
When the Hokies lose against a seemingly inferior opponent after coming off a big game, fans and the media alike sound the "didn't take them seriously" alarm.
It's an easy narrative to latch on to. Tech scored a program-defining win against Ohio State, then didn't adequately prepare for East Carolina and their unconventional offense.
But coaches and players alike insist that isn't the case, and it's hard to disagree with them.
"I'm not going to make that excuse," said Frank Beamer. "We were ready to play, we understood exactly how East Carolina was going to play, it wasn't a secret...I felt we had all the respect in the world for East Carolina, they just did a great job."
Keep in mind, ECU is a team that had a lead against South Carolina in Columbia, and thumped UNC last year. The Pirates may very well be better than many of Tech's ACC opponents this year (here's looking at you, Wake Forest) and the Hokies seemed well aware of the threat they posed.
"As a team, we all respected them coming in," said defensive end Ken Ekanem. "They're really, really underrated, it's all what we expected, we just had a rough start."
This loss simply revealed the great many flaws in this young, inexperienced team. Beamer has long preached patience with this squad, likely with an eye cast to 2015, and a loss to the Pirates revealed that the Hokies aren't suddenly a perfect team just because they beat the Buckeyes.
Picking on the Cornerbacks
Bud Foster's bold strategy of leaving his cornerbacks one-on-one with the Buckeyes' receivers earned a lot of praise after last week's win, and Pirates head coach Ruffin McNeill took notice.
He surely observed that Brandon Facyson, who was forced to rotate with Chuck Clark a week ago, wasn't at full speed, and when combined with quarterback Shane Carden's poise in the pocket, this proved to be a perfect storm to attack Tech's defense.
"Going into the game, we knew they were good, but we felt we had to hit some long ones to open things up," McNeill said.
It turns out he was exactly right. The Hokies put tons of pressure on Carden, even during ECU's charmed first quarter, but it didn't seem to matter as he connected on long throw after long throw.
That allowed McNeill to push the pace and force the Hokies to stay on their toes.
"It's important every game for us to start fast and sustain it," McNeill said. "This team is able to do that."
McNeill's bold strategy and Carden's poise definitely deserve praise, but ultimately, the Hokies' cornerbacks failed to make the kinds of plays on the ball fans have become accustomed to seeing.
"As good as were last week playing the deep ball, we were equally as bad this week," said defensive coordinator Bud Foster. "We had a good game plan, we just couldn't make a play on a deep ball all day."
Many of Carden's throws weren't perfect, looking like lobs more than anything, yet ECU's receivers showed an uncanny ability to make plays on jump balls.
In particular, Cam Worthy was able to use his 6'3" frame to make a variety of big catches on the day, finishing with an insane stat line of six catches for 224 yards.
"Their receivers did a great job of going up and getting the ball," Foster said. "We didn't do a very good job of that."
Part of that definitely stem's from Facyson's struggles, but his replacement, Donovan Riley, got torched on a few throws as well, as did Clark and both safeties.
But Riley did seem more confident than Facyson, and he probably deserves to get the start against Georgia Tech while Facyson continues to work his way back, but this definitely creates big questions about the Hokies' most consistent unit.
"(Facyson)'s missed a lot of time, missed a lot of practice time and you can't make that up," Beamer said. "He's a terrific athlete and a good kid, he'll be a better guy next week. And Riley is a tough guy that played his heart out."
Inconsistency in the Running Game
After Marshawn Williams and Shai McKenzie put on a show against William and Mary, people started to wonder if the running game would define the offense this year.
Three games into the season, it would seem the running attack isn't quite there yet. It doesn't help that offensive coordinator Scot Loeffler was game-planning against the Buckeyes' dominant defensive line and the Pirates' underrated NT Terry Williams the last two weeks, but fans were hoping for some signs of progress.
"I think we can look at our blocking, at why we weren't able to run the ball early and again late," Beamer said.
The Hokies can be forgiven for abandoning the running game when they were down 14 points in the fourth quarter.
Yet Tech's inability to get any sort of push on the offensive line when the offense desperately needed to give the defense some time on the sidelines in the first quarter is unexplainable.
"The fact of the matter is we should have put this away in the first half and we didn't," Loeffler said.
Williams was excellent on the inside, besting center Caleb Farris on several occasions.
