
Before Virginia Tech offensive line coach Stacy Searels was hired, the Hokies looked to three different OL coaches (Stinespring, Newsome, and Grimes) in an attempt to build the cohesion needed to successfully execute a zone scheme. None were successful; the best production by Cedric Humes in 2004. Over the years, the more I watch both the Hokies and other zone teams execute, three factors for success are critical. First, an offense must effectively mix both inside and outside zone plays to prevent a defense from overplaying one or the other. Second, after being staunchly opposed to it for a long time, I am starting to see how the use of power plays serve as a counter for the defensive keys against zone blocking. Third, cohesion and timing on combination blocks are crucial.
On every zone run, you will observe double-team blocks where two blockers are responsible for a down defensive lineman and second-level defender (most often a linebacker). A covered and uncovered offensive lineman will try to "zone" block a pair of defenders. (If any of this is new to you read Joe's Zone Read Refresher or last year's running game review against William & Mary.) On outside zone plays blockers will look to turn defenders and seal them inside. On the inside zone runs blockers will drive defenders away from the box—either down the field or toward the sideline. The running back takes two strides, plants his outside leg, and then attacks the bubble created either by the initial double team or a cutback lane created by the horizontal pursuit of the defense.
Since the first attempts to adopt zone blocking, almost every version of the Hokie offensive line has struggled mightily in releasing the double team and getting to the second level. Far too often I observed a combination block where the double team didn't turn the defender's pads before the secondary blocker moved on to the second level; or the double team stayed engaged far too long and the linebacker or safety filled the hole unblocked. For the Virginia Tech running game to build on the momentum gained over the last four games of 2014, executing these blocks are a key to success.
I cannot emphasize enough how impressed I have been with how cohesive the starting Hokie offensive line has looked throughout the spring. Eric Gallo has meshed beautifully with Wyatt Teller and Augie Conte inside, and both Teller and Conte looked significantly improved from last season. (Teller should be licensed as a deadly weapon when Loeffler chooses to have him pull and kick out defenders.) Jonathan McLaughlin and Wade Hansen have worked beautifully with tight ends Ryan Malleck, Bucky Hodges, and Kalvin Cline to seal the edge on outside zones or widen defensive ends on inside zones. For someone like me who appreciates the nuance of offensive line play, it has been a pleasure to watch. Other than Teller, Malleck may be the best offensive lineman on the team, and that isn't an insult. He has been spectacular.
Let's watch that cohesion at work on an outside zone play. On an outside zone, the play side offensive linemen want to seal the defensive end and outside linebacker to the inside. If they cannot seal the edge guys inside, the blocker drives the defender to the sideline just like an inside zone and the running back has to find a cutback lane inside. Here, the Hokies (and a very underrated blocking Bucky Hodges) do a terrific job of sealing inside, and Wyatt Teller makes a terrific adjustment against a defensive spill call.
On the left side, Hodges and McLaughlin are responsible for sealing Vinny Mihota and Deon Clark inside. Hodges and McLaughlin turn Mihota's pads inside and Hodges peels off to seal Deon Clarke inside. This is a spill call, and C.J. Reavis comes up outside and unblocked. More on him in a moment.
Inside, we see a second combination block on Woody Baron by Teller and Gallo. Teller's job is to drive Baron's pads back so Gallo can get his head on Baron's outside hip. You can see how much of a blow Teller delivers if you watch closely and see Baron's head going violently up and back at contact. Teller then disengages, yet instead of getting up field, he adjusts to McLaughlin and Hodges driving their players inside. Teller floats to the outside and finds Reavis in the alley and buries him. This is beautiful at the point of attack.
However, a perfectly executed zone run should have two running lanes: play side and a cutback. When you watch the back side, there is some room for improvement. (Although this is pretty good given the performance of past groups.) Gallo doesn't get his head on Baron's outside shoulder, and Baron ends up making the tackle after a 7-yard gain. A play side scoop block against a one-technique may be the hardest block for a center play side, and Baron is a quick defensive tackle, so this isn't bad, but there is room for improvement.
