
For the first time in four years Virginia Tech basketball is relevant in late February. With postseason aspirations and a nose toward a .500 conference record, the Hokies came into Sunday night's game against Wake Forest with serious goals.
And in their 81-74 win over the Demon Deacons in the Lawrence Joel Veterans Memorial Coliseum, Tech kept everything within reach. They improve to 8-8 in the ACC with two more to play and beat a struggling Wake team, a necessity to keep their slim chance at the NIT alive.
Justin Bibbs jolted his guys early on with 11 points in the first eight minutes of play, resuming his familiar tormenting of the group in gold. Bibbs finished with 22, bringing his scoring total to 54 in two games against the Deacs this season. Guards Seth Allen and Justin Robinson threw in 14 apiece, and Zach LeDay locked up the result at the free throw line down the stretch.
It was another confident victory for the Hokies on the road, their second in a row away from Blacksburg, and another step forward in the progression of the Buzz Williams era. It's one thing to beat Boston College in their place on a sleepy Tuesday, but in the Joel on senior night? It was a hostile environment, and it was handled well by the youngsters.
"As the month has played itself out, I think that we're playing better," Williams said. "I think that they're playing for one another more. I think they better identify the recipe from which we have to play. I think they're more accepting of the negative margin that we have to start with. I think that all of those things are good signs relative to our maturity."
It wasn't all sunshine and warm feelings, however. The Hokies failed to take command for the first 20 minutes, running sloppily with their equally careless opponent. Even up seven at one point in the first half, turnovers and bad shots let the lead slip away almost as fleetingly as it came.
But as simple as it may seem, Tech was just the better team as time wore on. The Demon Deacons evened the score at 44 with 14 and change to go, and never got as close again. Bibbs and company scored a few quick baskets, were up nine just a few moments later and never looked back.
Now sitting at 16-13, they head back to Cassell Coliseum with two more to play. First up, a rematch against Pittsburgh on Wednesday and then a second showing against Miami to finish off the year.
To be more than a NIT afterthought, the Hokies probably need to win one of those, a tall task considering they already lost to each by sizeable margins. But a goal can only be achieved one step at a time, and without a positive result on Sunday, the rest of the schedule is irrelevant.
Anything Buzz and his staff want to accomplish between now and season's end is still in play, in large part because they've taken care of business against the bottom of the league. And with their game in Winston-Salem, they look ready for a larger test.
A few quick thoughts
Allen and LeDay may be the present, but Robinson and Chris Clarke are the future. The duo plays fast on both ends, gets out and run when they can, but also play within a halfcourt offense. The best part about watching them as freshmen is they get to figure things out without major ramifications on their minutes.
Clarke may not have had an overly impactful performance in the box score, but his energy and movement was too much for Wake to handle. One of his baskets came off his own miss where he landed, jumped back up faster than anyone else, and got a hand on the ball for a tip in. His shot's still in need of major renovations, but he can still make the defense worry without one.
And Robinson added another entry in his case to become the starting point guard until his eligibility runs out. He's active with and without the ball, and has become a confident shooter, especially in giant moments. He has a cool control over everything, and while his assist numbers aren't high, he still has a hand in the outcome of most possessions.
Bibbs scored 22, but only hit a trio of threes. He was aggressively looking for his shot, got into the paint and caused problems, drew a few fouls and was the best player on the court for long stretches. It's nights like this that make me want to shake him, why can't he always play like this?
"As the season has played itself out, I'm not as concerned with Bibbs as maybe I should be," Williams said. "He's the most offensive efficient player we have. He's the most defensive efficient player we have. He's never, ever, ever going to play out of the scouting report. I don't know that I take him for granted, but I don't ever even want to sub him."
And maybe it's who he is. A guy who'll do a lot of things right, always helps the team, but will never take over three or four times in a row. There's absolutely nothing wrong with it, but selfishly I want more.
