
The Justin Fuente era began in the way many Hokie fans expected. Virginia Tech defeated a game Liberty squad behind a throwback defensive performance and explosive vertical passes from new QB Jerod Evans. Although, the process and execution were far from smooth. Turnovers on special teams, and fumbles by Evans and Cam Phillips gifted the Flames a brief first half lead. Evans was replaced by Brenden Motley after a second turnover (22 seconds before the fourth quarter began), and the offensive line and skill position players were plagued by poor blocking for chunks of the game. The potential is there. There is also a ton of improvement that will be needed in practice this week if Tech hopes to handle the talented Tennessee Volunteers.
Vanilla Defense Still Dominates
There is a checklist for Bud Foster's defense that fans should use to evaluate his group on a game to game basis. The 2015 defense was plagued by poor gap discipline, didn't get off the field on third down, and was prone to giving up big plays.
Admittedly, the litmus test on Saturday wasn't daunting. Liberty started a new quarterback and didn't look particularly threatening most of the day. Still, the defense dominated every facet of the game, and remember, the Hokies' defense struggled at times last season against FCS opponent Furman. The Hokie defense forced three interceptions and held the Flames to 2 of 15 on third down.
All four defensive tackles jammed up double teams and ripped off blocks to make tackles. Ken Ekanem and Tremaine Edmunds prevented the option game from breaking outside. Andrew Motuapuaka had some moments when he could have filled more aggressively. However, I can't recall Motuapuaka missing any tackles. The safeties and Mook Reynolds were very solid in their role filling the alley. Greg Stroman showed playmaking ability with two interceptions as Foster's experiment of not using a true boundary and field corner passed its initial test.
Perhaps most exciting was how the Hokies controlled the game defensively with an incredibly vanilla game plan. There were a few slants and blitzes mixed in, and behind those blitzes the secondary mostly played either man free, or man to man with a bracket leverage zone on one receiver. There was very little zone for Tennessee to scout.
The Picasso moment for Foster was Terrell Edmunds' second quarter interception. The play featured two techniques highlighted recently in this column: 1) A robber coverage using leverage technique, and 2) a Vinny Mihota stunt that cleared a rush lane for a blitzing linebacker.
To start, let's look at the pass rush design. Tech's defensive line slants hard to the right. Ken Ekanem loops around the left side of the offensive line to pressure that side. Mihota draws the right tackle's attention to the inside and Tremaine Edmunds comes free off the corner. Edmunds and Ekanem's pressure only allows the quarterback to throw to his pre-snap read — the skinny post to the slot receiver.
Why is the post the quarterback's first read? Terrell Edmunds aligns well over to the boundary side and Chuck Clark looks like he has one-on-one press coverage against the slot to the field side. Clark aligns in an outside leverage position. With no safety in the middle of the field, a skinny post should be wide open.
The trap is set. As the quarterback's eyes move down to take the snap, Edmunds starts to bail to the middle of the field. He is the inside leverage help for Clark. The quarterback faces quick pressure and throws to his pre-snap read, and Edmunds is there to take the ball away from the "open" receiver. This is textbook Bud Foster design. Edmunds and Clark do a terrific job executing the scheme without tipping off the quarterback.
Mihota looked pretty good coming off the edge when needed as well.
Mihota is aligned wide, and gets a great first step on the right tackle. He turns the corner and uses a rip move and comes in under Stephon Masha's throwing arm. The throw is too far inside and Greg Stroman gets his first of two interceptions. It is a good start.
Hokies Have Interior Offensive Line Woes
A gigantic microscope was on redshirt sophomore Colt Pettit as he stepped into Wyatt Teller's left guard spot against the Flames. Pettit delivered a shaky performance. He appeared confused by some of Liberty's stunts in pass protection and got very little movement in the running game.
On this play, the Hokies run a little kick out power play off right tackle. Right guard Augie Conte pulls to kick out the blitzing safety, and Pettit pulls to lead up on the corner. Bucky Hodges is supposed to crack down on the inside linebacker and Steven Peoples is supposed to block down on the standing defensive end.
This play quickly turns into a dumpster fire. The corner jukes Pettit leaving the young guard on his belly. Peoples gets terrific initial contact, but the defensive end ultimately sheds him and recovers to step into the hole. Hodges barely gets halfway through the first word of "Patty Cake" before the linebacker shrugs him off and joins in on tackling party that Sam Rogers is hosting. The poor guard play and weak blocking by the skill position Hokies were omnipresent through most of the first half.
