BCS Primer - Week 1 of the BCS Standings

The season's first BCS rankings have been released, and I figure if TheKeyPlay.com has any chance to become a dominant force in the college football blogosphere it's about time for us to start talking about bowl games and who's going to square off in the BCS Championship Game.  Let's face it: it's mid-October, we're halfway through the college football season, and the Hokies are bowl-eligible for their 19th straight year.  We're late to the game!  ESPN.com has had their bowl projections going since ... well, I think they've had them since January.

Seriously, though, I think there's alot of confusion among the casual football fans (and even among some of the serious college football fans) about how teams are selected by the BCS Bowls.  I'm actually writing this post so my Hokie brethren will enjoy a leg-up during the second half of the season when they're talking with their uninformed friends about who's going to which BCS bowl.  I hope this post sheds some light on the "rules" that determine who's eligible for a BCS bid at the end of the season.

Everyone knows that the top 2 teams ranked by the BCS will face off in the BCS Championship game - this year it's hosted in New Orleans on January 9th.  Most people also know that the Big Ten & Pac-12 champs are slotted in the Rose Bowl, the Big 12 champ goes to the Fiesta Bowl, and the ACC champ slides into the Orange Bowl.  What many people don't understand are the nuances of the qualification process for teams that aren't champions of those conferences.  For the full details of what I'm about to go through, you can read the BCS Selection procedures at BCSFootball.org.

What I'm going to do is go through the selection process as if the season ended today using the freshly released BCS standings.

First off, a reminder of the BCS formula: the rankings are based the equally-weighted average of (1) the USA Today Coaches Poll, (2) the Harris Interactive College Football Poll, and (2) a computer average consisting of 7 computer rankings.  Most of you already know this, and I won't dwell on how the BCS rankings are calculated, so let's take a look at this week's rankings:

2011 BCS Standings - Week 8, Oct 16

Rank Team BCS Avg Conf
1 LSU 0.9522 SEC
2 Alabama 0.9519 SEC
3 Oklahoma 0.9301 B12
4 Oklahoma State 0.8568 B12
5 Boise State 0.8027 MWC
6 Wisconsin 0.7708 B10
7 Clemson 0.7582 ACC
8 Stanford 0.7484 P12
9 Arkansas 0.6263 SEC
10 Oregon 0.6190 P12
11 Kansas State 0.5688 B12
12 Virginia Tech 0.5048 ACC
13 Nebraska 0.4972 B10
14 South Carolina 0.4914 SEC
15 West Virginia 0.3730 East
16 Michigan State 0.3288 B10
17 Texas A&M 0.3074 B12
18 Michigan 0.2995 B10
19 Houston 0.2863 CUSA
20 Auburn 0.2645 SEC
21 Penn State 0.2311 B10
22 Georgia Tech 0.1968 ACC
23 Illinois 0.1516 B10
24 Texas 0.1348 B12
25 Washington 0.0871 P12

LSU, Alabama, and Oklahoma are clearly in a class of their own and are in the driver's seat to play for the BCS Championship.  LSU and Alabama are both in the SEC West and face each other in a division game on November 5th.  Should they both continue to play at the level they have been thus far, that matchup will likely be the defacto SEC championship game.

Now that we have the rankings, let's pretend the season ended today and figure out who would be going to what BCS bowls.

NOTE: For the purposes of this exercise I'm going to have make an assumption about the Alabama/LSU game, as it will be virtually impossible for them to meet the BCS Champaionship Game.  Since they're in a virtual tie for first, I'm going to assume that Alabama beats LSU because the game is in Tuscaloosa, and that the top of the standings will look like:

  1. Alabama
  2. Oklahoma
  3. LSU
  4. Oklahoma State
  5. Boise State

If the game was in Baton Rouge, I'd assume the Tigers would be the victor in this situation.

With that in mind, let's move onto the qualification process.

Automatic Qualifiers

According to the rules, there are six ways teams can automatically qualify for a BCS bowl:

