
When Virginia Tech's trip to Purdue was scheduled, many Hokies wrote off the Boilermakers as an easy win. Purdue's loss to a Rakeem Cato-less Marshall squad did little to change that perception.
Not so fast my friends. Purdue could present some significant challenges to a beat up Hokies team after two physical football games in five days. Defensively, Purdue has large and hyper-aggressive defensive linemen and linebackers that work downhill. Purdue's defensive front-four look to beat blocking through the gap and be disruptive rather than engaging and reading, like Ohio State attempted to do. The best player in the box for Purdue is 6-2 260 pound sophomore Ja'whaun Bentley. Bentley, an ESPN Freshman All-American last season, is a DeMatha product where he played with Hokies' receiver Cam Phillips. Bentley mans the mike linebacker spot for the Boilermakers, and often aligns to the wide side of the field when Purdue replaces a linebacker with a nickel corner. He is extremely aggressive. He is quick to commit to his keys, and he gets downhill quickly. He also does a fantastic job of getting downhill while avoiding blocks from offensive linemen. When he arrives, or he does get blocked, the collisions are epic.
Marshall calls a zone run on a 3rd-and-short with 240 pound former Richlands product Devon Johnson.
The right guard chips the defensive tackle and gets out squarely on Bentley. Bentley gives him a little shoulder fake, and then blows by the guard to his inside. Bentley then changes direction again. He pushes hard off his right leg, bounces outside, and wraps Johnson up for a loss. This is big-time football right here. Bentley reminds me of a bigger and faster version of Boston College middle linebacker Steven Daniels. Daniels, as you may remember, has performed magnificently against the Hokies in two consecutive Eagle wins.
Where Bentley and the rest of the Purdue defensive front-seven struggle is against misdirection plays. The defensive line and inside linebackers have a tendency to violently go after their primary read. As result, Marshall and Indiana State had great success with quarterback keepers, bootlegs, and other forms of play-action.
Bentley's aggressiveness is exposed on this play. Marshall runs an inside zone read. The Purdue defensive end and Bentley both crash hard on the dive. Marshall doesn't block the end, and instead releases the offensive tackle to block the outside linebacker Danny Ezechukwu.
Bentley and the defensive end absolutely crush the Marshall running back while Birdsong saunters for a nice gain. Exechukwu seems pretty content with being blocked on the play. Up front, this is pretty typical fare for the Boilermakers. Some guys look terrific one play. The next play it seems like they are disengaged.
Purdue has two multi-year starters in corners in 2014 second-team All-B1G selection Frankie Williams and Anthony Brown. The pair is very adept at getting off blocks and supporting the run. Williams finished No. 3 in total tackles for Purdue in 2014 and Brown was No. 5. Purdue doesn't appear to flip their corners based on boundary or field. For the most part, Williams aligns as the right corner and Brown aligns to the left. Williams is very adept at press coverage, however is only 5-9. Brown is not much bigger at 5-11. Against the press, the Hokies may look at flexing out Bucky Hodges and targeting Hodges and Ford down the hill. Make no mistake though; both are very solid players that can hang with the talented but thin Hokies' receiving corps.
The Hokies have struggled against misdirection offensive plays this season. Purdue's offense features misdirection play-action off inside zone read runs and an athletic quarterback that can throw the ball or run off of inside zone action. Up front, all five starting offensive linemen are back from last season. The Boilermakers will run varieties of the inside zone read from a dizzying variety of formations and motions. Quarterback Austin Appleby (JR, 6-5, 239) will run option keepers, bootlegs, and even triple option (using a motioning receiver or H-Back as a pitch man) off the inside zone action.
"(Appleby is) big, strong, throws the ball very easily," Virginia Tech head coach Frank Beamer said. "Flicks it, can hum it. He gets it there. He's a threat running. The big guys, kind of like Motley. Big guy and they can run it. I think he does a nice job for them."
Appleby isn't going to break long runs; however he is big, powerful, and athletic enough where a quarterback run must be defensed on third-and-intermediate down and distances.
The foundation is the inside zone and running back D.J. Knox (SO, 5-7, 197). Knox is similar to J.C. Coleman. He is diminutive in stature and isn't particularly elusive. Knox is a fullback in a tailback's body. He takes the inside zone handoff and gets downhill quickly. Knox loves to run through contact, and he will run over defensive backs if they do not tackle with correct form. The Y wham version of the inside zone seems to be the most comfortable play for Knox.