These schools were in the exact same spot two years ago, stuck on the underside of the ACC elite like gum on a shoe. Both were in major need of a revamp (Tech having never recovered from the Seth Greenberg firing, Wake after living through four seasons of the terrible Jeff Bzdelik), and both looked for young coaches to reenergize their programs.
Danny Manning won five conference games in his rookie campaign, a nice start to build on. Williams, as we all know, watched his group struggle as their talent deficit was too large to overcome almost every time out. Going into 2016, if you were to make a bet as to which one was going to vie for a mid-tier spot and first round bye, it probably wouldn't have been Buzz. Yet here he is, as we watch his guys grow whenever they hit the floor while Wake has the same issues they've had for the last half decade.
This isn't necessarily a condemnation on the job Manning's done in Winston-Salem, it's more so an acknowledgement of one of the most important steps on Tech's path to relevancy. If they ever want to head back to the NCAA bubble, the Hokies have to be better than all the other teams rebuilding around them. They need to develop faster than Wake, BC or Georgia Tech, and leap into the Florida State/NC State/Clemson zone of the standings (where bids to the dance can be found once in awhile).
And it looks like it's happening. Buzzketball is growing faster than anyone, possibly even Williams himself, could have anticipated.
"I think what is healthy is to improve, to not be satisfied, to not be content," Williams said. "I'm very transparent with them. I tell them where we're at. I tell them what's happening within the league. I don't know that that's necessarily the right thing for a coach to do, but within our culture, team rule number one is: Always tell the truth, no matter your emotional state. Secrets are lies. That's team rule number one, so I just tell them the truth."
It's impossible to say what will come, because the future tends to throw curveballs to a program on the rise. But with the a little luck and the continuation of what's currently cultivating, the job Buzz and his staff are doing is impossible to ignore.

Comments
You know, I could learn to like this Buzz guy. Most amazing turnaround in Va Tech sports in many years. Basketball is fun again!
He's definitely worth his oats.
Way to go Hokies! It was a great win, Congrats. Wow, a bye in the first round, let's keep it going. It's great to see a team play like a team, all paying 100% regardless of when they get in the game. The team if definitely buying in on Coach's philosophy and it's wiring.
When we were struggling early in the season, Buzz was a lot more animated. I miss that (and the new clothes in the 2nd half), but not losing games.
Let's Go, Hokies!
I was very proud of the way the boys played last night. WF on Senior night is a tough place to play. VT fought through the early sloppy play and in the end they came out on top. Last year this team would have lost but they are definately on the right path. I say we just win the ACC tournament just to bust up Joe Linardi's bracket. Why not, let's have fun!
Was at the game, and it was as full as I've seen it for a Wake game when not full of away fans. Good Tech crowd, as was commented upon by several of the coliseum employees I talked to. The company doing the event did VT football this year, and a parking lot attendant who worked the cage for football said we were the best fans he'd seen. However, it was a not a tough crowd to play in front of. The student section only got to their feet twice all game, when it was tied, and sat right down and shut up when we scored. Overall the crowd was louder against the refs than for their team. We looked like the better team all game, and the crowd was out of the game early and stayed there. I'll take the road win, but had to be one of the friendliest road games
My ultimate goal at the season was a ~.500 record and a shot at the NIT. We secured a regular season winning record last night and if we can win one of two this week we'll have a .500 ACC record. Great stuff. I'm already excited for next season. Here's to pissing some off in the ACC Tournament!
We have momentum and two home games remaining. If we win both of those games and things break right we could even make our way to a 6 or 7 seed in the ACC tournament. How about that?
Had the good fortune to score free tickets to last night's game for REALLY good seats. Being down on the sideline, and really watching these kids up close it is very easy to see that that they have turned a corner in how they play together.
I'm not going to make too much out of beating BC and Wake this year, but these are two games that the Hokies probably would have split 1-1 last year. With the way they seem to be gelling, there could be a couple of surprises this week and next, and certainly next year these guys are going to be dangerous.
