
When I think back to halftime of the Ohio State game, I vividly recall the promise of the 2015 season. The Hokies led the defending national champions even though the defense was struggling and the offense had left points on the field. Perhaps, the team I saw on paper in August would equate with the on-the-field product. An All-American defensive line group and secondary would cover up the weakness at linebacker. Scot Loeffler finally had talented players after holding together some semblance of an offense with chicken wire and misdirection for two seasons.
Fast forward a mere 7 weeks, and I find myself spending a windy Sunday morning in the Outer Banks watching the Hokies play Miami. As I watch clip after clip, I can't reconcile my halftime emotions with my eyes telling my brain that, at key moments, a mediocre Miami team is better than my Hokies.
On Saturday, Travon McMillian ran the ball with authority in between the tackles. After gashing the Hurricanes time and time again, the same Travon McMillian had the football stripped on an ill-conceived counter play. He didn't receive an offensive touch the rest of the fourth quarter. The offensive line mashed the Hurricanes in the run game, yet was overpowered by edge speed in pass protection. Brenden Motley was sharp for most of the first half, but he threw two abysmal interceptions in the second. For the first time all season, the defensive line looked dominant against the run. The same dominant defensive line couldn't sustain any pass rush. The secondary maintained tight coverage and was excellent in run support. The same secondary couldn't stop a slant route, and even when in perfect coverage lost 50/50 plays to bigger, more talented Miami receivers. Even the coaching was uneven. There was Frank Beamer's decision to kick a 51-yard field goal on 4th-and-9 down 13-20 in the middle of the third quarter, but then decide to go for a first down after a 5-yard Hurricanes' penalty put the Hokies more comfortably in Joey Slye's range. Beamer followed up the failed fourth down attempt by punting on a 4th-and-1 from his own 42 when trailing by 10. It is easy to second guess each of those decisions. When things are going well, those decisions pan out. When things are going badly, you end up losing in front of 60,000 empty seats in (insert stupid sponsor name) stadium.
The McMillian Show
The most positive takeaway from Saturday is that redshirt freshman Travon McMillian proved that he could be an explosive, every down running back who can run in between the tackles. For the first time since the Purdue game, Loeffler's game plan heavily emphasized the inside running game. McMillian proved he has the vision and explosiveness to take advantage of holes created by the offensive line on the inside.
When Loeffler arrived from Auburn, he and Jeff Grimes brought a zone running scheme to Blacksburg that depended on the running back's ability to attack the line of scrimmage, plant his outside leg, and cut sharply into a bubble created by the defense's lateral movement. Even when the running game has worked since Loeffler's arrival in 2013, the effectiveness of it has been more the byproduct of the offensive line creating huge holes than the running back's ability to exploit those holes.
Against Miami, McMillian didn't always get huge gaping holes. Instead he correctly read the defensive bubble and then displayed the necessary cutback ability and explosiveness to exploit those small seams. Here is an example. The Hokies align with the strength to the right and run an inside zone back to the left.
Ryan Malleck cuts off the back side defensive end. Augie Conte and Wade Hansen get about two yards of push on the three-technique defensive tackle. Eric Gallo gets just a little bit of lateral movement on the nose tackle. There is a small bubble for McMillian to run into between the double team and Gallo.
There is a problem though. The right inside linebacker for Miami should be blocked by either Hansen or Conte sliding off the double team. Neither disengages, so McMillian is left to deal with the linebacker in the hole. Time and time again over the last few seasons, a Hokie running back would have slide to his right, right into the unblocked linebacker's lap. McMillian takes a different tact. He cuts right off Gallo's block, gives a very subtle shoulder lean to his right to freeze the linebacker on the right side of the double team, and then cuts sharply back to his left. This is called setting up a block. McMillian essentially uses his movement to freeze the linebacker and shield him with Hansen and Conte's double team.
McMillian isn't finished. Miami safety Deon Bush (No. 2) comes up in run support. McMillian dead legs him then breaks away to the left. Miami corner Artie Burns (No. 1, ably blocked by Isaiah Ford) makes contact with McMillian at the 43-yard-line. Instead of getting tackled, McMillian drags the corner all the way to the 32 yard line. This is a big boy run.