Purdue's offense builds off of the inside zone series with a wide variety of fakes, motions, and screens. On the play above, Purdue has pieces moving all over the place. First, a tight end flexes into a wingback position behind the left tackle. After he sets, the right side slot receiver jet sweep motions to the left. At the snap, Appleby fakes the jet sweep. The tight end crosses the formation like he is going to wham (kick out) the defensive end to the bottom of the screen.
And here's another wrinkle off of the read option.
The defensive end squats to brace himself in anticipation of the block, but the tight end passes him and heads to the flat. Appleby fakes the inside zone and reads the defensive end. When the end commits to the quarterback, Appleby flips the pass to the tight end. This may go into the record books as a pass completion; but it is essentially a triple option pitch.
Purdue does not have elite speed at wide receiver. Danny Anthrop (SR, 6-0, 186) will catch a ton of short passes, screens, and quick outs off jet sweep motion. Anthrop is similar to the Hokies' Sam Rogers in that Purdue uses him blocking, passing, and in motion. Anthrop has been slowed with a sore knee, and the other Purdue receivers are big bodies that are not run-after-the-catch breakaway threats.
Purdue's drop back passing game presents the biggest advantage for the Hokies. The receivers struggle to get off man coverage. The Boilermakers use basic spread passing concepts (double slants, levels, stick routes). Appleby is a talented quarterback, but Purdue fans though never know when "Bad Appleby" shows up. In 2014, Appleby threw more interceptions than touchdowns (52.9%, 1,449 yards, 10 TDs, 11 INTs); and he opened the season against Marshall with a four interception performance including this doozey on the first offensive play of the game.
Purdue runs a double slant at the top of the screen. The Marshall safety aligns 10 yards deep and the Marshall corner shows press, then bails out into outside leverage. Appleby reads the outside leverage and assumes that, with the safety deep, the inside slant will occupy the inside linebacker and there will be an open window for the outside slant to come open. This assertion is exactly what Marshall's defensive coordinator wants Appleby to think. The corner bailing out and showing outside leverage triggers the expected slant read, and the safety is actually a robber. At the snap, the safety is jumping the outside slant the entire way. Appleby never even sees him. The Marshall safety intercepts the pass and returns it for a touchdown. Bud Foster and Torrian Gray have been using this kind of coverage concept for years. Last week, Andrew Motuapuaka had a pick six in almost the exact same type of outside leverage-robber combination. The Hokies have an opportunity to mix coverages and force Appleby into some interceptions.
That is, if they can force Appleby into third and long situations. Tech's precarious situation at mike linebacker could wreak havoc with the Hokies' run defense. With Andrew Motuapuaka sidelined for up to 4 weeks with a sprained MCL, the next man on the depth chart is Sean Huelskamp. Bud Foster has often discussed how much he likes Huelskamp, and against Furman he played . However, Huelskamp is an undersized 212 pounds. In base alignments he will be asked to attack the back side bubble on zone runs. Will he be able to fit his gap and hold ground against Power 5 caliber blocking? True freshman Carson Lydon has the physical tools to be a very good mike linebacker; however the coaching staff initially chose to redshirt him this summer. Lydon will get a look if Huelskamp can't hold up against blocking. It would be difficult to expect Tremaine Edmunds or another inexperienced player currently at a different position to come over and learn all the calls and the defensive keys for the mike spot in one week.
Edmunds is an intriguing candidate though. Foster has committed to getting Edmunds on the field this season, and I think Foster envisions Edmunds as a backer who will spend much of his time aligned on the line of scrimmage as an edge defender. Edmunds has prototypical NFL outside linebacker size and plays with a heavy shoulder. That heavy shoulder could mean that he would be even better at setting the edge in the run game at the backer spot than Clarke when his time comes.
Despite the promise of Edmunds at backer, the need is immediate at the mike spot. McKinnon and Jamieon Moss have three years at backer in Bud Foster's system, and have shown in spring ball that they can be serviceable. The mike spot is a more dire need.
A mike linebacker close to the size of Edmunds isn't unprecedented. Jake Houseright was 6-4 and over 240 pounds. Bruce Taylor was 6-3 and over 235 pounds. George Del Ricco was a taller player. Edmunds has terrific bend in his hips for a big man. In high school, Edmunds played a very similar role to the mike linebacker. He demonstrated an uncanny ability to find the football. He is an excellent form tackler. With his tremendous bend, Edmunds gets underneath the pads of much smaller blockers pops them back, and finds the football. His size and range by itself makes him an intriguing prospect.
