So, a quick Week 1 summary:- Wake has not named its starting QB- Pitt is not naming its starter despite Nate Yarnell being the starter after spring- Clemson is not releasing a depth chart because UGA won't - Stanford could start any 1 of 3 QBs, Taylor says- UNC hasn't named...— 💫🅰️♈️🆔 (@ADavidHaleJoint) August 26, 2024
Forums:
DISCLAIMER: Forum topics may not have been written or edited by The Key Play staff.
Comments
Lmao classic. So much proprietary information
How incredibly refreshing not to be among these
You know what they say, "If you have two starting QBs, then you... "
have a TE that you are planning to play as QB?
UNC decided not to announce any lineup info after Minnesota coach said he wasn't releasing his. Early season pissing contest in the press.
Mack Brown should have followed Mike McIntyre's lead from 2016 vs Michigan/Jim Harbaugh and released a farcical depth chart.
That's basically what Pry was doing last year.
McIntyre's included "Loose Ends" and "Narrow Receivers". That's next level.
Oh, that's beautiful lol
What can you say?
It's a game of inches.
The idea that this gives any competitive advantage at all is goofy.
It definitely does because it makes you gameprep for multiple scenarios and styles of offense - especially week 1. As a team routinely gashed by backup QBs.... it is a competitive advantage.
I would argue that our inability to tackle a backup running QB has its roots in places other than "We weren't ready for the idea of a QB running." Sure, different physical skills mean you might see more or less of a given thing, but the offense is what the offense is come a point. Especially at a place like Wake where the style is so distinctive.