Recent Comments
$33M on Dec 15th.
Lawyers
Always
Win
It's the LAW
First thought, what is his buyout?
Second thought, was the LSU AD somehow involved on it?
FAM....Drones somehow leads the ACC in total touchdowns with 21 (14 passing/7 rushing). He is 6th overall in rushing TDs. Haynes King is actually #1 in rushing TDs with twelve. Drones is 4th in passing TDs with three guys tied at 17.
Definitely not a stat I thought could be this season.
John Stossel had a great list of these too. Based on actual lawsuits. Off the top of my head, I remember:
Do not use while unconscious.
Do not use as a hair dryer (It was a paint stripping heat gun)
There were a bunch more.
The reason why we have new style gas cans (who all here remembers that thread) is people pouring gas out of the can onto a fire and suing for that.
Supervisor: There is a new mental health training at work, but it is optional if you want to join.
Me: No, of course I do not want to join. I don't need it.
Supervisor: How do you know that?
Me: Because the voices tell me that I'm fine. And I always listen to the voices.
Yep and as I learned in my 'business law' class at VT in the 1980s, that's why you see the idiotic warning labels like 'don't try and fold your stroller with the baby inside it". My fave example was two neighbors who decided to trim the hedge between their lawns by holding their power mower and running it along the top and one slipped and had his hands mangled but successfully sued the manufacturer cause it didn't specifically warn them NOT to do so. Companies hire lawyers to think of the dumbest things to possibly happen with their products and put a warning label or instructions...e.g. don't use your hair dyer in the shower...
Join The Key Player's Club to read comments posted in exclusive content and its members only forum.
Join The Key Player's Club to read comments posted in exclusive content and its members only forum.
Join The Key Player's Club to read comments posted in exclusive content and its members only forum.
Join The Key Player's Club to read comments posted in exclusive content and its members only forum.
In the Transfer Portal era it will always make sense to maximize compensation to a successful coach versus a player.
The lack of any restriction on transfer rules has marginalized the value of a player.
Why would any organization increase compensation for an employee who is essentially a "temp" versus an employee that's under contract and can be controlled?
That makes no economic sense
We're heading for an eventuality where there are only 4 to 8 teams that will ever make it to the top of the mountain, IMO.
I think we are already pretty close to that point already. The 12 team CFP is largely pointless, the bottom 8 teams aren't really in the same league as the top 4. Even when there were only 4 teams, most years only 2 or 3 really felt like they belonged.
But you are right, the people that thought that NIL was going to somehow lead to some sort of equilibrium in the sport missed the mark entirely. The Media/TV conglomerates are the money men in CFP and they are never, ever going to share money willingly with 18-22 (or now 18-28) year-olds. It won't happen.
Schools are going to continue to pay absurd contracts to coaches and build absurdly expensive facilities because they are at least a constant factor that can be controlled in a world where any player can leave at any time for any reason at all.
I think in the next 5 years we'll see a shift towards players making more than coaches. Everyone agrees that "Jimmy's and Joe's matter more than Xs and Os" but no one putting their money behind it that way. That is what will change iMO.
Edit: not individual players making more than an HC; rather whole rosters making more than entire staffs
Kelly was in a no loss situation and might have come out ahead. He can walk away with all the money, no stress, etc.
"Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics." Sir Charles Dilke but made popular by Mark Twain.
the arms race won't stop until there's a big bubble burst or some other major event that precipitates large scale reforms in the sport. I'm not sure when (if?) that will happen but that's what it will take to slow (stop?, change?) the arms race. Until then, I'd expect it to continue on this wild path. We're not that far from coaches of top teams making $20+ million and players that start on that team making between $1-3 million
what will be interesting to watch is how many teams those types of figures will take out of the running altogether. We're heading for an eventuality where there are only 4 to 8 teams that will ever make it to the top of the mountain, IMO. I'd expect that when that happens, the sport will grow stale and interest will plummet. We shall see.
Scrolling on instagram, I saw that UF was willing to make him the highest paid coach (annual basis) at 13ish per year?
Side note: This is why I don't think the extra fundraising is going to propel VT into the upper echelon of football/athletics spending. The arms race hasn't stopped
The pushback I would give here is that big-time college sports already devalues education to begin with, so it's hard to say what value players are getting from their degree compared to an average student.
But the piece doesn't compare athletes to the average student; it compares athletes graduating pre-NIL to those graduating post-NIL
There should be more guardrails in place, but the players also need to have the freedom to make decisions and live with the consequences of them.
Completely agree.
No? The piece I linked in OP includes a link to the academic paper (I'm not sure what the right word is - study? Experiment? research? Maybe Guitarman can weigh in) - this isn't some journalist throwing data together; this is work published by a marketing professor at Carnegie Mellon. I don't think he has some ulterior motive here beyond working on something at the intersection of his career and personal interests.
You can argue that the findings are meaningless (like Shelton did quite reasonably, below), but these aren't 'cooked numbers'
oh absolutely, it was weird AF
Haven't seen a years involved but have to assume it's significantly above the $8-$9M a year Ole Miss is paying. My guess would be 6 years at $13.5M
No. It was perfect the way it was.
Oh I agree completely, and it's probably why he felt comfortable doubling down on not wanting to fire his OC. It's just funny to me because the response was "ok, then you're both fired"

Join The Key Player's Club to read comments posted in exclusive content and its members only forum.