In the first quarter, the only runs Tech managed over five yards was a six-yard jet sweep to receiver Deon Newsome and a 10-yard burst by Marshawn Williams. That's it.
The second quarter was even worse. Williams had one gain of five yards, with a number of others stopped for no gain.
McKenzie got in on only three series in the first half, finishing with seven yards in the first two quarters and 18 in the whole game.
Yet, Williams slowly gained steam in the third quarter, before the team had to pick up the pace to catch up.
He got nine of his 17 carries in just the third quarter, and used them to gain 57 of his 77 total yards.
"It just started opening up," Williams said. "Some plays they open up, some plays they don't, on some plays we had good blocking to the outside."
He came agonizingly close to breaking several runs wide open, particularly on a 21-yard scamper in the third, but couldn't quite hit paydirt.
"I've got to break a few more of those tackles," Williams said. "I'm going to learn from that and it shouldn't be a problem again."
But Williams was the only positive in a dismal day for the running game, and the staff will have to find some answers going forward, particularly on the offensive line.
Freshman WRs Thrive, Veterans Struggle
When Willie Byrn dropped what would've been a sure third down conversion late in the fourth quarter, it was an odd sight to see.
"It doesn't happen very often, does it?" Beamer said. "It wasn't because of effort, you just need to get the next play."
Byrn, popularly known as the "Paper Boy" because he always delivers, put on an uncharacteristically inconsistent showing against the Pirates, and he was wasn't the only one.
Josh Stanford looked invisible on the field, catching just two balls for 14 yards and making bad drops on two other throws.
Most people thought Stanford and Byrn would be stabilizing forces for the offense this year, yet it was the freshman receivers that came through when the Hokies needed it most against the Pirates.
Cam Phillips finished with seven catches for 89 yards and the game-tying touchdown, while Isaiah Ford had seven receptions for 77 yards and the team's other two scores.
"Somebody's going to have to make a play," Ford said. "As a receiver group, we knew it was going to have to be one of us. If the ball came to us, it was crunch time and we had to make a play."
Ford was guilty of a drop himself, letting what should have been a touchdown slip through his fingers on the Hokies' second scoring drive, but he recovered to score three plays later.
But that doesn't mean he isn't still a little frustrated about his misstep.
"I'm really hard on myself like that," Ford said. "I don't expect to drop any balls so it was kind of a little relief when I caught the second one, but at the same time, that can't happen."
Receivers coach Aaron Moorehead has to be thrilled with the effort he's getting from two true freshmen, even if the veterans' issues are a little concerning.
One thing is for sure after Saturday's drop-filled performance: the JUGS machine will be making another appearance at practice very soon.
Carden Under Fire
Beyond some bright spots with the young offensive players, Tech's staff has to be most encouraged by the ferocity the front-seven played with in the second half.
The Hokies sacked Carden four times on the day, and hit him a whopping 17 times, proving that this defense can still pack a punch even without a big lead or an exotic scheme.
Defensive end Ken Ekanem and linebacker Deon Clarke looked particularly good in the pass rush, combining for 3.5 sacks and eight quarterback hits.
Ekanem attributes the change to some halftime adjustments and a growing comfort with the Pirates' offensive line.
"We just got a better feel for the offensive line and what they were doing protection wise, we applied the right pressure, we had a few scheme changes during halftime, so we got to the quarterback more and I got a better feel for my tackle," Ekanem said.
The Hokies got a decent push in the first half, bringing Carden down twice, but the pressure wasn't nearly as consistent as it was in the second, when the pocket was constantly collapsing for ECU.
"We came into halftime and we adjusted, so it definitely helped us out, and we started playing with more intensity," Ekanem said. "We were a little shocked at first, but after we got over the shock, we were good."
But for all their positive efforts, Ekanem still feels like the unit could've made a big play late in the game to seal the comeback.
"I thought I was doing pretty well against the tackles, I thought I would give myself a chance to get to the quarterback and maybe force a fumble, and I came pretty close at the end, but it was kind of disappointing," Ekanem said. "I'm disappointed in myself that I didn't make that play. We would've had good field position, and who knows how that game would've ended."
Foster shares that feeling of disappointment, and has a simple request for Hokie fans headed into next week.
