Recent Comments

After looking into each service's rankings you're right, IDK exactly what they are doing. I assume the services leave room to elevate some 4 stars to 5 stars at the conclusion of their senior season, but it does look like there too many composite 5 stars compared to 5 stars at each individual service.

Either way 🤞 tech gets themselves a 5 star one way or another.

And this happens very rarely as the legal threshold to prove such is quite high. Essentially it has to be proven that the bartender knowingly served someone who was clearly and obviously intoxicated. Establishing this without doubt would commonly require a witness to testify to the offenders obvious intoxication.

Yeah, except the Sorsby case is equivalent to someone showing up at a bar and telling the bartender they're drunk and planning to drive, the guys friends are saying he's drunk and planning to drive, then the bartender continuing to serve him.

Is Sorsby the root of all this trouble? Of course. But Texas Tech is at fault for this continuing. As soon as they found out, they had the institutional responsibility to kick him off the team.

Didn't FSU go all in financially on some bad decisions and are now kinda sitting in the outcomes of a failed push?

This afternoon I chatted with my good friend who caught the most marlin of any female angler in the world last year. She's also a Hokie, '07.

Sounds like you need to convince her to join TKP!

This was my basic point. On a superficial level, the math did not seem to be mathing.

Bar's point is correct. That if there is enough variation in recruit score in the other player rankings that pull them down, he does get to 5-star level. But, it doesn't seem like that's what is happening here. idk.

We do hold bartenders accountable if they over-serve someone. Dram shop laws are a thing.

And this happens very rarely as the legal threshold to prove such is quite high. Essentially it has to be proven that the bartender knowingly served someone who was clearly and obviously intoxicated. Establishing this without doubt would commonly require a witness to testify to the offenders obvious intoxication.

Other schools/companies could have figured it out and didn't care to.

Can you prove this as factual? Yes, the Big12 requires Student Athletes to download ProhiBet but I can find nothing that states that Institutions are required (or are even able, given privacy laws) to share information on any flags that may come up for individual Student Athletes. Additionally, I cannot imagine any scenario where PrizePicks or any other Gambling Operation is going to willingly provide user information to a University without some legal compulsion (i.e. subpoena) to do so. Could they (shoud they?) do so willingly, is a different question.

Could Cincinnati have been more proactive here? Maybe, but neither of us knows how much Cincinnati knew. Per the best data I can find, there were more than 100 Prohibited Betting cases in 2025 alone, so let's not pretend like having a ProhiBet flag was an extremely rare event.

Moreover, what is Sorsby's responsiblity here? By all accounts, he attempted to be surreptitious while gambling (but was too dumb to use a burner phone) and then continued to attempt to hide the gambling until April when he was essentially compelled to.

Again....where is the personal responsibility and accountability for being grossly deceitful? Oh...wait....I forgot....he is a college athlete....nevermind.

ever try something like Hovland's double pump on the range when warming up?

Pages