Recent Comments

non-game watchers- is there anything more annoying? How many people said "Bama's O-line needs time to gel, they will be fine"...totally ignoring that our O-line wasn't exactly gelled and that our D played it's ass off.

that is pretty bold... oh wait, it's from Bleacher?

I'm pretty sure that Loeffler would have this in his playbook but I would imagine that a Flanker Drive out of a bunch formation would present a scenario where Demetri Knowles could make an easy catch and get his butt upfield

I like this route combination because it attacks levels of defense. I found it against Cover 3, but I imagine it would work even better against Cover 2 (because the middle of the field is open if the in route can split the safeties). I would have something like Byrn (or someone who's a vertical threat) lined up wide and then Stanford-Coles-Knowles bunched up to the right.

The primary is Knowles on the drive route. If it's man coverage, he uses his track speed to create separation, MAKE THE CATCH, and get upfield for a few yards (maybe even make some people miss). If it's zone coverage, then Logan throws a catchable ball in the soft spot in the coverage.

The next read is a deep in. I didn't know how deep to put the route, but the idea is to keep the safeties and LBs away from the drive route underneath. If the drive is covered, then the same principle above can be applied to the in route.

This is where things get fun. The wheel route first attacks the flat and then gets upfield, which allows the play to attack two levels of the defense. Now in most Cover 3 looks, the OLBs have to cover the flats and usually end up covering RBs and TEs there. This creates the potential for a mismatch with a linebacker or a strong safety. If anything, it helps isolate the drive route underneath and create a vertical threat.

Other than those three routes, there's usually some kind of alert on the outside (like a streak route in case of a busted coverage) and the back can stay in and block or can run some sort of route as a check-down.

I'm not French or Mason, but I couldn't help but think how this play might be incorporated with the talent that we have.

Did you read what he wrote? Because you can tell he didn't watch the game. This is dumb.

I think, to be fair, we need to start distinguishing the barbecue we're talking about.

For ribs: Yes, I'm 100% on board with dry rub. Sauce is not only unnecessary, it detracts.

For pulled/chopped pork: Unless you're making it at home, the BBQ joint is probably putting some finishing sauce on that ish. For me, anything other than vinegar sauce is soul destroying.

To be fair, at least the board is consistent. If we get any Texans in here insisting that you make barbecue from a cow, I will BURN THIS PLACE TO THE GROUND.

yea, I really would love to see Caleb get about half the carries to be honest. I'm ECSTATIC that we have yet another stud in Edmunds, but anything we can do to quickly transform Caleb into a competent replacement is time well spent in my mind.

Sam Rogers doesn't flush the toilet. He just looks at it and scares the sh!t out of it.

This is the best post since all the MascotMock posts combined. Gotta love, respectfully, poking fun at others.

There is no comparison. Chuck Norris wishes he was Sam Rogers.

Sam Rogers delivers his semester paper/project during Syllabus Week.

When do the Chuck Norris and Sam Rogers comparisons start?

Sam Rogers reads the textbook in the first night then shows up with notes for the whole class. Why? Because he's team first.