Recent Comments

This is accurate, Apple Uglies are highly enjoyable and are sized in such a way that they could be compared to a newborn human.

Right, Big East not P5, I was thinking the new phrase to describe the major conferences was P5. You are technically correct! The best kind of correct!

UConn got shafted hard by the whole thing. Cincy and USF were both in CUSA until very recently. They bubbled up to a major conference then got corrected. UConn had been a founding member of the Big East and had it crash down all around them. I think UConn would be a good school to join the Big Ten if something can be done about their non-AAU-status. Same with Kansas and/or Kansas State.

Does Wake excel in other sports? I know we have like a research partnership together or something similar, but I think that could exist just fine without them being in the ACC

Not a bad idea. I have a different trade option:

We get Vandy and trade NCSt. Hear me out!

SEC purportedly does not want to add competition in Florida to avoid competition with the Gators. They do want to expand into new states, but they won't get both UNC and Duke (which reportedly must move together), and Wake isn't an attractive option. NCSt adds a state and is a team we would be willing to let go of.

Then, UNC gets a rivalry weekend game every year against their new in-state SEC foe, NCSt, while new-ACC-team Vandy gets a rivalry weekend game every year against their old SEC foe, Tennessee. Instant television inventory.

KY sticks with the SEC and plays Louisville every year. Then we add Navy and play against in-state Big Ten foe Maryland yearly. Pitt/PSU keeps going. FSU/Florida. USCe/Clemson. UGA/GT

In-state, out of conference P5 rivalry games are 100% the way to go.

I subscribe to the Whizzer White philosophy and check the sports pages first for news. The long lines and jump of 15 cents per gallon where I am now was quickly explained by your post. Relevant for me in the realm of getting from point A to B and back. Thanks.

It's the direction of the block. You can't block towards your own goal line, which typically means coming from behind a defender. Cunningham's block is fine because he's blocking forward. Wyatt is laying into a guy in the opposite direction.

Definition of Biweekly by Merriam-Webster:
biweekly. 1 : occurring twice a week. 2 : occurring every two weeks.

That settles it. So is HokieVision appearing twice weekly or fortnightly?

That stuff's nasty. Make sure to boil your water until given the all-clear.

There's an Off Topic forum section for a reason - so people can discuss off topic things in a community they enjoy. This one even tangentially relates to Hokie football and tailgating. This is certainly in the realm of good discussion.

And on a less serious note, you question this and not the thread devoted solely to salads? (Love that one btw)

I'll make a point to stopping at one next time I'm down. What's the barbecue place?

For Orange Blossom, I suggest the apple uglies. I think they're as big as my son was when he was born.

Thanks again for your responses TechHokie13. I still don't see why you think it's ok for Cunningham to block below the waist but not Teller. (and if you freeze frame the video at 1:20:22, you will clearly see Cunningham hitting Kirkland from below in between his legs OUCH!!!) Both guys are blocking the LB about 3 yards beyond the LOS. You say that Teller should just shove the guy in the shoulder, ... why shouldn't Cunningham do the same thing? There is absolutely no reason that Cunningham has to go low. Just trying to understand why it's ok for a TE to block like that but not an OG. I guess I am still trying to get an answer about whether this is a blocking technique that the coaches are teaching, or not.

Is there a typo here:

You can kind of think of this as the more altitude you gain the more atmosphere there is above you pressing down on you.

I thought it was pressure decreases as altitude increases?

Thanks TechHokie13 for the response. I appreciate you taking the time to share your opinion. The penalty against Cunningham had a huge negative impact - wiped out a 19 yard gain plus an additional 15 yards for the personal foul penalty against the guy who hit Evans.

Pages