The Gap Defense: When Gaps Go Wrong.
Thanks everyone for the great comments and questions on my first edition of "French on the Bench". Many of you asked what causes the defense to be ineffective against different teams, and it is very difficult to address all the reasons because of the different styles of offense. So, I will take a moment to look at the new Clemson offense and try to explain why the Hokies struggled against it last year.
Clemson runs the Urban Meyer spread, a version of the old Single Wing. The Single Wing is predicated on motion, misdirection, play-action, and forcing a defense to commit, and then going somewhere else with the football. It uses a very small number of plays, but each play serves as a direct counter to the others.
Clemson's base bread and butter play for their offense is the buck sweep. It looks similar to an old power sweep, but it is meant to be a kick out play that creates a seam off the tackle. The quarterback bootlegs off the hand-off, which serves as a counter action that must be accounted for (as Tech defended it with the stud end).
1:36:52–1:37:16
The Hokies attempted to defend the buck sweep, as they did most of the game, with a nickel look. That means no whip, Kyle Fuller at nickel corner, and Cris Hill coming off the bench. On this play, Fuller has man responsibility on the H-Back, who motions from the slot to a wing position. Fuller follows him across the formation.
Clemson's wide splits make it difficult for the Hokies DL to stunt to their assigned gaps, leaving them vulnerable to down blocks. At the snap, Clemson's right guard and the H-Back pull to the left. The center blocks down back on the nose (Luther Maddy), who gets too far upfield and does not control the 0-gap. Gayle can't pursue down the line because he has to account for Tajh Boyd on the bootleg.
On the playside, the left guard blocks down on Derrick Hopkins, getting an advantageous angle on Derrick as he moves to his left to secure the 1-gap. Derrick ends up getting blown out of the hole as he attempts to cross the guard's face back to the play. The left tackle blocks down on Jack Tyler, who attempts to pursue through the 5 gap, but finds himself right on the tackle's railroad tracks. He gets blown up. The tight end does a veer release and option stalk blocks the rover (Exum), who before the snap is lined up almost of the line of scrimmage, but backpedals when he sees Allen release. He is moving backwards with Allen moving forwards... that's never a good mixture when trying to beat a block against a bigger stronger player. JR Collins crashes inside to take on the pulling guard and does a decent job, but because gap integrity has been lost inside, there is a huge hole for the running back to cut inside of the guard's block. Edwards has the gap outside of Collins, but by covering that gap, he takes away the only unblocked player in the front seven who can scrape to get Ellington. The H-Back, who now doesn't need to block Edwards, turns upfield looking for a safety or some kind of backside pursuit. The end result is a crushing 15 yard run on the first Clemson offensive play of the 2nd half, right up the gut. Here it is drawn out.

Now, Clemson has established that buck sweep, and the rest of that opening drive, they methodically moved down the field with a wide variety of misdirection. By the last two or three plays, Hokie defenders were looking into the backfield trying to find the football rather than aggressively securing their gaps. Clemson finishes the drive with the same offensive formation as the first play, but a simple pass pro with Allen breaking Bonner's ankles on a flag route for a touchdown finishes the drive.
Clemson then gets the ball back, and this time the play action comes into play.
1:50:17–1:51:00
The Tigers fake a sweep, and the Hokie defenders crash to the fake, including James Gayle, who has bootleg responsibility in the 6 gap. Tajh Boyd fakes, rolls away from the play, and then finds Watkins flying behind Chris Hill and Jack Tyler (what the hell is he doing 40 yards from the line???) for an easy touchdown. If Gayle doesn't bite on the fake, Boyd doesn't have time to roll comfortably and pump fake to sell the double move.
Now, can the Hokies stop this bread and butter look? Here is an example in the first quarter:
18:10–18:27
Tariq Edwards stunts to take the outside gap. The Hokies interior maintains their gap fits and Edwards holds up Ellington enough that he bounces outside, where the free safety Eddie Whitley makes the tackle. Still, even in this best case scenario, if your safeties have to make a bunch of tackles, that leaves you very exposed to play action. Simply put, Clemson presents a bad matchup for Virginia Tech's gap defense.
For those of you who have spoken with me since this game, you know that I think Clemson and Georgia Tech both present very unique challenges for the Hokie defense. I watched South Carolina stymie Clemson, but their success was more the result of bigger/stronger/faster DL beating up Clemson's OL than any scheme. In fact, Clemson was able to be successful running the ball, but was so ineffective in passing situations that they could not sustain drives. Short of simply manhandling the offensive lines of both teams in future games, Bud Foster's scheme will need to continue to evolve to handle both looks.

Comments
I watched
a handful of plays from the videos above and it seems that most plays we brought just 4 and got completely manhandled. The plays we brought extra blitzers which were few and far between we stopped the bleeding some why did we stop being aggressive was it the fear of getting burned deep because even when we dropped 7 into coverage we still got toasted. Im optimistic about the coaching moves as I trust Torian but from the selection above I really hope Bonner is going to play a lot more aggressive than he showed in the acccg
Great breakdown
Do you think Bud will have to change his bread-and-butter D (a la post 2003 insight bowl) to account for this? Or, perhaps he wants the Hands and Browns of the recruiting world to come to Tech so he can indeed blow up the Clemson OL?
Also, how did NC State beat Clemson then?
I have not watched the NC State game, but as I recall, NC State scored a ton of points. If you get ahead of Clemson, you take them out of their running/play action game, which really limits their offense. Clemson looked incredibly flat in that game as well. I will watch when I have a chance and try to offer feedback.
simplest
answer is boyd played like shit and they had under 50 yards rushing so play action that French mentioned goes out the window
That 50 yards rushing is a misleading stat as well. Clemson ran the ball well against the Gamecocks based on the film. However, Boyd was ineffective in the passing game thanks in a large part to an overwhelming pass rush. South Carolina also took an early lead, which forced Clemson into straight drop back passing. Sacks late in the ball game made the rushing total look worse.
