasizing the fact that I'd fit in the offense perfectly and that it wouldn't even be much of an adjustment for me to do the same because I'm already a quarterback that fits that system."
Unlike some of the other prospects, Patterson came down on the Friday before the junior day event, because he was hoping for "more insight on everything, and knew I wouldn't get that on junior day."
Based on what he saw of campus and heard from the coaches, it would seem that proved to be the right decision.
"It was arguably my favorite school so far," Patterson said. "There was really nothing bad you could say about Virginia Tech, it was just all positive."
After getting a full campus tour — including a look at Goodwin Hall (Tech's newest and priciest engineering building), which he felt was "just ridiculous" — Patterson got to sit down with Cornelsen and Fuente.
While he said got to spend the most time with Cornelsen and get "a good sense for who he was," Fuente clearly made an impression.
"Considering that he works directly with the offense, even though he is the head coach, it's good knowing I'd have the support of the head man in charge," Patterson said. "And knowing he's done the things he's done with Jerod Evans, Paxton Lynch, guys like that, it kind of just shows you the direction he can send these quarterbacks, and it's always positive. You never hear anything bad about his projects."
But with so much uncertainty surrounding Tech's quarterback situation now that Evans is draft-bound, it's unclear whether Patterson would ever get the chance to follow in his footsteps as Fuente's prime pupil if he committed. Nevertheless, Patterson (who's rated a 3-star prospect by the 247Sports Composite ranking) isn't even considering removing the Hokies from contention just because he doesn't know who might be holding the top job this season.
"I'm actually looking at their roster right now, and I see they have six quarterbacks, but that's one thing I don't necessarily worry about, just because of the fact that I'm pretty confident in my abilities," Patterson said. "I wouldn't say I'm planning on starting my freshman year, because that's a little unrealistic considering the type of quarterbacks they already have in the system, but I know they'll prepare me and I'll be able to play."
Woods is facing some similar questions about where he might fit into the RB rotation. Junior Travon McMillian will likely still be around by the time Woods might arrive in Blacksburg, but he seemed to fall out of favor with the coaching staff at times last season. Oscar Smith R-SO Deshawn McClease was sidelined last season with an "upper extremity" injury after 8 rushes in Tech's opener against Liberty. 2017 signees Jalen Holston and Terius Wheatley will also surely offer some competition for carries, but Woods is hearing that Burden is looking for a definitive answer at the position for the future.
"They're saying how they need an every-down back," Woods said. "In the past, their quarterback was the main runner. Coach Zohn was talking about how the quarterback was the main runner so the running backs didn't get much of a chance to get much run in, so now that he's gone, he wants to shift the carries back toward the running backs, so they need that every down type of back who will take all the carries and lead them to a win."
Woods arrived on campus on Saturday to get the full junior day treatment with the rest of the recruits, starting with a "big meeting in the basketball stadium" and followed by a full tour of the football facilities and even a classroom.
But when it came time for him to meet with Fuente, the head Hokie had a special surprise ready: an offer from Virginia Tech for the 3-star prospect.
"Coming in, I knew they were very interested in me, but I didn't know they would offer me that day," Woods said. "I just wanted to get out there to be able to see the facilities and everything myself, but it was a great surprise when Coach Fuente offered me."
Had an amazing visit and blessed to receive an offer from Virginia Tech!! #GoHokies pic.twitter.com/MqYBOjN7dd— Justus Woods (@jwoods21_) February 18, 2017
Fuente stressed that Woods had the right character to be a "great fit into what they're trying to build for their program in the coming years," and the RB agreed based on what he learned about Burden during his trip.
"He told me he was always learning and trying to be a better running backs coach, which I admire, because I'm always trying to be a better running back," Woods said. "So I love having a coach who always pushes himself to be great as well. He was really chill and laid back, but I can tell he coaches them really hard based on the production they have on the field."
Jefferson and Rafferty didn't get quite the same humble message from their prospective position coach.
"(Coach Vice) was very confident, telling me they were gonna win the whole thing and how I could come and be a part of it, or read about it, because it's gonna happen," Jefferson said. "He was really confident, and that was really impressive to me, that he's that confident in what they have going on there and he really believes they're gonna be great this year."
But Rafferty, a 3-star prospect, says Vice had more than just bluster to offer.