Pettit wasn't the only interior lineman that struggled. Augie Conte's lethargic performance gave me pause on several occasions. For much of the game, Conte reverted to his old habit of driving his feet into the ground and bench pressing the defender. When the defender has active feet, like Liberty's JaRon Greene (No. 76), they will slide off those "bench press blocks."
Three plays highlight the difference in guard play. The first is an interesting variation on the old lead draw. The Hokies use a little pin and pull block between the guard and the center. The quarterback shows pass and then wraps the ball back to the tailback on the delay. Conte pulls and squares nicely on the linebacker.
However, instead of running through the defender, Conte plants both feet into the ground and throws his hands like he is trying to bench press the linebacker. The linebacker keeps his feet moving and gives a little ground. Conte ends up on his knees, and the linebacker finishes the tackle on Sam Rogers.
On the next clip, Pettit pulls and hits the linebacker on the same type of play. Pettit keeps his feet moving and stays engaged with the linebacker.
Conte has a nice initial turn out block on the three-technique defensive tackle, but again his feet die and the DT trips Travon McMillian from behind.
When Teller entered the game (with Braxton Pfaff replacing Conte) the run game suddenly got going. It was no accident.
On this play, the Hokies run a power lead off of left guard.
Teller drives the defensive tackle almost to the opposite hash mark. Pfaff delivers a nice block to trap the inside linebacker. Again, the Hokies are one block away. Steven Peoples couldn't turn-out the defensive end.
Virginia Tech's Poor Skill Position Blocking Can't Continue
As I noted in my review of Fuente's offenses at Memphis, the tremendous blocking from skill position players was critical in the Tigers' ability to stretch the field horizontally. Against the Flames, the skill position blocking by the Hokies was at best tepid. Some of that can be attributed to a lack of experience in the scheme at a full game tempo. That said, there were some plays that featured ghastly efforts on the edge. I suspect Steven Peoples, Chris Cunningham, Sam Rogers, and all three receivers will receive a tongue lashing at different moments during their film study this week.
On this play, the Hokies run a jet sweep to Henry Murphy. There are three potential defenders with the leverage to hem Murphy: the outside linebacker, the free safety, and the corner. The Hokies have Rogers (tailback), Chris Cunningham (tight end), and Peoples (H-Back) to account for those three defenders.
Peoples stretches to reach the corner and drives him off effectively. Cunningham veer releases and squares like he is going to block the outside linebacker. Cunningham inexplicably lets the linebacker go and releases to the free safety. At this point, Rogers has to block the outside linebacker. Instead, Rogers also runs past him and runs into Cunningham and the safety. The outside linebacker has the angle on Murphy and trips him up for a minimal gain. Tennessee and athletic OLB Jalen Reeves-Maybin won't be so forgiving.
Fuente uses packaged quick wide receiver screens as a tool to stretch the defense horizontally. Off those looks, the inside zone and play-action should open up. Hodges blocking screens could be at best described as lackluster. At the end of the first quarter and again in the second, Fuente threw a quick screen where Hodges was supposed to aggressively block the corner.
Both times, Hodges tepidly moved into an option stalk posture and then stopped his feet and waiting on the defender to come to him. Hodges is supposed to pin the corner to the inside.
Hodges moves forward two yards and then stops his feet, even though the corner is five yards off the line of scrimmage. This allows the corner the space to work back to the outside. This play, if blocked properly, isn't a game breaker. Phillips would likely pick up around 4-5 yards, but instead of third-and-ten, the Hokies would have a more manageable third-and-five.
Hodges blocking aggressively and making the screen effective has bigger benefits for the team and himself. The screen game widens the safeties, which opens up the interior for inside zones. More significantly for Hodges, establishing the screen game causes the safeties to bite up on the screen action. Even without the screen game working, Hodges was able to slip behind the safety and Jerod Evans hit him with his prettiest pass of the day.
On this play, Hodges lines up in the slot, and the Hokies show a bubble screen look where Cam Phillips slips to the inside and Hodges kicks out the corner. Hodges flashes at the corner and then turns hard up field for the wheel route. To his credit, the safety doesn't bite too hard, but he can't defend a perfect touch throw by Evans. Imagine how much more open this wheel route off screen action would be if the screen game is consistently effective.
Inexperience can lead to confusion, and confusion leads to hesitancy. Uneven play should be expected until the players have more experience in the scheme at game speed. If younger players like Murphy, Divine Deablo, Eric Kumah, and Chris Durkin want to see the field more, the quickest avenue will be to have a great week of blocking. Based on all the film I watched of Memphis, Fuente won't tolerate this kind of blocking long if he has other options that will be more effective.