I am researching defensive keys for beating this style of offense, but the fact is, it is the perfect style offense for countering what the Hokies do best. I think the biggest thing the Hokies can do is play well offensively and get a lead. That limits the variability of the offense so the defense can attack rather than read and react, and it keeps the defense fresh. It is worth noting that the Hokies did very little substituting against Georgia Tech's option and Clemsons misdirection because Bud Foster didn't trust his young players against those looks. Those kids will need to take the next step this year.
I was
referencing the 50 yards rushing total against nc state not south carolina. Regardless a key to stoping clemson as you have mentioned is stopping the sweep action runs to negate play action waggles and floods
The first play each video shows is what is referenced in the document. I think that the option/read component takes you out of a bunch of blitzes because the QB can read the blitz and option away from it. Up front, Clemson's scheme gives VT problems. While it doesn't fix everything, the defensive tackles must maintain gap integrity. If that doesn't happen, everything else falls apart. Clemson was even able to run effectively against South Carolina at times, who had a much more intimidating front than VT. In the back, talent won.
I know we don't always recognize this, but VT is still in rebuild mode talent-wise on defense. After the 04-06 bunch, there was a major drop off in defensive recruiting. The recruiting is now back on the upswing, but there isn't a top level recruit either starting or backing up in the secondary besides Manning. Elite corner recruits (which they have been able to snag) and defensive tackles (which hopefully Hand and Brown will start the trend) are the keys.
So what does this portend...
for our defense against the new kid on the block (Fedora@UNC)?
I apologize for the late response. I think the defensive performance against Michigan (two broken play touchdowns) against a much more dangerous running threat shows that the Hokies can win the battle up front. However, Clemson is so dangerous in the vertical passing game that it will be tough to give the same kind of run support and still be ok against the deep ball.
North Carolina has an offensive line and a QB who I think will adjust well. I formation blocking is similar, with lots of down blocking, double teams, and pulling. Renner isn't the athlete that Tajh Boyd is, but he is just as adept with ball fakes and bootlegging (which has given the Hokies FITS against UNC from the I.) I think the difference is that UNC doesn't have anywhere near the talent in the receiving core. If the Hokies can stop the run and finally figure out the UNC defense, that becomes a very winnable game.
WVa
I know Clemson had a few turnovers which opened the flood games in the OB, but what did WV do to stop them offensively too?
WVU struggled early on, but their 3 down linemen were much better in tying up blockers while not getting driven off the ball, and that allowed WVU's 3 linebackers and their hybrid OLB/safeties to fly around unblocked.
Also, Clemson was much more focused on running the veer dives from the Oregon version of the spread and stayed away from the more horizontal counter movement of the buck sweep series. The same holds true for the South Carolina game. It confuses me, because I think Boyd is much more comfortable where the back moves across his face so his eyes can stay down field, which works much easier with the back offset instead of deep.
If we beat Clemson, this will be my living room.
As for NC State vs Clemson, I am watching the highlights. It just looks like the NC State front destroyed Clemson rushing 4 and playing nickle. Plus, Clemson turned the ball over a bunch and NC State did whatever they wanted.
The Hokies inability to move the ball against that defense was just as big a disappointment.
Quote from a friend of mine who coaches high school offensive and defensive lines: "These stunts and slants have guys thinking about gap control. Adding the misdirection has guys thinking instead of playing football. I don't know if VT can do anything specific to stop it....other than whip the guy in front of them!"
After everything I have watched, the easiest solution is to be so good on offense that they get a lead, negating the run threat. Of course, that is VERY easy for me to say from behind this screen.
First play - is it just me or..
did Fuller completely overrun the play to his right? If he had filled up the middle instead of looping to the outside (he was expecting Ellington to bounce it outside I'd guess) he would've taken away Ellington's cutback behind Hopkins at the LOS.
I certainly agree that our defense struggles with against good opponents with gap-fit adjustments to motion and pulling blockers. Against lesser competition we win 1v1 battles too often for bad angles and an extra blocker to be too much of an issue.
In this case the right side of the defense had things bottled up yet Fuller sped across the formation as if the play was breaking to the edge. From the end zone camera its easy to see that Edwards and Collins had the defense's right flank sealed off. Edwards came clean to that gap and Collins was probably supposed to have inside leverage but got met by the pulling guard who kicked him out - right to where Edwards filled. So between the them the outside was taken away, and Ellington cuts back up the middle.
If the H-back had blocked Edwards, Ellington might have had a clear path to continue to the outside, but Tyler was riding his blocker to the outside (probably a failure on his part to maintain a gap in the middle) and the way the blocks were developing, the better option was up the middle, and Fuller should've recognized that his teammates had the outside covered and stayed at home in the middle.
I thought Collins did a decent job (although the technique that we were taught was to take on the pulling guard with the inside shoulder instead of facing the blocker.) If the Hokies were playing a base defense, Edwards would have been filling that inside gap. The call put him out of position, but even if he is inside Collins plugging up the hole, he wasn't the best at taking on OL one on one.
The damage was done when Hopkins was blocked. I can't understand what Derrick was doing on that play. He had an angle on his blocker, but the guard was not only on him quickly, but was able to turn him. That block guarenteed that barring a miracle play by Collins or Edwards, the play would go for a minimum of 6 yards. When you add Tyler and Maddy both getting driven from their gaps, it became a recipe for disaster. Fuller didn't help things either, but it is still a big game even if he makes the tackle.
of course, according to Kirky Herbstreit, it was all Collins fault.