"He was like, 'Hey, if you're gonna come here, we're paying for your education, so you might as well get your Master's. You need to take advantage of it not only athletically, but academically, of the opportunities that you get,'" Rafferty said.
Yet, unlike Patterson and Woods, the offensive linemen on campus don't have to worry too much about how they might see the field if they come to Tech. Rafferty says both Fuente and Vice stressed that there's "definitely a need for offensive lineman" within the program after the Hokies didn't sign many in their last two classes, and Jefferson notes that the team's upcoming graduations might exacerbate that need.
"(Vice) was telling me that he was graduating five offensive linemen, and he was telling me that nobody on his offensive line ever has a starting spot nailed down," Jefferson said. "He said, 'I don't care if you've been here for five years or five minutes, you always have an opportunity to get on the field.' He said he's started a freshman for two consecutive years, and he was basically telling me nobody ever has a spot nailed down until the season starts. Your spot's always up for grabs."
The Hokies have yet to offer Jefferson, who's currently unranked by the 247Sports Composite, but he also heard from his area recruiter (WRs coach Holmon Wiggins) that his snapping experience could set him apart as the Hokies prepare for a future without senior center Eric Gallo.
"Coach Wiggins was telling me they have a guy and have to teach him how to snap," Jefferson said. "And they were telling me that it's good to have a guy who already knows how to snap and can play multiple positions, and they said that was really attractive to them, because it's hard to find high school centers who are really good.
But beyond the temptations of playing time, Rafferty and Jefferson both came away enamored with Fuente's accomplishments, in particular.
"I knew he was a great coach, but just seeing what he could do with a program in a year where he couldn't really recruit anybody is very, very impressive for a college coach to do that," Rafferty said. "And when I met him, I felt like I could trust him and I could talk to him, because it seemed like he cared about his players beyond just football."
For all their focus on offense, the Hokies hardly neglected the other side of the ball on the weekend. DB Nasir Peoples of Warminster, Pa.'s Archbishop Wood HS also got his first chance to see campus up close after the Hokies offered him earlier this month.
"I love it," Peoples, who ultimately committed to the Hokies just days later, said. "I love the football facilities, the coaches and everything about it."
He also got some one-on-one time with Fuente on the trip, who told him Bud Foster and company are "still building their top defense, looking for players to fill the role."
Though the currently unranked prospect alternates between corner and safety, he said the Hokies already have an idea about what role he might fill in Blacksburg exactly.
"They liked my size and athleticism and could see me playing safety there," Peoples said. "They're saying that they're losing a couple D-backs and they need to fill the role."
That's part of why Peoples is already planning another trip for just a few weeks from now.
"I don't have a date set, but I will be back during spring practice," Peoples said.
Rafferty says he'll "definitely" make it to a spring practice as well, and Woods said he's looking through the list of practice dates to see which one might work best (though he has plenty of other schools to visit like Duke, Stanford and Northwestern).
Jefferson is also targeting a spring return date, particularly if he scores an offer.
"I should be going back up there either to see their spring game or a couple of spring practices, to see how the team interacts with each other, how the coaches interact with the players, see how I could fit in, stuff like that, just to get a feel for it," Jefferson said.
Patterson faces a long ride to get back to Blacksburg, but he too is weighing another trip down sooner rather than later.
"They wanted me back for spring ball and possibly for another low-key visit like how it was Friday," Patterson said. "Because I went with my coaches this time, but they were saying I could get my parents up there, get them a feel for everything too."

Comments
Nice write up, need to find a better picture of Patterson though because he looks the exact opposite of excited in it. Maybe that's his game face?
Thanks Alex, great article as always. Hope we see a few more jump on the boat and we keep jumping.
Every time I see 'exit light 18' I think exit 118b.
good, then it's working (as long as you mean Exit 118B on I-81 and not I-64)
Gotta go to Lane North once every couple years.
Not a fan of the spring spirit dance?
Kinda freaky how that worked out. Someone at VDOT must have been a bit devious!
Mileage-based exit numbering will really get after ya.
I wonder what the old numbers were... I might be able to look it up.
Yeah, but the Blacksburg/Christiansburg exit is like three miles long. It merges off I-81 SB at like mile 120 and NB at mile 117. They had a bit of leeway in selecting a number.
I'm pretty sure Blacksburg was Exit 37 when I was in school, not sure about C'ville.
