
97 more days...
So yeah, that was kind of a tease.
Georgia Tech athletic director Dan Radakovich confirmed the ACC is trying to develop a bowl game similar to the one recently announced by the SEC–Big 12. It's a move that might be too little to late because the options are extremely limited. The ACC Champion playing Notre Dame every year might draw the most ratings and generate the most buzz, but could it consistently be the best annual matchup, and how long before it becomes stale? The Big East could offer up Louisville and Boise State. Woo? Playing the next best SEC, Big 12 or even Big Ten team after their playoff and respective bowl participants may be the best option in terms of allure and money. However, scheduling a game against sloppy seconds (or thirds) would be another public relations hit for the ACC. Isn't the little kids table fun.
Clemson BOTs held a meeting yesterday evening, part of it was an off the books executive session. Some of the subjects at hand were the ACC TV contract and the state of the league. Chairman of the Board David Wilkins told TigerNet.com they'd listen to what other conferences had to say.
"If we were contacted by a conference, we would obviously listen to what they had to say," Wilkins said. "And then we would make a reasonable decision. We aren't seeking that, and we aren't making any overtures about that. I think we have a responsibility to consider any viable component that would come our way. But we haven't been contacted by anybody. We just want Clemson athletics to be the best they can be. This board is committed to Clemson athletics."
There's no harm in just listening, right?
Eagle in Atlanta conducted a top notch Q&A with a sports lawyer familiar with the ACC TV deal.
The SEC-Big 12 bowl pumped new life into Larry Scott's Plus-One "playoff" model.
"I'd say before Friday that idea of a plus-one didn't have much traction, but I think the announcement on Friday's a game-changer," Scott said. "We're pretty far down the path on four-team playoff options, but given the very positive reaction to what the SEC and Big 12 have done, it's possible that (a plus-one) could get some traction."
This has to be the least favorable option for any conference outside of the Power Four (this is what I'm calling the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, and Pac-12 for the foreseeable future). The only scenarios that put an ACC team into the championship game under a Plus-One model is if they're a consensus number one and they win their bowl, or chaos. Kind of like it is now. ACC teams won't be able to tout conference strength or a premier bowl opponent against the Power Four, so they aren't leapfrogging anyone or getting the benefit of the doubt.
This reads as another play for the Rose Bowl —a surefire way to keep it a part of the postseason championship formula. But now the SEC and Big 12 might be more willing to buy in since they have a baby of their own.

Comments
I'm not a lawyer, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, but it sure seems like this whole post-season mess is getting closer and closer to collusion. I don't think the NCAA has anti-trust exemptions like the NFL, so I don't know if the ACC, Big East, and the other little guys could make a case in court or not.
I read an article (on CBSsports I think) that said the ACC and BE could threaten to withhold votes or tie up the NCAA legislation that would allow for more than one post season game, but again, I don't know if they would have enough votes or if the Power 4 would simply break away from the NCAA. This whole thing is a mess though, and I never thought that the idea of a playoff would have a lot of fans wanting to keep the BCS the way it is now.
Notre Dame?
Good fan base, good history...NOT who I want the ACC champion to play every year. They haven't even produced much since the mid 90s, and, as everybody should know, teams are cyclical and that would put a HUGE weight on ND to be good, or else the ACC looks even weaker.
Really Looking forward...
...to the 2013 Orange Bowl featuring Rutgers and Wake Forest. In Joe's words: "Woo?"
no disrespect but as enamoured as everyone seems to be with leaving the ACC, half of these teams aren't worth anything in a supposedly weak acc. sure its big fish eat little fish, but have fun lining your pockets whilst still playing for 3rd-5th in your new conference
I don't think many people are enamored. Most people like the ACC and thing that it is the best fit for us...unless FSU or Clemson leave. Many people are hoping for ND to join the ACC and then we can win the respect for the conference in the next 4-5 years.
What do you mean by "half of these teams aren't worth anything in a supposedly weak"? What teams?
"the ACC is trying to develop a bowl game similar to the one recently announced by the SEC-Big XII."
Whats even the fuckin point?
The best the ACC can hope for at this point is the 4 team playoff being so successful and popular (it will be) that they expand it to 8 and then 16. Then they'll be assured a spot every year. Just keep pluggin away with the Orange Bowl, maybe lower the ticket prices.
Not going to happen
NCAA football 16 team tournament will never happen, and there is hardly a chance for an 8 team as well. Football is not basketball, and teams cannot play that many games in such a short period of time.
they do it at every other level of college football
exactly, in every team sport at every level of NCAA sports (including DIAA, DII, and DIII football), if you win your conference, you enter a tournament for the national championship. If Big East, ACC, MAC, MWC, sun belt, etc conference champions don't get to play, then they are not playing DI football. For the folks who say those weaker conferences can't compete, then the favorites shouldn't have any problem drilling them in round 1.
My format, which I will detail more in a blog post:
16 team tournament with 9 conference champs and 7 at-large games
Top seeds get a home game for opening round
The reason it won't happen is the expansion. Schools are forming superconferences designed to take the TV money pie and divide it up into the fewest pieces/most money per school possible. Also, divisions in bigger conferences make it almost impossible to eliminate games (you would need an 11 game season and no conference championship game for a 16 team playoff to work.)
I am not sure how DIAA and DII schools do it, but the DIII champion and runner up plays a 15 game season.
There is no NCAA DI Football Championship
Bowl games are about money. Money for the schools and money for the bowls. Lately many, if not most, schools have been losing money on bowls even though almost everyone else is making money (especially ESPN).
The traditional powerhouses use their leverage (fan base and connected alumni) to squeeze the up and coming schools out of opportunities for increasing revenue. They get in the way of a real playoff system, even making up new bowl games to directly compete for revnue with a playoff system. VT is not one of the traditional powerhouses and does not have the leverage to sway the direction of where college football is headed. Right now it is a battle of the haves versus have nots and the haves driving the train. The NCAA has no power to create a playoff system or equitable conferences. It is free market versus government control. Should college football be this way?
nope
Nope
I second the "nope."
They do have the power. It will happen.
I don't think the question is 'if' anymore, but how these teams will be decided and if any bowls are left for the teams who don't get an invitation to the cool kids party.