I see mixed results on the back side. Malleck does an outstanding job to give ground and then take away the pursuit angle for Nicolas. On the interior, there is a third combination block with the tandem of Hansen-Conte trying to account for Andrew Motuapuaka and Nigel Williams. The initial combo block is good, with William's pads being popped up. Like Gallo, Hansen doesn't get his head inside Williams, who eventually peels across to assist on the tackle. Conte is too high on Motuapuaka, who slips through the center-guard gap into the back field. If Hodges and McLaughlin don't seal the edge, Edmunds would cut back and find Motuapuaka in his lap.
The cutback lane is even more critical on an inside zone. The key block becomes the combination block on the back side defensive tackle and linebacker. On the next play, the Hokies' right side provide a perfect demonstration.
On the play side, you can see McLaughlin with his head inside the defensive end as he attempts to drive him to the sideline.
McLaughlin and Teller both get solid movement. Malleck pulls back to the right side on a wham block designed to seal the back side pursuit outside.
Let's focus on Conte and Hansen. They are responsible for Steve Sobczak and Motuapuaka. Motuapuaka (who did not have a very good outing) is too aggressive scraping play side instead of filling the bubble. Conte slips off Sobczak and drives Motuapuaka to the sidelines. Hansen then cuts Sobczak and puts him on the ground. Malleck pulls back to the right side, but doesn't even need to kick out Kiehn because Hansen's legs have inadvertently tripped Kiehn. Hansen's elimination of Sobczak and Conte's seal on Motuapuaka opens up a huge cutback lane for a big gain.
Once again, I also want to credit Bucky Hodges for his blocking. Hodges is aligned as a wide receiver to the boundary. He does a fantastic job of pinning Chuck Clark outside. If not for a great recovery by Reavis, who also got sucked in on the initial zone movement, this could have been a touchdown.
The only inexperienced player from the starting group is center Eric Gallo. Gallo was an unheralded recruit who I didn't have a very high opinion of when I first saw him on film. I was wrong. Gallo looked very comfortable, showed some strength playing against good defensive tackles at the point of attack, and moves pretty well. He is very similar athletically to Caleb Farris; unlike Farris, Gallo has been a center his entire life.
Gallo's biggest area for improvement is going to be quickness. At center, getting your body into the path of a defender offsets the disadvantage that you face with having to get the snap off and execute the block. Gallo had some moments where he was set up for successful blocks but didn't get good body position. Also, Scot Loeffler loves to pull his center on outside zones and jet sweeps, and on C.J. Reavis' big highlight hit on J.C. Coleman, Gallo was just a step slow to kick out Reavis. As he continues to work and becomes more comfortable, I think Gallo has the ability to execute those blocks. Of the "Fab Four" Grimes' offensive line class, he certainly had the best day of the group on Saturday.
Even when things were not well executed, the offensive line group still got enough push to prevent the disastrous tackles for a loss that have derailed so many drives over the last three seasons. On the opening play of the game, pretty much everything that could have gone wrong managed to go wrong yet J.C. Coleman still managed a three-yard gain.
It is impossible to know who is responsible; however there is a communication breakdown with an outside zone as the play call. Chuck Clark shows a corner blitz, and Brewer should have audibled to an inside zone. When the check didn't come, the play side linemen probably should have checked out of a pin and pull and gone to a base zone. Instead, they went with the pin and pull. Teller drives Baron inside, and Eric Gallo pulls around him with Conte and Hansen in train giving ground to scoop. Conte slips on the wet field, leaving both he and Hansen hugging air while the Foster defense has the play side completely outnumbered.
Coleman and Malleck (him again) both make something out of nothing. Coleman cuts back sharply on the wet turf and finds a small bubble made possible by an outstanding scoop block by Malleck. Malleck has Dadi Nicolas (no slouch) on ice skates as he drives Nicolas past the cutback lane. Coleman gets small and pushes into the bubble where an unblocked C.J. Reavis and Ronny Vandyke tackle him after a three yard gain. It doesn't seem like much, yet that second-and-a-manageable-seven in 2015 is much better than a brutal second-and-13 in 2012.
