Illinois Hokie's Recent Comments

I don't know if that's necessarily true across all types of pass coverage regardless of whether the defense is in man or zone. Some defenses, like ours, are at a schematic disadvantage against screens because they base so much of the defense around pressuring the QB. Looking at Foster's love of extra pressure, I don't think I can say that our defense should be expected to stop 100% of screen passes if everyone plays their assignments, because in our base defense a large percentage of the time we have several extra defenders, often defensive backs, whose job it is to get to the QB, not defend against a pass. In those situations, a screen pass can be lethal if properly executed.

My point is, despite the article insisting otherwise, ANY play that you run the shit out of on practice can be a base play. And it's pretty obvious that we run the everloving shit out of the bubble screen in practice.

And then there's the question of how many of our bubble screens are part of a package play where it could have had a different outcome with a different read before or at the snap?

It was an interesting read, though, and it leaves me wondering if Lefty is suffering from either too many or too complex base plays. Thanks for the links!

Hmm. Okay, so, when I read that, I get the impression the author is saying, "The bubble screen is a constraint play...because I say it has to be a constraint play!" I honestly don't see why the bubble screen can't be one of the base pass plays you build your offense around. I do get the base/constraint play dochotomy, I just don't get the author's firm insistence that a wide receiver screen MUST be a constraint play. If anything, Lefty's claim that the screen is an extension of our run game actually argues that that it IS a base play for us. If we need five yards, the screen is a go to. Lefty definitely uses it more than just as a fallback.

Pages