The 2008 Virginia Tech team had two defining characteristics. A defense that allowed just 16 points per game and sometimes single-handedly won football games, and then an offense that was absolutely nauseating to watch. The team only topped 30 points once all year, and beat DUKE 14-3. Ultimately that same offense managed to pull a '06 Chicago Bears move and make it to the postseason, and actually won the Orange Bowl behind Darren Evans.
Today, I saw many signs of that '08 team in that the offense was stalled repeatedly, and the defense basically won the game for us. Not only did Bud Foster's D force three turnovers including the safety, but the defensive backs all let at least two or three other picks slip through their hands. Outside of the first drive by ECU, the defense looked absolutely immovable, and will probably be the top-ranked defense in yards allowed after this week. A few key points I took away from Saturday:
Where Did the Run Game Go? A few factors contributed to the disappearance of Trey Edmunds and the run game as a whole. First, at one point late in the third quarter, Tech had run the ball on first down 11 out of 14 times. That's ridiculous. It would be different if we weren't averaging 1.6 yards per carry, but we were. Running on first down was what the ECU defense expected, and we paid for it. This led to 2nd- and 3rd- and long situations, where Logan had to pass the ball for further downfield, lower-percentage attempts. Another factor was the line. Although the pass protection was decent on the day, the line couldn't get the push that we saw in the first two games. Perhaps more gaps could have opened up if we changed up the first down play-calling, but ECU's defense isn't that good. We should have been able to run the ball on any down, and especially for more than 53 yards.
Special Teams is Almost There, But Almost Not. Kyle Fuller came close to blocking not one, but two punts. I was personally glad to see CFB going after the kicks more, but when you send the forces to block, the return game consequently suffers. Jarrett had one solid return, it just unfortunately was from the 4-yardline. On the other hand, Cody Journell will be everybody's scapegoat all week long. Yes, he had back spasms throughout the week. But if he wasn't fully recovered from those, why was he put in even after the first two missed kicks? I don't think it was his back. The first kick got into his head, then it just got worse and worse, forcing the offense to go on 4th down (which totally should have been run out of the pistol formation btw). Let's just hope he'll get his sh*t together by next week.
Just When We Thought the Defense Was Downright Nasty, it Got Nastier. Seriously. We have not allowed more than 206 yards in any game yet. And those 206 yards were to the top-ranked team in the country. Not only that, but it looks like Bud can get back to his three turnovers per game rule. Around the time of the 2008 team, he wanted his defenses to force at least 3 turnovers every game, and many times he got them. The '08 team intercepted 20 passes, ranking 8th in the nation. So far this season, the Hokie D has picked off seven passes in just three games, and has 12 sacks. Wut. Plus, four of those sacks came against Bama. I don't know what coaches will do with Antone when he comes back, but Facyson and Kendall are playing at the level that Exum was at the end of last season. Good problem to have, though.
Lastly, Logan looked infinitely better today than he did a week ago. You want to know why? HE DIDN'T THROW DEEP BALLS. He tried it once in the second half towards Knowles, and if the ECU defender was physically coordinated at all, he would have easily picked it off. Sure, Knowles didn't make a good play on it, but the guy is 6'0. You can't ask him to be Marcus Davis. The longest completed pass was the 30 yard touchdown to Knowles, and that was a dart over the defender. It was the loft jump balls down the sideline that needed to be eliminated, and I didn't see a single one today. Logan's one interception on the day? A 48-yard attempt. Case in point.
Also I liked the move of Chris Mangus to a flex wideout position where he can line up all move the field. I wrote that I wanted that move last week, and I think he can really be successful there.
Marshall should be an easier test than ECU was, and I'll be looking for the running game to dominate. If the defense is on point and the line is playing well, TruckEmTrey and hopefully JC (if he's back) and Caleb will run all over Marshall.

Comments
I (along with everyone else) was disappointed with the running game. If we can't power it down their throat, than spread them out and let our guys use their speed and athleticism. I was hoping to see some triple option, but that never came either.
The Defense was lights out though, all the way around. They will win some games (like last year) by themselves. But if the kicking game doesn't return, we're in for a nail-biter every week.
Maybe it's just me, but it seems we've seen a different offensive philosophy in each game so far. Do you think the coaches are just testing everything out while we've got the "easy" games on the schedule? That could explain why we're not seeing option, certain passing situations, certain players, etc.
edit: also the classic 'not showing our hand before ACC play'. It helped that we actually had the lead and a great defensive performance...the last two weeks, they could stick to the game plan, if that in fact was the case.
I think it's more of figuring out what works with the players we have. Some things have worked, some have not. Since the triple option was effective when used, I think we may be seeing it more when ACC play rolls around.
Yeah that's what I think. I think Alabama was the only team we really had a "game plan" for. These other games are about winning but also testing the waters. As for Logan's only INT on the day, it was third and long and so the risk is worth it. DK was 1 on 1 and had beaten the defender and logan under threw it. Consider it a 48 yard punt that would have happened if it was incomplete. Logan just has to put a little more arm into it. Overall I am much happier with LT and the WR's play--this game would have been a blowout if we could have gotten the running game going.