Shai McKenzie Makes His Case For Carries
Surprisingly, a name I heard rarely mentioned during fall camp delivered a strong case for having more of an offensive role against Tennessee. Shai McKenzie wasn't expected to make much of an impact after continued knee trouble ended his season last year. McKenzie had an opportunity to get some tailback work in the third quarter, and he delivered several positive plays that jumped off the screen. McKenzie caught two passes including one that kept a drive alive on third down. He looked smooth and explosive on a handful of carries, including this nice cut and spin move off of a Wyatt Teller block.
McKenzie also delivered the one thing that was absent from the tailback spot most of the game- a decent block. Here, Cam Phillips gets the ball on a jet sweep. McKenzie doesn't take a great path to get the angle on the edge defender. However, when he makes contact with the defender, McKenzie keeps his feet moving and ends up driving the defender into the ground.

When you compare McKenzie to McMillian on a similar jet sweep with Bucky Hodges, you can see why McKenzie may see a little more action next week.
To his credit, McMillian got the message. His nice block on the edge sprung C.J. Carroll for a long run on a jet sweep in the fourth quarter. On the same drive, Cunningham had a nice block on a speed option to McMillan. There is significant room for improvement, and it starts with one nice block.
It is Bristol Week
Many Hokies were excited when the Volunteers needed overtime put away a really solid Appalachian State squad. Saturday's erratic offensive effort probably reined in some of that enthusiasm. The Vols appear to be very vulnerable to misdirection, and the Mountaineers were able to block the Tennessee defensive tackles without double teaming. At the same time, the Tennessee secondary is excellent. Fuente won't be able to dial up Isaiah Ford on a half-dozen back shoulder fades to bail out poor execution in other facets of the offense.
It is often said that a team improves the most between week one and week two. The Hokies need to find a way to get better inside and on the edge offensively. If Virginia Tech can, it will allow Ford and Hodges opportunities for explosive plays that could make the difference between a win and a loss in Thunder Valley.

Comments
Oh thank everything that is holy. The French film reviews are back!
it looks like you may need to adjust your signature
The defense will set the tone early. We've talked all off season about getting eyes on the ball and too much man, yet we see the same thing in the opener. The game is afoot, let's see how it plays out.
Glad I was up early enough to read this hot off the press as it were. Great job as usual French. One question, do you think Stroman made a strong case for the starting spot over Alexander?
It was hard to get much of a feel because so little of Liberty's offense focused outside. I thought Stroman played well so there will be a conversation. Fuente has to factor match ups (keep in mind Josh Malone's catch over the top changed the game for the Vols against Appy State) in his decision.
The one worrisome aspect was that Brandon Facyson and Stroman both got beat over the top and Liberty's QB couldn't connect. Quick fades are deadly versus man free and don't require much pass protection time, so the Vols best ticket to create space in the running game is the exact type of pass route that this defensive approach could struggle against.
Thanks, makes sense. Quick follow up, do you think Bud was playing close to the vest, maybe a "vanilla" D and has something else in mind for UT? I know that Bud is a master at showing looks and then working in disguised blitzes/coverages.
The news that Teller is STILL with the 2's on the depth chart is unsettling to say the least. If we play musical left guards again we probably lose this game. I am growing increasingly frustrated with this situation because without the details of whatever has Teller in the doghouse, all we can see is a coaching staff stubbornly playing Petit to the detriment of the team. The difference between our offense with and without Wyatt was obvious, and it'll be tougher sledding in the run game against Tennessee.
That said, great review French! So glad I have these reviews to look forward to when you have time throughout the season. I am excited to have McKenzie back and have long been in he (and Marshawn's) corner. I think they will again contribute heavily to this offense. I do hope some of Sam's carries transfer to Shai and Travon in week 2.
I was surprised that Shai looked as good as he did. He has to be banging on the door.
I do recall at least one, maybe two, WR screens where Bucky executed his block very well. Fuente used the word 'consistency'. I have a feeling that is what he will be preaching all week.
Two biggest mysteries of the season so far: 1) Pettit over Teller 2) RB by committee
We're going to learn a lot about this team on Saturday. I can't wait!
Thanks, French!
I don't think the RB by committee is a mystery...we knew coming in that would be the case. The only part of that which could conceivably be mysterious is that Sam Rogers is listed as RB1
Yes, the old mindset of a linear RB depth chart, where guys get carries according to seniority or whatever, is gone. Personnel groups are the new way. Rogers is probably RB1 because he's the most versatile player on the offense, at RB/FB/HB.
I can agree with both of you here. I guess my point is more that the run game itself is still a mystery. We just don't quite know what we have yet. We know what we have in the passing game with Ford, Bucky, Cam, etc. And Jerod showed some good stuff throwing the ball. But the run game, we can expect a good does jet sweeps and perimeter runs mixed with some inside runs. And we can expect several players to run the ball. But I'm not sure what to expect beyond that.