I walked away from both the spring game and the limited publicly available practice video feeling very good about how this starting group is gelling. My biggest concern is the ability of McLaughlin and Hansen to handle speed rushes from the defensive end position. My second biggest concern is depth, although Yosh Nijman, Alston Smith, and Austin Clark made positive strides during the spring game. Next week, I will drill down on how Hansen and McLaughlin protected the quarterback, and the following week I will drill down on the performance of the young backups. I will close out my review of the spring season with a closer look at the mike linebacker position.

Comments
Wow, that look on Tellers face is not something I would want to be on the receiving end of. Coach Searles is going to get some flying lessons a la JC Coleman if he is not careful...
Excellent write-up as always French, I am cautiously excited about this years o-line and the offense in general...
I'm willing to bet Searles is as heavy as two JC Colemans (SI unit)
EDIT: added the missing W in two

As a stickler for grammar online, I will now go sit in a corner and take my punishment
Too Wyatt they are all just pancakes...
I noticed that two. Glad I wasn't the only won
I'm gonna pitch a cop show where Wyatt Teller is the young, brash detective who bends the rules, while Stacy Searels is the gruff, by the book commissioner who is constantly busting Wyatt's balls and threatening his badge without ever actually reprimanding him. Wyatt's calling card will be eating a stack of flapjacks off a perp's head after placing him under arrest. Wyatt's partner is a talking beefy Frito's burrito from Taco Bell. Beefy Frito's is a seasoned veteran of the force just months away from retirement. The comic relief of the show comes in the form of Wyatt's increasingly elaborate, nearly successful schemes to eat Beefy Frito's. Season two takes a dark turn when a criminal mastermind blows up a Taco Bell, killing Beefy Frito's family (but saving many people's digestive tracts). Wyatt starts carrying a special bottle of 100% pure maple syrup his grandfather got as a present after retiring from the force, vowing to use it on the pancakes he eats off the head of the scumbag who did this.
Yes.
Thank you for this analysis.
This is much better reading than the ranting of an entitled and self-important fan.
Key take away- keep Ryan Malleck healthy.
But it was on top, sort of hovering above the trash...
"it still had the doily on!"
I view taco bell in the trash as someone catching and releasing fish. Just putting it back from where it came.
You disrespect fish everywhere.
and probably drinking Zima too
"Hey, Sam - what do you think about that?"
Leg for the Sam Drago reference. The Drago nickname doesn't get emphasized enough around here.
man, it always cracks me up how it looks like the dude is getting tabletopped...
Question for those that know:
It seems that Grimes tried to install a zone blocking scheme with limited success for his year, but I find my self being more optimistic with Searles. Is this a scheme that meshes with Loefflers vision better or the benefit of having some players that have had 2 good years of coaching?
There are still some things that don't jibe with my understanding of a zone blocking front. The tight splits make it easier to scoop defenders, but it also tightens up those cutback lanes. I would like to see Searels start trying to widen his OL's splits. Grimes was a really good coach and teacher of the scheme, but he didn't have big talented athletic guys to teach and grow in his system. Searels now has McLaughlin-Teller-Gallo-Conte for at least 2015-2016 and that is some pretty good clay to work with.
Right now, I kind of worry about Grimes recruits. So far, Gallo is the only guy to step forward. Tyrell Smith had a good spring and is currently the number 2 center, but at times he was outmatched. Grimes other guys (Mitchell and Pettit) both finished with the 3 group and barely played in the spring. I also would love to know what is happening with Braxton Pffaf. He started the spring in non-contact, then got some contact work, then didn't play in the spring game. I think he can be a very good guard, but I don't know if his shoulder issue is a long term challenge. The same goes for David Chung.
We do know that at the end of the spring, the 2nd OL group was:
LT: Nijman
LG: Osterloh
C: Tyrell Smith
RG: Alston Smith
RT: Darius Redman
Of that group, I thought Austin Clark looked good in the one series that I saw him play and should be getting a look at replacing Redman.
How is Osterloh looking? Still like a guy who has relied on his size for much of his career?
Also, I just realized you're getting your Wang and your Chung confused.