You are correct, sir. Exit 37 was the old number.
Exit 37. I seem to recall a local band of the name around 1990.
It is surprising B-burg and C-ville have the same exit numbers. But, it is very clear the recruits know the difference!
All intriguing players. Going to be interesting to see how they fit into
the system.
Big time write-up...better than anything you're going to get on any of the pay sites.
Join the key players club and support TKP!
Fantastic writeup. Looking forward to seeing how these guys progress in their recruiting. A QB from Chicago, crazy times gents!
Well this stood out to me...
After all the debate about whether Fuente's offense naturally doesn't have a feature back or if he just hasn't had "that guy" the last few years it's a little refreshing to hear this leaning toward the latter. Now I know this could partially be coach speak but I'm hopeful that if we can eventually nab the next KJ25, RW34, or DW4 then we'll have a feature back again.
I think this offense needs a better O-line more than a feature back. We have the talent in the backfield to have a decent running game. Just need to pave the way for them.
I agree completely, but as it has been mentioned until we are able to have that feature guy again I think it's going to hurt our RB recruiting as we go forward.
it's a little bit of chicken/egg IMO
we can get the best RBs but if we can't open holes for them and they're constantly getting hit at or behind the line of scrimmage they're not going to put up huge numbers. A stud RB running behind a bad-to-mediocre line will look like an average RB. A stud RB running behind an average-to-great OL will put up monster numbers. We can recruit all the best RBs but they probably won't amount to much unless we give them some more space to work.
A mediocre OL will make a great back pedestrian. A fantastic OL will make a pedestrian back look very good, if not great. If you have a very good OL and a great back, you get trophies.
It's not going to hurt recruiting. The term "feature back" doesn't really mean what it used to mean and almost nobody uses a feature back in the traditional sense of the word anymore.
The options are pretty limited these days for guys who base their decision on being a traditional feature back - both on the college & pro level. Fewer carries and fewer miles on the tires is a recruiting plus in some ways.
I may be overestimating the impact that having a "feature back" may have on recruiting but I think it's safe to say that it definitely has some impact. If I'm a running back you better believe a program where one guys is getting 15-20+ carries a game on average looks more attractive than a program where everyone is getting less than 10 a game. Besides the whole point of Woods' quote was that having an "every down type of back who will take all the carries and lead them to a win" is appealing to him.
It's not safe to say. It will have virtually no impact.
How many ACC teams build their offense around a feature back in the traditional sense any more? There were only 2 ACC RBs with 17+ carries per game last year. Even James Connor and Wayne Gallman - two potential top 3 round picks - were only around 15-16 carries per game.
Knowing that only one of them (at best) could be the so-called feature back sure didn't stop 2 top recruits from going to FSU (where arguably the most dangerous RB in the country last yr got only 20 carries a game).
So you're saying most of the big time backs in the ACC were getting at least 15 carries a game? Well that certainly helps my argument. Oh and as far as FSU goes you're saying that having a big time back getting most of the touches helped them secure 2 of the best RB recruits in the country? Yea you're definitely not helping yourself there either... However what even brought this up in the first place is that the RB recruit in the article was talking about the appeal of being the main guy in the backfield. Even further we can see that Zohn is using this as a recruiting pitch to RB's. Sure maybe some people overestimate the impact of having a main guy in the backfield in recruiting but there's way too much evidence here to logically say that it has "virtually no impact."
I will have to disagree a bit. I think we have room to improve on both. I don't think we have a back on the roster that compares talent wise to many of the feature backs we have had in the past. We have some good ones, but who is healthy, can see and get to a hole, has the strength and balance to break tackles, can make someone miss, and run away from the field? If we have someone like that I have not seen it. It would be great to have gaping holes for our backs to run through, but it would be great to have an NFL prospect at RB too.
I'm not sure what you're disagreeing with. I said I think we have the talent in the backfield to have a decent running attack. We just don't have the O-line to give them room. I'm not saying we currently have a feature back. In any case, I think you and I are in agreement that both the RB position and the OL group could use some TLC. I just think the OL is more important. NO RB is going to be great behind a porous OL. Even incomplete RBs can run with relative success behind a monster OL. The running game starts and stops in the trenches. If we can get a couple stud lineman to open things up for the talent we currently have in the RB room I think this running attack will be formidable. If we keep striking out on big OLs and land a super-elite RB our running attack has a chance to be dangerous but more likely would be maddeningly inconsistent.