  1. The top two teams in the final BCS Standings shall play in the National Championship Game.
    In this hypothetical, that would be Alabama and Oklahoma, who we'll assume to have won the SEC and Big 12, respectively.
  2. The champions of the Atlantic Coast, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12, and Southeastern conferences will have automatic berths in one of the participating bowls through the 2013 regular season
    Taking the highest ranked teams from those conferences, you end up with Clemson, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Oklahoma, Stanford, and Alabama.
  3. The highest ranked champion of Conference USA, MAC, Mountain West, Sun Belt, or WAC if that champion is (a) ranked in the top 12 or (b) ranked in the top 16 and is ranked higher than a champion of one of the 6 auto-bid conferences mentioned in rule 2.
    In this case, Boise State is ranked 5th, and thus would automatically qualify for a bid.
  4. Notre Dame will have an automatic berth if it is in the top eight of the final BCS Standings.
    I just scanned the BCS standings twice, I see neither the word Notre nor do I see the word Dame in the top 25, let alone the top 8.  Let's move on.
  5. If any of the 10 slots remain open after application of provisions 1 through 4, and an at-large team from a conference with an annual automatic berth for its champion is ranked No. 3 in the final BCS Standings, that team will become an automatic qualifier.
    We still have 3 open slots, and LSU is (hypothetically) ranked 3rd.  They are an automatic qualifier.
  6. If any of the 10 slots remain open after application of provisions 1 through 5, and if no team qualifies under paragraph No. 5 and an at-large team from a conference with an annual automatic berth for its champion is ranked No. 4 in the final BCS Standings, that team will become an automatic qualifier.
    EDIT: This rule doesn't apply, because LSU automatically qualified under rule 5.

At this point, we have 9 8 teams automatically qualifying for a BCS bid:

Hypothetical Automatic Qualifiers

Team Conf. Qualification Reason
Alabama SEC Ranked 1st**
Oklahoma Big 12 Ranked 2nd**
Clemson ACC BCS Conference Champ
West Virginia Big East BCS Conference Champ
Wisconsin Big Ten BCS Conference Champ
Stanford Pac-12 BCS Conference Champ
Boise State Mtn West Highest ranked non-AQ in top 12
LSU SEC BCS Conf team ranked 3rd**

** NOTE: If you're confused by this, re-read my assumptions listed above.

At-large eligibility

There are two spots available for an at-large team in this situation.  The short version of the rules for the pool of teams a bowl may choose, should they choose an at-large team:

  1. Team must have 9 or more wins.
  2. Is ranked in the top 14.
  3. Must not be the 3rd team from a conference.  (eg: The SEC has 2 automatic qualifiers, so none of their other teams are eligible for at-large selection.)

Assuming they'd meet the first requirement, our eligible at-large pool includes: Oklahoma State, Oregon, Virginia Tech, and Nebraska.

Team Selection

At this point, we have our available teams and the BCS bowls can begin selecting from them after the following automatic assignments:

  • Alabama and Oklahoma to the BCS Championship Game.
  • Clemson to the Orange Bowl
  • Wisconsin & Stanford to the Rose Bowl.

Because the Sugar Bowl lost the SEC champion (Alabama) to the Champsionship Game, they get to select a replacement team first.  Let's assume they take LSU, as it's the obvious choice.

Likewise, because the Fiesta Bowl lost the Big 12 champion (Oklahoma) to the Championship game, they get to select a replacement team.  Given the available teams (West Virginia, Boise State, and someone from the at-large pool listed above), I think the Fiesta would take Oklahoma State, Boise State, or Nebraska.  The more obvious selection is Oklahoma State, although I think they'd seriously consider Nebraska or even Boise.  Let's assume they take the Cowboys so that they have a Big 12 team coming to Glendale, Arizona.

At this point, we have 7 of the 10 slots filled through automatic berths and BCS Championship Game replacements.  The Sugar, Orange, and Fiesta Bowls each all have one open slot, and that is the order they'll fill their open slots this year.

Given the draw of Husker Nation, and the fact that LSU & Oregon already played this season, I would surmise that the Sugar Bowl would select Nebraska from the at-large pool to play LSU.  (Remember, Nebraska is a Big Ten school this year.)  Could you imagine the ratings for a Nebraska/LSU match-up in the Sugar Bowl?  That would be one of the most compelling bowl match-ups outside of the BCS Championship Game.

Since the Sugar went to the at-large pool, the Orange and Fiesta Bowls must choose between West Virginia and Boise State, as they're both automatic qualifiers and there are only two open slots left.

While West Virginia would bring more people than Boise to Miami, the Orange already has a great travelling fan base in Clemson.  I bet they'd go for TV ratings and take Boise State, leaving the Fiesta Bowl with West Virginia.  (Note: Let's say a smaller fanbase wins the ACC, say Georgia Tech or Wake Forest, though both of those don't look like likely title contenders right now; the Orange would definitely grab West Virginia in that situation.  I just think Boise vs Clemson would be a sexier matchup for TV.)

Projected BCS Matchups

BCS Champ Game Oklahoma Alabama
Rose Bowl Wisconsin Stanford
Fiesta Bowl Oklahoma St West Virginia
Sugar Bowl LSU Nebraska
Orange Bowl Clemson Boise State

I hope this helps shed light on the BCS selection process, and I hope it wasn't too hard to follow.  The BCS procedures are a bit convoluted, but there is a certain method to its madness.  If TKP readers are interested, perhaps I'll do these projections each week after the BCS rankings come out, using the guidelines dictated by the BCS folks.

