Illinois Hokie's Recent Comments
What is Shai's legal status? I know he had a court date on March 16 but never heard the outcome of that.
And they obviously knew that everyone thought a major character was going, so they found ways to put multiple main characters in peril to keep us guessing. Really, really well done.
And the look on Rick's face at the end was epic. I have to go back and watch Clear again now.
But fuck amphibians.
I can only imagine if Nijman sticks at DE and he plays on the same line as Settle. That would have to be one of the biggest DLs we've ever fielded.
Gimple is handling juggling simultaneous storylines better than either of his predecessors. I think they've definitely found the right guy to run the show for the rest of its broadcast.
Well, I don't know about you guys, but I couldn't have asked for a better finale. Just proves that it isn't always about which main character gets eaten.
I'm trying to remember. It really seems to me like it was redshirt year, complete silence from Wiles, move to OL, then career finished due to injury. After he was actually inside the program, the only buzz I remember about him was from message boards. I picked him to be a breakout player his redshirt freshman year, so the silence surrounding him was particularly noticeable to me.
Really? I seem to remember all the buzz about Nick Acree suddenly drying up as soon as he arrived on campus and started practicing.
Yup. That's what I meant.
Imagine if I'd made a post here with similar language and tone that BlackSheep used in their post. I'd be blurred out in less than 5 minutes.
And rightfully so. That article was trash from a journalistic standpoint. But Blacksheep is just a rag covering the allegations. As for the group of students affiliated with Take Back the Night who took exception to the behavior of football players at the event, we don't know anything about any inherent bias they might harbor, except for some word of mouth accounts that some of the people saying they were very disruptive are also people who attend and cheer loudly at football games.
Are there some people who have a hidden agenda against the football team? Doubtlessly. Does any person who would self-identify as a feminist? No. Does every person complaining about the behavior of our football team? I highly doubt it.
Regardless, OP was making speculation, unsourced, on what a feminist group felt about the football team. It didn't add to the conversation and seemed to flirt with the community guidelines. What we know is that some people took exception to the behavior of our football team at an event. We don't need to launch into immediately discrediting the opinions of those leveling the accusations. I have confidence in Dr Sands to separate bias from fact and take whatever, if any, action is appropriate.
Funny thing is, this is almost verbatim what we were saying about Dadi Nicholas when he was a freshman.
|
11 years 3 months
# | Bitter blog - Practice report: Hokies will mix and match in the secondary throughout the spring This.
Bud's defense is high risk, high reward, and it's by design. We play more man coverage than most college defenses because Bud believes you can stop both the run AND the pass simultaneously, so long as you have a defensive backfield good enough to maintain coverage man to man.
Crazy thing is, he's right.
But the flip side of that is going to be unavoidable allowance of a handful of big plays, because the importance of individual assignments and gap control is exponentially more important in his scheme. And if an opposing QB can handle consistent pressure and contact without it getting into his head, we should be worried. I'd post example, but they're all heartbreaking.
Then he's here for life.
Wu Feng is for the children.
|
11 years 3 months
# | Bitter blog - Practice report: Hokies will mix and match in the secondary throughout the spring -- Loeffler said the pursuit drill the offense did at the beginning of Tuesday's practice ... was inspired from the defense, which does a similar drill to start practices.
Coach our offense with the same level of expectation that Bud coaches our defense?
I think this analysing illustrates the absurdity of the NCAA rule. It's one thing to say you can't be paid to play. It's also one thing to say got can't license your own image for profit. But to say that you cannot have a JOB (or in this case, I suppose technically own your own business) if your notoriety from playing a college sport would benefit your performance in the job, is patently absurd. The NCAA is trying to put its student athletes in a vacuum that does not exist in reality.
Left tackle
1. Jonathan McLaughlin
2. Darius Redman
3. That's it.
Others: Seriously, that's it.
I lost it.
No I think that ended the year they had the bowl ban or the year after that.
See, what had happened was, I was sitting there, and all this Advocare stuff was just scattered all over the table, and I'm a neat freak so I stacked it up all nice, then my buddy says hey smile and then they snap this picture...
Now there we completely agree.
Right but I think he'd be covered there by the fact that it was removed. He could argue that he insisted on its removal when he realized it was being used for advertising. I mean, this is the NCAA we're talking about. I don't see them coming after this with teeth unless there was a full ongoing advertising campaign Braxton was complicit in. But like I said, enough to give Urban am easy out if he's looking for one by siding with your interpretation.
Only until he repays any remuneration received.
Stinky had no answer for press coverage on our receivers disrupting the routes.
An age gap is not always readily apparent, no argument. That's also never a valid excuse for committing statutory rape.