"I apologize to everybody for how we played as far as giving this one up in the end," Foster said. "Don't get down on us, we need everybody next week when we open up ACC (play)."

Comments
Mostly it just exposed a bad game plan. IMHO
Agreed, we weren't ready. It would have been wonderful if we had played Western Michigan after the OSU game.
thought we were ready, just got outplayed. However I do agree it would have been nice to have those two teams swapped on the schedule.
I don't really see how you can say we were ready, yet in the first half our highly touted defense gave up 21 points and our offense had something like 40 yards?
We gave up the 21 points in the first quarter, not the first half.
Technically the first quarter was in the first half and they only scored 21 points all half, so...yeah.
Because we got beat.
Their offensive plan was to throw up 50/50 balls. Facyon got beat on battles he was winning last year. Looks like he is still recovering from injury, as he just wasn't moving well, and actually almost fell on 2 big receptions the first drive.
Offensively their linemen won one-on-one battles with our linemen, but we also had some inexplicable drops, and I'm pretty sure our QB got injured on the first or second series, which made his decision making questionable, and his execution iffy.
But you can't call it unprepared if an individual just doesn't play like you expect, or an injury messes up your plan.
I still feel like we came out flat and unprepared. Most of those points you're making above are really things I see as us just not being ready to play our first noon game of the year. We came out flat against a talented team. I'm not saying ECU wouldn't have been successful had we not come out flat, I just think if we came out with the same intensity each week we would've avoided such a let down.
Frank wasn't lying
Byrn and Stanford won't be stabilizing forces if they really are not targeted. And they aren't anymore. If Ford and Phillips are being targeted A LOT - and they are - then you can't rely on Stanford and Byn to deliver. And if the TEs are getting lots of passes, then...same thing. Stanford won't have a breakout year because of this. And whether or not people think the freshmen need to be targeted more...well, you take the bad with the good and will the increased bad be more than the bad of targeting Byrn and Stanford? We are gong away from "veterans". We are hyping the scores by freshmen... but will the outcome be different in terms of wins and losses when you go away from veterans who have helped in the past?
I think Brewer is throwing to whomever is open on his reads. It may be that teams know Stanford is good so the put more coverage towards him which allows Ford and Phillips to get open more. Same with Byrn. Force the freshman to make plays by taking the veterans out of it. Who wouldn't do that? I don't think it's a matter of Brewer or the offense in general to "go away" from veterans. The best players are on the field no matter their year.
And as soon as everyone else on our schedule learns that our freshmen WRs are skilled and reliable, they will pay more attention to them, and leave openings for Byrn and Stanford. As long as our third-best receiver is better than their third-best cover guy, we should be fine.
Assuming our QB is not concussed.
I'd disagree completely that the veterans aren't being targeted. Willie Byrn caught six passes on the day, they just all happened to be on short passes/screens and he wasn't able to turn them into the big gains we saw against OSU.
Stanford received a little less attention, but he dropped two very catchable balls, and Brewer was certainly looking for him on other occasions. I just suspect that the hamstring injury he suffered in the opener is still nagging him a little bit.
The veterans will be fine, with time, I don't doubt it. But they had opportunities to make plays against ECU, and it was the freshmen that stepped up instead.
Good points, especially about ECU. Far too many of this people on this site and others are blaming the refs or coaches et al instead of giving ECU credit. Did we have a bunch of freshmen mistakes? Sure, and alot of the upperclassmen had some bad throws, misses on D and drops but that happens every game. ECU is a quality team and has played both us and the rest of the ACC tough for years and they were the better team this past Saturday. Now lets destroy GiT because polyteching >>>> single teching!
It's the start of a new week. Bud asked for our support. He and the team have mine 100%. Let's take care of Georgia Tech. Go Hokies!
Here-here. And if any coach has a bank of credits to spend on "asking for support" he (most of all) will get it, unequivocally. Let the Hate Week in the battle for the TEC(H)MO BOWL begin!!!
Damn straight. I've been angry, I've grieved, I'm over it. We lost to a good, veteran team. We fought to the bitter end. I'm still a Hokie. Always have always will.
P.S. Hats off to ECU for playing hard, smash mouth football. You guys won fair and square. You were the better team this year. There is always next year.
Yes, after this, we won't lose to them next year.
To be fair, Ford also dropped three passes himself that hit him right in the hands, including one on the first offensive play of the game.