Lost in your response of seniority being a thing of the past is the fact that Sam is a senior.
Get out of here with your logic.
As far as where they're listed (in terms of RBs anyways), I'm not sure it really matters. Didn't McMillian get more carries anyways? I think we're all just gonna have to get used to the RB1 designator being pretty... not meaningless, but less of an indicator, maybe?
That being said if I were ranking the backs after week 1, Sam is still #2 on my list after Shai. It's pretty clear to me that they're all getting touches this year though.
I don't mind Rogers being RB1, I think it's cool because he's such a leader.
If the carries are going to be spread around anyway, why not have him
at the top of the depth chart? Could also be valuable as far as not giving
away who's going to carry it the most.
That's correct. Fuente is not going to consult the depth chart to see who should get the next carry.
The depth chart is being used to dispense knowledge to the players about whom is behaving as Fuente instructs. Team, team, team.
Rogers is playing team, thus RB1. Teller is not, LG2.
It was cool to watch the game, see Edmunds get that INT and think
"isn't that robber coverage?". Really well executed.
Didn't realize some of our skill position blocking was that bad but hopefully
it'll be better against UT. Seems like a few of those plays could've been
significantly better if the blocking was carried out.
It was terrible. I just scratched the surface.
I agree. Sitting there live, I was paying attention - thanks to French's writeups. The skill players did not look good blocking. They easily missed as many blocks as they made.
It was bad enough that Mrs. Freefall asked me at one point "I thought Marcus Davis was gone?". Ouch.
Did you notice any play calling tendencies relative to which ball carriers were in the game, or did everyone get similar looks?
I understand Sam Rogers' importance to the team, but please stop giving him carries. Shai McKenzie is a legit D-1 running back with a lot of upside and he looks like he dropped weight and is in solid shape. With Travon, Shai, and McClease, we have some actual weapons that need touches.
I could understand if Sam ran like Mike Alstott, but he doesn't. He is a not-fast, not-quick, not-overly powerful runner with not-great vision who should be used in two-back sets as a personal protector and check-down option in the passing game.
This may be blasphemy to some, but while Sam may be a good "football player" he isn't a good running back. I'm all for spreading around touches, just not to Sam.
I agree. Love Sam and what he brings to the team, but any carry he gets is better served being given to Travon, Shai, McClease, and in a few weeks hopefully Marshawn.
I agree. Sam is a shifty receiver out of the backfield, but he isn't an explosive, take-it-to-the-house running back.
Agreed, Sam's true value seems to be in the receiving game. When he is able to catch and has some space to make a move he is successful. But he looks too slow when he carries the ball. And surprisingly can't break a tackle very well.
Sounds like a fullback
I don't think he is an elite blocker though.
It's kind of harder to be much of a receiving threat out of the backfield if the defense can tell the wheel route is coming because the film shows you never get a hand-off.
Great analysis as always, Oline really worries me. Hopefully Wyatt grows back his Mullet and works his way out of the doghouse soon...
"the secondary mostly played either man free, or man to man with a bracket leverage zone on one receiver. There was very little zone for Tennessee to scout."
Based on this quote from Dobbs (below), the Volunteers are expecting a decent amount of man coverage...
"First down efficiency is going to be huge. We're playing a very aggressive defense. We're going to see all different kinds of pressures, man-coverage on the outside. It's going to be about winning one-on-one match-ups and identifying the defense we're given," Dobbs pointed out. (By Rob Lewis & Paul Fortenberry on Volqusst.com)
I have a sneaky suspicion that Bud is going to have something prepared that is going to really confuse Dobbs quite a bit so far as the passing game is concerned.
I just hope we put up some points in the first quarter while UT is on its heels and have a lead to build on. Let UT adjust in the second and tighten it up, then make halftime adjustments and drive it home. I wanna see an FSU-esque third quarter.
And for any vols fans on here: yes, this is blind homerism, but a guy can dream.
...I like this part
...but I hope we're not down by 22 at the half!
I think it would be awesome to score 21 points in the first quarter (a la ECU did to us 2014) and then pull an FSU in the 3rd (scoring 24, not being down by 22) and cruise to a nice comfortable 48-10 win in Bristol
hey, a guy can dream, right?
absolutely a guy can dream!
in my dream for the Battle at Bristol, our D gets Dobbs and the Vols O so flummoxed that we get a pick-6 in the 1st quarter and recover a Dobbs fumble to give our O a short field in the 2nd
I sure hope so. Dobbs looked questionable at best in his decision making against App State. I think Bud should be able to bait him into an interception or 2..or 3. His deep ball accuracy is worse than Evans' too. I expect to see a lot of loaded boxes against Tenn with some zone and robber coverages mixed in to confuse Dobbs and force some turnovers. I hope our defense can limit Tenn to 13 points just like App State did. If we can do that I think we have a decent shot at stealing on in Bristol.
oh, so now you're saying points scored in OT don't count? What's next, post season games don't count towards win totals?