You can't even expect generational talents like Herschel Walker, Bo Jackson, etc. to dominate without some beef to clear the way for them. When great backs are getting hit before they reach the LOS on every carry they aren't going to have great performances. But if you clear the way for a half-way decent RB to hit the second level you'll have more production in the run game. Therefore, OL is more important than landing the stud "feature back" we all dream about.
The blocking has been bad, but I agree. We haven't had even a good RB since Wilson.
McMillian isn't a natural RB, his YAC stats last year (was last in the ACC late in the year) are a perfect sign of that. I'm optimistic on Holston and Wheatley, both of which look to have good tools and instincts to me.
Seems contradictory considering Fuente's qbs seem to have a one read and scramble progression. Unless he's just never had a qb that could adequately go through progressions and he's just forced that model.
We had a returning 1000 yard RB coming into last season who some games got less than 5 carries. We just never seemed to commit to the run or try to enforce our will on another team's DL.
I think this is an interesting part of things, particularly the earlier part of the quote where Woods mentions that Evans sucked up all the rushing yards last year.
Did he bear the running burden because that's the design of Fuente's offense, or did he do so because he didn't have the kind of vision necessary to go through a bunch of progressions, and Fuente adapted accordingly? I think the latter is a big possibility, but we'll find out for sure if we get Josh Jackson under center, or one of the transfer QBs who's more of pocket passer.
Didn't Evans go through progressions against UVA? Where did that come from?
Yeah, on that one play. Against UVA's pass D. Against UVA's pass rush.
Tyrod wasn't great at progressions either, that's probably what he picked up in Baltimore while he bided his time. It's probably not an easy skill to possess, especially for running QB's who have been scrambling for first downs their entire career.
Okay well I don't think we should bring Tyrod into this conversation at all since he was coached by a completely different set of coaches.
I'm not trying to say that Evans can read through progressions. But the fact that he tried it tells me that it's at least something he's learned. I imagine that he learned it from the coaches on Fuente's staff. The entire point I'm making is that maybe our coaches aren't sold on 1-read-and-go plays and do actually coach QBs to read through progressions. If anything, it's a glimmer of hope.
Perhaps the coaching and play-calling is catered to how comfortable the coaches are with the player's ability. Maybe if we get a truly cerebral QB who can master the art of reading through progressions then we'll see that manifest on the field.
I think Fuente truly caters his offense to the personnel he has available. With Evans coming in and starting his first year of DI ball right out of the gate, Fuente/Cornelsen likely wanted to keep the reads simple to make things easier on Evans. Then Fuente comments towards the end of the season that Evans has been progressing and going through more reads on pass plays. I think if given time to develop a QB for a few years, we will likely see the reads in the offense increase with more experience and reps. Whoever wins the job this year will likely be a 3 year starter at least, so we should see a lot of QB growth and maturation over that time. It all depends on how quickly that person can grasp the offense and what he is comfortable with.
It seems like you are being literal. The complaint, if there is one, is that the basis of Fuente's offense with Evans was it was one-read-and-go. That doesn't mean when you facing a 12 second UVA pass rush, you don't play backyard QB and say "which one of my NFL draft worthy WR's is running free? Oh, it's Bucky on this play."
But that one pass doesn't mean that French was wrong when he noted all year long that one or two receivers every play were running ghost patterns.
sure. But is that because Fuente's offense utilizes those naturally or because the coaching staff felt more comfortable with Evans' ability on plays with only 1 read? The point I'm trying to make is that maybe the coaching staff would like a QB to read through progressions but if they don't feel comfortable with a player's ability to do that they're going to simplify the offense to generate the best results given the talent available.
I think we can all pretty much agree that reading progressions isn't a simple task to ask a QB to do. If you have a guy who has physical talent but struggles with reads why would you spend so much time forcing him into an offense requiring him to think too much? Why not spend that time making the offense simple for him to operate to make him more comfortable?
I'm not sold that Fuente/Cornelson's offense is strictly 1-read-and-go. It might look that way based on their comfort level with the QBs but I believe if they had a QB who could work through progressions with suitable proficiency we would see more of that.
