Recent Comments

The dollar value wasnt a huge hurdle, but no one forced Beamer to do what others knew needed to be done.

We had done more with less, but tgat is a huge reason why we didnt do more.

If I say I want what so and so had earned, then the first step is to learn what they did to earn it and replicate as much as possible. So If I am the AD and buy off on the goal of a national championship then 1) i need to learn what the ADs at FSU, Nebraska, UF, Michigan, etc were doing as they all just won championships. I need to make sure my coach and their staff is doing the same.

Saban didnt as much overhaul the system as much as legitimize it and organize it. Under Don Nehlen, WVU had a scout in the NRV watching high school kids and VT, but they were a volunteer. Saban made that kind of position part of the team and not just some one giving opinions on what to do. Integrated into the machine.

We didnt spend the money to go find out what successful teams were doing. We didnt align the university with the goal, we just put up an empty trophy case with no investment in learning what we needed to do.

Claude Code was a major factor. It didn't only help with tedious work, it helped with all the work. I delegated writing all the code to it. Where I interjected myself was during review and somewhat with planning the approach. What took som upfront effort from me was building out its infrastructure (agents, skills, etc), but now that it's in place I can move fast. It was super helpful at bridging the gaps between my down periods. Without, I would have had to re-familiarize myself with why I stopped, what I was doing next, what was already done. That would have taken my weeks, whereas it just understood the git history nearly instantaneously.

I'm far from anything remotely resembling a soccer expert, but I feel like the starting defenders are a much bigger risk than the missing depth at midfield and striker.

It was a different era though. Being competitive with top 5 teams was a difference of 6 or 7 figures; not 8 or 9.

Also in those days, money wasn't holding Beamer back. If you gave him an extra million, it just would've been distributed to the coaches already on staff. It didn't occur to Beamer that he could have an army of assistants scouting recruits, another army of assistants scouting future teams, another army self scouting, etc. I think it was 2010 when bud famously went up to Iowa to learn about defending the triple option where he discovered that every position coach had their own assistant?

TLDR; the limiting factor through the meat of the Beamer era wasn't money; it was creativity.

This was before the Saban-ization of college football.

The absence of depth at striker and midfield will be the undoing of this team in the knockout round. I love Pepi but his hold up play is non-existent, and Weah couldn't stay onside to save his life. The second half was atrocious from the midfield. Last but not least, Pulisic had to drop deep too often when he came on, and it nullified his pace on the wing. The game winning goal was a byproduct of Pulisic being so aggressive on defense, that an extra body was in the box, which is the cause for the extra man on the back post. Tough loss. We go again...

They're likely right. I went and looked at my spreadsheet and it's looking that way. Since there are already 3 3rd place teams guaranteed to max out at 3 points (Scotland, Korea, Senegal/Iraq winner) it's most likely that 4 points will get through. Not guaranteed tho. Although it's extremely unlikely, there's a world where there could be 9 3rd place teams on 4+ points. If that happens, Bosnia could actually get knocked out on GD/GF.

As of now these are the teams that could end on 4+ points in 3rd place (I've put GD for teams that I know if they finish on 4+):
Bosnia & Herzegovina(-2)
Paraguay (-2)
Ecuador (0)
Sweden (0)
Iran/Belgium
Senegal/Iraq
Algeria (-2)
Congo
Croatia

Thats 9 3rd place spots that could be at 4+. Then it'll come down to GD. There are a few teams at -2. From there it'll go to GF. Bosnia & Herzegovina have the advantage here but if Paraguay and Algeria both score 2+ goals then they could get bounced. Super unlikely. In all likelihood the teams that get to 4 points will advance. Since we know three of them (Bosnia & Herzegovina, Ecuador, Sweden) that eliminates a bunch of the possible pairings and the only remaining possible pairings all have 1D v 3B. So although it's not completely set in stone it's pretty gd close.

We tried that over here and Alumni office said that they can't share private information about students because they are government funded. Neither to us or to other organizations. Meanwhile other universities have alumni apps connecting them with links for donantions.

Alumni office has ALWAYS been a barrier when trying to connect to other alumni. Doing the exact opposite of what it should be doing.

The one in Harrisonburg was always pretty good. I haven't been in a couple years, though. Hopefully it hasn't gone downhill. They just opened a new one in Bridgewater. I'm pretty excited to try it out one of these days.

Oh, I didn't know it was official. I knew that of the 495 possible combinations, 329 of them had 1D facing 3B. Interesting that they've already eliminated enough of the possibilities to know that it's locked in. That surprises me a bit since there's still several groups with teams that could miss the cut. I mean, there are still 6 groups left to play that have 3rd place teams sitting on 3 or fewer points. Any of those teams could either fall short of the 4 points that seem necessary to guarantee advancing, or get there (with the lone exception of Senegal, who have 0 right now)

Pages