**sits back in my chair and opens a bag of popcorn**
Does this mean that OOC games count now that we have a new staff, or are we still having pre-season scrimmages?
Purely out of curiosity, what kind of popcorn?
This kind

Where'd you get that quote? Sauce?
Also, is there a similar type of analysis on the ut game that we can dissect?
The first quote is from the analysis French gave, the second is listed (not linked, sorry) in parentheses.
Problem is that there is years of footage of Buds defense. They should have a very good clue of what is coming.
Yes Bud has been around for a long time but one of the main reasons he is still around and sustained success is that Bud's defense has changed over the years to adapt to new offensive schemes. So while there probably is footage reflecting how Bud could game plan against UT, there is limited time to prepare a college team in a week and the UT coaching staff has to take their best guess on what that will be and effectively coach their players on it.
And same response from other thread with same comment:
"Ask Urban Meyer"
All football schools have at minimum, decent coaches that know football and can develop a game plan. Bud may play a man coverage with some wrinkles and deceptions. Tennessee is somewhat similar to an OSU in that they are a predominant run team. Stopping the run, and qb runs by Dobbs is paramount.
Not to get anyone excited but I will be compiling a RB comparison in week 4, so we can see whats really up. I am not surprised by the use of multiple RB's at all. I do however think in a few weeks things will be much clearer as to what Fuente sees in terms of the running backs.
It's very obvious that Fuente does not care about last year's lead RB unless said RB can block and show the effort required. As French said if the skill positions lackluster blocking continues don't be shocked to see Fuente try other options.
If I told you Deshawn McClease had more carries than Sam Rogers would ya'll believe me?
Excited.
I also think we'll see Jerod running the ball a good bit more this weekend.
Agreed. Seemed like he was used in the situation where we needed to convert the 4th down and gain back momentum (and the lead) to keep Liberty from believing for too long. I'd expect him to have more freedom to run this week.
Might be just me, but I can't see the clip / image of Shai blocking the jet sweep. Just the one where TMac whiffed.
Spoiler alert: Shai can make pretty good pancakes.
Great write up French! Can't wait to get down to B@B.
*pulling into Bristol like*
via GIPHY
great analysis, French! thanks for putting the time in to share your analysis with us...your postgame analysis is the most important football-related thing I watch in between games!
let's hope our guys can dramatically improve in our blocking, and we can hold on to the ball
my eye is untrained, but I have to agree on Shai...that one run where he spins off of two would be tacklers, twists, always continuing to move forward, dragging two guys with him as he finally goes down, that clip would go in my book as "this is what a tough inside run looks like"...we need more Shai!
While reading this the theme from Smokey and the Bandit started running through my head. "We got a long way to go, and short time to get there. We gonna do what they say can't be done."
I think some of Fuente's comments on the depth chart probably apply to guard and RB, not just CB. There is still some sorting out to be done, based on last week and how they respond.
I was disappointed in the blocking when I watched the game. Now I am even more so. Remember the good ol' days when we were just one block from breaking it for a big run? Now we are 2 and 3 away. Are the reps spread out to so many people they are not getting a chance to get it down, or are they spread out to so many because we are still looking for someone to step up and do it?
I knew coming in there would be a transition period, and it would take a little time to get the new offense down, but knowing it and living it are not the same. ARE WE THERE YET?
I believe that was every bit as much "coachspeak" as it was true. Blocking on the o-line and at skill positions hasn't been all bad but both have certainly had their struggles in recent years, many times simultaneously.
Hopefully there's still beer in Texarkana
But we'll get it there no matter what it takes!
Wasn't this a great write up by French. So much work done by the TKP team in so little time. It would really suck not to have this next season wouldn't it. Well unless we can keep growing the Key Players Club it might not be around next season.
Awesome write up. Definitely helped me learn more about they system than I could from being at the game. I like the new offense. It seems they are on the cusp of executing what we saw of the playbook with a high degree of success. Hopefully whatever they didn't show Saturday won't be too much of a reach for Bristol.
We saw about perhaps half of the running game scheme. Didn't see the counter, the QB counter, the quick pitch, outside zone to the tailback, QB sweep, etc. We saw only one or two inverted veers. There is a bunch more out there.