FTFY
As an indication of how difficult it has been for the Hokies to win on the road, this team has more road (not neutral site) wins this year than the previous 3 seasons combined.
2014-2015 - VT had 0 road wins,
2013-2014 - Only beat Miami on the road,
2012-2013 - Only beat UNCG & GT on the road.
I know it's only year two for Buzz and that this early success is probably causing me to jump the gun, but forget FSU/NC State/Clemson. We're already in that zone of the standings and now I want more. If UVA can do it, so can we.
Hoping we catch Pitt on a bad day. They lost to NC State by 17 at home, but also just destroyed Duke and did the same to us earlier in the season. Cassell should be rocking Wednesday!
We need to beat Pitt, I will be pumped, but I don't see us beating Miami.
Hope the Cassell is packed for both. It needs to be to show support for this team down the stretch and into the ACC tourney.
And....
We get a 1st round ACC tourney bye! How long has it been since we could say THAT!
as nice as that is, I think it would help us more if we advanced to the second round instead of just getting a bye.
How so? It probably would've had a negative effect on the RPI, especially if VT played BC (RPI = 238). NIT probably wouldn't really care about a win against a cellar team. They would sure as hell care about a loss.
Good point. I was thinking more along the lines of getting another game in, notching another win, winning convincingly even if it's against a crap team, entering the 2nd round with some momentum, etc. But yes, I can see how someone might see it as a lose-lose situation (see: playing ECU from here to eternity)
To be fair, this 1st round bye isn't what a "1st round bye" used to look like. Nevertheless, a huge accomplishment for this program.
I had no doubts. I believe they can nab 1 (maybe BOTH) of the following games. We owe da U some serious payback.
Buzz doing good things, keep it up!
While its going to be nice to have the first round tourney bye, our success may end up hurting us in the short term, at least as to whether we make the post season. We have a tough task the next two home games, and unless we play dramatically different basketball, we likely have two losses ahead of us, which would put us at 16-15, 8-10 on the year going into the tournament. By getting that first round bye, we lose a potential game against a bottom feeder before playing in the second round. We still should get someone ranked below us in the first game we play in the ACC tourney but after that it will be uphill opponent wise barring other upsets. Any hope for an NIT bid likely means we need to get to 18 wins which rests on either winning 1 of our remaining home games and the first game we play in the tournament, or probably needing to win two games in the tourney if we lose the next two home games.
As was mentioned above, Pitt just demolished Duke 76-62. Miami has to come in to play us after knocking heads with Notre Dame on Tuesday, so they may be a bit beat up after that matchup. Either way, it would be better to find a way to win one of these games. Also keep in mind that Pitt is a bubble team for the tournament so they will likely have that to play for. Miami is squarely in the tourney, just fighting for seeding at this point.
With two losses, we won't be playing someone below us. 11-14 winners play 5 and 6 respectively.
Looking at all the possibilities for the rest of the season, i think the most likely is that we and Clemson end up 8 and 9 and play each other. We hold the tie breaker, if head to head is the tie breaker, against Clemson, FSU and GT. Even if we lose both games, we end up ahead of GTor FSU for 9th seed, which means we play the 8 seed, most likely Clemson, if Clemson loses to UVA and beats BC. Syracuse is a possibility if they lose to UNC and FSU on the road. I thnk PItt is also a possiblity if they lose to us and GT and Clemson beats BC. Or I could be way off base. This is too complicated.
We all know this already. But have we seriously thought about this: what if our 3 best players this year (LeDay, Allen, Bibbs) aren't even our 3 best players next year? What if it's Clarke, Outlaw, and Hill? I'm not as big on Hill as everyone else, but I don't doubt that he's good and could be that good next year. This is a nearly .500 team in ACC play and overall that has good guard and forward play for the most part led by 3 guys who could start on every team in the ACC. But next year they might not be leaders on this team.
It's also possible that Hamilton may take a step up next year.