I was thrilled to see Loeffler using the pistol and running McMillian in between the tackles. Being good in between the tackles isn't necessarily a function of being big and powerful. Darren Evans was much more comfortable on stretch plays, while the much smaller Ryan Williams was more explosive cutting back against the grain on inside zones. McMillian doesn't jump cut like Williams. However, McMillian does have Williams' vision and downhill explosiveness to get to the second level quickly.
On this next play, the Hokies run an inside zone from the pistol. McMillian is heading downhill at the snap. Wyatt Teller does a terrific job of scooping the Miami nose tackle. Gallo and Conte reach block the play side linebacker, and Conte rolls off the double team to pick up the back side pursuit. McLaughlin gets lateral movement on the play side defensive end. This is pretty well blocked. The challenge for the Hokies here is the free safety. Watch closely as the free safety flies into the box as McMillian gets the football from Motley.
McMillian is one-on-one with the safety in the hole. Tech's running backs from 2012-14 get tackled for a three-yard gain by the safety in the bubble between Conte and McLaughlin. McMillian runs right through the safety and then finishes a nine-yard gain with a big thump against two other Miami secondary players.
These clips represent more the norm than the exception from Saturday. Despite this, McMillian only got 16 carries on the day. Some of that was a byproduct of Miami's time of possession and Motley's turnovers. However, McMillian didn't get a single carry after an oddly-designed counter run backfired badly at the beginning of the fourth quarter.
I don't even know where to begin with this play. The Hokies run a fake quarterback counter. The right side of the offensive line blocks down. Teller and Malleck pull and lead up in front of Michael Brewer. Nijman cuts off penetration on the back side. The design and execution makes it look like Brewer should be keeping the football.
Instead, Brewer hands off to McMillian. I don't understand the logic here. 1) McMillian has had success running right at Miami all game long. 2) The design removes blockers away from the intended path of the football by pulling Malleck and Teller. If that's done to influence Miami's linebackers to scrape away from McMillian, it ignores that Brewer is in the game and the Hurricanes know that he isn't a running threat with a recently mended collarbone. 3) Nijman is blocking passively to prevent a crashing defensive end from getting inside. This allows the defensive end a free pass up field on the outside, which is exactly where McMillian has to go on this play. Either the play design is a total mess, or Nijman should be aggressively reach-blocking that defensive end. The defensive end wrecks McMillian before he can secure the handoff. McMillian fumbles. The Hokies recover and we don't see McMillian touch the football for the rest of the evening. Frankly, even if this is an execution error by Nijman, this was an ill-timed play call with absolutely terrible design, especially given the personnel grouping with Brewer at quarterback.
It didn't help matters that the Hokies struggled with pass protection against edge speed. Miami was able to get pressure with four rushers. Usually, the three down linemen rushed along with one of the two Hurricane outside linebackers. The Hokies didn't bust their protections. More often than not, when Motley received pressure, it was the result of Wade Hansen and/or Jonathan McLaughlin being overwhelmed by edge speed.
On this play, Hansen over sets to compensate for the speed of Al-Quadin Muhammad off the edge.
In other words, Hansen tried to rush outside and in the process he lost technique. In this case, Hansen got too far outside and stands too upright. As result, he lost his low center of gravity and balance.
Hansen's momentum is moving backwards and doesn't get his hands up. Muhammad punches with his right hand at Hansen's left shoulder. If a defensive lineman initiates contact with the pass blocker first, the defensive lineman can dictate leverage. A pass blocker always wants to punch first and then slide. Muhammad gets Hansen off balance and drives him back into Motley's lap. This just isn't good enough from Hansen. Both he and McLaughlin struggled against speed rushes all day long.
Defensive Malaise
As confounding as the Hokies' offense was, the defense sent me on more of an emotional roller coaster ride. Up front, the Hokies were dominant against the Miami running game. The Hokies' d-line used their speed to get penetration at the point of attack. When the Hurricanes were able to effectively double team the Hokie defensive linemen, those defensive linemen stood up to the double teams to allow the linebackers and alley players to make the tackle in support. The system was working beautifully.