I seem to remember one quick pitch to the boundary, I believe it was McClease at TB. Wasn't blocked well and went for a short gain.
And all the "real" running game we ran in situations like we'll see in the future, worked. Even though the play calling was vanilla/mismatched, it was well sequenced and worked. In the words of Doge, "much hide."

I should qualify what I'm about to say with the disclaimer that I don't know anyone on the team or coaching staff personally, nor am I trained in the psychiatric arts...
I'm worried about the Wyatt Teller situation. I think that his frustration is leading to frustration along the entire OL unit. We gotta get him out of trouble and get our best guys on the field.
Pure Speculation here: I think it is tough love from Vice. I think Vice sees a lot of himself in Teller. Teller will eventually respond in a positive way and lead the OL to greatness. A Lifetime movie in the making.
Gosh I hope that isn't the case. These aren't 5 years olds out here where they need that negative punishment to learn. If he has problems with attitude or something else, just suspend him to drive that point ome, I don't like teh pussy-footing around though.
Interesting, Leonard. As a junior in high school I got placed in the doghouse by my coach, a very young guy, over some perceived transgression. We old timers still try to figure things out as that became part of the spiral down of a very talented team as other players started to rebel against him. I never said a word, just sucked it up and tried my best. I don't think Fuente, nor his staff, are that type, nor is this team anything like mine way back when. I want to give them more credit. If Teller is in the doghouse, it has been made clear why and they all understand. They will play hard and Teller will find his own way back. Although, you know, they're all rooting for him.
I hope that your scenario is the case. A long time ago, I played soccer in high school. We had an awesome keeper. D3 schools were drooling over him, and he was getting a few D1 looks. His only knock was that sometimes he got lazy in practice, and he liked to clown around. Nothing major, he was well-liked by everyone, and our coach up until our senior year just let some of it go, but could rein it in when necessary. That coach was just one of those assertive pack leaders who just knew how to choose his battles.
Well, my/his senior year, we got a new coach, and let's just say there was a personality conflict. To prove his point, the new coach started the second keeper for the first few games of the season. In all fairness, #2 keeper was a hard worker, but the talent gap was not so much a gap, as an infinite chasm between the space time continuum. Locker room got tense. Players couldn't understand the rift, and even the #2 keeper was mad, because he wanted to play stopper. He didn't want this situation.
I did offer a disclaimer in the above comment, because I truly don't know the situation, but if it's a coaching ego thing, it could get ugly. Again, I hope you're right. You probably are right. I'm just worried, because it's time to get the best guys out there. With Teller and Petitt, it's not even close.
Thanks for that story. We've got a good coach. The best players will emerge. I think circumstances will ensure that.
And need we be reminded, we've played ONE game?
Thanks French! Top shelf as usual.
Me too, the Teller thing has me bothered.
French, I'm surprised neither your review nor the GIFtory mentioned Wyatt Teller's performance at 9:39 left in the 4th Q. I can't figure out how to post it because the original is longer than an hour, which appears to be imgur's limit.
youtube link here
You no-showed Wyatt Teller's pancake breakfast. You need those carbs to have the energy to TKP harder.
Well then. Need to look more carefully at the Tracker, not just the headlines. Thanks, Joe.
I don't claim to be the expert that French is; but it seems to me Rogers would be much better in the role Peoples was trying to fill and Shai(and possibly Travon, if he can block) would be the better option at tailback.
They will get plenty of runs this season. I'm not concerned about it. Put them in when it counts, not when it doesn't really matter and your linemen are still working out the kinks.
I know Evans didn't run the zone read much but one time he did towards the end of the half he misread the DE and was tackled for a loss.
You saw the same thing I did re: Peoples' blocking, but I didn't realize it was so widespread.
Yes, he didn't read that play well.
Really was a fan of Vinny Mihota at DE. He didn't sack the QB I believe, but got good pressure and forced 1 or 2 of the interceptions that Liberty threw just from pressure.
Dislike Ludwig at punter. He did have a good looking punt on the play we got a safety, but his punts looked very wobbly and didn't get much distance for the hang time they had.
Yeah, Tech tried to bring in two punters in the offseason, one scholarship, one walk-on, and Shibest noted in the spring he wanted more competition at the position. I don't feel good about Ludwig's ability either.
On a positive side, his bad punts were still at least 35 yards and allowed no return due to the hang time.
And now we see why Shibest was searching for a punter. The safety was more dumb luck than anything. Hopefully he bounces back because field position will be important vs. Tennessee
I'd like to see all our punts bounce forward, personally.