EVERYBODY WANG CHUNG TONIGHT
Do you think that's a function of age/experience, size, strength, or just a lack of underlying talent? Looks like we've got two seniors (Redman and Hansen) and four juniors (Conte, McLaughlin, Smith, and Willenbrock), so in a couple years, Teller and Gallo (and Osterloh) are going to be the "old guys." Should we expect to see Smith, Mitchell, and Pettit in the two-deep next year, and starting in 2017?
That's what I'm thinking. It's pretty standard for an offensive lineman to spend a couple years developing not only their technique and skills, but also working on strength & conditioning. Toss in injuries (Pettit, Pfaff) that slow development of strength and skills and it's even less likely that a lineman will be ready in his first or second year. The main problem with that normal progression is that our OL is thin due to some recruiting failures a few years ago. Not enough upperclassmen or position diversity to fill the two-deep. A. Smith (r-JR), P. Osterloh (r-SO), and K. Chung (injured, R-SO) are only 3 guys for 5 positions and none of them are Tackles.
Any time a guy like McLaughlin or Teller or Gallo are able to step up to major roles in their first or second year I consider that a surprise and a bonus (or a scary neccessity in the case of Nijman & Redman as first-year OT's). I'm not disappointed that Pettit, Mitchell, or Pfaff aren't in the 2-deep, but I'd like to see them stay healthy and really start pushing Osterloh and A. Smith, or even Conte for playing time at Guard during fall camp. Conte is basically our #3 OT right now so having a capable backup, or backups at OG will make an injury at OT less painful.
French could you contrast an inside zone versus a conventional trap play? There are times when the zone scheme sounds like very much what I was used to doing in the early 90s with the full and half steps and the double teams. Sometimes it sounds like same product new package, yah know what I mean?
Really appreciate the time you spend discussing the most important facet of the game! Thank you
French did you happen to be paying football at same time as Andy Stanley? Wasn't sure you're age.
Yep. Good guy and absolutely nuts. He was a fantastic tailback that hurt his knee, and as a team first guy became a fantastic fullback. He was a big leader on the undefeated EHC team in 98. We played a lot of golf during the summer of 97 while I was taking summer classes and he worked at the little EHC golf course.
Thought you may have. I played ball and wrestled with him and his youngest brother in high school. All really good athletes. Small world.
You know a guy by the Chris Miller played at EHC not sure of the years exactly likely early 2000's?
I know who he is but he came after me. I played 97-99.
Annual can't help myself moment!
Not happenin this year!
Kicking out defenders...?
Man! Bendo did not see that coming.
Searels technique of going to the DL room to recruit is working beautifully. Bucky Hodges is an underrated blocking machine.
And he was a QB.... (ducks)
So what you're saying is that Marcus Davis had no excuse, right?
I'm confused...Marcus Davis wasn't a blocking machine??
He was about as effective as your standard gumball machine. Technically a machine. Technically can be put on the field to "block."
Blocking was Marcus Davis only key weakness, he had all the physical tools.
His key weakness was lack of effort on any play where he wasn't the primary receiver. He was just as likely to lollygag on a secondary/tertiary route as he was to not block on a running play.
Totally agree. For all his tools, Marcus Davis's key weakness was the six inches between his ears.
I disagree. He did have all the physical tools but blocking was not his only key weakness. He was not a great route runner, timing was poor, he was not aggressive enough on jump balls, he waited for the ball to come to him too much, he was not a great sideline receiver nor was he great at catching over the shoulder, his hands needed work, and he was lethargic on the "sell" even when plays were going his way.
Pure speculation, but my belief is had AMO been his coach he would not have been playing. No matter his potential his will to push his limits was just not there. We should have been playing Corey Fuller A LOT more those last 2 years, and not wasted so much time with Davis.
That's essentially the situation AMO was in with Parker.
And for essentially the same reasons. Buy in or cash out.
I can't think of one thing here I would disagree with. Well stated.
Remember that Corey Fuller was a track guy and was thus really, really raw as a receiver as well. Had the worst case of stone hands I'd ever seen until his senior year. It's a testament to his work ethic that he's an NFL receiver.
