
The most dynamic Virginia Tech defenses in the ACC played a heavy dose of zone coverage. Following the Hokies' disastrous 2003 campaign, in which Tech finished No. 76 in passing defense, Bud Foster began to incorporate more variety of coverages, including basic umbrella zones like the 4-4 G coverage, robber coverages, zone blitzes and leverage zones to confuse defenses and force turnovers.
The plethora of interceptions zone coverages produced paid dividends during the Hokies' dominance over the ACC's Coastal Division from 2005-11. The 2010 Virginia Tech defense was one of Foster's worst defenses against the run in recent memory, yet the Hokies closed out the season with an ACC championship due largely in part to Foster's ability to bait quarterbacks into throwing picks against zone coverage (T-No. 2 nationally, 23 interceptions).
After the 2015 season where the Hokies were forced to play mostly man coverage due to an inexperienced secondary, Foster is primed to play more zone coverage in 2016. Foster recently stated Tech worked on more quarters and zone coverage in spring practice.
"I want to get back and let those kids understand the concepts of two deep, three deep besides just playing man," Foster told The Key Play. "And in man, we gave up some plays, but also you get more eyes on the football, and particularly nowadays with the way offenses are trying to split your defense as far as running bubbles over here and a quarterback counter over here and a sweep over here, splitting just means you've got to have more eyes on the football, and that's one thing where I wanted to get back to what we did back two years ago and before."
Quarters coverage with leverage zone technique, and robber coverages have been hallmarks of Foster's pass defense. Leverage in quarters allows defenders to show man yet only account for half the defensive space in the coverage. Robber coverage provides the guise of open receivers, but it's a trap to rotate a defender into the "open" space when the quarterback isn't expecting it.
Over the years, outside leverage technique with a robber inside has produced more than its fair share of interceptions. The quarterback is baited to throw seemingly open quick slants and post routes, but the inside leverage help, often the safety, robbers over underneath the "open route". No Virginia Tech team was better at running this coverage than the 2006 defensive unit, as evidenced against North Carolina.
UNC identifies blitz and runs play-action with a post against the whip linebacker. The quarterback has to read the free safety. He reads the free safety biting up to support the run, and sees the whip protecting the outside of the field. The post should be open.
However, the quarterback never sees deep zone coverage rotation. Rover Aaron Rouse rotates to the deep middle, watching the quarterback the entire way. The quarterback throws the post and the Rouse steps in front of the pass for an easy interception.
"We want to get back to what we've been doing," Foster said. "What we changed from the beginning of season 2004, to where we were last year, I want to get back to doing those things up to where we're just not playing man all the time. I want to get a few more eyes on the ball. Play a little bit more, show a little bit more two high. Even though we might be playing some man, we want to do a little bit more disguise, and things of that nature, which we have done in the past. But I think the big thing is getting more eyes on the football."
Those uniquely talented Tech teams, along with the limitations of traditional one- and two-back offenses incorporated by most teams in the mid-2000's, allowed Foster to defend the most high risk areas of the field and force quarterbacks to throw where Foster wanted them to. The scheme required experience, communication, and full trust in both the scheme and technique. If required, Foster could even run a traditional Cover 4 zone, with the three linebackers ranging underneath.
The Hokies were successful playing this softer zone because they were able to generate pass rush which forced quick throws and kept the quarterback in the pocket. The linebackers and defensive backs could play soft and "keep their eyes on the ball". The soft coverage took away big plays. The "eyes on the football" allowed defenders to read the quarterback and come up to make sure tackles on short routes.
So, Why So Little Zone Now?
In 2015, many wondered why Foster played so little leverage or umbrella zone when his defense was giving up so many big plays. Injuries, and inexperience within the scheme were big reasons according to Foster.
"Last year was just one of those years where we had a lot of injuries, a lot of situations that put us in tough situations," Foster told The Key Play.
In order to play the quarters coverage and to robber, the secondary players have to understand their positioning and technique in the coverage and be in the right place.
