Boston College (Counter) Runs out of Virginia Tech's Bear Trap

Virginia Tech's defense almost locked down the Eagles' ground game.

Boston College QB Tyler Murphy runs with the ball. [Mark Umansky]

Early Monday morning, Daily Press columnist David Teel shared an alarming statistic. Bud Foster's defensive unit, which is traditionally one of the stoutest defenses against the run nationally, has allowed the most 20-plus yard runs in FBS this season.

According to Teel, in Tech's last three games, the Hokies defense has given up more yards rushing than the 2001 defense allowed all season (832 yards to 788). allowing almost six yards per carry. Even worse, Tech allowed an average 5.8 yards per carry against Pittsburgh, Miami and Boston College. That is unheard of for a defensive unit that dares opponents to throw the football by overwhelming the line of scrimmage with numbers.

So what has happened since the Hokies held Ohio State, one of the top rushing offenses in the country, to under 108 yards in a dominant defensive performance. Personnel is a huge issue. The lack of big, space eating defensive tackles put a burden on Chase Williams and Deon Clarke, two linebackers who thrive in space, in the position to take on and defeat blocks. In order to mitigate that issue, Clarke has spent much of the season playing in a 46 or a stand up-edge alignment in a Bear front. Up front, the injury to Luther Maddy has further forced Foster to abandon some gap fitting principles and instead shoot quick defensive tackles Corey Marshall and Nigel Williams through gaps in the hope of disrupting plays in the backfield before they can get downhill.

So far, this gameplan has produced a ton of negative plays, but has also resulted in huge gashing runs that have come at the worst possible times. Safety play has been a major culprit too. Regardless of what the Hokies front does, every defensive call features a collective of players creating a wall, an edge player to either force the running back inside or spill him to the outside, and an alley player who is unblocked and awaiting the back at the proper location. During this three game losing streak, senior safeties Kyshoen Jarrett and Detrick Bonner have found themselves alone in those alleys far too many times with little pursuit from the defense. On one play, one or the other will make a spectacular solo tackle. On the next, they take an abysmal angle, hesitate and grab air or just plain get run over. Bonner and Jarrett are both converted corners who were moved to safety to satisfy Bud Foster's desire to have five defenders capable of delivering solid man coverage on the field to combat spread offenses. But, while Jarrett was solid against the run for two seasons, both have been liabilities in run defense since injuries depleted the defensive front. It certainly didn't help Jarrett, Bonner, Clarke, or first time starter Andrew Motuapuaka against Miami when often both defensive tackles found themselves being driven into the second level time and again.

Adjustments for Boston College

Against the Eagles, Foster utilized the Bear front (three down linemen covering the gaps from guard to guard) and two edge players with Motuapuaka and Jarrett playing de-facto inside linebackers to stop the potent Boston College option attack. It was a very effective strategy against the option game, as Tyler Murphy did not break any big runs on an option play after an opening drive scamper down the right sideline. Despite looking a bit lackadaisical for long stretches, the Virginia Tech defense contained the Eagles most snaps.

The Bear front is designed to dedicate interior defenders to stopping the dive on option looks, while having defined edge players who have purely contain responsibility against the option. The assignments are simple.

  • Nose and three-technique players must control the gaps of the inside shoulder from left to right tackle.
  • The "Edge" defender aligns outside of the offensive tackle or tight end on the line of scrimmage standing up. They become the force/spill defender. A spill call means the edge defender crashes to the inside, and the alley player supports the run to the outside. More often, the wide alignment of the edge defender in the Bear front mandates a force call. On the force call, the edge player gets upfield and forces any run to turn inside of him, and the alley player fills the hole.
  • The mike linebacker should "stay clean" because the interior defenders occupy the inside gaps, freeing the mike to scrape to the football.
  • The safeties/alley players fill the alley created by the edge defender, inside or out. Most often the alley players are the rover and free safety, but certain alignments make the corner an alley player.

