Basically Deleware State didn't award enough scholarships for them to count towards bowl eligibility. U/bakonydraco created an excellent thread on r/CFB and I highly recommend checking it out.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CFB/comments/7lac2l/fsu_may_not_be_bowl_eligible/
So, will anything come of this? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, no. We do strengthen our argument for technically holding the longest bowl streak though.
Forums:
DISCLAIMER: Forum topics may not have been written or edited by The Key Play staff.

Comments
Please let this be true.
But why do I think they'll get a waiver, even if true? Just add another asterisk.
Since there are bowl eligible teams that didn't get a spot, waivers aren't allowed this year... atleast if we're going by the rules.
I'm certain that you're right...
But I'm also certain they're not going to cancel a bowl game that's already announced...
soon they'll have more asterisks than consecutive bowl games played
Like most things FSU, they already have more than they deserve.
FSU has more asterisks on their bowl streak than UVA had fans at... their spring game?
Is that how to do it?
Obviously the NCAA has ulterior motives, but how is this something that was ever overlooked?
If you read through the article it took them a long time to get the information.
I don't believe you. They moved swiftly with the UNCheat allegations.
Exactly. So why are random people, presumably with completely unrelated jobs, uncovering this information and not NCAA staff whose job it is to review this?
I'm sure the NCAA will take immediate action by deleting the emails they got about this and ignoring any other questions about this story completely.
In all seriousness there is about zero chance they do anything about this. Logistically they're never going to replace them in a bowl that is already announced and selling tickets, and they're not going to punish them for a mistake that was made by the NCAA and not FSU.
FSU will do FSU things and be the first non-eligible bowl team to play in a bowl game. Then they will argue that since they actually played in the game the streak continues.
(Jeff Goldblum): "And there it is..."
There you go
Emperor Josef was there first

He also came up with such prescient observations as:
Also advice on how we can get down to the 85 limit after spring practice:
Every time an asterisk is put on the FSU bowl streak, a Delaware State walk-on earns his scholarship
So, they play? No time to switch things up. The other teams haven't practiced. Scramble to get there and sell tix. Just not gonna happen.
BUT, what about the payout? Does the ACC get screwed with not getting paid after the game?
Why wouldn't they get paid?
Remember, it's the NCAA's mistake.
You said it...NCAA. Hard to tell what tact they will take.
Maybe a clause saying they have to meet certain criteria. And if they don't meet that, maybe it gives the bowl/NCAA an out.
The Independence bowl WANTS FSU.
Nobody is getting refund, and the ACC will be paid.
I love that subreddit. It goes from memes about Joey Freshwater to potentially changing the NCAA recordbooks at surprising speed.
As hilarious this is, don't get your hopes up.
But Turntle died for this. He must be avenged.
Alas, poor Turntle! I knew him, NerdMagic, as a turtle of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy.
Yet
he'll likely not be avenged, but rather remain a footnotelet us beat Florida State on Labor Day weekend next year, so as to avenge his mistreatment (among other wrongs).On Labor Day, we #TurnUpForTurntle and take out the Noles.
I seriously hope there is a Turntle sign at every Gameday next year
May I suggest a minor change:
#TurntUpForTurntle
^ This dude is going to be puking with salmonella poisoning!
NCAA Offices
ftfy
They will play. If the NCAA does anything about it, they'll make them vacate the win or some such nonsense. Because, you know, that has had such a huge effect in the past
The F$U fans responding to him are something.
This should have been caught at 3 levels: FSU, ACC & NCAA
He's right, but which of those had an incentive to catch this? Though now that it has been highlighted, I'm guessing it might get caught next year.
It really bothers me that most news sources are giving credit to "reddit" or "r/cfb" (which is actually better) instead of the specific user. It wasn't a community effort, and reddit doesn't consist of just one person. I guess it's a bit of a "hacker known as 4chan" situation.
Wasn't it one of the r/cfb mods though? I guess that doesn't really change it.
Yeah, which is why saying r/cfb or " the college football subreddit" is definitely a bit better, but there are places that just say it was discovered on reddit. Honestly, I wouldn't care if they just said reddit if they provided a hyperlink, but that's not happening as much as it should either.
To be fair, it's not like reddit is quick to give proper credit to everything they repost.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. If they repost an article, "credit" is inherent in the posted link to the other site. A claim without a source is always met with "source?", "link?" Comments.
We have TKP articles posted there all the time. There's always a link to the TKP article, and a comment section for Reddit users to discuss below it.
I see your point, but it's similar to a story saying "the Washington Post first reported... " and not giving the journalist specific credit
Except is it? Because wouldn't that journalist be getting paid by the Washington Post to do that work?
Bitter put this up in his mailbag and I think he makes a good point.
In the not too distant past the Hokies had some 6-6 regular seasons with victories over FCS teams being needed to get bowl eligible. I for one am not so sure I want the ACC or the NCAA going back and checking those FCS teams to make sure they had enough scholarship players on the roster. Not sure too many people even knew this was a rule before the guy on Reddit dug into it.
True.
It might be worth the NCAA checking this in the future, though, in advance of those games.
I saw where the FCS school provides the numbers to the FBS school and its one of those things where it's taken at face value. Tough for one school to really go through and audit another one
except in the past the ncaa has punished other schools a la usf in 2003, I have a feeling if we violated it, it would have been enforced. I do think certain schools get preferential treatment
EDIT size for the office:
Apparently the Reddit source didn't count academic scholarships, so apparently they did qualify PER ESPN.
fsus reply was "this is how we interpert the rule" in no way and in no place is this written into the rules at all
Tbf, they said it was how it HAS been interpreted in the past. So there is precedence for their interpretation. At least that's what they claim.
except it hasnt per my post above usf was left out because of this rule in 2003
Looks like FSU gets another asterisk then...they have the record for most asterisks....
UNcheat just figured out how to get 100 guys on scholarship.