I listened to and read quotes from all of Tech's media sessions this week. As someone on the outside of the program looking in, it's really the only way to take the pulse of the team. In my mind, the game against Duke will ultimately make or break the season, and it may say something about program's future. Our backs are firmly against the wall Saturday, and however unlikely, an ACC Championship is still within reach. It won't be, and bowl bid won't look promising, if we lose to Duke.
These are some quotes I found interesting and telling along with my thoughts.
Bud is getting the defense back to basics this week.
The early part of Virginia Tech's practice Tuesday focused all on tackling. Defenders rotated through three stations, one manned by defensive coordinator Bud Foster, one by defensive line coach Charley Wiles, one by defensive backs coach Torrian Gray.
Each had a different tackling drill -- wrapping up (Foster), shedding blocks (Wiles) and open field (Gray) -- all in an effort to correct the missed tackles and blown leverages against North Carolina last weekend.
"Normally when we do, that next game our execution and fundamentals are a lot better," Gray said.
It was a change of pace from the media's regular viewing session, which usually involves just position drills. After rotating the groups through the tackling drills for a period Tuesday, Foster called the defense together for a punishment drill. One by one he called players out for "loafs," having the entire defense do up-downs before sprinting off the snap 10 yards.
"We need the intensity level to be ratcheted up, obviously," Gray said. "We wouldn't be putting the emphasis on the start of practice like we're doing if we were satisfied with the way we're playing overall right now."
Missed tackles in the open field, unsecured gaps, blown coverages, basically a lack of defensive fundamentals have accounted for a slew of big plays conceded by the defense. As Antone Exum put it during the team's weekly presser, defenders need to stop playing "Hero Ball" and just do their job.
Shane got after the running backs too.
The defense wasn't the only group that ratcheted things up a little. The running backs were doing a modified bull-in-the-ring exercise, working on low pad level, with Shane Beamer commenting from the outside of the hula-hoop-like ring (he kept referring to players by their high schools). After Martin Scales and Joey Phillips had a punchless matchup, Shane remarked, "Y'all look like to old women."
The coaches calling guys out during practice, making them do up-downs before their seventh game of the season, not referring to them by name, emphasizing hitting, and letting the media see it all seems like an attempt to curb any egos into a team focus that's tougher and more sound.
Although, it's disappointing as hell to read the following.
Trey Edmunds stood up Scales on two occasions, drawing a, 'That's how they do it at Dan River" comment from Shane. He's definitely got some power.
There's no doubt in my mind Trey Edmunds could have helped this football team.
When asked if the strategy at beginning of the season was to run Logan less to save him some hits, Bryan Stinespring replied, "Early in the year we were running a little bit more option, and the ball was being dealt a little bit more." French harped on Logan missing the read on the zone option to start the season. He has gotten better at it, and Stinespring said they called more runs for Logan.
Going into the season the defensive line was a perceived strength. Rolling two-deep at every position, I expected them to set the tone upfront and provide a pass rush that would force quicker throws, which would make the job of the piecemeal secondary a bit easier. They haven't done that. Tech is T-96th in nationally with 8 sacks, and the defensive line has accounted for 6.5 of them (Wilson 2, Gayle 2, D. Hopkins 1.5, Roth 1). Wiles admitted the d-line is being content and not making enough plays.
But Wiles also expects more from a defensive line that was billed as the strength of this defense in the preseason. The only player he singled out for praise Tuesday was Gayle.
"I thought inside we've just got to get off more blocks. We've got to pitch more of a fit," Wiles said. "I don't think there was a bunch of loafs necessarily, but just don't be content with just winning your gap. We've got to chase it and fight. We're fighting for our lives, man, and you've got to play like that every play.
At defensive tackle, Wiles conceded sophomore Luther Maddy's play been hampered by an ankle injury and senior Antoine Hopkins was taking first-team snaps during Tuesday's practice. "Since Georgia Tech, I haven't seen the same guy," Wiles said of Maddy.
To help address the issues inside, the Hokies used four defensive ends at times in Saturday's game, with redshirt junior J.R. Collins and sophomore Corey Marshall at defensive tackle and redshirt freshman Dadi Nicolas and Gayle on the edge. Wiles said the team plans on utilizing that lineup more in the future because of their ability to make plays on the perimeter.
And Wiles was as frank as ever.
Asked if he was shocked by the team's struggles, he said: "I never go into a game or into a year thinking I'm getting ready to get my ass beat. I don't take that approach. But I mean, I'm not saying I'm surprised. I'm disappointed. But the only way we can get it solved is this Saturday. We need to win the game this Saturday and we'll move on from there and get ready for another big game. I mean, every game down the stretch is a big game."