The Bear front is susceptible to the running game at one key area—off tackle. There is a large gap between the three-technique and the edge player. If a defense can make that bubble larger (by kicking out the edge player and getting an effective downblock against the three-technique) the alley player and mike linebacker has a more challenging situation to jam up the bubble.

To prevent the off tackle plays from being effective, the three-techniques must do one of two things: 1) physically dominate the space between the guard's inside shoulder to the inside shoulder of the offensive tackle, or 2) split the double team of the tackle and guard and try to make the tackle in the backfield. Without a big space eater like Luther Maddy, Bud Foster is forced to play the former, higher risk style. Ken Ekanem, Dadi Nicolas, and Nigel Williams, along with nose Corey Marshall, all work to shoot through the gaps unblocked and create chaos, because against a big power team like Boston College, Foster knows those smaller defensive linemen can't stand up to double teams all game long.

It was pure calculated risk-reward for Foster. If his interior defenders get into the backfield, the defense can generate negative plays that put Boston College into uncomfortably long down and distance situations. The Hokie defense generated nine tackles for a loss on Saturday as result of that strategy. However, when the interior linemen were not able to out-quick the Boston College blockers through the gap, often they were driven to the inside. This expanded the gap between the edge defender and the interior linemen, exposing the Hokie alley defenders in space time and time again.

To their credit, the Eagles found a way to attack that weak spot and improve their advantage with counter action off tackle. In both the Bear front and the base four-man look, the Hokie defensive line reads keys. If a blocker steps to the inside, the lineman either crosses the blocker's face or trails the play right off his outside hip. This technique is very effective against inside and outside zone reads, where the blocker's step takes you to the football. However, it makes a defensive tackle very susceptible to a down block by the adjacent blocker to the outside. Boston College's most consistently effective play all game long was designed to show the defense an outside zone read, with the back side linemen and the running back all going the same direction, while the Eagles would pull a lineman and the H-Back from the opposite side to kick out the defensive end and lead up on the alley player. It was truly a battle of attrition, with the Hokies defensive line slashing through down blocks to make tackles in the backfield on one play, followed by a gashing run for big yardage the next.

Let's watch two plays. The first highlights how the high risk approach was effective at disrupting Boston College. The second shows how, if that three-technique can't make the spectacular play, puts the edge and alley players in a very difficult position.

Against most of the option looks, the Hokies were able to get penetration and stuff Murphy. Here is an example. Boston College runs a veer dive with a wham block.

Dadi Nicolas is aligned as the three-technique and is presumably the optioned defender. He explodes up field and almost runs into the back and Murphy near the mesh point. Murphy pulls the ball, and Dadi wraps him up for a big loss.

Now, watch how that penetration backfires when Boston College runs the quarterback counter off the outside zone fake.

Boston College's left offensive tackle (No. 67) blocks down on Corey Marshall, who is attempting to shoot through the guard-tackle gap to the bottom of the screen. Nose tackle Ricky Walker beats the center cleanly, but is chasing the running back to the top of the screen. This creates a huge gap between Marshall and the edge defender Ken Ekanem. BC pulls two blockers from the right side. The first kicks out Ekanem, who is playing a force technique and must stay outside to prevent Tyler Murphy from breaking contain. Because of the alignment, Kendall Fuller and Kyshoen Jarrett both have inside alley responsibility, with Andrew Motuapuaka scraping across. Fuller is a mismatch against the second puller. Motuapuaka scrapes across, and the down blocking tight end just barely gets a piece of him to prevent him from getting square in the hole. Jarrett's angle is too wide to close the space, and Murphy gets a big run.

The Hokies stuffed most of Boston College's running playbook with the exception of the long touchdown run and the late quarterback draw, but the quarterback counter off the outside zone read action burned the defense again and again. Every time, the plays looked like carbon copies of each other.