Yet, the same defensive line group couldn't get consistent pressure on Brad Kayaa (who I feel will be a first round NFL draft pick) with four. The Hokies were solid from an assignment perspective in the secondary. Yet, without pressure, Kayaa was able to put the football in positions where his receivers had matchup advantages.
Kayaa led Joseph Yearby, who slid right behind Andrew Motuapuaka on a circle route, out of the backfield perfectly on Miami's opening scoring drive.
Herb Waters outmuscled Terrell Edmunds for a jump ball to lead to Miami's touchdown before the half.
And Perhaps Kayaa's best throw of the day was a pinpoint strike to Rashawn Scott against outstanding coverage to close the first half.
The Hokies are in a dime defense and are using a leverage zone. At the bottom of the screen, if a receiver breaks to the outside, Brandon Facyson will jump the route. If a receiver breaks to the inside, Anthony Shegog with take him with inside leverage technique. The Hurricanes run a quick out from the slot and a deep in by Scott on the outside. Facyson jumps the quick out, and Shegog is in perfect position against the deep in route. If you freeze the clip just before the ball hits Scott in the hands, you will see that every Miami receiver is well covered. Shegog has his body in between Scott and the football. You can't ask for better coverage, especially from the backup whip linebacker against one of the best receivers in the ACC.
Kayaa only has one option. Because Shegog played inside leverage, he has his back to Kayaa. Kayaa knows that it is unlikely that Shegog can get his head around quickly to intercept a pass. Kayaa throws a high, leading pass that Scott can adjust to. Shegog can't get his head around quickly enough and Scott makes the play. This is NFL execution against excellent college defense. Miami is just plain better on this play.
That basically sums up the day on defense. The Hurricanes were able to beat the Hokies on slants and occasionally win those 50/50 passes on the outside. The Hokies' defense put Miami into third-and-long situations with excellent run defense, and then couldn't get off the field. The absences of Kendall Fuller and C.J. Reavis are becoming felt. Inexperience in the secondary (even though it is worth noting that Mook Reynolds was outstanding on Saturday and it seems like quarterbacks are going out of their way not to target him in the passing game) make it much tougher to run the robber zones that made the Hokies secondary so dangerous in 2006-2010.
I think I was most troubled by a seeming lack of enthusiasm on defense Saturday. The Hokies did lots of good things, especially in the running game. Even when I saw Luther Maddy blow up an inside zone, or Dadi Nicolas pressure Kayaa into an incompletion, there was very little celebration. Guys got up off the ground and got lined back up for the next play. It was surreal.
That carried over to the on the field performance as the game moved along. After Motley's third turnover, the defensive pursuit seemed to lag. This play summed up my frustration.
The Hurricanes are driving to ice the game. They run an inside zone to the right. Nigel Williams blows up a down block and gets penetration. Motuapuaka scrapes and wraps up the Hurricanes running back with some help by Ronny Vandyke for a one-yard gain. This is a really nice play.
Then, I watch the play again. Woody Baron and Dadi Nicolas are on their behinds. Adonis Alexander and Facyson are scraping across in support, yet I wouldn't call it flying to the football. And, most infuriatingly, Deon Clarke has completely quit on the play and is walking towards the football with his hands by his side. That isn't Hokie football or Lunchpail Defense.
This Saturday, a solid Duke team comes to Blacksburg. The Hokies responded with a big win over Duke in Durham last season after three straight losses. If the Hokies don't deliver a similarly inspired effort this week, the Frank Beamer era may be setting over the Blue Ridge.

Comments
Thank you very much for the analysis.
I can't stand the wailing and gnashing of teeth after losses which has nothing but escalated the past year.
Analysis in the sea of emotion is like a life raft on a stormy sea.
Heart attack Hokies
Why must you play so badly?
Knock it off Hokies
Decent Hoku.
No, not decent, it was outstanding Haiku.
Haikus lamenting bad football will always get upvotes from me
How did we get here?
How are we sub-.500?
Damn, my liver hurts.
Well, that part's pretty easy.
OSU - Lost QB1, offense turtled in fear of losing QB2, defense finally gave in.
ECU - Defense shit the bed against a mobile QB, despite a strong effort from the offense.
