Recent Comments
Google's top result was this: http://intermatwrestle.com/articles/16643
I don't follow PA wrestling since I stopped running the tabulations for the regional tournaments a few years ago (the step right before state competition), but the competition up here has always been some of the best in the nation. Huge get for the Hokies, at first glance.
I got you

Yeah! - I love when we get commits from athletes, but have no idea anything about who this is, as I just started to follow any wrestling on TKP last year. Love the sense of humor on the name, but any background? From where, what weight, rankings, etc?
Thanks, I didn't even have to jump in on that Memphis comp. If half 3/4 of our offense gets kicked out of school in the next three weeks, that would be comparable.
We have a ton of offensive talent. We have a talented HC and OC. And I'm not asking for the moon to say we should be in the top half of the ACC. We were 6th last year in scoring. We were 8th in total offense. We don't play Clemson, FSU, Louisville or NCSU (4 of the top 5 ACC defenses last year).
By default we are 9th this year -- we should have a better offense than BC, SU (first year, no talent), Wake, Pitt and UVA. So can we be better than GT? NCSU without Brissett? Louisville? Miami? Duke? It's not crazy to expect we should be better than 3 of those teams with a reasonable chance to be the best of that group considering everything we return on offense.
Elite Offenses: UNC, Clemson, FSU
Pretty Good Offense: Miami, Louisville
Question Marks: GT, NCSU, Duke
Better be good at defense: Pitt (new OC), Wake, UVA
Loeffler: BC
Wait until next year: Syracuse
Where would you slot VT in that tiered system?
|
9 years 11 months
# | On Eve of Fall Camp, Justin Fuente Remains Tight-Lipped on QB Battle, Dishes on WR Depth If you're going so far as to say that not choosing a QB is an indication that Evans isn't that good or much better than Motley, which you did say, then yes, you are being pessimistic. You are refuting the exact point I made in saying that there is no way to fairly judge them based solely on Spring practice. I never said that anybody would come out and torch defenses from the start, though we should torch Liberty without question. What I'm saying though is that you are making predictions and setting expectations without any real information beyond speculation and historical anecdotes. There's reason to believe that this OL, while being with a new coach, can be one of the best we've had in a while. While we aren't deep, we have a trio of WRs who are more talented than what we had with Boykin and Coale. You can take every one of your knocks against them and flip it the other way. You can't be realistic though without reality and speculation is not reality. In the pre-season, you are either optimistic or pessimistic. Being realistic comes when you have actual evidence to support and you are either denying or accepting the truth of the situation.
Just having someone in charge with the right attitude to get these things done is sufficient. Don't think we have to trash old people: I worked creating software for 35 years (in civilian industries) and I also favor the type changes fernleyhokie is advocating and would be one of the first to use them.
On the lighter side, If you would just speak up loud enough for us old fogies to hear your young ass, maybe we could get something done here !!! :--)
Just so long as he gets useful backup reps. Don't have to keep [qb2] on the bench until the final whistle, either.
I saw the spring game, and both looked like they needed work. No surprising given its a new system for both of them, and they were distributing reps a lot more widely at the start of spring. If you left off the spring wanting both to do their best to improve, and feeling like each was close to what they showed on the spring, you tell them this is their offseason to get the job and let them go for. Saying something different now, before they even get a chance to show off how they improved over the summer, would be a real asinine thing to do. If you are gong to run the QB a lot you would like to have a #2 that is close to the starter, and has enough reps to confidently run the system, as they will likely have to win a game for you somewhere. Did the coaches think someone had a lead coming out of the Spring? Likely. Had they earned the job, where the other player could not catch them by working on their weaknesses of-season? No. Naming a favorite or starter in that position is counter-productive IMO.
Yeah, I was looking for the old-school gobbler logo last night for a car and I kept seeing that stupid Foghorn Leghorn. That's gotta go. It's fine for the mascot, but we need to transition to a more sleek look until the Foghorn Leghorn is ironically back in style like Oregon's duck.....and like Oregon, use it sparingly.
By the way, if anyone knows where you can get the gobbler car decal, please let me know.
Well, it can't really get much worse or more inconsistent than it has been the past few years. I would expect a simplified, wide open offense would at least slightly improve upon Lefty's overcomplicated hodge podge, especially considering the returning talent. I don't expect a lights out top 20 juggernaut, but it will be incredibly concerning if he can't at least marginally improve the production from last year. If we're still just as sloppy and unproductive as last year, I don't buy that it will magically be scary in '17.
I don't see him playing 2 qb's. He choose Lynch, an underclassmen, and stuck with him the whole time to develop him. He seems like he is great at evaluating upside and willing to ride the consequences of short term struggles to get larger success down the road.
It will be Evans or someone younger. Motley will squarely be the back-up.
Bigger than Adibi? My beard just quivered in excitement.
I'm so glad you're on top of it. I pondered putting a Macho Man addendum on my previous post but was hoping you'd come along to complete the package.