Again, like Corey Marshall on the previous play, the interior lineman (Nigel Williams, 3-technique to the top) gets driven inside. The edge player (Nicolas) gets sealed outside by the pulling guard. Motuapuaka gets pancaked by the pulling H-Back, and there is no alley presence to help support the play.

Boston College had so much success on the counter off the outside zone that they caused the defense to key so much on it that the secondary completely lost the H-Back on the same play-action Y-dump pass that I highlighted in my preview.

Subtle Highlight of the Week

There's been so much negativity the last couple of weeks that I didn't want to end without recognizing a subtle great play by a real defensive standout this season, Corey Marshall. It is easy to recognize Marshall's speed and big play ability on the inside, but with his team wavering in the second half, Marshall made two huge, yet almost impossible to spot plays that helped give the Hokie offense a chance to find itself and get back into the game.

First, you can see Marshall takes on a double team. Instead of trying to shoot the gap with his speed, he gets low and stands both blockers up in the hole. Marshall isn't built to do this every play, but by sacrificing his body and eating up two blockers, Marshall prevents the tackle from sliding down to block Motuapuaka on the inside from being blocked. Motuapuaka makes the solid tackle in space, while Marshall doesn't get any credit from the statisticians or the fans. But, I guarantee Foster and Charley Wiles appreciate this kind of play as much if not more as the tackles for a loss.

Later in the same series, Marshall takes on another double team from the nose tackle spot.

Marshall splits the center and left guard, and those two kids are big, bad men. Marshall then makes the tackle for no gain. This is a combination of brilliant pad level and technique, coupled with outstanding effort at a critical juncture in the game. I am sure many of the defensive linemen have plays they'd love to have back, but plays like this from Marshall show me that the effort on this battered Hokie defense has not slacked off.

Comments

As soon as we took the lead 24-23, I thought, "we have this!" And as soon as we committed the defensive offside penalty, gave them 2nd and 1, and gave up with Y-dump pass (that I knew was coming because of your brilliant preview) I though, "oh no, we don't have this!" That penalty and play hurt us so bad.

Loved this review! It seems that every loss we have, one factor in the loss is the ability for the opponent's offense to exploit a small weakness in Bud's D. The counter runs here remind me of the counter runs PITT gashed us with in 2012. Against ECU it was the arm punts, numerous times it has been the QB runs. Usually Bud makes good in-game adjustments, but sometimes the adjustments come too late or the offense cannot do enough to keep up or overcome a deficit. I used to feel like Bud's halftime adjustments would mean shutting a team down in the second half. The last couple of years have felt different. French, do you think Bud has failed to make appropriate adjustments in some of the recent losses these past few seasons? Or maybe it is just that we haven't been as good overall the past few seasons, and our defense gets a bit worn down late in the game.

Those highlights of Marshall are awesome!! It is so cool to see a guy that recommitted himself play so well!

I think the problem is personnel issues/losses to injury have limited what Bud can do or forced him to do things he'd rather not do because he has few other options. French touches on this early in the article. I don't think it's a case of failing to make adjustments, but rather an inability to make the adjustments we'd like because we don't have the players to make them successfully.

Deposit whiskey, receive wisdom.

Correct. Bud is playing the hand he has. And, to some degree it has worked. The Hokies got the Eagles behind the sticks a bunch, which didn't happen often last season.

We are not harping on it this week if these negative plays caused turnovers. When you get 9 tackles for a loss and 3 sacks, you expect that the pressure will force some fumbles and interceptions. Credit Boston College for taking care of the football.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

Thanks! Yeah turnover margin has been disappointing this year, especially with the hype surrounding the secondary and the exciting speed/potential of the D-line. Not only credit BC for taking care of the football, but how about Pitt, Miami, and BC executing solid game plans and playing really sound and complete football.

The hype of the secondary was lost when fayson was lost for the season. Our defense requires perfect execution by every member. One weak link makes everyone look bad and reduces individuals opportunity to make game-changing plays.