Agreed. Just look at the difference in the QB and RB rushing stats for Memphis in 2015 and VT in 2016...*
2015 Memphis Rushing
1. Doroland Dorceus -- 155 carries, 661 yds, 4.3 avg, 8 tds
2. Jarvis Cooper -- 91 carries, 389 yds, 4.3 avg, 5 tds
3. Paxton Lynch -- 87 carries, 239 yds, 2.7 avg, 2 tds
4. Sam Craft -- 82 carries, 333 yds, 4.1 avg, 5 tds
5. Jamarius H. -- 60 carries, 320 yds, 5.3 avg, 4tds
2016 Hokies Rushing
Jerod Evans -- 204 carries, 846 yds, 4.1 avg, 12 tds
Travon Mc. -- 145 carries, 671 yds, 4.6 avg, 7 tds
Sam Rogers -- 67 carries, 283 yards, 4.2 avg, 2 tds
Marshawn W. -- 59 carries, 244 yards, 4.1 avg, 2 tds
2016 Memphis has a QB who was a better passer, but a worse rusher than Jerod and not only the production but the play calling shows it. Now obviously Memphis still spread their carries out but then again they hardly had a feature back either. Even so Jerod had 2.5 times more carries and 3 times as many yards as Paxton did on the ground.
HOWEVER it is interesting to note that Lynch was 296/443 throwing for 3776 yards and 28 tds. Jerod was 268/422 for 3546 yards and 29 tds. While I still think Lynch was the better passer I think Jerod just had much, much better weapons to throw to.
*I apologize I didn't know how to make one of those fancy tables. Forgive my poor TKPing.
there's good info here. I think French has pointed out that quite a bit of Paxton's Memphis film seemed to feature 1-read-and-go type of plays though. I don't know that style of QB play is the real issue with our running game though. I really think it all comes down to the O-Line.
technically, I believe French says "one read and then scramble drill" which does not necessarily mean he's pulling it and running. Rather, he's trying to find an open man while running for his life (see: Tyrod Taylor's college career) and running if necessary. The numbers seem to reflect this sort of approach. I could be wrong in my recollection though.
It did not feel like Travon got more than twice as many carries as Sam. Also suprised to see he racked up almost 700 yards.
Making tables is difficult. I usually do it in excel, screen shot it, then upload to Imgur.
Another good way to post them is to put it up however you want and let some anal retentive nerd reformat.
you can also embed a google docs spreadsheet, I found out recently, using iframe the same way that youtube embeds.
My theory is that this is something Fuente has wanted to incorporate into his offense for some time, but never had the personnel to do so. My guess is Jerod had been practicing for weeks, and up 3+ TD's against UVA was the perfect time to try it out.
We don't always agree, but a leg to you because I am a McMillian fan and agree 100%.
I think the requirement dual threat QB in Fuente's system is overstated. Paxton Lynch never ran for more than 300 yards in a season. I think last year was a bit of just working with what we have. Between our OL, Trevon's difficulty with blocking and/or fumbling, Sam's subpar running ability (the guy is great, but he's not a true running back) and Jerod's unique skill set, it made the most sense to have Jerod be our main ball carrier. I don't think this is the norm for a Fuente offense
I love that Coach Burden mentioned wanting to shift the run game back to the RBs and getting a good every-down back
I'm very much in the camp that our running struggles (LAST in P5 in yards before contact and yards per rush between the tackles) is an OL issue. There was just no room and no holes far too often.
i love coach vice's confidence
I'm actually impressed by the spice mix...emotional, technical, personal...
You mean this:
Vance Vice of the House Hokies, First of His Name, the Impenetrable, King of the Gaps and the Pass Protections, Khal of the Great Offensive Line, Breaker of Blitzes, and Father of Pancakes
It is known.
If only.
He has not impressed me as much as Grimes or Searels did. But he is definitely a step above
Kurt Newsome, Last of the Line, Master of the Bunny Hop.
searels had circles schemed around him. see the infamous wake forest game
The what game now? I don't recall them playing a game.
You know, the one we had inside info on :D
Grimes is the real deal. Searles looks great when he has 4 star guys.
Is there a comprehensive list anywhere of who was in BBurg this weekend for the event?
Watching the recruiting videos of these o-line guys (Jefferson and Rafferty) and how they love to pancake the opponents... I likey! CJF is now building the offensive machine we have been waiting for. Speed offense, awesome defense, OH BOY!