Pitt - Flip the script. Running back rotation finally kills us, Motley doesn't have enough to carry the team.
Miami - Motley has a day of questionable decisions that undoes a strong showing in the run game. Defensive mistakes and penalties seal the deal.
I really can't argue with any of that.
100% agree with you on all accounts, but I was trying to keep the Haiku thing going. And evidently failed miserably.
But now here we are
The Haikus have all but stopped
Sam Rogers is pissed
Shitty shit shit shit
What I get for replying
Straight from comments page
don't fret we forgive
but there are consequences
film review for penance
Harsher punishment
Play ECU forever
And now I am sad
pretty sure he was just making a hokie haiku
Like this:
Bud's infallible
We will fill that trophy case
Keep the koolaid coming
Nice read and analysis as always French, good to know we have a monster at rb next year for whoever is coaching...
McMillion, Ford, Cam, Bucky, Kline (maybe), Rogers, 3rd receiver to be named later.
If we can keep this recruiting class together, we will fill that 3rd receiver slot. We've got a number of solid WR recruits.
Can that be his nickname now?
he needs to put up a lot more yards to justify that one. Like at least 3x as many.
Or even 2392 times as much as his 418 yards.
On only 59 carries
Only 676 yards to go before he reaches 1,000,000 millimeters. Doable, especially if he can put up oh let's say 276 against UVa!
I saw Hansen's attempt to block Muhammed in real time and thought "Yeah, French isn't going to like that one."
The good: McMillian
The bad: Hansen's edge blocking
The ugly: Deon Clarks effort at the end
Brutal.
When Deon Clarke was sitting on his ass looking the wrong direction on that last drive on an extremely important third down as Kaaya scrambled to that side of the field, four seasons of disappointment welled up inside me and I just wanted to scream for like 10 seconds, no words, just a scream. Unfortunately, I was at a tailgate and had to remain relatively calm.
I felt the same way. I was watching at home and did, in fact, shout at my TV "What the hell are you doing, Clarke? GET UP!" He was on his butt staring at the end zone while Kaaya rolled out with defenders in pursuit. It's like it was a foregone conclusion in his mind that they would score and he just wanted to witness it. I was outraged to see that from a Hokie defender. Maybe LPD needs to be retired until these guys remember what the VT tradition is. Sitting on your butt waiting for someone else to finish off a play is the opposite of the blue-collar approach we're accustomed to seeing. Probably nothing in the game bothered me more than that play.
i am not a football guy but that was perhaps the most blatent no call of offensive pass interference
receiver blocked Clarke onto his backside, then got involved in the play, drawing Moto, and maybe Alexander
our guys almost handled the fiasco, but the back DB/safety Alexander? took a half step too much toward the guy that blocked Clarke and that Moto picked up... that half step was just enough to get the pass complete
i'll never have to worry about being a HC... were I frank I would have gotten tossed, belly bumped, showed up the refs for that one... of course since I don't really know football I'd have had to ask whether it was indeed offensive pass interference
the inability of this staff to get on the officials during this game was beyond my comprehension
An interesting possibility, I didn't notice this, regardless he should have gotten up and continued playing. However, this would explain why he was sitting on the ground doing what looked like pouting.
Connecting with the offsides on 3rd and 20 in the review above, where the entire defense just stopped after the snap and pointed at the Miami O-line, it seems that a lot of our guys are set on trying to play the refs rather than the other team. If there's any truth to that at all, quit griping about calls and play until you hear a whistle. If the call doesn't go your way, get pissed off, pin your ears back, and make a play on the next one.
Clark was coming across seemed to want to cover the guy the guy PLANTED him... it was like a punt return block...