As for the d-line, speed is great to make big plays (sacks, tackles for loss). But 220-270 vs 320 is a losing battle in the power running game. Losing big Lu was probably the nail in the coffin for this team. His ability to clog the middle and consistently take on double teams is greatly missed.

I love the analysis but I think it all comes down to recruiting and keeping 4* D-Linemen at their position. I believe Bud gets a little too caught up on speed and the "twitch" that he and Wiles talks about. A D tackle only has to run 4 to 10 yards which means you don't have to have a lot of speed. Sure they need to be able to get off at the snap but what is more important is not allowing themselves to get pushed back into the second level. D tackles job is to clog the middle and allow the linebackers to scrape and make tackles. If the tackle can get off blocks and disrupt plays is even better but I would settle for a tackle that commands two blockers (double teams) and has the ability to take away the middle leaving the offense having to run horizontal which would play into our fast linebacker/d backs strengths. Look at what the ECU tackle did to us! That dude was disruptive but even when we did block him we did not move him. He ate up the middle and commanded two linemen to block him. None the less I know Bud has forgot more than I will ever know about football so this is just my opinion.

And I know Wyatt looks great on the O line but I would have loved to seen him at D tackle. The good news is it looks like our recruiting of linemen on both sides of the ball is vastly improved!!

Great Review, it really helped confirm my thoughts that we really play a great game defensively. It might have been the best game we have played. If we can get our d line healthy again and get sweat,settle toliver and errbody else we will have a nasty d line.

lol

Also no idea how backjudge doesn't see the clear hold/block in back. MOTO clearly had an angle on Murphy, no idea if MOTO gets the tackle but it looked like he got held just enough so Murphy could cut back inside.

"I'm high on Juice and ready to stick it in!" Whit Babcock

I don't usually pay attention to backjudge behavior, but he certainly doesn't seem that into the play. That definitely could have been called. Maybe he was distracted by the smell of smoked turkey legs. Unfortunately, everyone takes plays off, players and officials included.

FYI that's the Umpire, not the Back Judge...and the holding was iffy and probably shouldn't have been called

Beat me to it. Also, I'm not 100% sure on free-blocking zone rules in college, but generally a block in the back near the line won't be called.

Blocking in the back is allowed within the tackle box, and +/- a certain # of yards from the LOS.

Grabbing someone's arm and pulling them away from the play isn't allowed though.

Wiley, Brown, Russell, Drakeford, Gray, Banks, Prioleau, Charleton, Midget, Bird, McCadam, Pile, Hall, Green, Fuller, Williams, Hamilton, Rouse, Flowers, Harris, Chancellor, Carmichael, Hosley, Fuller, Exum, Jarrett

With how this ties into recruiting, the defensive tackle recruits are diverse this cycle. First, you have your redshirts in Mihota and Sobczak. Both are guys who can shoot the gap, but Sobczak has the build to sit down and jam up a hole.

Committed already you have Eric Whitehead, who has that fireplug Antoine Hopkins space-eater frame. Harry Lewis is similarly sized to Corey Marshall and will grow some, but won't be huge. And then you have more of the SEC style DT in Dee Fullwood, who is already 6'4 and 240 and will likely fill out in the 270/280 range. Settle gives you the monster inside that they really have not had since Jonathan Lewis (and Settle has more upside than Lewis, who may be the best defensive tackle of the Bud Foster era with David Pugh, Derrick Hopkins, JC Price, and Luther Maddy all having a say.)

My worry again remains defensive end. With Mihota moving inside, essentially there has not been a true defensive end recruit over the last two seasons. Hill comes in with a great opportunity to contribute early. Damien Dozier and Xavier Burke are guys who could possibly play defensive end (I think Burke has more upside at DE than TE) if this recruiting class somehow falls apart. But while we feel good about several DE recruits, there is always the possibility that Sweat, Dalton, DeBerry, Taylor, and Gaines end up picking somewhere else. And they really can not afford that right now, especially with Fullwood and Mihota both being guys on the inside.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

I just hope Dalton helps clear up some of these questions by committing to VT later this month!