What if they land on the 1 yard line???
touche
Easy solution.... don't do that
He has yet to demonstrate that he has #PunterSwag. Not saying he doesn't have it, but we'll all feel a lot better if he proves that he does.
Great write up, was excited to see it posted when I woke up!
I watched the replay last night and tried to pay attention to a few things with my untrained eye:
1. I really wasn't impressed with Peoples' blocking. There were a few plays where he either just didn't know who to block or just did it poorly.
2. Same with Conte, there was a play in the first quarter where he completely lets a defender run by him. At times he was so bad at blocking, I'm unsure how he passed Kindergarten.
3. The run game was a bit worrisome to me. I dislike Rogers at tailback in general and think his purpose should be in the pass game. He doesn't seem to do well with contact and goes down pretty easily when the contact isn't directly head on.
4. McMillian also went down to contact rather easily. I know the blocking was poor on a lot of plays, but a truly great college running back makes plays one-on-one and he didn't really do that.
5. Excited for Shai to get back into the swing of things. Admittedly, he got lost in the excitement of McMillian for me, but it is easy to see why he was a top recruit and record breaking high school star. I think he gets bulk carries sooner rather than later.
6. Not much to say about Ford. He is a monster and will break so many records here at VT. Let's hope we make the most of his last year here.
6. Bucky showed himself as the redzone threat he is. But I was disappointed that we didn't get him involved more in the pass game. I don't think there was a single time he was thrown to and let him use his size to high point it. Although, I don't know if that is a good idea, but to me it seems like an advantage we should utilize.
7. Evans looked good to me. I like his athleticism and especially like his ability to extend plays and throw on the run. He had only one play over the middle I think? The catch by Ford, so it will be interesting to see if we expand into that area of the field as time progresses. I was worried by some of his passes to Ford. At times it looked like he was just lofting it up and hoping Ford would catch it based on who he is. Against better corners I see those throws as 50/50 balls that will lead to many INTs. After seeing TD throws again though I was very impressed. They were placed perfectly so that only the receivers could make plays on them. That was great.
8. The defense I honestly didn't pay as much attention to. They held firm all game really and only got beat a few times. Ekanem seemed to tackle poorly at times and let the player slip away. Motu, while not being a playmaker, was a very sure tackler. I liked that a lot. The Edmunds bros are awesome. So happy that they are doing so well.
I stand with Sam.
He may not have elite speed, but I like how he carried a few tacklers for tough yards on several plays.
He also completely missed the hole on a few plays. The 3rd and 1 he got the hand off, had a wall of blockers to the left but he cutback right into the waiting defenders. He has to know he only needs 1 yard and to follow the big boys who had a serious push on that play.
I couldn't believe that when it happened.
Yeah his vision as a runner leaves a bunch to be desired.
French- Not picking on Sam but saw this play early 1st drive ( 1st o line clip) and I am wondering what Sam's key is? Looks to me like he has a ton of space outside but cuts it up behind the block of Pettit? Yes the vision to see this cutback lane or space plays a major part as well.
Question for French. I think in your preseason review, you mentioned that at Memphis they always ran towards the side with the full back. I tried to pay attention at the game, but you know...
In your film review, did we always run to Peoples side?
IIRC, the ball usually followed the H-back...not necessarily to that side of the formation
I didn't follow it that closely knowing that Liberty would have some red herrings scheme wise. I focused more on individual performance. I will find a small sample and take a look.
French how vanilla was or offensive game plan this past week? Alia do you think they were working on the long ball or do we expect shots like that alll the time?
Also the offense ran for 200+ yards with 10 different people. Should we expect the running game to be distributed like that all the time?
Thanks in advance!
Very vanilla- we didn't get a ton of read and inverted veer option, only two speed options, quick pitches etc. I don't think you are going to see Cam, Bucky, and Carroll as the guys getting the ball on jet sweeps that regularly.
so we've got a 6'7" tight end turned WR? Let's have him run plays we reserved last year for our 5'8" speedy RB.
sounds about right.
Why not Carroll? He's quick and can pick up yards in space
Is the pitch option a major part of a Fuente offense? I was surprised to see it and I'm generally wary of something like that where execution mistakes are usually turnovers but Fuente's remarks afterwards made it seem as if it's a play they rep quite a bit.
I would say they ran it 2-4 times per game at Memphis.
A bit off-topic wrt to this game review, but Tennessee's WR #7 Preston Williams jumped off the screen to me in the App St game. He is tall and smooth with great body control and Dobbs looked to him heavy in the early part of the game.
