Recent Comments
yeah I guess I see where you're coming from. What if QB1 goes down to injury? Or QB2? Then who is going to throw those screens? Who is going to pose a running threat from the QB position to keep the Linebackers from cheating outside? Our WRs might be more experienced by the fall but somebody else might be brand new at a different position. I don't think the first year with a new HC is the year to dream about beating established programs (that's not going to stop me from dreaming, though, I promise) like ND and Tenn. I think if we manage to stay healthy then our chances of beating ND should better in November than they might be in the first month of the season. But they will also have more game film and will see how other teams try to defend us. What works? What doesn't work? We just won't have the element of surprise against ND that we might have to make the Tenn game interesting.
I like it! And I selfishly nominate Louisville to be our new crossover.
there are other ways then gauging fans to go see an average product. Not everyone has loads of cash laying around to GIVE to vt. im a recent college graduate with a child and soon to be married giving tech an extra 1200 a year isnt in the budget and im gonna guess more are in my category then in the 100,000 a year donation category.
You can still buy tickets with ZERO donation, or 50 a seat or 100 a seat.
And while the shortfall adds up to over 20 million what do you think will happen to the program?
I still have these!! Bought the boxed set so we could watch them with the kids. That and old home movies are the only things we keep the VCR for. Isn't this the set that comes with the original "how it was made" series by Lucas, with the different size models, examples of relative distance filming for making thing look larger, and pin hole stars?
Creating our own depth is the reason I feel better about playing them later. Injury concerns will always be there, but right now we have 2 WRs that have legit experience so I expect a handful of new guys to look a bit lost during the UT game. By late November I think we will have established a reliable receiving group. Setting the edge on screens is a huge aspect of keeping Fuentes offense moving. Its definitely a double edge sword, I just feel better about playing them week 11 than week 3.
Then the Hokie Club and Athletic Department need to do what Whit stated and make fundraising less "transactional" and more "philanthropic" in nature. We can keep raising our ticket prices, seat surcharges, concessions, whatever. Eventually, the overall cost per game to come watch football is going to very strongly outweigh the benefits for some. "Why should I keep paying more and more for football tickets when I can just watch at home?" They need to figure out some other angle to approach fundraising other than a means of paying for football tickets. What's in it for me as a Hokie Club member other than tickets? What other benefits or advantages can they offer for my philanthropy? I keep hearing that this aspect has been missing in our fundraising, but I see little in the way of solutions offered that don't focus on football tickets.
Pretty sure that's Xavier Adibi.
May the 4th be with you! pic.twitter.com/wCjzJysQMuβ Calvin and Hobbes (@Calvinn_Hobbes) May 4, 2016
well said! the price should not be going up especailly after 3 subpar years. go 10,11 wins and people will pay to watch i really wouldnt mess with basketball because there is just now beginning to be a groundswell to watch Buzzketball y jack up prices and run people off.
But without all the information, how are we supposed to second guess the decisions other people made in the past with the benefit of knowing how it all worked out in the future (which, of course, those decision makers didn't know at the time)? /s
My sister's father in law is an Anglican priest (actually in Ivy, up your way). Wanna have a fun conversation? Start with "Anglican? Isn't that just Episcopalian?"
just playing devil's advocate here.
I think we all agree that any time the price of anything goes up people are going to complain. Right?
So if you raise the price by $50-$100 people are going to complain. Eventually, after the dust settles, people will move on and everything will go back to normal and be peachy again.
Well, if you turn around and raise it AGAIN the following year, people are really going to wonder what the heck is going on. "The prices are going up EVERY YEAR" they'll say. And that could actually lead to more problems. If you raise the price once people will complain and then get over it. If you raise it a couple times in quick succession people will start to wonder when the price hikes will stop. Fear could drive them away.
I think in the end people will fall in line. People overreact initially but this is what everyone wants right? A winning program (and who cares about that more then the people ALREADY involved in Hokie Club)....and this is the stepping stone to a winning program so people should be on-board with this mission because its the winning mentality.
All I will say is man my HD tv is looking like a better option every time the prices rise.
I had them on laser-disc!
...walks away in shame...
it's kind of a double edged sword. ND has more depth than VT does. Playing them at the beginning of the season would benefit us because we are more likely to be healthy. It's a disadvantage because we aren't experienced enough to execute at a high level. On the other hand, playing them at the end of the season would be an advantage because we'd have a few more miles under our tires and should, theoretically, be able to execute at a higher level. However, if we get hit by a couple of key injuries, we just don't have the depth to keep up with a team like ND. So playing them early in the season versus late in the season could be a wash. They are a more experienced, deeper team right now and I don't think we'll surprise them without quite a bit of good luck.
Hence why I thought they should've only raised it by $50-$100 first and then implement the $200-$300 after this upcoming season.
I'm just glad ND is so late in the season. I feel reasonable about surprising them
Southern Catholic
While I understand there are tough choices for many on whether they can increase their current Hokie Club donation, it is extremely disconcerting to me that some are reading the material published by the Hokie Club regarding our multi-million dollar gap between donations and scholarship expenses, as well as our 11th place ACC standing in donors & dollars, and their takeaway is they are going to reduce or eliminate their current donation.
Coaching and staff salaries are covered by athletic department revenue (ticket sales, corporate sponsorships, ACC revenue sharing, etc.) The shortfall is in regards to scholarship costs. The reason for the gap is the cost of scholarships has increased 60% in the last 5 years (tuition and room/board increases + change to allow schools to pay cost of attendance) and our donations have leveled off . The reason the Hokie Club was established was to pay for athletic scholarships and as a fanbase we are not currently doing that.


No, I totally get what you're saying. I just believe (at this particular time and juncture) $50-$100 is more palatable for folks vs $200-$300. Yes there will be some gripes, but less so with only $50-$100 vs the other.