Maybe true, Beamer has now said multiple times that these wins aren't pretty, but still wins.
Also nice to think we still have JC and Exum coming back.
Funny, 3 of my main take always are completely counter to yours.
1. Scrap the fucking gimmick ass pistol. Line up in the I and run the fucking thing.
2. Run the fucking thing on first down. This team was giving up over 6 ypp on 1st down. Gotta pound it at them. It was frustrating that there were so many 2nd and 9s but I believe in that gameplan and I'd do it again tomorrow.
3. Gotta throw it deep more than once. We got scared after yet another Knowles deep ball effort. Our WR corps just has no seperators. I'd love to see Newsome or Prince get a shot. Our WRs are depressing.
Overall, the OL was atrocious and the backs tentative. Bad combo.
I would have loved to run it on first down as well, but we tried that over 75% of the time, and it yielded nothing. Less than 2 ypc, so I actually wish we would have opened it up a bit earlier.
The reason I've been lobbying against the deep balls all year is because 1) Three of Logan's picks have come on passes of 30 yards or more, 2) His completion percentage is terrible, especially downfield, so shorter high-percentage passes should mean more gains, and finally 3) Our wideouts simply don't have and haven't shown the ability to make plays with the ball in the air. We don't have any 6-5 athletes who can win jump balls, we've got possession guys who will make catches within 20 yards unless a fast guy like Knowles can beat his man downfield. So that's my reasoning behind avoiding the deep ball.
Yet, many NFL offenses are using the pistol with great success. It's not a gimmick, and the many of the BEST offenses are using it. 49ers, Redskins, Philadelphia, Oregon, Clemson,
I agree, to an extent. If it's not working, you gotta figure out something else. "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -Albert Einstein
I gotta agree with him on the pistol a little bit, especially if we're gonna run over left- or right-guard 80% of the time while in it.
SF and WAS only run it because their QBs used something like it in college and it eases their transition, and PHI uses it because it's all Chip Kelly knows (seems like it, anyway). But there is quite a bit of gadgetry involved when you run a pistol offense, much like the Wildcat. Time will tell if it remains at the pro level.
ECU game plan was to stop the run and force us to throw. That worked for them so we passed a bit more and moved the chains. Receivers got open and caught passes. If we could kick a field goal and extra point, we would have put up 25 points. Credit ECU D, they were pretty tough and they played like this was their superbowl. Our game plan? Run first, then pass. We are not a hard O to figure out so I wasn't surprised we struggled a bit. A win is a win though so bring on Marshall and lets do the same, but with better offensive output.
Neither is Alabama, but when you can execute what your offense can do at will, then it's hard to stop without an elite defense. Of course, having elite recruits in your roster helps...
I am personally guaranteeing a blocked kick next week against Marshall. I was watching their game against Ohio last night and their punt protection isn't very good, I would not be surprised if we got to one in the first half.
Just for the sake of beamerball not being completely dead, I really hope we get ANY kind of kick blocked next week. I was glad to see Beamer being aggressive in that facet against ECU
BeamerBall has been dead form so long, that's its widow doesn't even have to wear black anymore.
Burn
Maybe we can pull off that blocked kick in the IU game. Dude literally is so fast he takes it off his foot and runs it in.
I was happy to see Mangus run how he did. Kid looks pretty good with the ball in his hands, and with Edmunds I think we have our 1-2 of the future.
Mangus in front of JC? That is crazy talk!
I didn't know what to expect form JC this year based on his performance of last year (offensive line woes notwithstanding). Haven't seen much of JC yet this year. Still not sure what to make of it. But Mangus looks like a guy who can run. And we pretty much know what we'll get out of Edmunds at this point.
We have more than 11 sacks right? We had 4 versus bama, and 7 versus ECU. I have no idea where you can see actual defensive stats online, other than interceptions and fumbles, but it seems unlikely that we got no sacks versus western carolina.
NCAA.com actually does a pretty good job with all of the stats.
Thanks! I love actually being able to look this stuff up. Second in yards allowed, second in interceptions, second in tackles for loss, third in sacks. The defense is incredible.
Yea, the only defense that seems to be close is Michigan State. But then you factor in who they've played and I think we've been more impressive.
Having only played VT and TAMU, Alabama's defensive ypp is #105 and ypg is #86 nationally. Will be interesting to see what it settles out to as they get into the "regular" schedule. VT at #2 in both categories is awesome considering what AJ turned in yesterday.
If it's not on ESPN I go here and look it up:
http://stats.ncaa.org/rankings?sport_code=MFB&division=11
They seem to keep track of everything even relatively useful
This is the best stats site:
http://www.cfbstats.com/2013/team/742/index.html
Hands-down.
Yeah, typo. Pretty sure it's actually 12. I thought we only had 6 vs ECU.
I hope Clemson and/or FSU (please be Clemson!) experiences a rude surprise in Charlotte.