Welcome aboard! There are a few guys that provide updates on wrestling, baseball, etc., pretty regular. If there's something you're missing during the season (like "hey there's a match tonight"), feel free to share it with us yourself! It's the community that makes TKP great.
(just read the guidelines and check the tracker before posting)
Okay, calm down. I'm not being pessimistic and saying this offense is going to suck because we don't have a QB. I'm being realistic. How many first year starting QBs come in and light the world on fire? It. Is. Rare. I don't want people to expect the second coming of Cam Newton and then be disappointed when that doesn't happen. You make valid points about the QBs not being fully evaluated through spring because they were just trying to learn the offense and the fall camp evaluation is more important. That kind of falls right in line with my theory that the coaches really don't have a QB1 in their minds yet.
But either way, I really don't think it is fair to expect our QB to come out and torch defenses right out of the gate. This offense isn't just new to them. It's new to all of the skill players and the O-line as well. This O-line is working with their 4th coach in 5 years. It's downright foolish to expect them not to make costly mistakes. When you do see a first year starting QB come in and play like a senior it's usually because he has a lot of help around him. We don't really have that at VT. I don't think it is pessimistic at all to expect rocky QB play. Especially since I think that the QB play, and play of the offense in general, will improve over the course of the year. With more reps in the system, more game experience and added familiarity with the players around each other this offense should look better and better each week. But it won't happen over night. It won't happen in the first half of the season. By 2017, I fully expect this offense to scare everyone on the schedule. This year is going to be sloppy, though.
Mine should be here between 2:30 and 6:30.
Pshhhh, she can't own the juice like Savage.

Jordan Williams and Tahj Capehart both will commit on Aug. 6th. Predictions: Capehart-VT Williams-CLEM— Fuente Football (@FuenteFootball) August 3, 2016
|
9 years 11 months
# | On Eve of Fall Camp, Justin Fuente Remains Tight-Lipped on QB Battle, Dishes on WR Depth Definitely differences in the way they play, I just don't think its enough to make UT worry. At least not compared to the moves Fuente pulled out for Ole Miss.
You can't compare the starting point at Memphis to Fuente's situation here. The talent differential is night and day. Fuente is walking into the most experienced OL we have had since 2011, first round draft-caliber talents in Ford and Hodges, a human Swiss Army knife and veteran leader in Sam Rogers, and a 1,000 yard rusher and plenty of other good depth at RB. The missing ingredient is simply solid QB play which can minimize turnovers. Not expecting us to be top 15-20, but anything less than significant improvement from last year's mess will be disappointing. I wouldn't be surprised to see us top 50 this year.
I agree with your overall premise, but:
Look at Memphis. They weren't very good for their first two years. It wasn't until YEAR 3 that they started playing good offensive football.
This is a bad comparison. When Fuente was hired there, he had something like 50 scholarship football players on the roster and those kids hadn't been winning games for years. He had to recruit, rebuild, and completely overhaul that program. He walked into VT with a full roster of some very high-quality kids. I agree that 2017 is when my expectations will rise, though. This year, offensive improvement is just a bonus.
Let's see who's old or weird enough to get this reference.

Hermione roid rage...lookout, Draco.
(Standing by for nerd.gif)
Tim Svettle.

Wait.......there's more to them than the "I accept" button? ?