Here is an example from Tech's disastrous 16-21 loss at Pittsburgh in 2014.
To the bottom of the clip, Kendall Fuller is playing outside leverage coverage against Tyler Boyd. If Boyd runs an out or a corner route, Fuller is in terrific position for an interception. Against a post or a slant route, Fuller has to depend on Kyshoen Jarrett for inside help.
Jarrett takes a poor angle to cover the post. Boyd makes the easy catch. Jarrett runs into Fuller to allow Boyd to break free for a touchdown. This is almost the exact same route concept and defense (with the rover rotating over from the boundary to give help) as the UNC interception, but the poor execution turned a possible interception into a touchdown.
These breakdowns happened much more often in 2015. The Hokies were inexperienced at rover. Chuck Clark was playing a new position at free safety. The Hokies lost Kendall Fuller at corner, and seemed to be in a constant state of flux at the nickel spot. As result, there were numerous busts in leverage coverage. Defending spread offenses that can attack vertically posed an even greater challenge.
Let's analyze a few clips from Tech's game against North Carolina last season. On this play, the Tar Heels line up with trips to the field and a lone receiver to the boundary. The Tar Heels stress the leverage zone vertically and when the receivers identify the leverage, they break away from it.
Nickel Greg Stroman is in the slot playing a short inside leverage coverage. Corner Terrell Edmunds is playing a short, outside leverage zone. Free safety Chuck Clark is playing a deep third. Andrew Motuapuaka is playing an inside leverage on the tight end.
UNC responds with a vertical route concept. Tight end (Y) Kendrick Singleton (No. 81) runs hard up the seam. Slot receiver (Z) Austin Proehl (No. 7) identifies Stroman's leverage and breaks away with it. If Stroman played outside leverage, the Y-streak takes away inside help and the slant/in/post is open. If Stroman was playing inside leverage, the tight end would likely be open down the seam, or the X receiver (who gets vertical behind the corner to draw him deeper and then curls back) will open up the Z out.
When you watch the video from the quarterback's vantage point, the play design opens up all kinds of vulnerabilities against this coverage.
Motuapuaka has no deep help against Singleton's seam route because the safety is aligned out wide. Motuapuaka has to turn and run, back to the football, down the seam with the tight end and hope that Marquise Williams doesn't recognize the coverage or makes a poor throw.
The play also exposes why the Hokies have trouble with mobile quarterbacks.The routes of the tight end and running back run both Motuapuaka and Deon Clarke completely out of the middle of the field. If Williams decides to run, UNC has five blockers and a runner versus four defenders. Dadi Nicolas ran past the pocket which created more space than the defensive tackles can defend. There is plenty of room for Williams to take off and get the first down.
Despite all this, Williams makes the wrong read and throws the out under the sticks. This is exactly what Foster wants in this coverage: a short completion with two defenders (Edmunds and Stroman) bracketing the receiver to make the tackle short of the first down marker.
Instead, the inexperience in zone coverage allows UNC receiver Austin Proehl the space to make a play. Edmunds and Stroman are very slow to react. Stroman takes a very poor angle, and Proehl makes a sharp cut to get up the field. Stroman has no help with Clark tied up on the X's deep vertical route and Motuapuaka running to the end zone with the tight end. Instead of a relatively easy change of possession, North Carolina converts third-and-13.
Leverage coverage gets exposed even more when offenses attack vertically with all three receivers to the wide side of the field. This time, the corner and the nickel are both playing outside leverage, with the free safety running to protect the outside third. UNC counters with three vertical routes to the field.
Stroman and Edmunds both play under the outside release go routes of the X and Z. This time, UNC aligned Ryan Switzer as the Y receiver, and Motuapuaka has to run vertical with Switzer. Clark is on an island and has three deep routes coming into his zone.
