Obviously I think Indy should trade down lower in the top ten possibly picks 6-10; anywhere in there and Indy could nab Tremaine along with some other value they could possibly get from the trade. What do you all think? Any Indy fans here that would agree?
Forums:
DISCLAIMER: Forum topics may not have been written or edited by The Key Play staff.
Comments
I think they have a great shot at getting Chubb at a position which they need desperately, so I don't see them trading down, unless it's Cleveland trading up to ensure that nobody else trades up with Indy, like Chicago did last year.
Username checks out
Not an Indy fan, but if some team wants to trade up to get Their QB Of The Future at 3, then Indy should 100% trade down to accommodate that.
Depends on how far. They have a lot of needs, true, but the two most important positions these days seem to be QB and pass rush. If they are set at three to get a game-changing pass rusher, which they might miss out on by moving back too far, then staying is not a bad idea.
Not just how far, but also how much they're getting. If a team like Arizona wants to trade up from 15 to 3 by throwing in a third and next year's first, they should absolutely do it. Going from "abysmal" to "average" at a position can be just as useful for a team as going from "average" to "elite".
Pass rush is a big big deal, but a shutdown corner is important too. I think I could see a team like the Jets trading up for Their Guy At QB. Will Chubb be there at 6? Idk, but one of Minkah Fitzpatrick/Derwin James will be.
As a New England fan I wish we could get edmunds but instead I'm hoping for settle atleast
Happy to see another Colts fan on here. I do disagree though, we desperately need a player like Bradley Chubb to re-re-create our defense. He could be a player in the mold of Freeney and Mathis.