someone plants you like that 1) totally unexpected 2)clark seemed to point yell to official 3) these guys are world class athletes... you can't give them seconds to get up and get back in the play... it was going to take Clark seconds to get up
should he have tried to do something? I think I would have tried to plant Kaayu, f*** the 15 yard penalty... the damage was done he couldn't get back in the pass play... then again we always had low threshold for late hit 15 yard message penalties... and we're surprised when we can't play football very well? Kaayu is a skinny mofo... a late hit on that play is how old school VT woulda played this turn of events... we weren't going down like that
its a game of aggression, late hits, nastiness, imposing your will on other human beings, play after play after play
all these xos we forget that sometimes... well we are so well behaved I'm not sure we have forgotten anything
there was a very pretty red soccer ball beyond a yard fence at one of my kids games... my generation we would have jumped over the fence, yelled at the owner, maybe thrown a rock at the house for putting the fence up... this generation, the kids are just like 'its ok mom and dad will get me another one'
we need some kids who throw rocks at owners while playing this game... JMHO
when your coaches don't stand up for you why bother frankly... take the late hits, shots at knees, the knees to the thigh... just take your annual beating and head back to the Burg
Are you saying that we used to play dirty/cheap football? Cause I have completely missed out on seeing that in my life(with the exception of Marcus Vick).
Ed Wang used to get called for leg whips all the time. That's about the extent of the dirt that I can think of...
After their cheap shot on Brewer, yeah send a message.
That message being what? We're willing to be as undisciplined and dirty as you?
Retaliation sounds like a good idea until you realize the second guy always gets the flag. You only hurt yourself more by stooping to their level.
Guess I missed where Marcus Vick was a dirty/cheap guy because he stepped on Dumervil.
Marcus was a little guy and his action was really pathetic. Dumervil's play acting belonged on a soccer field.
Older VT teams used to look after their own a bit better than these teams do. Alexander seems to be the only kid cut from old school cloth.
Sorry, but Marcus Vick was WAY out of line when he stomped Dumervil.
There are recent examples of VT players looking after each other, notably:
Ehhh not exactly Jake Grove type nasty
Not sure throwing a rock at an innocent landowner is a generational thing. Maybe upbringing? Region? Just sayin...
Please. We all know the type. Put up a fence because neighborhood kids allow their balls into the yard.
These losers now put up cameras and stuff to videotape how often the neighborhood kids come into their fenced yard. Then they put it on the police or neighborhood associations to keep these criminals out of their yard.
Anything but learn to get along with the broader community. Yes, someone should throw rocks at these cretins. They got it comin.
No, nobody should be throwing rocks at property owners.
Please don't teach your kids that this would be OK.
You never know why people have a fence.
Keep their small kids in, keep their pets in, keep the deer from the garden.
Keep the neighbor kids out because they have a pool or their large dog doesn't like strangers and feel threatened by them....
In the good 'ol days VT was always pretty well behaved, despite what you may think. The difference was the blue-collar mentality that was oozing out of the majority of our guys on the field. The mentality that we were the Hokies, we didn't care what school you played for, how many NC's you have won, what your rank was...all that mattered was that we were going to come out and knock you in the mouth because it was football.
I don't see any semblance of that anymore on our team, which depresses me, and is a boon for whomever owns stock in bourbon distilleries. I think it may be a side effect of getting higher starred/more highly touted recruits who feel they deserve rather than want to go out and prove they deserve.
Sorry those guys were fun, but more than just a little dangerous to be around. I get you are only young and live once and want to have a good time... they just needed some gentle guidance on where the boundaries were. So did I, so I'm not making ridiculous judgments about the players. They reminded me of guys I knew at the academies. Always breaking stuff in their pursuit of over the top adventure/fun. A little too much collateral damage, I guess. Different time different place, though I'm still not sure our team has enough of the alpha male top of the foodchain mentality.
I looked back at the tape and Clarke looked like he anticipated getting rubbed by the Miami receiver, got around it only to discover his man aggressively going the other way back through the rub receiver. It was pretty clear he was likely to get picked unless he and the other guy changed players, which it didn't seem to be how they were going to play it. So I think Clarke stuck his legs out and tried to trip the Miami player. It worked, but the Miami WR kept his balance and popped back up a yard down field while Clarke who had an official right on him played up a collision instead of a pass interference. This made his trip look like the receiver knocked him over as he flopped onto the ground.
Anyway, bottom line is I was apparently the only one fooled by this little exchange. Clarke could have been called for PI. The ref was right there and didn't call anything. I don't know what the rules are on rub routes but they are effective and utilized extensively in the NFL. We got a little worked on the play and unfortunately ended up a half step away from having it defended beautifully.