To Clark's credit, he recognizes Switzer as the primary threat and recovers back to the inside. Clark makes one hell of a play to dislodge the ball from Switzer. Motuapuaka (no fault of his own) is beaten, and Clark probably doesn't recover if Williams so much as looks at one of the outside verticals before throwing inside. This kind of coverage can't sustain itself without much more pressure at the line of scrimmage, no matter how many defenders (in this case 7) are in coverage. Despite seven defenders in coverage, Switzer and the split end to the wide side are both open.
Play-action and run-pass options put more strain on the scheme. The Hokie linebackers were so committed to stopping the run that receivers were wide open all over the field.
UNC runs a packaged play on second-and-ten.
There is a screen look to wide side of the field, on top of that Williams fakes an inside zone to the left, and then looks up at the receiver to the boundary.
Boundary receiver Mack Hollins runs a skinny post. From the rover position, Anthony Shegog should have short inside leverage to take away Hollins' slant or post options. Brandon Facyson is playing deep outside leverage. Instead, Shegog wanders to the boundary flat. Both Clarke and Motuapuaka are fitting inside on the run fake, leaving nobody in the middle of the field with inside leverage to help Facyson. Williams probably didn't have an easier throw in his career.
Foster hopes a year of experience for his young secondary yields more comfort and familiarity of the scheme. Virginia Tech's ability to play more zone effectively will minimize big plays. More defenders' eyes on the football will produce more Hokie turnovers. Even considering the Hokies' poor defensive performances last season against Duke, Pitt, and East Carolina, a turn over or big third down stop could have produced a couple more wins. With offensive productivity and ball control expected to improve for the Hokies, a defensive unit that gets off the field on third-and-long will be a key for success in 2016.

Comments
Great analytics, I know I speak for all of us in saying "thank you" for taking the time and effort to break this footage down. Here's to hoping for better production in our 2016 pass defense. Cheers!
First off,

In clip 9, the last clip, how is that not ineligible man downfield on UNC? The Right Tackle, the Center and the Left Guard are all multiple yards downfield when the QB throws the ball. If I was Shegog I'd be expecting a run in that situation too.
If I recall correctly this type of downfield movement by the OL is allowed on screen passes, but a 10 yard crossing route is not a screen pass. Y NO FLAG REF

p.s I hate UNC
The only Tar Heels that AREN'T playing screen are Williams and Hollins. Looks like screen design..
The O line's tutors told them they could go downfield so they did
So, in the effort to be concise, I wrote about my frustration regarding package plays and linemen down field and then deleted it because it was a side topic. Please note, this is rampant throughout college football. The Hokies used it effectively the last two seasons and Fuente will use it on run-pass options and screen package plays. As a general commentary on the state of college football, I believe that the interpretation of the lineman down field rule is way too loose and puts the defense at a significant disadvantage. I hope this gets tightened up.
I had a feeling you had very strong feelings about this. I was originally going to comment on the above picture that "the short answer is that this rarely gets called anymore on these types of offenses" There are some examples of Baylor having linemen 7+ yards downfield on RPO's, several plays where they had to throw around a lineman to complete a pass because they were so far downfield they were getting in the way of the pass. I also hope this gets tightened up.
I hate it too.
I guess as long as we're abusing the situation as much as the teams we're playing I can live with it, but I'd much rather see strict enforcement. Spread offenses are already hard enough to defend without breaking the rules.
Usually, when the ACC refs tighten up on things, it gets tightened up on us, but not the team we're playing. Unfortunately. Cue Ron Cherry giving us the business.
Man it's tough to watch the last few plays after the 2006 appetizer. Great article, as always.
Amen. I am really liking the rumors I am reading about bringing the nasty back to the DBU along with some zone. That hearkens back to the brandon flowers days of coming in from off screen and putting the fear of the terror dome in their hearts for their next pass.
Yeah, can't do that any more. Some hard hits that aren't anywhere near the helmet are still getting flagged. Over the last few years, refs would rather throw excessive flags than miss a single legitimate one.