Sweat, Settle, and Gaines, aren't announcing until December but we get officals with all 3 before then.

D. Taylor is comitted to UT and while there's been rumors swirling about us being in good position to pick up another commit-flip, I just can't bring myself to believe we'll get him. Hopefully we can get him on campus for the UVA game and some of other recruits can get in his ear. However, I think if we get any other flips it will be the LB from Isiah Ford's HS, Victor Alexander.

Wiley, Brown, Russell, Drakeford, Gray, Banks, Prioleau, Charleton, Midget, Bird, McCadam, Pile, Hall, Green, Fuller, Williams, Hamilton, Rouse, Flowers, Harris, Chancellor, Carmichael, Hosley, Fuller, Exum, Jarrett

French, even when the Hokies are bringing the ass you bring the heat. Nice work, sir.

And, in reference to the headline photo, "Kyshoen! Turn the fuck around!"

"You know when the Hokies say 'We are Virginia Tech' they're going to mean it."- Lee Corso

KJ is one of my favorite Hokies over the last few years, but he's a pass-first defender and not a run-stuffing safety. Bud has him playing out of his element and its no fun seeing him get run over by 250lb TBs or take bad angles while trying to avoid pulling linemen. I'd rather see the safeties split time with hybrid LBs rather than hope for the best when outwieghed by 50+ pounds.

"It's a Hokie takeover of The Hill ... in Charlottesville!" -Bill Roth

I'd disagree. With the exception of the Pitt game in 2012, Jarrett has been one of the best close-to the line of scrimmage run supporting safeties we have seen at Virginia Tech. This season, really since around the GT game, his tackling has taken a huge step backwards. Part of that is having to cover more space than he perhaps has the ability to cover as result of the lack of a big space-eater inside. Part of that could be the accumulation of wear and tear that comes with making so many tackles over the years.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

^^THIS... is a top two factor in the Hokies' propensity in giving up the big play this year on defense.

Nobody misses Luther Maddy more than Jarrett and Bonner.

Leonard. Duh.

Getting Luther back 100% would definitely be a huge help for our D line. Hopefully soon. I think we need him to have any better than 50/50 chance of making a bowl game this year.

I do think we will be much better next year and it would be gratifying to finish strong with this recruiting class - Sweat and/or Settle and at least one other big time DL prospect and another 4 * OL would be nice.

Texashokie

You do know Big Lu is out for the season right?

Thanks so much! Tweet and share with your friends and fellow Hokies! My goal has always been with my column to try my best to share, based on my experience, what I feel really is happening on game day. There is only so much we can know without knowing the calls, assignments, and being in the film room everyday. But, after years of playing, being around some of the great coaches in the Commonwealth, and watching these replays, we can get a decent idea to determine if the results of the play are because of the player, coach, etc. I have been tremendously frustrated to hear players take heat when it isn't really their fault (see Logan Thomas on a couple of INT's last year or the OL last season), but at the same time, the coaching staff, for whatever their faults, are limited by the execution, effort, and ability of the athletes they coach. I really try hard to strike a fair balance.

I have been really rough on the two senior safeties over the last few weeks, and in many cases rightfully so. But because the space they are accountable to fill is often larger because of the skill set of those interior linemen shooting gaps instead of fitting them, it exposes them to more situations where they can look bad. For every poor play that Jarrett and Bonner have been associated with, they make several very good ones. Foster has rolled the dice that his seniors can make those plays rather than put extra pressure on his young front seven guys to do things that they may not have the ability to do. Unfortunately, that gamble has not paid off the last few weeks. The more I watch, the more I am convinced that the defensive struggles are the result of personnel issues and match ups than poor coaching.