I did the same while watching on TV home and said the exact same thing. The unfortunate part of the story is that my daughter's name is Clarke and she promptly became very upset that I was yelling at her when she wasn't doing anything worthy of it. Sheesh....
I did give him a stern reprimand, and my son (11) said "Why is that guy quitting on the play, the QB still has the ball?"
Ladies and Gentleman, your 2015 Hokies
You're raising your kid right.
nice analysis
would have felt better about the whole game if not for the McM run
Miami had a couple of good receivers... I think Facyson can hang... but I think we lack a stud #2... so I kind of expected us to get beat from slot etc.
not sure our WRs are matchups for Miami... their DBs are usually pretty legit... a few ints doesn't surprise... i really would have like to see more TE (though we saw some for sure) targeting what is usually a smaller LB, DB corps for the canes
but the McM play... it seemed as if if it had been drawn up as an option... he would have followed the pulling linemen to a big gain... he likely would have stayed in the game... who knows... but for him to get blamed for the execution of a play that doesn't seen very appropriate given the DE speed mismatch...I mean if we ran right at the DE I could see it.... but playing OT passive...and neither the QB nor the RB seemed to have an optino... i dunno maybe QB had the option... but why run the kid on an option with his collarbone?... but maybe Brewer should have taken it down and followed the pulling blocks
maybe McM was hurt by the DL who seemed to bring his knees down into the thigh on that play...knees to the thigh can end your day (though McM returned a kickoff later).... but the insinuation that he was brought out of the game because of poor play on that play??? i just find that absurd.... disgusting if true... our coaches can't be that dimwitted? seems like lots we don't know, so no sense in jumping to conclusions... troubling for certain
I didn't get to catch the entire game, but I too wondered if McMillian got hurt some time in the 2nd half. When he returned the kick, he did not have the same pop and quickness he usually displays. Maybe a coach laid into him after the fumble or maybe he was banged up.
on that long completion before the half, it kills me that half the defense was just sitting there waiting for the play to be called dead. COME ON PEOPLE!!! PLAY TO THE DANG WHISTLE. On plays like that I want to see the QB sacked and Golden happy to have a penalty to accept.
old days that play was a great play to smash Kaayu to the ground... last weekend it was a great time to take a break
Yeah to me once you go offside you should just go full on unabated to the qb so they call the play dead. Usually doesn't matter that much but a good qb and receivers will go downfield on a free play every time
when the referees don't blow VT offsides aggressively you know fundamental things have changed
they're not worried about skinny arse Kaayu getting planted upside down... its just VT
Those first two clips were SFW Hokie football porn. That's what I shall choose to focus on to keep the cap on the bottle this morning.
I have always wondered if defensive highlight reels for Hokie football are to Bud Foster what normal Internet porn is to the rest of the world.
Great work French.
Yes Miami has some good receivers, but I still wonder about the teaching of TGray. We draw more PI's and see big plays vs. our secondary that could be int's because of the inability to locate the football. Is he teaching this? Seem to recall a statement by him or one of our DB's that recovery speed is better without one's head turned but that runs counter to what it seems every NFL DB will do. Regardless, incredibly frustrating to see, year after year.
http://www.thekeyplay.com/virginia-tech-football/2015/06/9434/beating-bu...
One of my favorite articles on here. Corner has always been my favorite defensive position and it's frustrating to see/hear all the misconceptions and misunderstandings of various techniques.
I saw a play in the NFL this weekend where the CB looked back for the ball and lost his man, it resulted in a TD. It goes both ways
"Woody Baron and Dadi Nicolas are on their behinds. Adonis Alexander and Facyson are scraping across in support, yet I wouldn't call it flying to the football. And, most infuriatingly, Deon Clarke has completely quit on the play and is walking towards the football with his hands by his side. That isn't Hokie football or Lunchpail Defense."
Call out the coaches for not getting the juice flowing. But, when the game was still within reach, this is as much a breakdown of on-field leadership as it is on coaching. At some point peers need to 'encourage' each other to step up and pick up the lunch pail.
The lack of enthusiasm kills me. I can live with getting beat if they are at least trying. This team seems to quit at times.
I almost wonder if Beamer is retiring and the team already knows or something. I just can't fathom the lack of emotion.