Well done. I think the zone concept will help allow our defensive line time to put more pressure on the QB.
French's awesome write-ups, if you needed another reason to join TKP Club. :)
Thank you!
So, French, I notice you haven't join the key players club... /s
psh, freeloader.
Great write up as always French. From the limited access you have and what you have seen from SC is Foster actually getting back to what he said he would like to or is it still too early to tell?
We have seen almost nothing of team scheme. In drills, I see a ton of the corners playing press man. Brian Mitchell emphasized press man at WVU. Part of me suspects the zone talk, especially given the personnel, is a red herring and they just plan to play more true man under with some deep safety help. Again, I may be wrong. I do know that what we see versus Liberty will NOT be what we see versus Tennessee, even though they have relatively similar offenses.
I really think we have more consistent push from the d line this year. I a very bullish on Walker and Settle providing great depth. Baron has looked really good in the limited snap chats. Return of the Terrordome????
if not more push, at least minimize the gaps inside of the rushing DE's, and use a blitz from one side or the other to dictate which side of the field where the QB can roll...hopefully toward the strength of the zone coverage.
Yes- account for the 4 main avenues for escape, collapse the pocket, and keep the ball in front of you in the secondary. Bud will continue to be aggressive, but with the loose rules for RPOs and spread systems, the ticket now seems to be win up front, keep the passing game in front of you, and score more than your opponent.
One more note- this analysis is built off of Foster's comments about zone. To play devil's advocate, while Foster has talked about zone, new cornerback's coach Brian Mitchell played a ton of true press man at West Virginia. The difference between leverage and press man is that in press man, the covering defender breaks with the receiver no matter if he cuts inside or outside and doesn't play leverage. I watched WVU play Liberty and Baylor and they played press man well over 2/3 of the snaps.
Given how secretive this camp has been, Foster may have talked a ton about zone but I wouldn't be shocked if they came out pressing the Vols all over the field.
In one of the recent videos, Foster also said they are teaching new "techniques".
Yes, and in the early camp snap chat footage they were showing press man drills where the corner had to react and chase the receiver on both inside and outside releases.
Does our talent lean towards press coverage or zone?
Zone, if they play their technique. True man scares me if you don't have a ton of corner depth. They don't have a ton of corner depth.
Which style would better take advantage of getting pressure on the quarterback since Tennessee is thin up front at tackle?
Both styles would benefit tremendously from a better pass rush and not getting too far upfield.
You would hope the Hokies can get there with four. Ekanem is going against a very talented kid in Drew Richmond, but it will be only his second ever DI game. The DE's have to contain rush and keep Dobbs hemmed in.
With so many DT QB's these days, I'd almost rather concede a side to the QB rather than letting him break free up the middle. Geometry says that it takes about 40% more steps/time to gain ground at a 45 degree angle than straight ahead. Plug the middle with the rush, bring a DB or LB from one side, and encourage the QB to roll toward the strength of the zone or away from the strength of the formation.
#TimSettleForQB
That sounds like a losing strategy. I would rather the coaches just spend the time working on D-line contain and discipline instead.
I really hope our line gets to know the Vols QB as well as we got to know Louisville's. #GroupHugs
I don't think sound strategy and proper fundamentals are mutually exclusive. In my way of thinking, this is just strategic "leverage".
Prior to the proliferation of mobile QB's, defenses capitalized on numbers advantages and the sideline. Spread offenses have more than mitigated that. [I think the best play ever designed is one man play action (e.g., Tebow under Urban Meyer).] A well designed play guarantees the offense has a numbers and/or matchup advantage somewhere. The only question is whether they have the time to find it and execute. If defenses simply try to match the offense, they will inevitably lose. Foster said it himself, the spread offenses create "creases" in the defense.
Spread offenses adopt several principles from basketball...spacing on the field, creating mismatches, moving the ball quickly from one point to another. So my suggestion is do what basketball teams do on defense as well...overplay to force the offense to do certain things. Defense can't eliminate mismatches. It can dictate the path of least resistance.
