Recent Comments

I think it's going to lean toward the DPP, but with added responsibilities similar to an NFL GM. I think they will be responsible for leading the recruiting efforts (maybe not closing the deal), scouting the portal or the potential portal, hiring/firing non-coaching staff, ensuring roster compliance and managing NIL/revenue sharing. I think it will also have elements of the Assistant AD of football (whose R&Rs are similar to an NFL GM from an operational standpoint).

There is also zero evidence that NFL guys won't work in a GM type of position (not coaching - plenty of evidence of that). There is actually no data either way. It really depends on what the structure of the organization is and the roles and responsibilities are as to whether or not an NFL front office type can be successful as a GM at the college level.

My problem is there are too many orange / white uniforms out there between Cuse, Clemson, and Tennessee, all nearby or in conference too. Our shade of maroon made us stand out.

Buuuuuuut..... the metallic orange visor absolutely fucks. Give me AME with those visors any day of the week

This is about the third time this has been pitched to the Big 10 and no deals were reached the first two go rounds. Guess we will see what happens.

Well, in almost every case it's true. When I worked for DuPont and they decided to get rid of their chemical division, the Carlyle Group swooped in and bought (took over). I can actually say they ran us well and overall things remained almost seamlessly. Now, with that said, they only owned the new company for a short time (2-3 years roughly) so maybe they didn't have time to destroy it.

I worked for a company that was bought be a private equity firm, they were buying companies to package them up to sell to a larger company, during that time we got investment capital to build our products at a larger scale and we got profit sharing which was great. It was probably the best few years I worked when you balance everything from a job. But we were a lean company already and engineer ran and focused so we got money to engineer more, and more pay on top of that. As al the companies under them grew they became more profitable during a sale, a d then they sold and that company was fine, but then they got a bad leader and were a mess and they sold off pieces.

So while it is 100% easier to buy and slash so the books look good, a few exist to prop up smaller companies and build portfolio that iz attractive because of the people and technologies they possess. That is much more work and doesn't work for every industry.

this however end with Purdue and Northwestern losing funds to be door mats.

Pages