Foster believes Edmunds can be a multi-year starter at backer, so it's not likely he will take this route. Huelskamp will get the start this week. Lydon is slotted to back up Huelskamp. If that is the path Foster sticks with until Motuapuaka is healthy, one way to mitigate Huelskamp's size disadvantage is to stay in more Bear looks. By covering up the guards and center, it is very difficult to get a blocker out to the mike linebacker on interior running plays. Chase Williams was an undersized mike linebacker, and he was able to stay away from blocks much better when the Hokies lined up in the Bear.
With Edmunds or another bigger body in the lineup that can play downhill at the mike spot, Foster is afforded the luxury of being able to mix and match between the Bear and more of a base four-man look. The bigger body can also help against power teams. Looking ahead at the Hokies' schedule, Tech's first ACC contest is against Pitt. The Panthers have replaced All-ACC back James Conner with 230-pound redshirt freshman Qadree Ollison that has rushed for 288 yards in two games. Having a big, talented, ranging mike linebacker that has the bend to stick a big back in the hole would be a nice luxury to have as the Hokies open ACC play.

Comments
"Bad Appleby"
Good one, French.
via GIPHY
Can VT offer Bently a scholarship before the game? They could use a Mike LB.
Just noticed there is a dude dressed like a giraffe in the crowd. Ok.
Wow I didn't know HD was a Purdue fan
HD is a fan of anyone VT...no make that...the ACC is playing.
He looks like he's waiting for the smaller girl second from the right to get separated from the pack. Wait, are giraffes not predators?

Hokies have to watch out for The Purdue Mary!
This is actually a nice design- flooding the front of the end zone, and then intentionally (I think) overthrowing the ball to Anthrop as he sneaks in from the side opposite the throwing lane.
I have to imagine that a ball hanging in the air that long against our secondary gets picked; at the very least it's incomplete
Have to be impressed with the throw- that ball is in the air for 60+ yards.
no doubt. I know I couldn't throw a ball like that...not in a million years. But Tyrod did it!
Nothing but Luck. That dude could not drop it on a dime like this. I see your point though.
Other things to watch- Indiana State scored their first touchdown on a fake wide receiver screen where the "blocking" receiver slipped past the defender into the open space behind him. The Hokies have that in their playbook. Last season, Brewer lead Hodges a bit too much when they ran it against Ohio State. I believe Ford had a nice catch on a fake screen against UVA, and Byrn had one against UNC.
Could a (would Foster) Bentley at 6-2, 260, play mike for Foster? Would he be ideal for the BC's of the world, or is that a fantasy? What would be his weaknesses in our system outside of misdirection plays?
Our MLB has to be able to scrape at play speed. That usually means the heavier guys have hips that are too stiff, but we know from from Vince Hall 6' 0", 240 @ MLB...when they get the size to play the position, and maintain the speed....OMG.
"Ezechukwu"
Gesundheit
This will be my first game of the year in person. Weather is going to be a factor (heavy winds) after storms move through in the morning.
I live in Nashville (if you couldn't tell by my "name"), and I have been thinking all day about whether I should drive the ~5 hours up to West Laf to see this one. I may not make it to the Burg this fall, so this may be one of my only chances to see the Hokies live this season. I figure tickets shouldn't be too hard to come by outside the stadium.
I'm on the fence.
Speaking as someone that rarely makes it to ANY games anymore, you should go. Hit up the bar that other TKPers are going to and enjoy watching some Hokie football.
That would be the chocolate factory bar and if you and Joe are there, then at least one round is on me. See you tomorrow.
So French, what is your prediction for the game? Who wins/final score?
Prediction?
I'm not a huge Loeffler fan as a whole and think his skills are better suited to an NFL offense than college. But one thing he does well sometimes is scheme, and as I read this i'm thinking it's a good match-up for him: Purdue has defensive characteristics they're really good at and others they are poor at. To me that's an ideal scenario for someone whose strong point is scheming to take advantage of weakness, although with Loeffler one always has to worry about overthinking things.
I'm a simpleton, but it seems that we can spread out their rather beefy LB's to try to cover our TE/RB's in space and have some advantages. Could lead to more scramble room for Motley as well.