Corey's problem was not his hands it was him not seeing the ball all the way in. He would start reacting before the ball was securely caught which caused him to lose the ball. That's a timing issue and technique issue. He was making solid catches his junior year, especially up the middle in zone pockets and seams. And his track experience made him a deep ball threat. What he needed was just more reps, which Sherman wasn't giving him.
Eh, agree to disagree. There was a point in time when Corey was dropping balls more often than not. You're right that it was a technique issue and that he needed more reps to get it right. Just glad that he did.
no worries. but after he caught his first game pass i don't remember him dropping loads of balls. i'm know he dropped some in 2011 but he was clearly the receiver with the most upside in my eyes, and other fans as i recall.
but i think if you were to go back and watch Corey after his first game catch in 2011 you would see that when he dropped passes it was because his head was already turning, and body already reacting. that would cause his hands to lose the ball, and not that he was simply just dropping balls.
anyway moot point if neither of us are going to look it up. haha. turkey leg for you though
French, when it comes to Teller I know that you really liked him as a Tackle, but the staff has him entrenched as a Guard. Is there something in his game that they see that kept him inside? I don't know anything really about the finer points of line play, but if Tackle is a more valuable position why wouldn't they put him at LT, leave McGlock at RT (where SS thinks he's more suited for) and move Hansen inside?
I just don't get the McGlock at RT. He played MUCH better at LT than RT, and I think Andy pointed out in one of his articles the McGlock had a better spring this year at LT. If I am not mistaken there was even a quote from him saying how he felt more comfortable at LT.
Obviously its a judgement call and gets to the point of my question. What is it that SS sees that makes him think McGlock or Teller would be good in one place vs. What French sees? Aside from development why didnt the move Teller out to RT last year when McGlock went down and move Hansen inside?
oh I am full agreement with you. I also would love to know those answers. I love how Searles is developing the OL but some questions like this do come to mind. As well as, knowing the number of times Teller was told of Brown's NFL contract when he "volunteered" to switch to OL, yet is now a OG.
SS wanted more athleticism at LT and Gibson was a clear upgrade in that department over McLaughlin even though McLaughlin may have better fundamentals. I think if SS had more athletes to work with that McLaughlin would still be at RT but he's forced to move him back over to LT this year.
you're missing my point.
When McLaughlin came in, he played at LT and was named as one of the most pleasant surprises that year. Then Searles came and switched him to RT, and there was a clear drop off in his play. Yet Searles still says he should play RT, despite McLaughlin having had a better season his first year and having a great spring at LT this year. And seemingly despite McLaughlin saying he feels more comfortable there.
So if he consistently plays better at LT then my question is why does Searles believe so much that he should be RT? If you say Searles wants athleticism then my counter is, I would take a higher performing LT with less athleticism than an under performing RT every time.
Not missing your point and not sure who named him one of the most pleasant surprises that year. he did admirably for a true freshmen (prepped a year) who had to step in and start due to our horrid depth, but he was not consistent or a great LT by any means. I think we expected him to progress his second year at RT and IMO he played at about the same level or maybe slightly below.
Where are you getting him consistently playing better at LT? He played RT when he prepped as well. I would take a higher performing LT with less athleticism than an under performing RT as well, but I guess after evaluating them both last year SS didn't feel that was the case. If McLaughlin regressed as a sophomore and it showed up at RT I can only imagine how much worse it could have possibly been at LT.
http://athlonsports.com/college-football/college-footballs-2013-postseas...
2013 All Freshman Team, 2nd Team
the rest of college football seems to disagree with you.
One link = rest of college football. I'd be curious how many freshmen even start at OT it's not like other skill positions. He played every snap for us out of necessity not because he was a world beater. Obviously our OL coach doesn't agree with you, but apparently he doesn't know college football either I guess, right?
My claim: He was good at LT and pleasant surprise that season. Evidence to the fact provided.
your claim: that "he was not consistent or a great LT by any means." No evidence provided, so just your opinion.