That being said, Jarrett and Bonner are seniors. You have to get more out of them. Kendall Fuller is an All American candidate. You can't let a no-name wideout with 11 catches beat you cleanly to the inside on a slant where you are supposed to be playing inside leverage and you know you don't have safety help. Dadi Nicolas can't give up on plays when initially blocked. Ken Ekanem can't freeze up every time there is a read play and he is slow playing the option. Clarke, DiNardo, and Motuapuaka have to take on blocks squarely and plug up holes instead of running around blocks and making them wider (although Clarke had a much better week than he did against Miami, and Motuapuaka may be the best open field tackler the Hokies have right now.) Nigel Williams has to play more of a fit style, Far too often he was completely wiped out on down blocks, and he wasn't getting the same kind of penetration as Marshall to excuse it.

And most importantly, the entire defense needs to run to the football. When you watch the tape, it is stunning how so many offensive plays, good or bad, being executed by the Hokie opponents conclude with one player making the tackle on defense. You don't see gang tackling like we were seeing against Ohio State, and that is something that can't continue.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

This supports what Foster has been saying, and that is that players are in the right schemes but they have to make plays.

French, based on some of the stuff you've been saying about our DT's, is Tim Settle the most important HS prospect to get for Virginia Tech? Is he the type of playing that can come in as a true freshman and make an impact right away (a la Kendall Fuller) or our problems in the interior DL too big for one stud freshman to fix?

I think because of the number of defensive tackles coming in (Walker is a freshman, Mihota and Sobczak will have four years of eligibility, and Fullwood, Lewis, and Whitehead) there is a good chance a couple of guys stick. But, if Settle does pick VT, he gives them a different element than the Hokies have seen in a long time.

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

Imagine the possibilities. This is in no way indicative of talent level, but if recruiting goes well, imagine this lineup on the first day of fall camp up front.

Nicolas-Maddy-Marshall-Ekanem
Alford- Williams-Baron-Dooley
(Dalton)-Walker-Mihota-(Sweat)
Hill-Sobczak-Fullwood-Dozier
-Whitehead-Lewis-(Settle)

You went from very little depth to potentially six four and five star guys as backups. I doubt we get all of them, but imagine the possibilities!

Five star get after it 100 percent Juice Key-Playing. MAN

We were saying the same things last cycle with the Hand-Brown-Nnadi-Holmes potential defensive front....just based on what happen last year, I'm not even thinking about projecting rosters until players actually commit to VT

You are so correct. I has sad now.

"You know when the Hokies say 'We are Virginia Tech' they're going to mean it."- Lee Corso

Where "commit" means "show up on campus the first day of practice"

"Our job as coaches is to influence young people's lives for the better in terms of fundamental skills, work ethic, and doing the right thing. Every now and again, a player actually has that effect on the coaching staff." Justin Fuente on Sam Rogers

I think it would look something like this after a few weeks

(Sweat) - Maddy - Marshall - Ekanem
(Dalton) - Walker - (Settle) - Nicolas
Hill - Williams - Baron - Dooley
Alford - Mihota - Whitehead - (Gaines)
[] - Lewis - Sobczak - Fullwood

Wiley, Brown, Russell, Drakeford, Gray, Banks, Prioleau, Charleton, Midget, Bird, McCadam, Pile, Hall, Green, Fuller, Williams, Hamilton, Rouse, Flowers, Harris, Chancellor, Carmichael, Hosley, Fuller, Exum, Jarrett

You think Dadi leaves after this year? Personally, I still think he's too raw to be drafted higher than the 5th round. He'd benefit from one more year. If I remember correctly, he picked up the game late in high school

He's got Dadi moving the 2nd team and being replaced with Sweat. I could see that happening, Dadi may be better suited as a 30 play a game guy in pass situations. He's just too susceptible to those down blocks.

Whoops. Overlooked that since I didn't think of Dadi possibly backing up Ekanem