Question: how many PBUs did Facyson get in this game?
Zero, per Hokiesports. 1 solo tackle, 1 assisted tackle, that's it.
So, unlike NCSt, essentially he got torched? Or did they just not pass in his general direction during the game?
Honestly, I don't recall Facyson being mentioned during the game, so they probably didn't even throw at him. He and Mook sounded like they were pretty well on lockdown. What was killing us was slants through the middle against the LBs and safeties.
I'm pretty sure they were avoiding he and Mook. Unless I blocked something out, he had a really good game.
I don't think there were many if any targets his way
Ah, but does that mean they were throwing away from him?
i noticed Clarke and Dadi have a poor exchange on the sideline when Tech took their second timeout before halftime. Not sure if it was being sick of Dadi's mouth or Clarke just having a tantrum. It seemed the latter with his play in the second half.
Man I feel like Bud must have not noticed Deon or he would have thrown his tail on the bench. I mean I'm typically all for putting the best man out there but that kind of crap has to be nipped in the bud immediately.
Initially there was no pun intended with this statement. After further review I reverse my original intent. There is now pun intended.
Great writeup, French, and very eloquently titled, to boot. You know the Hokies are having a bad year when inconsistency, melancholy and desperation are in the forum topic title!
I thought when I was watching live that our young secondary guys were covering their guys tight, but we got outmuscled or that Kaaya just put it in exactly the right spot for the receiver to make a catch.
I really do hope we see more carries for Travon against Duke, but not that crazy counter disaster play!
Question for you: it seemed to me that our defense got more pressure on Kaaya in the 2nd half, for the most part. Was that because of a fiery halftime speech from Bud, personnel changes, scheme changes, or something else?
Watching that play on the clip, the only thing I can think of is that Brewer screwed up. I think it was a design keeper that he decided that he didn't want it. It looked like a great play if Brewer had tucked and run. I am going to chalk it up to him being out of action and move on.
If the play call is for the qb coming back from a broken clavicle to keep the ball, then he's not the one who screwed up - Loeffler is.
It's healed, if he can throw and his motion is not effected then it's healed, period, end of story. Now his thought process may give him pause but that's not the fault of the OC if Brewer has said he is mentally ready then it's on Brewer.
If it was fully healed 100%, then he would have been starting. A bone can easily be healed enough to be able to throw, but not enough to get pounded by a linebacker. So definitely not "period, end of story"
When a bone is declared "healed" or "fixed" that's it there is no more healing or strengthening to,do for that bone. That does not mean muscle or tissue still doesn't need time but the bone is as heals as it's going to get.
That's not true:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/health/19really.html?_r=0
Key quote: "because there is no weight or pressure on the limb, it becomes weaker — except at the site of the callus, where calcium is being deposited.
'The area that's healing is undergoing rapid mineralization, but because you can't use it, the rest of the bone is demineralized,' Dr. Amaral said."
I say again - it the staff was concerned enough to want to hold Brewer out another week and not start him, then they shouldn't have played him later regardless of the game circumstances, and they sure as hell shouldn't have been calling qb counters or draws with him. It's irresponsible.
This would be true except Brewer was throwing within a few weeks of the injury and continued to use his arm. A broken Bone is no more likely to break once healed than an unbroken one.
Brewer's collarbone didn't heal in any conventional way. They inserted/attached metal and screws or whatever to strengthen and support the fractured collarbone. So while the rest of his collarbone structure probably didn't suffer as much due to lack of motion and use, I doubt the actual fracture has fully healed as it would if there was none of that support structure. In any case, I still don't think any of it matters. If the medical staff cleared him for taking hits, then the offensive staff and Brewer should be absolved from any criticism about play choices. If they cleared him but his ability to survive a hit from running with the ball is still in question, then shame on the medical staff. Any coach or player shouldn't be able to override the medical staff...just ask the Redskins.
Watching it live and watching the replay, there were 2 different plays being run. Not sure who messed up and forgot the play if it was Brewer or McMillian, but the entire line wasn't blocking to where McMillian ran. It looks much more like a sweep around the right side. And, it looks like Bucky is on the left side looking for a pass or trying to fake a pass.
