Recent Comments

Its strange. Was listening to one of the YouTube VT channels and they were really high on him They said he was a target for the tOSU. Maybe there's residual VT effect b/c he didnt commit to tOSU.

what happens when unregulated, uncontrolled 3rd party money combined with ethically loose biased local judicial courts come together? final nail in coffin for the fallacy that is "student athletics". This should be neither surprising nor will it be the most egregious middle finger in the slow death of ncaa. Pete Rose wished he played in the era of NIL.

The NCAA should have been burned down to the roots long long time ago. While I also don't believe this shithead should be playing organized sports I am all for this hopefully changing the future of how the sport is managed.

Take a big swing and start putting up guard rails or kiss college foorball bye bye forever. The NCAA should abandon its case to prevent him from playing and pursue a criminal case against him in conjunction to whichever friendly court they work with. Send a message.

Yea, it was in terrible shape but this year it's looking great. The fairways were in decent shape and the greens were in great condition for a nova public course.

What a bunch of BS. To be clear, addictions are a real issue. Having an addiction should entitle you to receive help to try and recover from said addiction. It does not mean you are entitled to avoid the consequences of your actions.

Not sure whether this or statement from the AD are more cringeworthy.

Either way, it's pretty clear that Texas Tech is not going to suddenly develop a conscience.

They should be sanctioned into oblivion.

If only we had an authority with a neat 4 letter acronym who could dole out punishments to shitty rogue programs....but nah, we decided to ditch them for a random assortment of county judges to set our rules.

Texas Tech administration continuing to dig the hole, this time the coach...

Nice! Live pretty close to pohick. Have done a few of their scrambles they set up. Was pretty rough shape last time I was there. Maybe a year or so ago

Okay...but what evidence is there to the contrary??

More so, do we really think even a school with as loose of a moral compass as Texas Tech was going to pledge $5 million dollars to a kid that they knew had a gambling investigation upcoming beforehand? That they knew bet on his own team and would probably be ruled ineligible?

In light of any compelling evidence to the contrary, I'm going side with the established reporting that suggests Texas Tech knew on April 14th.

The opposite explanation that they knew long beforehand, gave the kid the money anyways, and then concocted an elaborate plan to sue the NCAA to maintain his eligibility simply isn't logical, particularly as the outcome definitely wasn't assured.

And even if it was, why not announce all this in January and get ahead of the story, instead of waiting until April??

They found out April 14th, had two weeks to concoct a story and legal strategy then they executed it.

Suggesting otherwise is baseless.

Pages