And everyone agrees.
Throughout the week the coaches were asked about the nickel package, and it sounds like we will see less of it. They essentially admitted it might have been too much for the defensive backs, three of which are playing new positions this season, to learn. In theory it's a great scheme, but we don't have the personnel to run it. There's no third corner coming off the bench, and Bonner isn't the same player in the roaming around the field as Kyle Fuller. The overuse of the nickel really baffles me because it takes Ronny Vandyke, one of the better playmakers and athletes, off the field, and puts Michael Cole, who plays hard, but has struggled, on it. Vandyke showed in August he could cover in man, and I'm happy we'll see more of a base look.
A lot of the problems this team has can't be solved in a week of practice. I don't expect the secondary to get better over night, and there's no switch to flip to make the guys on the interior of the o-line more fundamentally sound and cohesive. In my playing experience, from Pop Warner to high school, the coaches dogged us at practice when they felt like we weren't giving a maximum effort. I think that's the case here, a last-ditch attempt to turn it around before the season really spirals out of control. There is upside to the defensive line, the talent is there. Logan Thomas showed last season, and really the last six quarters this year that he can sling the ball around and stretch defenses. Knowles and Corey Fuller have stepped up and proved they are viable targets. All we can hope for is the players respond to the coaches' challenge, and the guys we know can make plays, make plays.

Comments
What I like to see
I'm glad the coaches are breaking it down to fundamentals and striving to get the most out of all the players.
""Normally when we do, that next game our execution and fundamentals are a lot better," Gray said." --> So do this every friggin week then coach!!
It's crazy to see players clearly not giving it everything the have on the field. It just can't understand it. With 3 loses already you'd think the players would be pissed and ready to start giving it their all... Hopefully we'll see that against Duke on Saturday.
I love that we're going back to fundamentals. We should practice them throughout each season and not just to try to turn things around. That's why they're called fundamentals. They're important.
On Edmunds, I think that he will help the team but that it was a good move to redshirt. He would have been stuck in a four back rotation if he played this season. But I believe he's going to be a big contributor against Bama next season.
About Knowles - he is going to be (and is) a stud for us. I mean, his first catch is a TD on a big play that we needed against GT, then he houses a kick against UNC? And he's only a freshman? I believe he's going to be our Sammy Watkins... Minus the suspensions for involvement with drugs.
He's housed two kicks, no? I
He's housed two kicks, no?
I agree, though, I really think he and Fuller ought to be out on the field more
I don't think so... Jarrett had a punt return against Pitt... That's the only other KR/PR TD I remember us having.
Oh, oops! You're right, of course
It's all good.
Edmunds is a tough call
Sure, it would have been better to play him, but would it have made any difference? I'm also glad he's redshirting, but if he's redshirting at RB instead of LB, he's still not in an optimal spot. I believe he could have been THE TAILBACK (TM) for this team, but with Reid and Harris coming in next year, I'm not sure we need him at TB anymore than we need him at LB. Here are the options for Trey Edmunds, in order of my perception of his effectiveness:
1. LB of the future, redshirt him this year and let him start platooning with Tyler next year at Mike.
2. TB of 2012. If we had played him to start the year, I believe he would have won the starting role by now. Then, going into next year, he would have been the returning starter and Harris/Reid/JCC would have been complimentary pieces. We could have redshirted Harris and/or Reid to space them out from Edmunds.
3. Redshirt this year, switch from TB to LB in the spring.
4. Redshirt this year at TB, August competition with Harris/Reid/JCC/Holmes for starter, move to LB if he doesn't win that job.
5. Redshirt this year at TB, August competition with Harris/Reid/JCC/Holmes for starter, stay at TB for 5-10 carries per game.
Depth
I agree that we need the depth at linebacker, but the guys you're talking about that will be coming in during the offseason (Harris, Reid) are just as unproven as the backs that we're playing right now.
Also, as many people have said on the site in various other posts on Edmunds, we promised him in his recruitment that we would give him a shot at tailback. That's why he's here. We at least have to give him the chance to win that job in the offseason and perhaps give him playing time. If not, he might transfer.
Joe, just tacking this on as well...
From this Roanoke Times article: http://m.roanoke.com/mapp/story.aspx?arcID=315220
"The coaches tried to instill that desire — or at least refresh it — in Tuesday's practice, where players went through hitting drills they hadn't done all season. Taylor said it used to be a given that they'd do those on a Monday after a poor tackling performance. He was glad to see the drills return, because he's seen them work."
Why haven't they done these drills til now? You wait until after the 3rd loss? I realize this is by far the worst defensive performance we've seen in quite some time, but they weren't without fault prior to this.