Ford tweeted something about his two drops and how he needs to play better. He failed to mention that he also caught two touchdown passes, one of them an absolute miracle. I like that kid more every day.
That is one of the marks of a true HC. #Foster4HC
Posted this over on TSL and some found it interesting...
Regarding "man to man" or "cover 0" vs. a Zone
It is about scheme, technique and personnel both ours and theirs.
In 'man to man " or "cover 0", you...
1) use the sideline as an assist on deep outs and flag patterns and fade routes. The technique is not to lose your man in coverage so you "face up" on him that is you run looking at him or face him to read his eyes and that is your key for playing the ball. you react when the receiver does by raising your arms or "running through "him after the ball arrives.
YOU ARE NOT PLAYING THE BALL DIRECTLY
2) on curls, slants that is routes run to the middle of the field, you maintain good inside position off the receiver's hip and maintain inside leverage.you now are now PLAYING THE BALL.( Fuller maybe the best I have ever seen at this as we saw many times yesterday)
In Zone Coverage
1) It is all about leverage and trusting your teammates.
MOSTLY THE BALL and THE QB's EYES are IN PLAY
I was taught this in HS and I discussed this this am with a HS Football coach who had watched the game on TV yesterday..
He confirmed that this is the technique still taught at all levels.
IN MY OPINION....
The ECU OC saw our DBs play the" face up" technique on the OSU film and had his 5th year senior QB throw "lob shots" to the sidelines over their TALL receivers outside shoulder. Now he knows our safety, if he is playing center field, can't get there in time and it is a 50/50 jump ball to a DB not watching the ball. At worst an incomplete pass.At best a completion or even pass interference
Unfortunately, it worked like a charm...
Other observations...
- Facyson is still hurt, couldn't stay with the receivers on the inside moves.
- Brewer was woozy after the hit to the chin in the1st qtr...
-Juco OT did a great job on Dadi
-Cam Phillips will break some DB's ankles before the season is over
-ECU DC schemed to take away our TEs
-OL is still a problem, I know......I know, Capt, Obvious
Still like this team a lot....
GO HOKIES
Thank God someone posted this. You're a gentleman and a scholar sir.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't feel at all bad about this past weekend. It's already done in my head.
Yeah, we lost. Yeah, we probably should have won.
But in the end, for this young team, a loss is every bit as constructive a process as a win, and in someways, more so.
I think all our coaches are doing good things, and I could praise any of their comments, but I'm going to glom on to what Loeffler said up there. "We should have put them away in the first half."
This is a guy that has a system and the confidence in it that, once all his pieces are in place, he is going to be doing just that, even if the D is not having their best day.
Now, we have yet to see if that's going to be true. I still think we are a year away from seeing his vision on the field, and our O-line is the biggest part of that missing right now.
But we have the coaches. We are recruiting the right kinds of players, and highly talented ones at that.
And we have a Sam Rogers.
We are on the cusp, TKPers. OSU we had a little luck go our way, but there were moments where everything was clicking.
ECU, there were still some moments where things were clicking, but luck ran against us.
Soon we aren't going to need luck.
I am still stoked for the future!
This is how I felt after the game...
I think having all summer to prepare for OSU played a bigger role in that win than most believe. I know its risky after the JMU flop but I think the coaches knew we could come out and play a basic game and beat W&M so they used most of the summer to focus on OSU. So beating OSU made the team look better than they really are.
I think ECU and VT were two very evenly matched teams and the ball just didn't bounce in our favor this week (that 3rd down conversion on their first drive on a ball deflected at the line...are you kidding me?). Everyone was calling it an upset (thanks to the rankings, which are useless this early in the season) but I think this is just the level that our team is at. We've gone 15-11 in the last two seasons. I think expectations after the OSU win were a little too high.
Someone tweeted this (I forget who) and I think it sums it up perfectly. "They are talented enough to beat anyone but inconsistent enough to lose anyone." (If it was you who tweeted this, please take credit for it)
On Saturday for all the reasons stated, we were beaten for all the reasons stated. Youth, outcoached, injuries, noon game, trap game, etc.....use whatever makes you feel in tune....I am clueless.....I don't know what really happened other than we lost......Gotta get back in sync and build up the adrenalin for the ramblin' wreck.....