Recent Comments
If he doesn't decide to reschedule it again 10 times between now and then.
There are a lot of fans and even schools that make things like that and recruits will post. I think he thought it was cool and shared it. I've seen some of our players and recruits post stuff like that before they officially committed.
Thank you. Not even taking into account our lack of luck getting JUCO players accepted. (seems to be no problem for basketball though)
Why him and why at Tech? Rumor has it Brad wanted to do this but since he's a big West Virginia fan, I'm wondering why??
Is anyone concerned at this point in the recruiting process for the Class of 2016 that we have the #50 ranked recruiting class per Rivals?
I mean, I have faith that we'll end up higher than that, but it just seems like we're off to a 'slower' start than normal.
Don't go to FedEx, ever.
I am icing my jaw today.
Stroman is an interesting case. I thought he had a terrific game in coverage against Cincinnati. However, in the spring, Stroman was victimized deep numerous times while Bud featured his as the top field corner. Isaiah Ford in particular beat Stroman badly on several double moves, including two in the spring game. One went for a touchdown from Michael Brewer. The other was a bad overthrow by Brendan Motley.
The reason that I didn't mention him was because of the void created with Clark moving to safety. Bud needs a nickel corner who can play the full whip responsibility. Alexander was a former safety and played around the line of scrimmage as a high school player. Reynolds was even more dynamic around the line of scrimmage, where he was one of the leading tacklers on his team and showed a knack for avoiding blockers and putting runners on the ground in traffic. Stroman wasn't asked to do much in run support in that Military Bowl matchup, and while he conceivably could rotate in if the nickel was struggling in coverage, I would imagine his future is outside.
Houston St. for me. I'm excited.
This statement is Leonard-certified.
Clemson's offense is going to be REALLY good. They might not need to play defense this season.
Coach Beamer just needs:
![]()
he has that aptitude all over him.I think they have shout wipes for that
I think they're called O'cain Wipes or something...they'll wipe that aptitude right off of just about anyone
so I'm at work and my math was kinda funny (wrong) but I was mostly joking. The point I was getting at was that if all of the voters who didn't pick LOLUVA last picked them to finish 1st or 2nd then it would take fewer dissenters to reach a total of 220
Nah, Sam's just a given.
I agree. He is either a Terp or Hokie. Seems like he has decided and will reveal on July 31.
The average voter had it this way:
GT 1.7 th place
VT 2.7 th place
UM 4 th place
Duke 4.1 th place
Chapel Hill 4.3 rd place
Pitt 4.6 th place
and UVA 6.6 th
So the tiers were: [Top] GT, VT; [Middle] Miami, Duke, Chapel Hill, Pitt; [Bottom] UVA
he has that aptitude all over him.
I think they have shout wipes for that
While we're on the topic of asking a USF alum questions, how often do you think back about the 2007 season and what could have been?
Any Clemson pick is just an anti-FSU pick. FSU lost a lot as well, so somebody has to win.
I'm a Coastal believer this year. I think we could 2 to 4 teams ranked throughout the year with as many as two teams finishing higher than any Atlantic team.
spots 3-6 being a jumbled mess and UVA ending up on the bottom.
Did you say 6-3(2OT) being a jumbled mess and UVA ending up on the bottom?

Interesting. I have been a Rutgers fan all of my life and I never knew why you guys were called USF.
Might I suggest a UNSSF? University of Not So South Florida?
my thinking was this:
if all 158 voters picked them for last place, they would have gotten 158 points (given my scoring system)
They got 220, not 158
220-158=62
Therefore, worst case, for them, 62 voters picked them for 6th and the remaining 96 picked them for 7th
62x2+96x1=220

joke--------->
_____me