My Q: since Bud has scrapped the field-boundary corner system, if I'm Tennessee's OC I line Preston Williams up against Stroman on the boundary side as much as I can and just toss him 50/50 balls like Evans did against Liberty's D. I realize that Dobbs isn't Aaron Rodgers but surely he can make that pass all night long. French do you agree with this concern and might Bud counter by putting Facyson back at boundary full-time?
I think this is part of the reason why they want to start 6' 3" Adonis Alexander even though Stroman looked pretty good last game.
Alexander is the probably starter across from Facyson. In that case our corners will be 6'2" and 6'3" which is about as tall as you're going to see at that position. Fades & jump balls aren't all about height/length but assuming the defender is in good position, a taller CB will make it a tougher play for the offense.
Adonis Alexander is likely to be starting in place of Stroman this week.
https://twitter.com/normwood/status/773286492672319489
Not so fast my friend.
One more red herring. I counted 3 times that a VT QB targeted CJ Carroll on a "Win" route concept that Baylor uses. Basically, your split end (often your best WR) stands up and turns to face the QB at the snap. The corner comes up on him. The slot receiver attacks the cushion of his coverage. If he gets inside leverage, he runs a corner. If he gets outside leverage, he runs a post. Carroll ran 3 corner routes with Hodges and/or Ford standing there at the line of scrimmage basically doing nothing. I would expect that we will see our top guys in twins with the slot guy on the corner route (see Bucky GW vs Ohio State) as a regular concept this year.
also known as "The ol' All American Bait n Switch (route)"
Is Bucky the target or the decoy? I would think he would be a good candidate for those "Pick" routes. Is that in the Fuente arsenal?
Great write-up French! Also, been meaning to compliment you on the use of Joe Izuzu as your twitter pic. On point.
Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii. I'm Joe Isuzu.
Would I lie?
I'm sure we have his word on it.
Shai next week. Good luck UT
Nice write-up, thanks for the time you put in.
I have never really been able to figure Conte out. He has several games a year where is feet go dead on contact and then he will have several games in a row where that doesn't look like an issue for him... only to again revert back. Nijman looks like he will be fine in pass pro but he also had issues similar to Conte in the running game.
A lot of our issues on perimeter blocking were from not attacking hard enough and/or being too soft on initial contact this mainly from Hodges, McMillian and Cunningham. For People's it was the exact opposite, he was actually trying too hard to make good impact and his body was getting too far out in front of his feet and would cause him to fall forward and let them disengage. He was attacking and making great initial contact which is something I still prefer to see over the aforementioned players. He is still somebody I trust and I think we will see a massive improvement from him going into week 2.
Re: Peoples- head down and leading with his shoulders. He needs better posture and needs to extend his arms. If he does, he will be fine. As our coaches used to say, "there is nothing down there but earthworms" when they saw us blocking with our head down.
What's the way too early thinking on Cunningham?
It seemed to me ( not knowing jack) that the edge wasn't well -established a lot of times.
French - I have to ask ... how much of this do you see when you are watching the game live?
From sitting near him for a bit of the Spring Game, it seems like he picks up a lot, bordering on a crazy, inhuman amount.
Once you train your eyes to follow the players/blocks and not the ball watching football will change drastically.
As a high school official, I do that quite frequently. What's impressive about French is he seems to be able to do it for multiple position groups simultaneously. The attention to detail on the line is nothing short of spectacular.
Oh, another thing...
If Tremaine Edmunds continues on his current trajectory, he could go down on Leonard's All-Time Hokie List.
The LATHL is very exclusive; hard to get in that club.
I feel as though CJF and Cornelson are creating some film of Sam at RB. By that, I mean, if he can get some film of tendacies with him as a respectable runner (which he can be) out of the backfield it will get more reaction from lbs and db's on play-action. Sam was a great runner when he was a spell guy. I remember quite a few times the old regime using him as a fresh set of legs yeilding better results. If we can establish a pattern of him being used as a downhill runner it opens up for not only him in screens and wheel routes but, allows some safeties who would be shading Bucky, IAF1, and Cam to crash down on the fake. Also, it will possibly make it so that H back will not be as quickly keyed. Thus, helping a young guy like Cunningham/Burke/Durkin (I don't think they are to the point where they can threaten athletic lbs or safeties enough, YET). Just my opinion. A lot of layers to this offense if utilized correctly.
Thanks everyone for the great feedback today.
French - These are absolutely brilliant pieces of prose and analysis. The avid football fan, but novice football mind in me really appreciates your work. I might sit here read the text, watch the clip, repeat x3, but I always leave understanding it and *seeing* exactly what you wrote... my own aha moment. It significantly improves my understanding of the full picture and the entire game on the field. Keep up the stellar work, sir!