If you can get Bentley out of position, yes. But he is very athletic and moves well laterally. McMillian, Edmunds, and Rogers will get some coverage out of him, however Purdue is like VT in that they don't like Bentley and Ezg in much coverage. They blitz or sit behind the pass rush watching the QB or any late release RBs. Malleck, Hodges, and Rogers will see a bunch of their safeties, I think. The kid from Richlands did score Marshall's first TD on a delayed release out of the backfield.
I'm curious why? Are there articles/posts on this? I would argue Lefty is exactly the sort of guy that is needed at VT. He can out-scheme opponents, mitigating the difference in raw talent between us and the OSU, Bama, etc's of the college football world. I'm not real clear on how being a schematically competent coach would be a weakness, so I assume there's something else I'm not aware of.
There is a huge difference between being schematically competent and over-scheming. It is no secret that for year's Virginia Tech has has one of the thickest playbooks out there, and instead of being really good at executing a few plays is often not great at executing a whole bunch of plays.
Look at the highest-rated offense at http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaaoff2014 - Ohio State, Orgeon, Georgia Tech, Auburn, Alabama...these are not complicated offenses but rather rely on a few core plays, adding small wrinkles and often using movement and route options to expose weakness in the defense and allow the QB (or RB) to make the right read.
To be fair, by pointing at anOSU, Oregon, Auburn and Bama, you also pointed at some of the most talented teams in the country. You don't really need a thick playbook when you line up a team that is top to bottom better than almost every other team they face.
All he really has to do is point out GT, TCU, and Oregon. Oregon recruits the best of the three but they are no recruiting juggernaut by any means. They had one class in the Top 10 the past six years. The rest hover in the high teens.
GT especially is the primary example of a team that fields a high performing offense with marginal talent and a commitment to flawless execution of a small number of core plays.
For us, the big issue is Frank's overall philosophy for the offense in relation to defense and special teams, and his stated aversion to a high-commitment offense like the spread. He feels it doesn't engender toughness.
OK. Lefty's playbook is very large. But, they all execute the same core concepts; in the passing-game: triangle-receiver packages, screens and picks...everything required to get play-makers open; in the running-game: zone runs, zone reads, and counters. I'm in favor of him reducing the size of the playbook, it could easily be a quarter the size. If he does, the offense won't be near as flexible, but should be more dangerous. That being said, he is moving in this direction, he is constantly having the slim his play-book down, due to injury, inexperience, and lack of talent. Given he didn't do it will-fully, but the play-book is now used differently. They run what the guys are good at, and focus on those plays. The added flexibilty of the concepts being the same, and being able to change the specific plays to still execute the things the guys are good at, from different plays, more suited and comfortable to the next man up, showed last week, even though they were running everything to get a grasp on the guys' execution. I would submit. the issue isn't really the play-book, or the plays, its the disorganized method of dissemination.
It's not the size of the playbook, it's how you use it. Ok I know it sounds like a penis joke, but really, look at Paul Johnson. The guy manages to score a whole lot more than anyone would expect given his game, especially how small his playbook is. You'd think he'd get shut down every time he plays the field, but, miraculously, the guy gets her done. There's something to be said for having a small playbook but using it to perfection.
That said, I hope we take his playbook and shove it down his throat this year. His system's biggest weakness is the inability to come from behind. He can't deal with competition that scores faster than he does and gets him to 3rd and long. I hope we're functioning well enough on offense to be that team when we meet.
Hah. Yeah. You had me going there for a second...
Nope. Still sounds like a penis joke.
Yeah. I lied. The whole post is one big penis joke...
GT's offense is effective primarily, though not exclusively, because teams see it so rarely and are somewhat ill-prepared..
I do favor a simpler offense, but mostly I favor recruiting better athletes.
Let's not confuse Loeffler with Stinespring. Major execution problems when CBS was calling the plays as OC, not so much with Loeffler (sometimes before but particularly after some OL talent upgrades). OTOH, everything looks better with a little OL blocking. But with Stinespring the plays were too often slow developing in addition to complex responsibilities for players who frequently weren't up to it.
I really don't understand this sentiment - not singling out you, a lot of folks share it. This is SL's year to prove he is the sort of guy you suggest, because up to this point there's not much data that backs it up.
Agreed. There isn't much data to back it up. There is an observable trend, even whilst we watch the guy learn how to do the job under a capable teacher (Beamer).