It is no different than the "robber" concept in the secondary which "invites" a certain throw and then takes advantage of that decision. I'm saying, "invite" the QB to roll to the side where the defense is most prepared.
That is exactly what Foster wants to do- dictate where the ball goes. He has been successful schematically for several years. The problem has been that ultimately, scheme doesn't win individual match ups. East Carolina's 4th wide receiver had a career day. CJ Brown runs up the middle. Ultimately, guys have to make plays.
At least this season, I think the linebackers will at least have fewer blockers to deal with if the front performs as I expect they will.
I don't see how this is any different than a designed pass rush opening a lane for a 5th rusher coming on a blitz except that you let the QB out of the pocket first and hope he doesn't make a play.
in my best Emily Litella, nevermind
Let the QB run to the side? Pretty sure WVU tried that back in 99. Ended poorly for them.
Great article! And while I loved the use of the clips to illustrate the point, I got lost a bit with terminology - didn't know how to know which UNC receiver was the X, Y, or Z.
Could you guys perhaps throw together a few MS Paint images showing whom you're talking about, as well as the coverage's to augment the clips?
X = split end (widest wide receiver, usually on the LOS)
Z = flanker (wide receiver, usually off the line of scrimmage to allow motion)
S = slot receiver
Y = tight end
So what if it's trips one one side and you have a clear X, but two other WRs that are off the LOS - the inside one becomes an S and the middle one becomes a Z?
X and Z are usually the furthest apart WR
So trips with the X on the LOS furthest to the outside would be
X... S... Z.. [OL] .. Y
Just curious here, but if the formation changes pre-snap does the nomenclature change to the new position, or stay the same as if it were motion?
That was an interesting article, thanks. Been trying to understand more about
the intricacies of coverages and this helps. That robber coverage is something else.
More Zone looks will also help the Hokies contain mobile QBs, which is something that has really hurt them in man coverage during recent years.
You gotta delete that Boyd TD from your database. I can't take that again.
That 2006 UNC game film is worth a watch. Hard to believe how different that D looks, even though the run game scheme is the same.
French's analysis has given me an even bigger appreciation for football. I always get in arguments with my dad when the Hokies falter and he makes it sound like it should have been an interception or blocked but its never just that easy. So much happening in the background to get to that half second moment.
This confirms my observations of M. Williams as a QB. I was never as impressed as a lot of the TV folks were.
They could have beat Clemson by two scores if he could have hit the broad side of a damn barn in that ACCCG. I think he started 5/23 or something and it wasn't all because of pressure.
Since Billdozer did the work, here is a bonus robber clip:
The game is vs Miami in 2010. Stephen Morris had been effective in reading the Hokie corners and throwing quick curl and slant routes when the corners showed soft coverage. Foster then baited Morris into a "fat lady" interception.
Hosley backs off into man coverage and Morris checks him. Morris is so focused on Hosley that he doesn't read the rover backing off and angling deep. This means Hosley has deep inside leverage help, so he can plant his heels and jump any inside-breaking routes knowing that he has deep help. Hosley reads the wide receiver's hips. When those hips turn inside, Hosley jumps in front of the route. Simple.
It is more difficult to do this now because that interior receiver is used as a vertical threat much more, especially by teams like ECU and North Carolina.
I just miss that number next to our name
Wait until Week 3.
I totally understand the expected increase in offensive productivity, but is there a specific reason you expect ball control to improve from last year? The new scheme/new QB situation leads me to believe that we may actually see a slight dip in that category.
Does "ball control"
mean minimizing turnovers or extending drives?
I took it to mean minimizing turnovers
aaaaannnnd I was wrong
Extending drives. Think of it more like Georgia Tech than a Baylor offense. They just use the short passing game and screens to supplement the running game.
How I feel whenever French writes:

Apparently I am Kevin. Susie is Ruxin.