Recent Comments
This is what I was talking about. With conferences this big, you have to go to a pod format. 4 pods of 4-6 teams each. Incorporate the conference race into the playoffs. Either that or more smaller conferences.
Join The Key Player's Club to read comments posted in exclusive content and its members only forum.
4th Quarter, 2nd break will be when he commits.
Join The Key Player's Club to read comments posted in exclusive content and its members only forum.
Nick Sorensen on the hot seat with the 49ers and I'm sure they want Salah back. Don't know if Sorensen wants to drop to college.
yep- you have to, else ANOTHER thing to hurt you in recruiting. Hey VT doesn't even have full 105 schollys- that will be used against you
Leg for the Scrubs gif.
|
1 year 6 months
# | And so it begins - CFP to discuss eliminating the auto-bye for conference champions The most logical way is a combination of quality wins AND no bad losses. That shows you a team can beat the top teams in a playoff. This year Bama had quality wins but bad losses. ND had a horrible loss but just one and enough quality wins. OSU had ONE bad loss, not multiple. Penn State didn't really have a great win, but zero bad losses. That is the most logical formula- meaning SMU is out- no great wins. Boise didn't have a great win, but they didn't have a bad loss either.
Nah, SEC and Big 10 will have two divisions each where the divisions will have a title game, still the SEC, still the Big Ten, but different. It will just redefine what conferences and divisions are because of how tv contracts work.
|
1 year 6 months
# | And so it begins - CFP to discuss eliminating the auto-bye for conference champions The overall top seed in the whole tournament is the team that most looked like it didn't belong
If only they lost to a team with a dog mascot
ATLIEN
|
1 year 6 months
# | And so it begins - CFP to discuss eliminating the auto-bye for conference champions Deserving = Who has the best regular season resume?
Best = Who would Vegas favor?
DON'TNEEDNOSTINKING⭐
|
1 year 6 months
# | And so it begins - CFP to discuss eliminating the auto-bye for conference champions What if Molly was the one that dished out the whopping?
Yea, but Whit and Pry have both said they expect to have 105 scholarships
Respectfully, but I disagree. The ASU player launched into a defenseless receiver. The only reason it wasn't called targeting was A) It hit chest first before going into his facemask. B) It would have undone the interception and the game would have been over.
I wouldn't read into this
I think they would have gotten lynched if they called one targeting and the other not. The ASU pick play, the other ASU defender clearly launched into a defenseless receiver. It should have been targeting 100% of the time.
They dont have to give him a scholarship, there is just 105 roster spots, he is one of them. A scholarship is a separate thing than a roster spot.
I agreed with the no targeting against Texas. Especially as they didn't call targeting the other way earlier in the quarter when the ASU player clearly launched at a helpless WR.
Barry record was safe regardless. Barry did it in at least 2 less games.
If ESPN wants it, they'll make it so.
PJ Prioleau has now been moved on scholarship. He has been a PWO up until now.
I wouldn't read into this - House settlement goes into effect in June I believe (fact check me, going off memory here) - there's no more walk on program. Just 105 roster spots (which Whit and Pry have both said will be fully funded). PJ was either getting kicked off the team or getting a scholarship.
What I liked about the BCS was the transparency of it all. They published the computer algorithms that determined your rating so everyone knew objectively what they needed to do to be successful. There was still the bullshit human element with the Coaches and AP polls, but so much of the beauty pageant mess was mitigated by the computers and it made the seasons enjoyable, because it was the best system we had that took bias out of the equation.
Of course, the logic involved is exactly why we no longer use computers. There's no controversy to be had with logical objective formulas determining ratings. Its hard to stack the deck in your favor when everything needs to be transparent.
Is that as part of the new requirements, where it's 105 limit and all on scholarship? Basically this would confirm that he's on the team next year.
Someone correct me if I'm factually off base with that thought
Yeah I have been very excited about this possibility. If Dex and potentially JSJ come onboard, the recruiting possibilities are phenomenal. As you mention Dex is a very good coach and highly respected, he has major pull. Quinn and X Adibi coaching LBs, Cheetah, and Price coaching DTs. Top it all off with Bud assisting in a defensive Jerry Kill role? I am completely on board with that.
Right now there are 16 Big12 teams, 17 ACC, 18 B1G, and 16 SEC teams, and ND. That means it the top level there are 68 teams ... which sucks as a number. So OSUw and WSU come back, we add Boise and whomever else to get 72.
So 4 conferences, 18 teams, two divisions of 9, or we really consolidate and have two conferences (SEC/Big10) with 6 divisons of 6. This means everyone divisions winner gets a playoff berth. Make it a 16 teams play off and add the top G5 and 3 at larges and be done with it.