So confused...next thing you know I'll be seeing white helmets on Saturday...
Thanks, I meant to include this one too.
I can't remember another time when a position coach at Tech absolved his guys and passed the buck (to Newsome).
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/hokies-journal/post/virginia-techs-r...
In a way, I want to really think poorly of Shane this year.
but, then I remember four things:
1. He was dealt a crappy hand. Not only are these guys not experienced, the talent level is very poor. Holmes was handed the starting spot, he's in the Burnell/Oglesby category, not the Evans/Suggs category.
2. The OLine has been atrocious, even by VT standards. I mean, awful.
3. Hite is still there, its not like this is a "We lost Hite, and Shane can't coach RB's" situation. Somehow, we were able to reassign Hite to seemingly the same job he has always had. I'm shocked UVA et.al. aren't complaining to high heaven to the NCAA about us having too many coaches. Hite on the sideline seems like a sure sign of that.
4. Pretty much our entire future is wrapped up in Shane. Sure, maybe he's not the next HC, but he has the best (only?) direct link into creating true change in this football program. I know people complain about his coach speak, but he's creative, smart and willing to voice his opinion.
You're right about Hite. He's walking up and down the sideline with a headset on for chrissakes!
Desk job my ass.
"Why don't we spend more time on..."
The answer to these types of questions is almost always "20 hours a week". That's how much college football players get, if you don't cheat. So you don't do hitting drills until you really think you need it, because that takes time away from coaching up the young guys on zone coverages, and then you end up playing man most of the time because it's simple, and upperclass QBs eat your lunch. You run the middle drill because it promotes toughness, and then you have less time for your running backs to do blitz recognition and pass blocking. You do X, you can't do Y.
This is one of my major complaints about our practice of visiting pro teams in the offseason to pick up ideas. Something that takes 40 hours a week to master is useless if you only have 20.
That said, it was certainly time to spend time on this, because tackling is now a major pain point, but you don't get it free.
We need this one bad
This team needs all the confidence they can get to propel them the rest of the season. They need some big plays to go their way early and often. They need to feel the support of the fans so show up and be loud....Not to mention there will be some big time recruits there this weekend so yea we need to win badly.
What was the rest of the offense doing? Learning to block, I hope.
1) All of this should have been done after the Pitt game. And, make no mistake. Drills like tackling drills and bull in the ring are also about the players getting a chance to police guys who have not been pulling their weight. Imagine a football version of Private Pyle getting whacked with soap.
2) No discussion about kick offs. While Brooks Abbott may be a big fan of The Key Play (Thanks Brooks) Branthover got much more height on kicks. Low and short is a recipe for disaster on kickoffs, and UNC really exposed it.
3) It didn't make my film review, but Dadi Nicolas was a disaster against the run on Saturday. When I say disaster, I mean getting driven 20 yards backwards disaster. If he gets any meaningful work, it should be as a pass rush end on 3rd and long, ala Cols Colas back in the day (and boy they could use that pure edge rusher now.
4) The second that Edmunds redshirted, he should have been moved to defense. I don't care what was promised. If you believe in your backs enough to redshirt Edmunds, and you have more top recruits coming, play the kid at his best position. If he is the best back, HE NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN REDSHIRTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. What a waste!
Yep, this Edmunds thing is
...really frustrating. It just seems like we are destined to screw this up. I know its delicate, but the decisions we have made so far aren't eliciting much confidence. Either he's the best TB we have or he's not. And if he's not, he should move to LB because he's the best young LB we have.
Agree about the KO's. I thought moving up the line would create more of an opportunity to pooch it to the up man OR kick it out of the back of the endzone. One or another, don't line drive it to the goalline.
Just like punts, low comes back at you fast.
1. Agree 100%, and yeah, there's no hiding from bull in the ring. It gets everyone's blood hot, and the players on the team see who is dominate, who wants, and who doesn't.
2. I didn't know Brooks was a fan, that's pretty cool. I agree, Branthover is the better option now, but Brooks has nailed a couple of touchbacks, but stil,l why waste a year of eligibility? Let him get stronger and work on his technique.
3. Yup, he struggled, reminded me of a raw JPP for the Giants (on a bit of a smaller) scale. It's taken him every day of being in the NFL to learn to play the run. He'll get better. My guess is he's showing the coaches something in practice, to get on the field that quickly after being suspended. I think that says something positive about him, working hard and putting a dumb decision behind him.
4. I still disagree here. It *sucks* he can't help the team this season, but in the longterm it's the smarter move. He has two younger brothers, and one of the strengths of the program on the recruiting trail (since we don't have bagmen and all) is pitching integrity and keeping promises.