1 is greater than 0, but here you go:
FanSided
http://fightinggobbler.com/2014/08/25/virginia-tech-hokies-football-2014...
http://www.thescore.com/ncaaf/news/272340
My question is exactly why Searles thinks the way he does. I am not questioning Searles ability to coach, stop reaching and try to provide something to back your opinion.
Being the best OL on an OL that wasn't very good isn't saying much, and IMO he wasn't the best OL that year. I explained why searels moved him. He wanted more athleticism at the LT spot and felt that Gibson provided that. If you don't like that answer then you are questioning his decisions.
Ask French for his opinions on JMac as a LT, RT hell even OG which is where i'd project him at the next level if he makes it there.
http://www.theacc.com/page/ACC-Players-of-the-Week
Still reaching. Your explanation is also your opinion, which is again unsubstantiated. So in that regard I am just questioning you.
I had this same concern. I thought he had been pegged as a four-year starting LT when he arrived and played well in that role as a true freshman. When he was moved to RT I was left wondering what happened, why he moved, who was better, or was he regressing? Now that he's back to LT, I feel like my first impression was warranted but still have this nagging feeling that he wasn't actually the best choice at LT, and almost feel like we sidetracked his progress as an LT.
I'm not knowledgeable about offensive line play at all, so maybe RT and LT are stunningly similar and I just might not get it, but I did question the move when it happened, and now even more since he moved back.
totally agree.
I think you are bit off on your story. Teller volunteered to switch when Grimes was still here. I believe Grimes had him at Tackle and SS moved him inside to Guard, but I'm not 100% sure on that. Nijman is the one that SS showed Brown's contract to. Nijman didn't volunteer at all.
Brown's contract came up when Teller moved as well, as I remember. But you could be right too. I know that Grimes was there. I was just being sarcastic about that anyway, given that I remember him being told about it and now he doesn't play it. That's not a criticism of Searles in any way. Just a snarky comment.
I do understand the snark. But I think it's worth pointing out that Brown's contract is worth $53.4 million, and the highest paid guard contract in the NFL is worth $51 million. So Wyatt is still gonna get paid playing inside.
point taken here. Apologies for the snark. It detracts from the main question I am asking about McLaughlin.
If you ever start posting without snark, I'll be concerned for your emotional state.
seriously though, you're spot on.
Don't ever change.
Here's Koma's article on it. I don't think there was enough time to bring up Brown.
http://www.fauquiernow.com/index.php/fauquier_news/article/wyatt-teller-...
More important than that is the he was immediately the second string Tackle after that switch with Grimes, so SS did move him inside. Really I'm more curious than critical, just wonder why.
As for all the position switches among the DL, I think you are I are aligned. I find it particularly interesting that Foster is STILL pissed that Moore got switched from DE in the pros yet we he is quick to switch a kid when he gets on campus.
That is a great question. I talk more about McGlothlin and Hansen's pass protection sets in next week's installment of FotB.
As for Teller, I maintain that his feet and reach are ideally suited for left tackle. My only concern with what I have seen on film is his long wind up when throwing his hands. Hansen has a similar issue and that allows a smart defensive end to get into his body and use leverage.
That said, I think Teller would be fine outside. Searels probably sees the movement that Teller creates against big defensive tackles and feels that is higher value.
Also Loeffler loves using pin and pull to get his interior linemen on the edge and Teller is by far his best guy in terms of having the mobility to square up on defensive backs in space as we see above on Reavis.
Looking forward (as always) to the next installment of FotB.
Thanks for the answer. It sounds like it's less about his limits and more about how much they value him at Guard.
That is a perfect summary. His weakness with quick hands is correctable and I saw improvement in spring ball. He still has a habit of sometimes digging his feet in against a bull rush which hurts against speed rushers and on wet fields. Those are minor issues.
Yet, at guard in this system he is a weapon, and tackles are not going to pin and pull except against odd fronts. Very few of the ACC teams play odd fronts, so by moving him to tackle right now, you take away a unique weapon. This is the same reason Corey Marshall should stay inside. Inside, he is a game changing weapon. Outside he is a serviceable DE. Hence, he is inside.