If it was McMillian's fault, I go back to my theory he got hurt late in the game (maybe banged too hard on the head) which is why we didn't see him. I know the clock became important, but much to my chagrin we weren't running a hurry up offense most of the 4th quarter.
I really love the Xs and Os that French does and I really appreciate them.
But as for the team, i think this thing is beyond the Xs and Os. I look at the calls that the coaches made, execution and effort by some players and just the overall feel. It just seem bbblllaaaaahhhhh.
Off course I'm not giving up on the team but we need to win dirty, win a close, dirty game to propel us into some sort of a momentum swing.
After seeing your title, all I can think of is that we should make this our official album of the season:
Take it away, Corgan
Come on now. We're not the Louisville basketball program.
Edit: This was supposed to be in response to two comments ago, which has now also been edited.
the analyst in me caught that quickly and fixed it. But it seems the coaches on VT football can't figure out anything
Watching this team makes me feel like Randy Quaid in Major League.
After watching the McMillian fumble play probably 20 times, my guess would be that McMillian made the mistake. I believe, this is strictly speculation, that it was indeed a counter play but McMillian countered the wrong way, if that makes any sense. I would presume that Travon was supposed to counter step left as if it was a zone left play and then come back right behind his pulling blockers. The way that all 5 linemen blocked on the play supports my thought here. French pointed out how Nijman passively blocked to cutoff backside penetration which leads me to think no matter what, the play was supposed to go to the right, especially with the way Nijman's first step is to the right to seal the hole vacated by Teller pulling. Also, Gallo turns his man to left, again leading me to think the play was going right. For a split second it looks like once Gallo had his man completely turned, he released to go upfield to find another body to block before realizing that McMillian is just to his left with the ball. Literally all 5 linemen as well as Malleck block as if it is a run to the right. Brewer clearly isn't reading the DE like he would if it was a called read play. If it was a called QB counter, then McMillian would not have kept the ball. I just think that Travon made a freshman mistake and countered the wrong way.
Maybe French can weigh in to either support or disprove my thinking here....?
I actually was getting ready to make a similar observation.
I think you're on to something. There was a nice wall formed up sealing defenders to the left that gave McMillian a nice alley if he had just cut to his right after and gone upfield behind Nijman. Instead he jams himself up and dances left trying to go around Nijman to the outside, and gets nailed by the passively screened (unblocked) DE. Meanwhile the slot defender is unblocked and would've shut him down at the LOS even if he got past the DE.
Here is something that I just do not understand. Where was the fire and the emotion in the Miami game? The coaches specifically mentioned that they addressed this before the NC State game and we had guys making plays and celebrating. One week later and right back to general malaise. Watch that first clip of McMillian again. Not only does he drop a couple of sick moves, but he finishes the run by lowering his shoulder and running through one Miami defender (#26) while carrying another defender (#1) on his back! If I was on that sideline I would have went nuts watching that, yet what are our players doing during that play? Reacting like they are watching paint dry. I just don't get it.
I miss the days of emotion and swagger we used to have back in the Exum days. He literally almost fought the entire LOLUVa team by himself one time. That guy was always fired up, and everyone around him fed off of it.
edit: We had that swagger for a long time, I feel like it tapered off dramatically after Exum.
Reavis was our Swag.. then he got snitched on and we all know how that ended.
I know, right? The whole miami game, I saw none of this:

so much this. This is really the first game I looked at their enthusiasm....well NCST was but they fixed it there. It was horrible as mentioned. there was a 4th down play that we stopped Miami on where our guys again just got up and went to the sideline. Ummm....you just stopped them on 4th down. You get the ball. Where's the fire?? Hopefully whatever the coaches did NCST week they do this week and show all this pathetic non-emotion crap from on the field to on the sideline. That was one of the most frustrating things about the game to me. So many obvious glaring examples of them just not being up for the game.
All I see everytime I watch this clip is how well Miami's Right guard is at wrapping up when he tackles Maddy.
That is all I saw as well. I get that a lot of holding doesn't get called, but that is a blatant take down.
Come on guys, the refs can't see everything. It's not like one of them was 7 yards away with a completely unobstructed view of the mauling...