Hill shot 38% from 3, was a lock down defender, rebounded and brought Chris Clarke type energy to the floor.
Before the season, Donlon told me that Hill had worked all summer to become a good ball handler and knockdown shooter. He described Hill as a brand new player, and would be miles ahead of where he was as a freshman. Donlon was pretty spot on with his prediction with Blackshear's impact, so I trust his judgement
Yeah, I think we all will be shocked at how good Med Hill is next year. He will be the best player on the team, a team full of good players.
Not quite #roadwarriors yet, but winning on the road against bad teams (BC, WF) is a step towards beating good teams on the road, which is a step toward an RPI high enough to make the NCAA tourney! This team has developed quite a bit since the start of the season.
This is entirely hypothetical and just for fun, but given this situation what happens?
Beat Pitt and Miami (probably results in a 7 seed)
Make the ACC tournament finals and lose
That would put us at 21-14 with a 10-8 conference record. Our quality wins would be UVA, Miami, and Pitt in the regular season. If we make the conference final we would also have wins over 2 of the top 4 teams (Duke, UVA, UNC, Miami). The only bad loss would be Alabama State. RPI would probably get a jump up to around 60 with those wins. SOS at 76 isn't horrible (and with those games will likely go up).
So that would be our tournament resume. Can they keep that team out? Right now we're 1-7 against the top 25, but after the games I listed we'd be probably at 4-8. I know it's not likely, or even somewhat possible, but it's always fun to look at hypotheticals.
So for fun, in that scenario Tech would probably be either the 8 or 7 seed in the ACC. Let's just say they're the 8 (with a tiebreaker over Clemson but not over Pitt or Cuse). They'd play Clemson, probably UNC, and then either Duke or Notre Dame.
According to RPI Wizard (a pretty reliable calculation tool), Tech would be 21-14 with a 67 RPI after beating those three teams and losing to Virginia in a hypothetical final. Not good enough still to make the dance, but somewhat similar to Maryland's run in 2013 (who almost made the final as the 7 seed). They'd have to win the whole shebang to go, but it's still fun to simply be able to have the conversation.
RPI isn't the say all end all. Getting hot and passing the eyeball test means something too. Also, we have some unused karma that we need to cash out. Not saying we'd be getting in, but say going 7-1 to close the season, beating Pitt, Miami, Clemson, UNC and playing a Duke/ND close, heaven forbid winning, I think you give the committee something to think about.
Regardless, our OOC schedule would ultimately be our downfall. Setting aside our neutral-site victory over UAB (24-5, Conference USA Regular Season champs), we simply didn't beat anyone good in November or December.
As we've seen in years past, that's too much for the committee to ignore.
Yeah, even if you add a few conference tourney wins this isn't a resume that gets you off the bubble.
Change the losses to Alabama St., Northwestern, and Notre Dame to wins, and then you have a shot. If this win out until ACCCG scenario goes through we have to be considered somewhat but it still wouldn't be enough. Those 3 games, losses to an awful team at home, a middling team at home, and a chance to beat a top 25 team on the road, hurt our chances the most.
I still hate the non-conference schedule argument the committee made that year while letting in a VCU team with a worse non-conference schedule than us. And for whoever is going to say it, just because they made the Final Four doesn't mean they had any business making the tournament.
While we didn't beat anyone other than UAB, our schedule wasn't entirely horrible. We played Iowa State, St Joes, WVU. Usually the rest of the schedule is made up of somewhat local teams after that anyway.
We're not a horrible efficiency team (around 80th on both offense and defense). I don't think this team passes the eye test however, and whether or not someone is a tournament team is completely subjective.
Let us dream guys.
Gotta beat at least one of those teams, can't get creamed by all three
...and we'd get to watch Seth Greenberg's head literally explode when they announced VT in the tourney :-)
Let's just win the ACC. Then nothing matters.
I like the way you think, I'll just add to the dream scenario that Buzz leads us to ACC Championship Glory with win over UVA in DC.