Huh? Learn how to do the job? Loeffler was OC at Temple and Auburn prior to VT. He makes about $500,000. This isn't a situation where we were supposed to be paying a guy to learn the job (that strategy was the previous decade with Stinespring as OC). As for the capable teacher under Beamer bit, limiting the offensive scheme has literally been the biggest complaint about Beamer during his tenure as head coach. A lot of people made the comparison to Gary Patterson, as he always relied on a strong defense but realized he needed to let the OC run the offense that puts up the most points. So... Yeah
Thanks French. Good stuff. I predict INTs.
I stopped the little pitch pass video at the point of the catch behind the LoS. I notice that the OL are at least 2-3 yards downfield. That's really close to ineligible downfield. I guess this is marginal and wasn't called this time.
There's your answer. Pretty much no forward-pass fouls (pass interference, ineligibles downfield) count when the ball doesn't cross the LoS (technically the neutral zone, but whatevs, same deal). So long as it's an eligible receiver who touches it first (or defender), you can do pretty much whatever the heck you want to him or other players that isn't a hold or personal foul.
I'm drunk what did you say?
Nothing matters if the ball doesn't cross the line of scrimmage.
Yay INTs! Especially of the pick-6 variety. I'm going to go out on a limb and say we score 2 TDs on INTs. I'm also of the mind that we go to Lydon early and he'll blow up some plays, but get burned once or twice.
my "wish list" for Appleby: 10-30, 1 TD, 3 INT, 1 fumble
Guilty of looking forward but geeze where does Pitt get these running backs from? They are all studs and typically fair very well on the next level. Look for special teams to play a roll against Purdue. CFB can surprise teams we have never played before with some form of beamerball esp if they use outdated punt formations. I predict we see our first blocked punt of the year.
good prediction
I love how the QB does not move in the pick 6 play.
Something I picked up in the box score/highlights was that Purdue didn't sustain many drives.
1st TD- busted coverage, 5 yard pass for a 50 yard TD.
2nd TD - deep bomb in 1v1 coverage, 50+ yards.
3rd TD - hail mary.
4th TD - fake punt leads to a huge play that gets them to the 1.
I didn't see the final td, but it seems like they had a few big plays but really couldn't sustain a drive against the Sycamores.
I don't think Purdue's offense is going to be having any fun on Saturday.
That said, I don't expect ours will be either. I'm thinking something like a 13-6 type of game. Really ugly. Like that 2013 UVA game.
Or a certain game that wasn't played and totally didn't end 6-3?
You know what? I don't care how the win against UVA looks. At the end of the day, every single one feels like 38-0 to me.
But yes, I would be disappointed if we had that ugly a game against Purdue. I totally understand the cynicism given our history.
I'm deciding to have optimism this week. I think our O-line is getting better every week. I think Motley is going to have better command of the game this week. I think our D will be hungrier and hitting their marks this week. I think Sam Rogers will be Sam Rogers, Bucky Hodges will have to be restrained from dancing, and Scot Loeffler sleeps more than 3 hours the night after the game.
I'm ready to see a 'whuppin.
Me too, would love to see the Hokies give the Boilermakers a whuppin. Then, we'd be 2-1 against the B1G over 2 seasons!
The OL is going to look bad at moments. Purdue is so aggressive that they will guess right on occasion and make some plays. You live with that if they respond with big plays when the Boilermakers are out of position.
Well I took that prediction to heart & after it got to 10-7, I shut it off and watched some snoozers (LOLUVA 2014 highlights). Really tho I didn't have a clue that 75 points would happen either....the write-up where we could be really challenged by their D scared the be-Jesus out of me...
Bentley is so aggressive, does he create space for quick hitters to a TE or H-back?
If he's on a slot receiver, is he likely to bite extra hard on play action?
In my head, I have been imagining a hard outside zone fake and a Y-Veer Release Pop pass, or a play action fake and a circle route from the H-back all day. I didn't focus as much as I wanted to on their safeties to see how risky it was, but if the linebackers have responsibility for the running backs I think it could be effective.
Short passes outside are not recommended this week. Their corners are good players.
For whatever it is worth, Michael Brewer traveled with the team and isn't wearing a sling. Looks like his recovery is going well.
I will guarantee that one arm is hanging....Been there.
Well...reports are that Brewer is already throwing. And not soft tossing...
They say broken bones heal stronger than they were before. Look out, linebackers!
https://twitter.com/vt_football/status/644979908758872065
Doesn't look like he is hurting here.
How old is the kid next to him? 12?
That's Michael Santamaria, kicker
We are going to kick perdue ass tomorrow!