EDIT: Thanks to pianobadger on reddit to pointing out my mistake on the 6th auto-qualification rule. I have made edits to the post to correct this.  I originally had Oklahoma State as an automatic qualifier at #4.  Any redditors who read this should throw some karma pianobadger's way.

Tags: 

Comments

No option left

VT has to win the ACC to get in the BCS. A match-up with WVU or a rematch with Boise? A lot can and still will happen to mix this all up.

For VT, I think that's true.

Yeah, I think the only way we're going to a BCS bowl is to win the ACC. I think there's an outside shot we can lose a close one at Georgia Tech and be eligible as an at-large 10-win team, but that doesn't mean we'd get selected.

A lot can and still will happen to mix this all up.

Abso-friggin-lutely. Don't take these "projections" as a prediction of what will happen. I did this only an exercise as if the season ended today.

EDIT: Meant to be in reply to jmichons.

No, we can't lose to GT to be eligible for an at-large spot.

Even a close loss to GT puts us out of the top 14 and we won't meet the requirements. The only loss we can take and even still be considered eligible is a loss in the ACCCG.

It'll be close.

I did say it would be an outside shot. I get your point, though.

My thinking is that in order for us to have a shot at an at-large bid as a 2-loss team is that our 2nd loss needs to come earlier, and I think we might be able to overcome a close loss on the road in Atlanta to make it back into the top-14.

Regardless of to whom & when we lose, even if we are in the top-14 as a 2-loss team, we're going to be hard pressed to get an at-large bid. There will likely be bigger named teams in the at-large pool that will draw better TV ratings, so I think this point it moot.

I was not criticizing

Understood that this is the latest snapshot. I probably didn't need to state the obvious. Always love/hate the surprizes that college football throws our way. I want to see some love for VT.

Conference Championships are key

The at-large bids are all going to hinder on the conference championships, especially considering the PAC-12 and B1G will have their first this year.

The last AT-LARGE bid will most likely be a battle between PAC-12, B1G, and the ACC, since the SEC and Big-12 will most likely have 2 teams in.

Conference championship scenarios are too early to predict, but it will basically boil down to 1)was there an upset and thus a team such as ASU or MSU steals the AT-LARGE bid 2) if no upset, who is the best 1 or 2 loss team.

I don't think VT will be the best 2 loss team, with Stanford and Oregon both looking strong in the PAC-12. It doesn't help that the Cardinal and Ducks are in the same conference and thus only one of them will be in the conference championship.

VT has 2 ways into the BCS: 1) win the ACCCG 2) end the season with 2 losses and watch the epic collapse of OSU, Stanford, Oregon, and Wisconsin each having 3 losses. If VT loses to GT and doesn't play in the ACCCG, VT will probably also need GT, K-state and Nebraska to lose 3 games as well.

It's pretty much Orange Bowl or bust. Clemson has a much better shot at the AT-LARGE, as a 1-loss Clemson is probably only beat by a 1-loss Stanford and 1-loss Wisoconsin.

wow

That's the dumbest load of crap I ever read (the BCS, not HokieV's analysis). Top 8 teams by final poll--choose whichever one you want--play each other in a playoff. Period.

BC$ = Bull C**p Series

Bowl Chamionship Series is an oxymoron. Neither a Championship nor a series. But to get the money you have to play the game. I would love to see it change but powerful interests who benefit from the current system haven't found a way to guarantee benefits from a playoff system.

BCS with 2 ACC teams

I'd like some ACC representation in the BCS. If VT goes 11-1, they will likely rise to about #8 right behind Clemson (if they go 12-0) due to other teams losing (KSU, Arkansas, Oregon/Stanford at least). If Clemson loses a close one to VT, they'll likely barely fall (no further than #12). Then it's up to who the bowls would like to see in their matchups. It's not likely it falls together like this, but this would be the best opportunity for the ACC to finally prove to be relevant nationally. Of course VT/Clemson would have to show up for the bowls, so it's also a chance to fall further I guess.

Pianobadger from reddit brought up a good point:

If LSU gets a spot under condition #5, then condition #6 is void and there are 8 at large bids. I'm sure OSU being ranked #4 would still get a spot, but they wouldn't be AQ.

Damn, good catch.

I totally missed that.

But yeah, Oklahoma State would be apart of the at-large pool instead of being an autoqualifier. I don't think it would change much here, but I'll make an edit to reflect this.